Jump to content

Ivan Gretsky

Members
  • Posts

    1,300
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13

Everything posted by Ivan Gretsky

  1. Thanks for the answer @szabesz! I've read the RuntimeMarkup module thread, and @kongondo also recommends to put the actual code in a file and just wireRenderFile() it. So that must be the main difference. I also thought about the easy inclusion of js and css in Runtime only as a substantial difference. By the way, I do not read any real sarcasm in @bernhard's post. I guess it is just a his style) He is always asking himself questions and answers them. Sort of inner dialog)
  2. @Robin S, I am choosing a module for markup in edit page. You mentioned RuntimeMarkup module in the 1st post, but did not mention, what are the differences between that module and yours. Could you please help me here and outline pros and cons of your module comparing to @kongondo's ?
  3. I think the cheatsheet is here. Maybe just change the link in the original post? I remember starting my way with this cheatsheet. I learned a lot. Not sure if it is up to date, but even as is it could be of a great value to many. Captain hook is also available, just moved to github.io
  4. Good day everyone! Last year we had some great improvements for admin theme customization. Big thanx to @bernhard and @ryan. But there is an area of customization that is not so easy to approach - changing the layout generated by process modules. For example, I want to change how tabs on page edit screen are positioned. On one project of mine I got so many tabs, it is reasonable and preferable to have them on the side to the left, not on the top of the page. Preferably sticky (see the screenshot below). Did anyone try to implement something like this? Did you succeed? Could you please share how you managed to do it? I am pretty sure I cannot do it just with this module. I have seen something similar done in Admin Theme Boss with jQuery UI Layout Plug-in, but I'd rather do it in php)) Please share your knowledge!
  5. @Clarity, could you please share, what was the solution?
  6. It seems like a good idea from the API consistency point of view)
  7. Great new module! Love it! I would also love to extend this module (or have a similar one) to export / import translations for fields' labels / descriptions / notes with per template override support + templates labels. That would make the translation workflow more complete and easy for sites with many languages. @ryan, doesn't your customer accidentally have this need too? 😀
  8. $page->fields->getField('my_field_mame', true)->getLabel() This also works and is a bit shorter.
  9. Hey, @ukyo! I read the module description, but I can't say I fully grasp what it does) Could you please write why this module, what problems it solves, what are typical use cases. Looking forward to learn more about this one, as I already use and love other modules of yours))
  10. That one seems to have a paid license, which is probably a showstopper for having it inside the core.
  11. As far as I know CKEditor 5 is quite a different beast and transition to it would require some massive changes. But it surely could bring a lot to the table. Maybe even some basic content builder functionality.
  12. Good day, @teppo! Hope you're doing fine. I am using Wireframe in everything I build now) And devs I collaborate with love it as it gives us a defined common ground. Thanks! We are using components a lot. Particularly for RM based content builder. And we often need to call some component-unique logic from the component view. I wish we could do it like we can in regular views: just calling a public method of component controller as a function (or a property). It doesn't seem to be a feature now. Could this be added?
  13. Great! Is there a chance to add hiding pages (and their children) by template or by custom selector. That would make the new feature more complete and useful IMHO.
  14. You send you request to /scan without the ending slash. ProcessWire by default redirects to a url with an ending slash. And all parameters get lost during the redirect.
  15. Good day, @BitPoet! Are you planning to merge dev branch to have a new stable?
  16. If using "Select options" fieldtype is not a requirement and you just need to have a more visual way to select things, you could use "Page Reference" fieldtype with InputfieldSelectize.
  17. Just checked it, and everything seems to work fine on 3.0.199 when creating new page:
  18. Great news! Having a recent master version is always a good thing. And maybe it is a good time to think about the roadmap for the future? Maybe even about those breaking changes, that could make 3.1 от even 4.0 a necessity? Something that revolutionize PW dev once again. I remember when 3.0 was planning. I didn't even understand what namespaces are back then)) But now I can't imagine staying at 2.x and love that that move was made on time. What is the next step?
  19. Good day, @andrewbauer! I suggest you take a little time and dig deeper into how ProcessWire works. After that your question will be solved by itself) You can start with one of these written tutorials or watch this rather old, but still conceptually relevant video.
  20. Hey, @Aleksey Popov! First of all you need to create a field to store page views data, and collect the actual data with a script. And then just use sorting in selector. Look at this topic or at this module.
  21. Good day, friends! I am back to using the mighty ARB and this super useful addon to it. Thank you for your time and talent! The old issue @adrian, it seems like you didn't find time for it yet. Is there a chance you come back to this in the near future? The new issue I just found that the changes that ARBS adds to the Page List also apply to the children tab on the page edit screen. I see this is an unintended side effect that looks like a bug. @teppo, is there an easy way to change this behavior? P.S Created github issues (this one and this one) for your convenience.
  22. Are you planning on "component namespaces"?
  23. Good day, @teppo! You answered in the other thread, but not here. And the posts were made on the same day... So just bumping this one to make sure you didn't miss it)))))
  24. Not sure how it goes and if the whole thing gets deleted for the good)) But I can agree with some points laid out and wish we could talk them out and improve on them. Just today I was chatting with a client representative on a project she works at for more than 2 years. And she said that she still cannot imagine doing strings translations by herself as it is way to hard in her opinion. This is a 10+ langs multilang project, so it matters. I admit, she might not be very bright, but everybody else on the team is trying even less)) Maybe it is because we are using lots of included and rendered files and so on. But the case exists. Managing multilang images is kind of not so easy too, but it can be done with something like image tags.
  25. I am a bit confused as I didn't see @MoritzLost's post to be insulting. Maybe it is my week English skills. But I am pretty sure he was not writing it neither to show any kind of disrespect, nor to promote another commercial CMS. He is not a native English speaker either. And a much younger person than me (as far as I can tell by the photo)) I wish we could see through wording and get to the points that he was trying to make. And I am sure he is making them in an attempt to make his beloved CMS better. I know he enjoys PW by his thoughtful posts here, his modules and his processwire.dev website. It is so easy to misunderstand each other. And sometimes it is hard to see ways to improve in criticism that sounds unfair. But if we can't handle it here, in our friendly home community, then who can?
×
×
  • Create New...