szabesz

Looking forward to it, thanks in advance!

These are the default settings of Photoshop (dark, medium, light): Text color is intentional, but you never know what you'll come across. If we cannot change it on the fly, then can it really be that useful?

@regesh How about using Pages::saved ? http://processwire.com/api/hooks/#before_or_after an example of using the hook:

Thanks for sharing!

@Zeka Simple and good idea! However, we should not leave the checkerboard option out. Better yet, probably all shade versions should still be checkerboards, a dark one, mid range and a light one. We should still signal that these are transparent images. BTW, this thread should be moved to https://processwire.com/talk/forum/5-wishlist-roadmap/ I suppose.

I forgot to attach a file from the old (no longer online) ProcessWire Wiki, just in case you do not have a copy of it. This is somewhat outdated, but you might still find useful info in it. See: "Module Creation - Wiki.html.zip" Module Creation - Wiki.html.zip

Hi Sephiroth, I'm not a professional module developer, but a person from your target group So my suggestions are from the "beginner's point of view", and are as follow: You probably want to clean it up by fixing typos, missing spaces, extra spaces and similar errors. When referring to code, you might want to copy stuff instead of typing, so ProcessPageImageEditSelect vs. ProcessPageEditImageSelect is spelled right, out of the box. You might also want to list the following resources: v3.x API docs: https://processwire.com/api/ref/#modules Blog post: New module configuration, https://processwire.com/blog/posts/new-module-configuration-options/ Blog post: Module configuration is now even simpler, https://processwire.com/blog/posts/processwire-core-updates-pull-requests-and-more-2.5.25/#module-configuration-is-now-even-simpler Blog post: Config arrays..., Expanded module configuration..., Module configuration methods..., https://processwire.com/blog/posts/processwire-core-updates-2.5.27/#expanded-module-configuration-options-within-module-file What really bugs me is the fact that Ryan has already documented so much in the blog, but it is really hard to find what one is looking for. It often occurs to me that I know I've read something in the blog, I just do know know were... We have tons of useful info buried in the blog. Nice incentive anyway, keep it up!

Hi, I've never experienced this, but the forum seems to be "full of" the issue, so you might find the answer with this search: https://www.google.hu/?client=safari#q=site:processwire.com%2Ftalk+"appears+to+be+forged" Edit: also, this message should be dealt with, I suppose: "Field: Fieldtype 'FieldtypeAdminCustomPagesSelect' does not exist"

BTW, did you notice this? :

@franciccio-ITALIANO Hi, You might want to refer to this: http://getbootstrap.com/getting-started/#template As a rule of the thumb, we should have the browser load our JS files at the end of the HTML document (right before </body>). Except, when there is a good reason for not doing so. Google search: where to load javascript in html file As Juergen pointed out, this is not really ProcessWire issue, but – in this particular case – a Bootstrap one. (tip: when using a css framework, refer to its docs first)

Yeah, TED Talks is stand-up comedy show... It has very little to do with "Ideas worth spreading". Thanks for sharing anyway, the first few minutes were really funny, then I got bored, skipped the end, and came back here to have a lot more fun in the ProcessWire "/talk"

@flydev Thanks for the contribution! Sooner or later everyone needs a good (re)CAPTCHA.

This is another great addition to the toolset of your No1 developer helper plugin! Thanx so much! "...hopefully it will be a significant timesaver when checking/debugging your site from other user roles." Sure, it will be! The only reason I sometimes used the ALIF module was the user switcher feature. Now we have a more feature rich solution, without needing to install another module.

@EyeDentify I get what you mean, but this is a short of shortcoming when there is no huge capital behind an open source project. The constant evolution of the system is a must, so there are little resources left for the rest. But we might want to try out crowdfunding, to raise some money on the vey first ProcessWire "book" (it should be online, so that it can be updated easily by volunteers later on). such as: http://crowdfunding.com So anyone interested can spend the time on such a book, without sacrificing too much free time/resources, and the result can be what it really should be. This book should be about introduction to ProcessWire as a whole, front-end development, admin customizations and of course, module development. I would be happy to support such a book. Anybody else?

I 100% agree

The old wiki was still useful when one wanted to learn about the general concepts behind ProcessWire, but module development has evolved since then, so probably a good starting point is this: https://processwire.com/blog/posts/new-module-configuration-options/ BTW, as far as I know, there are no plans about saving the old wiki. If someone needs it, I have a version of it that was saved by a "web grabber". Just pm me, if you need it.

This approach is quite good for the front-end, leading to better design. However we seem to be talking about the back-end/admin, where graphic design is of less concern, but usability is a must. Sure, to be able to use something one also needs decent graphic design, but the back-end is not about pleasing the eye, but about pleasing the deadline

@madprocessor Instead of the frontend-editing features of 3.x, you can also consider using modules such as: JqueryFileUpload by kongondo http://modules.processwire.com/modules/jquery-file-upload/ FrontendUser by pwfoo http://modules.processwire.com/modules/frontend-user/ and others you can find in the module directory: http://modules.processwire.com/categories/users-access/

I can imagine a landscape only gallery where saving some extra space is a good thing. However, it would be nice if we could just tick a checkbox labelled "use square thumbnails", which setting could be saved so that we can adjust the view to the use case in question.

Well, we love it or not, this is how WordPress works. For those interested, here is a (guess what...) new plugin to clean things up: https://wordpress.org/plugins/wp-asset-clean-up/

Hi, http://php.net/manual/en/function.include.php "When a file is included, the code it contains inherits the variable scope of the line on which the include occurs. Any variables available at that line in the calling file will be available within the called file, from that point forward. However, all functions and classes defined in the included file have the global scope." "Is it possible to have variables valid for the included file alone?" So I suppose the answer is no.

Hi Jonathan, Any news on this? Probable release date?

How about: 1=left|Side by side (image on right) 2=right|Side by side (image on left) 3=full|Full image (text on top) 4=small|Small article_overview_flexible_layout_type=full ?

Especially I like the blog entries with LOREM IPSUM in all uppercase Anyway, site is cool and so are the products.