szabesz

http://shop.spreadshirt.co.uk/pwgeeks/ You are not crazy

I see. Q1: I do not use Xdebug (or similar if there are any...) so it is not me who can recommend anything in this regard. What I used is @adrian's Tracy Debugger module. Q2: I neither use TemplateEngineFactory, but you might want to ask a Moderator to move this topic to its own forum and if you do so you should rename this thread as well. It is not the best idea to ask two unrelated questions in the same thread, even if they are seemingly related, because Q1 should be moved to General Support or Dev Talk, there are other discussion threads about it there: https://www.google.hu/search?as_sitesearch=processwire.com%2Ftalk&as_q=migrate#q=xdebug+site:processwire.com%2Ftalk Your questions might not be noticed by the right forum members this way.

Thanx! I do not use wireshell anyway

True. There are plans to do it: https://processwire.com/docs/tutorials/how-to-structure-your-template-files/page5 But this project of @ryan seems to be stalled.

This is not just for the common page cache that is used for speeding the frontend up, so it is not something you want to "ignore". For example FileCompiler "cache" is stored here as well, which is used to make old, none-namespaced code work with ProcessWire 3.x. But, other stuff is also stored here like HannaCode, etc... These are cache files in the sense that they are precompiled or db->to->file stuff, because there is no point in generating them over and over again, since they do not change often. You can use @Soma's Clear Cache Admin module to easily clear cache files, but normally it is for troubleshooting purposes and not something you should have to do on every occasion you change your code. Anyway, what sort of Page caching do you use? Out of the box, ProcessWire does not cache templates (except for the FileCompiler cache, but that is re-compiled whenever there are template code changes).

I doubt the validity of this list and any other attempts to get usable statistics in this regard. For example, they do not list PHP 7.0 for 1&1, but this is the screenshot I've just made (note that they simplify 7.0.x to 7.0 on this screen):

+1 Although it means that PW must also be present in order to be able to bootstrap it, but at least being installed is not a requirement anymore, if I'm not mistaken.

Maybe this one (LICEcap)?

Since the Page object is already in the memory, I can't see any performance related issues with it, but I'm not a PHP resources optimizer wizard, so someone might chime in to shed more light on it. Edit: @LostKobrakai was faster than me

Thanks! One question though: how to use it before running ProcessWire? If it is a module, I have to install ProcessWire in the first place. Am I missing something?

Just for the record: "I also tend to store additional properties in $page rather than creating global variables (e.g., $page->foo = 'bar' instead of $foo = 'bar'), which makes it a lot easier to use wireRenderFile(). As long as you pass in $page, you know you've got everything you need, and you can add more properties later without worrying about updating your "view bag."

Oh yes, this is great! Thanks for sharing

this one? https://github.com/ryancramerdesign/ProcessWire/issues/1257 Let's ping @arjen to ask for a status update on this issue.

As an alternative, you can use a site grabber/ripper tool, e.g.: https://www.downloadcloud.com/website-ripper.html Also, you might want to purchase the new ProDevTools module with the API Explorer in it (provided it will be released before you leave): https://processwire.com/blog/posts/processwire-3.0.41-and-a-look-at-api-explorer/

I have not yet used WireCache, but this is the kind of simplicity that I'm always looking for, that is why sooner or later I will try it out. Thanks!

Thanks for sharing @Can, looks pretty neat and dead simple! For small sites it should suffice.

but he also says; the search goes on, still cant't be found... so something is fishy... btw, the clip is a lot worse than the photo (even thought I have to agree that the photo is indeed horrendous), so so far you are the winner!

How about an online tool like this one which can also accept pasted content, so your clients can also edit the table later on: http://htmltablegenerator.com/ Not a perfect solution, but at least it can help a lot.

Welcome to the forum Another option (among others): http://trolsoft.ru/en/soft/trolcommander Free, and you can turn invisible stuff on/off. Or a Finder "extension": https://www.trankynam.com/xtrafinder/ Note that XtraFinder is a bit buggy (and/or Apple's Finder is buggy, so it is impossible to add these features properly by 3rd parties, which is quite possible... Finder has always been buggy too) Also, you need to disable System Integrity to make it work on 10.11 and above: https://www.trankynam.com/xtrafinder/sip.html I've been using XtraFinder for a long time, it is a great timesaver.

Well, most important thing is the compiler/namespace feature: https://processwire.com/blog/posts/processwire-3.0.14-updates-file-compiler-fields-and-more/ or in more detail: https://www.google.hu/search?as_sitesearch=processwire.com%2Fblog&as_q=recipe#q=namespace+site:processwire.com%2Fblog Non core/Ryan modules might fail, so it is recommended to read up on them too. And most importantly I would certainly clone it to a dev environment and upgrade that instance of the site firts, just to see what actually happens....

Hi, Quick tips Bookmark these two Google queries: tutorial site:processwire.com/talk recipe site:processwire.com/blog Whenever you are in need, just edit the first words accordingly Learn by doing, eg: (4 part tutorial): http://blog.mauriziobonani.com/processwire-basic-website-workflow-part-1/ OOP is "easy", read this one once a month and also study simple ProcessWire modules: http://www.startutorial.com/homes/oo_beginner Find simple ProcessWire modules/profiles in the directory, install them, change them, abuse them. Sooner than you think you will get a hang of it.

Not to mention that if you unite forces everyone wins, especially with such a much needed module. So I suggest Robin S leading the development with Bernhard posting lot's of pull requests

Hi, Did you post it twice by accident?

As far as I know, the ProcessWire API can either resize, crop or do both of these operations but it cannot pad an image. Are you looking for something like this: http://www.imagemagick.org/Usage/crop/#extent

Hi, Did you see this?