apeisa

Moderators
  • Content count

    4,431
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    51

apeisa last won the day on October 7 2016

apeisa had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

3,543 Excellent

1 Follower

About apeisa

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://twitter.com/apeisa

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Vihti, Finland

Recent Profile Visitors

21,033 profile views
  1. CMS critic is one website and not even a very popular one. It has done great stuff promoting PW (and many other systems out there), but it is very small amount of visibility. ProcessWire is steadily pushing forward, but it is true that some systems did get more popular in much faster - especially craft. See this https://trends.google.co.uk/trends/explore?date=all&q=processwire,craft cms (I believe they did get most users from dying Expression Engine community where they were popular plugin authors). I think ProcessWire is "old dog" now for most - it isn't "new and interesting" anymore, so all kind of marketing "gimmicks" should be used. New features should be promoted much more (videos, tutorials, blog posts etc). Ryan is doing most of the development, weekly posts and supporting his paid modules, so this is something where community - all of us - could help. Also I believe that this website, docs, tutorials etc are those parts of this project that can be most easily delegated to community. Another one is having official starter themes (site profiles) and admin theme. We have amazing amount of design and development talent here, I wish we could collaborate more easily. We all know Ryan is busy, so do not wait for green light and guidance - if you feel like you could do something for our community - just build it and share it! More people will pick interest and great things will happen!
  2. If there is someone missing access to the support forum, just email or PM me.
  3. Sorry guys. Buried with work currently, but it is getting better. Padloper is alive and kicking!
  4. @teppo have you taken look at this yet?
  5. Thumbs up for 3.x branch!
  6. PW doesn't use latest version of the PHP SmartyPants, it uses 1.7.1 while latest is 1.8.1 Maybe updating that would fix your issue? You can try it by updating that module by yourself and maybe creating github issue or PR for Ryan to update it in Core too (shouldn't be in the core at all imo). Here you can find the llibrary pw uses: https://michelf.ca/projects/php-smartypants/
  7. Not sure I understand what you are trying to achieve. You need PHP to use PW, you cannot use it from html only. Why don't you install processwire on www,yoursite.com/api/ subdirectory? There your /index.html could be static html/js and then /api/* would go for pw.
  8. Yes, you can include processwire from any path: https://processwire.com/api/include/
  9. Hi Teppo Tested this on latest ProcessWire (ver 3.0.62). Seems to work very well, except Image/File fields. In both of those it is possible to recover removed files, but when doing so, it loses the current files. These screenshots probably shows it best: First I have 2 images: Then we remove the other one: Now we only have the city photo there: Then I can go back time and find the Desert also: This preview works pretty nicely (although file names are hashed). But then after saving the page disaster happens: Desert is saved, but the city has gone 0 bytes. Any idea what might be causing this? I thought it might be image field related, but the very same happens with file fields also.
  10. Are you talking about this? https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/commandline/wsl/about
  11. The world is a vampire. (and an earworm for all you smashing pumpkins lovers/haters. You are welcome).
  12. Your users actually live in page tree: Admin => Access => Users => User So you can just create your users like that. Instead of $p = new Page(), just use $u = new User(); and you are good to go. No need to define template and parent in that case also, if I remember correctly. PW also has possibilities to use different templates than user for users. That is usable if you really need different fields for different kind of users or you need them to live on other place at pagetree. More information about that from here: https://processwire.com/blog/posts/processwire-core-updates-2.5.14/#multiple-templates-or-parents-for-users
  13. Looks great! It would be nice to have admin demo updated, so lazy ones like myself can try it too
  14. Unfortunately no. It only works with this on extra allowed content: p(*)[*]{*} a(*)[*]{*} div(*)[*]{*} Which is no go for me. I am switching to this one probably: http://modules.processwire.com/modules/textformatter-oembed/
  15. I hear what Teppo is saying, but choosing templates would pretty much nail that concern. Developer has chosen to show those templates through API, so leaves no place for confusion in my opinion. I will definitely give this one a good ride.