Jump to content

szabesz

Members
  • Posts

    3,016
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    20

Everything posted by szabesz

  1. +1, Let's get organized! E.g.: https://www.dropbox.com/paper https://www.dropbox.com/help/topics/paper recent review: https://zapier.com/blog/best-collaborative-writing-apps/#paper
  2. Yes, definitely We cannot thank you enough for this module, but at least we need to try! Anyway, the even stronger support of ajax debugging came just the right time for me, as I am about to start a new project utilizing lots of ajax magic.
  3. Nice design! It takes time to download the assets though. I noticed that tiny icons and logos are around 600-700kb each, why is that? Say album-arrow.png is 636kb, but after I have optimized it, it is down to 300 bytes only. This is just one example, there are lots of others.
  4. @FrancisChung For security reasons (security through obscurity) I would make such a feature optional. Although security through obscurity is not considered to be some sort of actual "protection layer" or such, in some cases I still do not like to advertise such info.
  5. I freaked out hearing the sound of the seagull so unexpectedly, but otherwise I like it
  6. Hi, Namespace issue? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19699319/php-namespace-pdo-not-found use \PDO;
  7. Hi, You might also want to compare the before and after state of the database, at least before you feel confident you are doing what you intend to do. I've already shared a simple but useful BASH 4 script to compare databases, you might also find it useful:
  8. If you feel you are starting to struggle with CKEditor, you might want to use Repeater Matrix instead. As Ryan puts it: "One use case for a Repeater Matrix is as an alternative to a rich text editor for those cases where you want more fine-grained developer control."
  9. There is a recent discussion about calendars and events over here: I also recommend doing a google search like this: event calendar site:processwire.com/talk As for pimping the admin, there are all sorts of techniques to tweak it to your needs. Of course, you will need to deal with Roles/Permission, but you might really want to consider using @adrian's Admin Restrict Branch: https://processwire.com/talk/topic/11499-admin-restrict-branch/
  10. Hi, Is it the one you found from Ryan? https://processwire.com/blog/posts/pw-3.0.28/ As you can see, it is quite recent which suggests there in no core support at the moment.
  11. Hi @AndZyk Here is one: GlobalEmailSettings, such as: sender and reply to. See this recent discussion: I'm not aware of any already published solutions to this and although it seems to be easy to implement and may not necessarily needs to be turned into a module, even a very simple module has the advantage of being ready made, easy to add and update (provided it is the the Module Directory...).
  12. Hi, I recommend doing some basic system design to sort out the relationships you will be dealing with. Here is a good article from @clsource on this: https://medium.com/@clsource/understanding-processwire-templates-fields-and-pages-201aecd0a1a4#.m9yquavll Next, decide what sort of Inputfields you will utilize in the admin in order to realize the relationships (look for 3rd party Inputfield modules too, but check PW 3 compatibility before you start using them). Start with the Page Tree, and decide what you want to present there, and other relationships can be represented by the selected Inputfields. You can start by working on both the frontend and the backend at the same time. If you are a solo developer, you will not be able to separate the two anyway. Thinking of "fields -> pages -> templates" isperfectly fine, but you can implement them in any order you see fit. "Is the product page that the "normal" user see in the front-end, the same that the vendors have access in the back-end?" It cannot practically be the "same", except if YOU for some reason implement it this way. You can give normal users (customers) limited access to the admin, but it all depends on your needs. Probably you only want to give partial access to the backend for vendors only. Normal frontend users (customers) will likely be better off with your own custom implemented frontend UI access. Hope this helps
  13. Hi, Here is a recent discussion (with some other links to related topics) that might get you started:
  14. Some more resources you might also find useful: http://modules.pw/ https://gist.github.com/blynx/92f9472712a823ef01180509b3e36ae1 https://processwire.com/api/ref/module/
  15. Thank you @Martijn Geerts! Works with both Lister and ListerPro, right? I will purchase my very first ListerPro copy in the near future, so I'm glad you've just shared it
  16. "...but said the aim of the review was to adapt the rules to the data protection regulation which will come into force in 2018 and simplify the provisions for cookies." Simplify? It had already been dead simple, and they were the ones to make it difficult...
  17. Thank you @adrian. This can definitely come in handy now and then.
  18. Thanks! However, it does not work on my Mac. Edit: command + enter does work. Maybe there is something else that also works, because it is hard to imagine how I press command + enter by accident. Edit 2: maybe my left hand is a bit too slow to release the command key when trying to open a new line with the right one.
  19. Hello everybody, Can anybody tell me what the keyboard shortcut to submit a post like this one is? From time-to-time I accidentally press it, which is rather annoying since it results in a not yet finished message. If I new the bloody shortcut, I could be more careful not to press it. I’m on a Mac BTW... Thanks in advance
  20. @biotech You might find some useful information by doing a search like this: https://www.google.hu/search?as_sitesearch=processwire.com%2Ftalk&as_q=migrate#q=https+htaccess+site:processwire.com%2Ftalk Edit: sorry, again, I accidentally submitted it by keyboard
  21. I'm not sure why hiding it should be desired. If we group things, they are probably somehow related, and if so, it should be possible to name that relation, which is helpful even for backend users. Just like in your example; it is an address, why should we hide the name of the relation? Maybe to save some space?
  22. Out of the box it is not possible. You might want to check out the settings page of AdminOnSteroids from @tpr to see a well organized page with loads of options.
  23. Hello, My comment might not be of much help, but why do you try to mix http and https (provided that is the case...)? I consider it to be an outdated practice. The web is quickly moving towards being https only anyway.
  24. Perhaps is it a missing ProcessWire namespace declaration?
×
×
  • Create New...