marcus

wireshell - an extendable ProcessWire command line interface

Recommended Posts

wireshell 1.0.0 is out   :) 

See Bea's post

Quote

 

wireshell 1.0.0  :)

Compatibility: ProcessWire 3.x

  • Prepares wireshell for ProcessWire 3.x, adds namespace support, only supports ProcessWire 3.x
  • Updates Github Repository: github.com/processwire/processwire
  • Improves module:upgrade command, if no argument is provided it just checks for upgrades
  • Extends new command, adds option --src=path/to/source to be able to use a pre-downloaded tgz/zip/folder
  • Extends status command, only shows database password if --pass option is provided, shows if an upgrade is available
  • Updates upgrade command, removes options dev and devns

 

 

wireshell.gif

-------- Original post -----------

 
Now this one could be a rather long post about only an experimental niche tool, but maybe a helpful one for some, so stay with me ;)
 
Intention
Do you guys know "Artisan" (Laravel) or "Drush" (Drupal)? If not: These are command line companions for said systems, and very useful for running certain (e.g. maintenance, installation) task quickly - without having to use the Admin Interface, first and foremost when dealing with local ProcessWire installations. And since it has a powerful API and an easy way of being bootstrapped into CLIs like this, I think such a tool has a certain potential in the PW universe. 
 
It's totally not the first approach of this kind. But: this one should be easily extendable - and is based on PHP (specifically: the Console component of the Symfony Framework). Every command is tidily wrapped in its own class, dependencies are clearly visible, and so on.
 
( Here was the outdated documentation. Please visit wireshell.pw for the current one )
  • Like 32

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just as I'm in the means to build a separate directory for bugfixes, where I just paste in disposable processwire installations. Really great. Will certainly take a look at it later. I can also see this very useful for setting up base installations in a more flexible way than siteprofiles. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great! Thanks for this, Marcus. So far, everything looks good here on Windows - have only just installed PW-dev, going to work with other commands now. (Update: Everything works like a charm. Looking forward to seeing more Commands.)

For Windows users interested in making this global:

  1. Make sure PHP is in your PATH
  2. Create a wireshell folder somewhere (also added to your path), and create a wireshell.bat file:
@echo off
php "path\to\wireshell" %*

Then you can run wireshell new --dev anywhere you like.

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the positive feedback!

Some updates in 0.2.0:

  • Attach roles on the fly while user creation: $ wireshell create-user foo --roles=superuser,editor
  • Create templates and attach existing fields on the fly with $ wireshell create-template contact --fields=body,sidebar , prevent template file creation with --nofile
  • Command aliases now available: c-u, c-t, c-r, s

Now planning field creation. :)

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ever since I learned about drush I knew PW could benefit greatly from similar tool. Great job, Marcus!

Those "with dashes in-between" comands look a little weird for a cli interface. I saw you can easilly add aliases for commands, so maybe cr showd be included as a third one (as it is quicker to type)? Drush commands comprise of an object being manipulated followed by a "manipulation type". Not saying it is the right way to go, but it is better to choose some naming pattern explicitly.

Wireshell is a bit long too... Why not add an alias like ''wish" (for WIre SHell). It sounds magical, and isn't PW a wish come true?!

Thank you for developing this!

P.S. It kind of bugs me a little that this cli tool is written with symphony, not with PW itself. I am not even close to being able to argue here, but can it even be done?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ever since I learned about drush I knew PW could benefit greatly from similar tool. Great job, Marcus!

Those "with dashes in-between" comands look a little weird for a cli interface. I saw you can easilly add aliases for commands, so maybe cr showd be included as a third one (as it is quicker to type)? Drush commands comprise of an object being manipulated followed by a "manipulation type". Not saying it is the right way to go, but it is better to choose some naming pattern explicitly.

Wireshell is a bit long too... Why not add an alias like ''wish" (for WIre SHell). It sounds magical, and isn't PW a wish come true?!

Thank you for developing this!

P.S. It kind of bugs me a little that this cli tool is written with symphony, not with PW itself. I am not even close to being able to argue here, but can it even be done?

Regarding aliases: Yeah, I'm aware of the dash, and wanted to try cr, cu, ct first, but in the case of "cr" Symfony Console bugged me with the following error:

Bildschirmfoto%202015-03-28%20um%2017.01

So in favor of consistency (cu. ct. cro?) I went for the dash.

As for "$ wish", that was also my first thought (especially regarding the pun), but I learned that - at least on Unix and OS X - there's a programm called "wish" already present (https://www.tcl.tk/)

/ Edit: and I'm totally open for a "command style standard". The current order "verb-noun" was nothing but a gut decision.

Edited by marcus

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems like you put the same alias for 3 commands...

Nope, but since the other two also start with cr.. Console component tends to misunderstand cr as an incomplete command.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure if this can be done with Symfony Console (I've never really looked at it before), but what about `create:user`, where a colon is used? I must be honest and say that I'm not one for short aliases - have always preferred concise, clear-cut naming. But, I'm sure others appreciate faster typing. ;-)

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure if this can be done with Symfony Console (I've never really looked at it before), but what about `create:user`, where a colon is used?

Good idea, totally possible and artisan-y. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm being really silly - of course it's possible. Didn't even look at the source earlier. Simple as pie, like commands in Laravel.

Yeah, I just think that it gives a nice factory feel to it. Also, it makes the commands a tad easier to remember, considering there'll probably be quite a few as you go along.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all, 

With interest of everyone and love for Processwire, I will send a the PR to wireshell . So it will be a a one click installer.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

this tool is really cool idea. It would be great to have command for full PW installation, not just download. I've managed it by modifying original install.php file from PW 2.5 sources. But I'm not sure if it is production ready, it works but I haven't tested all edge cases. It requires config file with configuration array (db connection, profile, admin user credentials, ...). If you are interested I can post it somewhere. I plan to do it also for PW 2.4. With this comes and idea for 'new' command to allow installation of another versions other than the latest.

EDIT:

... So it will be a a one click installer.

Hari KT, don't you have the same intention? What do you mean by 'one click installer'. Installer for wireshell or for PW?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Richard: Hari KT said in his post he will send a PR (Pull Request) to WireShell. So it will be a one click step installer for WireShell, I think. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the proposals regarding an installer process, @HariKT and @Richard. A command named "new" definitely promises more than a download, that's right. But for this command I was just tipping my toe in the water, and testdriving the Console component, mimiking "laravel new" (which actually just is a download since there's no installation in the classic sense). Actually your thread about a command line installation of PW got me started with Wireshell in the first place :) So it's really cool that you'll contribute. Looking forward to the PR!

@Richard, it would be cool if you can post your approach to this. Frankly speaking I'm still in the learning phase regarding whats really possible with the API and would be glad if we could discuss in this thread the best approach about this - probably - most important command of Wireshell :)

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Big update! Version 0.3.0 comes with:
 

  • a new "NewCommand" provided by HariKT! Big thanks again. This contribution should lead to a better workflow with Wireshell since it opens up the possibility to install PW via command line in a convenient way
  • A command for creating fields
  • A command for assigning fields to existing templates
  • A generic backup command (DB dump)
  • Commands for en/disabling modules (downloading them via Wireshell is still on my bucket list)
  • A little command outputting the currently installed ProcessWire version
  • An unified approach to naming commands and classes: entity:verb, so for example user:create
  • I dropped the "(Experimental)" from the topic's title  ;)

Read more about the available new commands and their options in the readme.

If you have an older version of Wireshell installed, make sure you "$ composer update" it in order to get the new dependencies. And we're on packagist now: https://packagist.org/packages/wireshell/wireshell
 

  • Like 14

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great! Thanks for this, Marcus. So far, everything looks good here on Windows - have only just installed PW-dev, going to work with other commands now. (Update: Everything works like a charm. Looking forward to seeing more Commands.)

For Windows users interested in making this global:

  1. Make sure PHP is in your PATH
  2. Create a wireshell folder somewhere (also added to your path), and create a wireshell.bat file:
@echo off
php "path\to\wireshell" %*

Then you can run wireshell new --dev anywhere you like.

Since Wireshell is on packagist now and "composer global require wireshell/wireshell" installs it into "~/.composer/vendor/bin/wireshell" on Linux, could you test/check what the comparable Windows path or workflow would be? I'm currently rewriting (simplifying) the installation guide. Cheers!

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On Windows, it installs to C:\Users\<user>\AppData\Roaming\Composer\vendor\wireshell\wireshell\ ... Not sure what the best way of making this global is, other than making a batch file look specifically in that directory. I must admit: I'm not a composer fundi, but I get the basics...

Update: In fact, if I run wireshell directly from the above directory (using php wireshell), it doesn't run because it's looking for vendor/autoload.php in that directory too. If I run the nasty php vendor/wireshell/wireshell/wireshell from the C:\Users\<user>\AppData\Roaming\Composer directory, it works. Phew, quite messy. But, like I said, I'm no fundi - there must be a better way to do this.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On Windows, it installs to C:\Users\<user>\AppData\Roaming\Composer\vendor\wireshell\wireshell\ ... Not sure what the best way of making this global is, other than making a batch file look specifically in that directory. I must admit: I'm not a composer fundi, but I get the basics...

Update: In fact, if I run wireshell directly from the above directory (using php wireshell), it doesn't run because it's looking for vendor/autoload.php in that directory too. If I run the nasty php vendor/wireshell/wireshell/wireshell from the C:\Users\<user>\AppData\Roaming\Composer directory, it works. Phew, quite messy. But, like I said, I'm no fundi - there must be a better way to do this.

Thanks so far! I discovered an installation guide for "laravel install" on windows: http://www.bitspedia.com/2014/09/how-to-install-and-make-first-laravel.html :

  1. Add your ~/.composer/vendor/bin path into Path environmental variable, so that Windows Command Prompt could identify laravel command that would be used later to install Laravel and doing other tasks. In my case the path where its located is: C:\Users\UserName\AppData\Roaming\Composer\vendor\bin 

    so I added it into my Path environmental variable. Must restart your Shell or Command-Prompt so that updated Path variables is loaded.

And when I googled "windows Path environmental variable", got this: http://www.computerhope.com/issues/ch000549.htm. This GUI/matrix seems to be the counterpart to .bashrc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By louisstephens
      So this is more or less just a question regarding best practices, and how to actually achieve this. I have an internal tool I built awhile ago that has just gotten very "trashed". The naming conventions are all out of whack due to trying to get something completed, and pages are just everywhere. The fields got really out of hand as well, but I believe I have found a much cleaner field structure with the Repeater Matrix and a few other ProFields.  I decided recently to rewrite the template structure and the fields from scratch to keep everything nice and neat, but then it hit me that I would need to move all the previous data over and populate the new fields etc.
      The current tree looks something like:
      Group Title - Section A (template "section") - Category One (template "category") - Category Two (template "category") - Section B (template "section") - Category One (template "category") - Category Two (template "category") Etc etc... The structure is pretty good, and I am thinking of keeping it as it serves my purpose. However, I now have about 140 Sections with child pages that I would hopefully like to move to different templates, as well as changing the child templates/mapping data to the new fields. The only fields I need to worry about are a few textareas, text fields, options field,  as well as 1 image filed.
      I guess my real question is, what is the best way to go about this "migration" via the api while keeping the parent/child structure. It would be ok to leave it as is and chip away at it if I were the only one using it, but unfortunately that is not the case. 
      I guess one approach would be to copy over the entire structure and make the move to the new templates/fields. Once we have verified all the data/templates are correct, we could remove the old structure and possibly rename the new to mirror the old. However, this might just be too complicated.
    • By EyeDentify
      Hello Fellow PW Fans and Gurus.

      I have run into a problem where i have created a template without a template file associated with it.
      Now i would like to HAVE a template file associated with it, not an alternate but as the main template file.

      So i thought, that's easy, I upload the template file and change it in template settings but I only get the Alternate template file setting?

      Ok so maybe i can change it via the API , so i wrote some code for this.
      <?PHP function changeTemplate($pages = null, $templates = null) { /* get the pages to change template on */ $logItems = $pages->findMany('template=tmp_log_item'); /* get the template object for our desired template */ $Template = $templates->get('tmp_new_log_item'); foreach($logItems AS $key => $logData) { /* use template object $Template to set template */ $logData->template = $Template; /* save page item */ $logData->save(); } } /* do the magic change */ changeTemplate(); ?> Needless to say, PW was not happy about this, It throw up an error message:
      Error: Exception: Invalid value sent to Page::setTemplate (in /home/virtual/mydomain/public_html/wire/core/Page.php line 1782)
      Now from what i understand i gave $logData->template the wrong type of value.
      So what should the value be to correct this?
      When I read the docs at: https://processwire.com/api/ref/page/
      the value can be "string" or "Template".

      So i gave it a string and it went haywire.

      How should I approach this cause I realy dont want to manually change template file on över 50 plus pages

      Maybe I should use the Template class to create the value that the API wanted, but I am unsure how to use it.

      Thank you for any info you can give me on this.

      If you want more info to help me, ask and I will try my best to give it to you.
      Updated and Solved
      I solved the problem and have updated the code to reflect this.

      Essentialy i used the get() method of $templates to get the template object for my template i wanted to use using the template name.
      I gave the Object to the $logData->template property and all went well.
      We learn something new every day.
      One Note:
      The template file you want to use must have been uploaded and added as a template in the Template section in the Admin for this code to work as expected.
    • By chcs
      After running this code in my module's __install() the template_id is not set. Any ideas why?  (The export contents from the template created and the one that I built with Admin are the same. Both exports have the template_id is set to mm_state. When I go to edit the field in Admin, the template is not showing on the Input tab and it doesn't show the template title on a page using the template that uses this field. Using processwire 3.0.98)

      // mm_state
      $field = $this->fields->get('mm_state');
      if (!@$field->id) $field = new Field();
      $field->type = $this->modules->get("FieldtypePage");
      $field->name = 'mm_state';
      $field->label = 'State';
      $field->derefAsPage = 2;
      $field->inputfield = "InputfieldSelect";
      $this->fields->save($field);
      $field->labelFieldName = 'title';
      $field->template_id = 'mm_state';
      $field->columnWidth = 100;
      $field->required = true;
      $this->fields->save($field);
    • By mattcohen
      Hi, I am wondering if someone can help me out with getting the count of the comments of a page? 
      I am using Ryan's comments module as a reviews system for my site and would like to display the count of the comments per page, as below 
       

       
      The shops part that you see above is something similar to this 
      <?php $set_page = $page->title; $count = $pages->count("template=prices, title=$set_page"); echo $count; ?>  
    • By louisstephens
      So I am making a front-end dashboard for an internal project, and was curious if it is possible to match 2 pages together based on their title and retrieve the data.
      To make it more clear:
      I have two pages "Section A"  and "Section B" that each has child pages with names (the specific person) with subpages for their services offered. 
      Section A - John Doe (name=john-doe) - Service 1 - Service 2 - Service 3 - Jane Doe (name=jane-doe) - Service 1 - Service 2 - Service 3 Section B - John Doe (name=john-doe) - Service 4 - Service 5 - Service 6 - Jane Doe (name=jane-doe) - Service 4 - Service 5 - Service 6 What I would like to achieve on the front-end (if it is even possibile), is an output like:
      John Doe - Service 1 - Service 2 - Service 3 - Service 4 - Service 5 - Service 6 Jane Doe - Service 1 - Service 2 - Service 3 - Service 4 - Service 5 - Service 6 Thinking aloud: use a find to get all pages using the template "service user" and then foreaching through their children (and possibly getting a few field values as well) to output in the front end. The service templates used in the sections vary slightly in which fields they use.
      <?php $findUsers = $pages->find("template=service-a (and or) service-b,(some how match based on names)"); //if no match exists, output what is available ?> <ul> <?php foreach ($findUsers as $groupedUser): ?> <li><?php echo $groupedUser->title; ?></li> <li><?php echo $groupedUser->service_a_location; ?></li> <li><?php echo $groupedUser->service_a_body; ?></li> <li><?php echo $groupedUser->service_b_location; ?></li> <li><?php echo $groupedUser->service_b_phone; ?></li> <?php endforeach; ?> </ul> Sorry, it is just me thinking aloud, but I was not even sure if it is possible to group them together like that. I was going to have a page for each "section" only displaying that data, but I thought it would be nice to display them all together as an overview for the user.