wbmnfktr

I didn't touch them at all. Those are available through Astro: View Transitions You can however take a look at the source code - the CSS is inlined there. Look for: data-astro-transition-scope

Uuuh... that's nice!

I have an account, I get the newsletter once in a while, yet there is something that makes it unusable for me. Maybe it's just that I can't consume any more sources of news, articles, tutorials, and all that. I focus more on posts and threads here, news from specific tools and services on X, some YouTube. That's it.

Wow. Thanks @szabesz. That's going on for longer than I thought. Maybe I should start more often from scratch.

So... while right in setting up a totally new project and adding basic fields and templates from scratch this error really caught my attention: Template name “404” not added because it contains only digits. As long as I can remember and in all projects I looked into, my 404 pages always get the 404.php template. Is this new? Since when? Do I have to change my existing projects? This is a bit weird as most projects run either the latest stable or latest DEV version and none of them complained so far. I'm not complaining. error-404.php is fine for me or any other name, yet that was an interesting find somehow.

Some of you may know that I took over the ProcessWire Recipes project quite some time ago. Including the .com domain a few weeks back and the new .recipes domain right after my start. To make it clear: processwire.recipes right now uses AstroJS on Cloudflare so that there is no real need for a hosting, and it could run there forever. But here is the interesting part and question: Would you expect, maybe even demand, that those and similar projects were built with ProcessWire itself? I'd really like to and want to hear all your thoughts and opinions about this idea and topic. All pro and contra-arguments. Everything. Maybe even roast me for not using PW on that project.

The Astro Discord from astro.build - is from another world. I have to say that! Still Discord but the people there, in the right channels, are as helpful and supportive as we a here in our forum. I love them. They helped me a lot. The whole community around Astro is super similar to our world here. Sure... you can't find anything from the outside, or even inside - as the Discord search is [redacted] - but yeah. Super awesome community, super awesome people there. You might want to ignore those that shout the loudest, but that's another story. Love them (almost) equally as the people, the community, and everything else here.

Wouldn't that mean that your test resulted in WireMailRouter took care of that test and ignored WireMailSmtp?

.. and a great weekend, too!

The community, the people... that's here and it will never move. I'm sure about that. BUT... having nice short updates on the go either on X or whereever is always nice.

Just clicked FOLLOW. I'm on there for over 15 years, and while it needs more work done itself, it just got way better. At least for me. I would do that. I'll take care of this. It absolutely is. Best community ever. AND it's a forum/board and not Discord or whatever.

X/Twitter is still my favourite place, yet... pinkary sounds nice. Joined a few minutes ago. Let's see. Maybe it becomes the PW Community's home.

There is always the option to only accept parts of the code Cursor created/generated. From the chat it's easier to see than from composer - still having only the small composer window and looking at the files, you can select the changes you want to apply.

Here is the interesting part aka links to that project: https://github.com/saoudrizwan/claude-dev https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=saoudrizwan.claude-dev That YT channel just sells courses of some kind. And in addition to this: Claude Dev is similar to Aider and AIDEV. You can look them up on YouTube and elsewhere.

Is the next on my list. Again. Tried it already but it couldn't convince me back then and made me try GitHub Copilot.

That's true. What I love that it can do the tasks I don't want to do. Split a large file into smaller parts, create some boilerplates, add fake data and content. Scaffold out the basics so you just have to fill in the blanks. Even little things you probably have in your snippets like: give me a foreach loop that iterates over $recipes and updates x, y, and z. generate 1,000 demo pages, add unique titles, some content, dates starting from 1997 to 2027. 5 seconds. Done.

It's been two weeks now since I switched to Cursor Pro full-time and I have to say... "Thank you, Supermaven. It was an awesome time. Fare well, enjoy your life now. Was a pleasure to meet you. 😊" I'm there, in a different way as planned, yet... I reached that point. And I am super happy. Best part... Docs included. Anyone else of you moved completely or at all to Cursor?

There is so much the community already has a solution for... we just have to remind ourselves about these solutions. (to be fair... I regularly can't remember core functionalities as well) Especially in cases like this, I would vote for something like a "merge this module into core"-principle of some kind, yet I want to see module authors thrive for and because of their efforts. Similar to the Weekly update – 2 August 2024 announcement - where we saw similarities to already existing solutions:

I became so used to use Template Field Widths that I almost always install it on larger projects. Super fast editing of values, tabbing around and done.

Oooh... that's where those screenshots came from. Sorry, no idea what's happening there with Language Packs. Your Language Pack doesn't look that different compared to other packs.

Never did this but you need an account for that part of ProcessWire.com and have to register an account here: https://processwire.com/modules/login/register You can link to your profile here in that process, too. Seems to be separated from the forums.

Damn... you are right. That should probably work even better. Always forget that we have that option. Sorry.

Podcast you probably want to watch:

Besides your workflow makes me feel a bit uncomfortable with all that raw HTML in input fields, and things like that, I struggle to really understand what pages you are looking at for changes you made and how you look at them and test them. You mention the change of session keys, which only happens in case the session changes, which is rarely the case while working in the backend. There could be of course things like enabled developer tools in the browser, using a CDN on the website, and maybe even code you use in your custom login screen. To make it clear: Usually working in the backend should NOT take two tries to save a change. That's rarely an issue someone would face. I can happen, when for example you are behind a VPN (like in Opera, without knowing), cookie blockers, adblockers, and even a not so perfect setup of Cloudflare CDN that tries to cache everything in your backend. To get you going: is this a local or remote setup if local: what kind of setup is that? (DDEV, Laragon, Docker, Custom) can you post screens of your editing and testing pages (so we know where you actually are in ProcessWire)

In my Front-End Page Editor settings there aren't even any image fields listed, so I guess: No, not possible. Maybe there are hooks or other ways to achieve that, but I wouldn't bet on this. Just an idea and never tried it but what about using a custom/different field like image_description (text or textarea field) you show somewhere in the frontend/on the page but only for admins, so you can edit it, and use it for the image desription by referencing it in the image tag. This way you can activate it for frontend-editing, edit it, and use it with the image. Multiple images wouldn't work here. // the normal way <img src="<?php echo $page->image->url(); ?>" alt="<?php echo $page->image->description; ?>" /> // the other way <?php if($user->isLoggedIn()):?> <div class="show-image-description-text-to-edit-in-front-end"> <?php echo $page->image_description; ?> </div> <?php endif;?> <img src="<?php echo $page->image->url(); ?>" alt="<?php echo $page->image_description; ?>" />