szabesz

Hello, I'd recommend implementing your own solution based on ProcessWire and various other helper modules that are being maintained, as all webshop solutions for ProcessWire are no longer maintained. You can get inspirations from @Mikel's modules such as: https://processwire.com/talk/topic/31455-stripepaymentlinks-–-simple-checkout-integration-for-processwire/ And from other community examples such as: https://github.com/mugdhachavan/cake-shop-processwire https://github.com/lombervid/shoppingcart Also Ryan's https://processwire.com/store/form-builder/stripe/ can simplify Stripe integration a lot.

Visiting https://www.kimi.com/membership/pricing a modal pops up for me and its top part looks like this: To tell the truth, I will probably use it for browser-based prompting, and it shows how many such tasks are still available for that day. For example:

I just paid for 1 month of Allegretto ($39/month) and used it with a deep research prompt asking for an "Intermediate PHP developer who is new to PHP Swiss Ephemeris" demo project (with detailed requirements, of course). It produced runnable code with outstanding results in about an hour. That might seem slow, but for me, it would have taken at least two weeks to figure all that out. It also came with explanations, which provides me a good starting point to learn the topic. So Kimi 2.5's deep research is very impressive, especially regarding coding-related prompts. It performs much better than my (admittedly) cheap Gemini Pro plan. I prompted Gemini with the same request, and it produced half-baked code, clearly running out of "steam" (memory/context window, whatever...). Additionally, Kimi's deep research acts like a programmer, while Gemini's deep research behaves like a very important executive who happens to be good at coding but prefers to give unnecessary executive summaries on the topic. I dislike that as it just consumes "tokens" on something you do not need. Well, my comparison might not be fair, as my Gemini Plan is a lot cheaper than $39/month, but those Gemini deep research unnecessary executive summaries also come with higher plans, I guess. Edit: "unnecessary executive summaries" and yes, I always prompt it not to do that but it does so anyway. The only difference is that they are shorter than the summaries one gets without asking not to do them.

Yes, the issue with blog articles is that they are verbose, and there is no need for such verbosity for an LLM. However, instead of trying to squeeze blog posts and API docs content and examples into a context window, it would be better to do some "sort of LLM training". Like LoRAs for image models. Does anyone have an understanding of how such a thing could be done?

Sure thing ;) Thanks in advance if you make it public.

Same comments with like/dislike just like for processwire.com blogposts, perhaps?

https://processwire.com/talk/topic/31724-wip-wiremedia-–-concept-for-a-central-media-management-module/

You can probably find hundreds more examples, e.g.: https://www.facebook.com/groups/771395196543555/posts/2371859523163773/ or:

Similarly, custom page classes suffer from the same limitation. Their files can only be dumped in one directory, we have no options to organize them. I have also tried various workarounds ever since I started using ProcessWire, but none of them came even close to some sort of proper native support.

Happy 2026 Ryan and everyone, too! @ryan This issue is none of the above, and might be overkill for a GitHub issue, and could already be fixed in the current dev, but it exists in 3.0.251. That's a repeater with an image field, probably with a z-index issue. I did't want to update the site just to see if it's already fixed, but it would be nice if it were fixed in the next major version.

Hello @maximus Thanks for sharing! I will certainly give it a shot. Side note: the guys at LEGO "can get furious" when someone else uses their trademark in a way they consider inappropriate. As long as it is for something personal, that should be legally fine. I am not a lawyer, but letting us download your file in a forum post like this should be considered to be "for personal purposes". If you were to turn it into a "product" then that would be a different matter.

Sorry for the off topic reply, but I cannot help wondering what will Google do with WordPress sites which take up most of the personal and small company landscape? Will it hide them at the bottom of its search results, just because they fail to adhere to any kind of "Core Web Vitals"? Don't let me wrong, optimizing for performance is always a good thing, I just cannot imagine how Google envisions forcing everyone to do it according to its own taste.

Some of us (including me) are lucky enough to have clients who do not care about the look of processwire.com and trust us that ProcessWire is the best. Not all of us are that lucky. So for those who are not so lucky, it matters a lot what a potential future client perceives when visiting processwire.com.

I built "my" first website in `96 with Adobe PageMill, fighting with tables to craft the basic layout it had. It was for a bank, a handful of static pages. I had no prior experience with HTML... :P

No to mention other issues like the following. On my 2560x1440 monitor, while scrolling, I get views like: I guess I do not have to explain why this is far from ideal. Just a big bulge blob with a subscription form in it and that’s it? To whom does it look professional?

But there is one thing we can all agree on, and that is the new design is quite controversial. And as far as I can tell, one either likes it a lot or does not like it a lot. And I don't think that such a controversial look is good in general. As for being "contemporary"? I started my designer career in 1997 and back then everyone used QuarkXpress, Aldus Freehand, and Color Studio (later Photoshop 2.5+). Because Macs were not too powerful, most designs were put together in QuarkXpress only. Why am I bringing this up? Because the current processwire.com design does look like "QuarkXpress only designs" from about 1995-2002. For this reason, to me, this is vintage.

I burnt some credits on Seedream v4. (BTW, Our grandchildren will surely ask us: Grandma, Grandpa, is it true that your image generators were so stupid back in your day?)

Recommended read: https://www.smashingmagazine.com/2025/10/the-grayscale-problem/ Quote: "Colour seems an appropriate place to start. When given the choice, try something audacious rather than safe. The worst that can happen is that it doesn’t work. It’s not like the sunk cost of painting a room; if you don’t like the palette, you simply change the hex codes. The same is true of fonts, icons, and other building blocks of the web."

I quite agree with your two points above. "Section for practical code examples." They could be added to the method descriptions, and not just sample code strictly related to a given method, but code showcasing typical scenarios with related methods and often used techniques, "coding patterns". "Currently a lot of core features are very fragmented and hard to find if you don't know they exist in the first place." So true! I have some notes of some important settings, which I often set up differently from the defaults, but having to look through them just to find something is time consuming. Some sort of clever way of gathering information and providing it in a categorized and digested way would help, I think.

That will definitely be welcome, for sure! Thanks in advance.

You guys rock!

Good luck to the Craft team, but to me it looks like they need to reinvent the wheel every now and then. Luckily, we have our own genius, Ryan, who figured that reinventing the wheel is not for everyone. At least not for us ;)

I would not say a "rollback" is desirable, it is just that the new theme needs some more work because it is rough around the edges. Eg. when selecting pages in a Lister, the "label" showing the number of selections makes the list jump, which is bad UX but can be fixed with a display:"inline-block". Also, used to be shaded inputfield groups can have their background color back, etc... So while I agree that it is sort of half-baked, it can surely be made better.

Awesome! Just what I will need in the near future. Thanks @Mikel for sharing!

News: "...npm got rocked by a record-breaking exploit..." https://youtu.be/QVqIx-Y8s-s And self-driving cars, AI agents, refrigerators, cat feeders, and who knows what else are and will be based on code written by who knows who...