szabesz

This approach is quite good for the front-end, leading to better design. However we seem to be talking about the back-end/admin, where graphic design is of less concern, but usability is a must. Sure, to be able to use something one also needs decent graphic design, but the back-end is not about pleasing the eye, but about pleasing the deadline

@madprocessor Instead of the frontend-editing features of 3.x, you can also consider using modules such as: JqueryFileUpload by kongondo http://modules.processwire.com/modules/jquery-file-upload/ FrontendUser by pwfoo http://modules.processwire.com/modules/frontend-user/ and others you can find in the module directory: http://modules.processwire.com/categories/users-access/

I can imagine a landscape only gallery where saving some extra space is a good thing. However, it would be nice if we could just tick a checkbox labelled "use square thumbnails", which setting could be saved so that we can adjust the view to the use case in question.

Well, we love it or not, this is how WordPress works. For those interested, here is a (guess what...) new plugin to clean things up: https://wordpress.org/plugins/wp-asset-clean-up/

Hi, http://php.net/manual/en/function.include.php "When a file is included, the code it contains inherits the variable scope of the line on which the include occurs. Any variables available at that line in the calling file will be available within the called file, from that point forward. However, all functions and classes defined in the included file have the global scope." "Is it possible to have variables valid for the included file alone?" So I suppose the answer is no.

Hi Jonathan, Any news on this? Probable release date?

How about: 1=left|Side by side (image on right) 2=right|Side by side (image on left) 3=full|Full image (text on top) 4=small|Small article_overview_flexible_layout_type=full ?

Especially I like the blog entries with LOREM IPSUM in all uppercase Anyway, site is cool and so are the products.

Oh yeah, you never know what he's up to

+1

Hi, Are we talking about ProcessWire 3.x? Then it might be the namespace issue. The easiest way to fix it is to start all your template files, _func.php, _init.php, etc... with <?php namespace ProcessWire; More on this: https://processwire.com/blog/posts/processwire-3.0.14-updates-file-compiler-fields-and-more/

Interesting Do you think people will figure out how to use the menu?

related forum topic: https://processwire.com/talk/topic/352-creating-pages-via-api/

wunderbar! gut -> besser -> tpr

Thanks soo much! Can't wait to try it out. Unfortunately I have to deal with a deadline, but I will manage to try it out on the weekend, I'm sure.

Well, all your mods should be part of ProcessWire by default, so...

Thanx a lot tpr! Feature request for the Reno Theme: Set the sidebar accordion to be always open. This is what have already discussed here: https://processwire.com/talk/topic/7625-reno-theme/?p=120420 I like your screenshot, so why not adding it to this module?

I would create a field for the section template to indicate in which language the page must be presented, and implement a language switcher (not for the visitor but as an algorithm to choose the language needed), you can use the docs as a starting point: https://processwire.com/api/multi-language-support/multi-language-urls/

"could I target search by default to a specific template ?" The only issue with it in this particular usecase (if I get it right) is that we get a dropdown select in the case of filtering for templates, we cannot use free text based search.

Hi bernhard, I get it now. I wasn't thinking about developing for giant organizations where various people the dev has never heard of might post notes in this issue tracker. I've never worked for/in such an environment, but now I see why you might need it. I also understand what you meant by "this page | this template | this website" As for "somehow connecting the error log entries with client notes" idea, I also think it would be great to have something like that. It might also be possible to automate it based on the "time stamp" of the log entries and the "time stamp" of the Notes, by showing those side-by-side which happened about the same time. What if the client generated a lot of log entries? Showing the most suspicious ones might help too. But this might be an overkill, especially when things are normally running smoothly

It's quite understandable that you want to stick to it, we like it too. It might be possible to separate the two modules (TD and "Notes") by introducing a third one that handles the panels and on which the two other modules depend, but it is extra work and probably not worth the effort, because we have "enabling/disabling tools quickly as needed" features already, so why bother dealing with separate modules when they are tightly integrated anyway? The only reason to do it is to introduce a "Tracy Debugger panels" like API into the core, so that other developers can rely on it. That way Horst's ALIF (Admin Links In Frontend) module, Tracy and this so called "Notes" could live under the same hood. I was also bold enough to think about somehow integrating/merging the GUI of not just these "three" modules mentioned above, but also the new GUI of the core Debug Mode Tools. However, so far I could not come up with a reasonable proposal since Debug Mode Tools has quite a different approach, while TD and ALIF are very similar in GUI terms.

Hi, 1. Is PW 3.x compatible with PHP 7? I"m not yet using PHP7, however ProcessWire 3.x runs on it and I've been reading reports in the forum to confirm it. But watch out for modules you might have that might have trouble running on it, e.g.: https://processwire.com/talk/topic/9507-php-7-coming-soon/ 2. Would you recommend PW 3.0.18+ in production? E.g. is it too "dev" or already "prd"?) Probably it also depends on the modules you use, such as anything not compatible with the new ImageField module: https://processwire.com/blog/posts/major-images-field-upgrade/ 3. Any known PW-related issues with migration from myisam to innodb? Here is the related blog entry: https://processwire.com/blog/posts/pw-3.0.15/ Older post from Ryan: https://processwire.com/talk/topic/10287-database-scheme-includes-no-foreign-keys/#entry97876 4. Pros/cons of switching to nginx + mysql + php-fpm? (apart of lack of support, e.g. need to maintain config manually with each upgrade) Never used it, so I skip this one

"name + email + phone on that panel? like "how can i help you?" We should only let authenticated clients (users) see this "Notes Panel" in the first place, shouldn't we? E.g. the developer sets up PW/Trace Debugger with a few users for people that might use it in the first place. From then on, there is no need for providing additional personal info. Only drawback is that they need to be able to login... but they will use the site anyway, so time to learn "something new" Filtering features are welcome, I think However, what do you mean by: "this page | this template | this website"? Another website? Aren't we working on the one in question already? Also, do we really need filter for page vs template? The client doesn't understand it, so they do not need it. Any usecase for us, devs? Priority: "high | medium | low" Personally I've never been able to use these. At first sight they look useful, but in reality these do not tell anything about desired deadlines. That is why I always use: asap, before launch, after launch, "nice to have in the future" or an actual deadline if any. Message types: "bug | request | comment" quite useful, I think.

Thanks for sharing! (Just for the record: note that there are plenty of Bootstrap navigation related topics in the Forum https://www.google.hu/search?rls=en&q=site:processwire.com/talk+Bootstrap+navigation&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&gfe_rd=cr&ei=BUlEV_nTNNOv8wf4pKi4Ag )