szabesz

Welcome @moh_baw Expanding on what @flydev said, here is a recommended post regarding your question:

Posted by mistake. Sorry.

This should be seriously considered, even better: in a configurable way. Best thing would be to support user level configuration, meaning the user could overwrite the default (defined by the site's developer) on its Profile page, similarly to current Default/Reno option, but in this case the base of the layout could be configurable. We even have mockups of this!

as explained above, but do not forget, you can always use a decent site grabber for your OS to get what you need, such as (macOS): http://ricks-apps.com/osx/sitesucker/index.html I would probably grab these https://processwire.com/about/ https://processwire.com/docs/

I wish there was a supported way to display a simple CHANGELOG that comes with a module. Other CMSes utilize this dead simple but very useful feature. I wonder why we have to live without it. Once I pointed this out, but only four of us seem to care including @adrian, of course Why are people are so uninterested in this? Strange. Last time I spent at least 5 minutes to find the "Admin Style" option of Tracy because it was renamed to "Server Type Indicator". A simple message like "Admin Style was renamed to Server Type Indicator" would have saved me the hassle. There are so many settings of Tracy that I often get lost, especially when things are renamed or moved around.

+1 for this Personally I'm not a fan of turning comments into interpreted code. It is hacky and can be hard to read when you have other comments for actual note taking purposes. But maybe it's just me who feels this way

Thanks for the answers! Time to "test" the free version

Hi @diogo Have you been using this feature? https://www.codeguard.com/monitor/ Does it also monitor database changes? How reliable is it? Amount of false positives? Also available in the free plan? So many questions, sorry! But I think such a feature can be powerful if properly implemented. I'm a great fan of all sorts of monitoring solutions as long as they work reliably and easy to setup

Me too, however, I'm not a fan of it in the case of administration interfaces. I do not like scrolling around, I prefer to see all stuff possible right in front of my face I'm not saying whitespace should be eliminated, but people often work on 11''-13'' laptop screens and not on 27" desktop monsters It would be nice to have some sort of whitespace settings and/or whitespace could adapt to the viewport size.

I think Adrian also automates EVERYTHING. I wish I could also do that too...

I think Ryan automates EVERYTHING. I wish I could also do that...

Maybe ImageMagick is not part of the default install of MAMP 3, so you need to add it to MAMP, I guess...

I have already upgraded to MAMP Pro 4 so I cannot be of much help here, but you might want to know that it is easy to "turn on" ImageMagick with MAMP Pro 4: EDIT: I forgot to mention that it is MAMP Pro 4 I use...

Swithcing to "selector arrays" might help to workaround this limitation: https://processwire.com/blog/posts/processwire-3.0.13-selector-upgrades-and-new-form-builder-version/#selector-engine-array-support

Thanks @Macrura for the info. I can live without such a module, but I see that it can be helpful in order to simplify things so I might start using it as it looks useful. I prefer modules being maintained, so I'm a bit cautious in cases like this, and that is why I'm happy to see you improving it

Hi @Karl_T You can find some troubleshooting tips by @kongondo here:

A short into by Ryan:

That is why in reality www stands for Welcome to the Wild West, and not for World Wide Web

It would be cool if the two of you could maintain this module. So far I've been hesitant to use it, but it's nice to see all the effort you are putting into it. Thanks!

The "official" blog post about this topic might also be of interest: https://processwire.com/blog/posts/making-efficient-use-of-fields-in-processwire/ True, the word "performance" is not even mentioned in it, but I guess this is because this is not really about optimizing performance too much. Optimizing database access by means of proper usage of API calls and cache should matter the most.

Thanks for the notes!

It's "funny" you chose the prefix "site_" because I always use it to prefix my identifiers in my "custom code" to indicate that it is my piece of code and not part of the core nor any other modules. Maybe I should switch to a less used word, such us "plat" or whateverv people would "never" use.

I created a request issue of this: https://github.com/processwire/processwire-requests/issues/78

+1 Example of replacing just the "content / innerHTML": <header id=my-header class=pw-replace-innerHTML> <p>First paragraph</p> <p>Second paragraph</p> </header> As and added bonus, this way any additional attributes the original ("to be replaced") <header id=my-header... has would be kept, so there is no need to repeat attributes all over the codebase which is hard to track and modify later on.

Ah, I see you did search...