Jump to content

szabesz

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    3,020

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    20

 Content Type 

Everything posted by szabesz

  1. szabesz
    Me too, however, I'm not a fan of it in the case of administration interfaces. I do not like scrolling around, I prefer to see all stuff possible right in front of my face I'm not saying whitespace should be eliminated, but people often work on 11''-13'' laptop screens and not on 27" desktop monsters It would be nice to have some sort of whitespace settings and/or whitespace could adapt to the viewport size.
  2. szabesz
    I think Adrian also automates EVERYTHING. I wish I could also do that too...
  3. szabesz
    I think Ryan automates EVERYTHING. I wish I could also do that...
  4. szabesz
    Maybe ImageMagick is not part of the default install of MAMP 3, so you need to add it to MAMP, I guess...
  5. szabesz
    I have already upgraded to MAMP Pro 4 so I cannot be of much help here, but you might want to know that it is easy to "turn on" ImageMagick with MAMP Pro 4: EDIT: I forgot to mention that it is MAMP Pro 4 I use...
  6. szabesz
    Swithcing to "selector arrays" might help to workaround this limitation: https://processwire.com/blog/posts/processwire-3.0.13-selector-upgrades-and-new-form-builder-version/#selector-engine-array-support
  7. szabesz
    Thanks @Macrura for the info. I can live without such a module, but I see that it can be helpful in order to simplify things so I might start using it as it looks useful. I prefer modules being maintained, so I'm a bit cautious in cases like this, and that is why I'm happy to see you improving it
  8. szabesz
    Hi @Karl_T You can find some troubleshooting tips by @kongondo here:
  9. szabesz
    A short into by Ryan:
  10. szabesz
    That is why in reality www stands for Welcome to the Wild West, and not for World Wide Web
  11. szabesz
    It would be cool if the two of you could maintain this module. So far I've been hesitant to use it, but it's nice to see all the effort you are putting into it. Thanks!
  12. szabesz
    The "official" blog post about this topic might also be of interest: https://processwire.com/blog/posts/making-efficient-use-of-fields-in-processwire/ True, the word "performance" is not even mentioned in it, but I guess this is because this is not really about optimizing performance too much. Optimizing database access by means of proper usage of API calls and cache should matter the most.
  13. szabesz
    Thanks for the notes!
  14. szabesz
    It's "funny" you chose the prefix "site_" because I always use it to prefix my identifiers in my "custom code" to indicate that it is my piece of code and not part of the core nor any other modules. Maybe I should switch to a less used word, such us "plat" or whateverv people would "never" use.
  15. szabesz
    I created a request issue of this: https://github.com/processwire/processwire-requests/issues/78
  16. szabesz
    +1 Example of replacing just the "content / innerHTML": <header id=my-header class=pw-replace-innerHTML> <p>First paragraph</p> <p>Second paragraph</p> </header> As and added bonus, this way any additional attributes the original ("to be replaced") <header id=my-header... has would be kept, so there is no need to repeat attributes all over the codebase which is hard to track and modify later on.
  17. szabesz
    Ah, I see you did search...
  18. szabesz
    Hi, did you search the forum? This is a question the comes up quite often: https://www.google.hu/search?q="it+appears+to+be+forged"+site%3Aprocesswire.com%2Ftalk&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8
  19. szabesz
    Maybe there is some confusion here. There is a topic discussing it:
  20. szabesz

    Passenger Drones

    szabesz replied to kongondo's topic in Pub

    Er, well - maybe, but only the stable branch
  21. szabesz

    Passenger Drones

    szabesz replied to kongondo's topic in Pub

    If it does not take off then why not? However if it does, I do not even want to be nearby... I do NOT trust software as I've already seen some in operation
  22. szabesz
    Thank you! I've been missing it
  23. szabesz
    This should be the keyword here. Also meaning a related API dedicated to support custom configuration options as well. No one likes to reinvent the wheel I guess, so some sort of "sub-theming" or better yet transportable settings and customizations would be nice to have instead of two or more completely separate admin themes.
  24. szabesz
    How many admin themes are we going to have? This is not clear to me. We can expect UIkit 3, that's great However – just as I stated above – I'm a bit concerned about seeing people working on different admin themes instead of joining forces... I might be misunderstanding something here, I dunno.
  25. szabesz
    May I ask why? The readme says: "Obtain a fresh copy of ProcessWire 3.0.51 or newer"
×
×
  • Create New...