Ivan Gretsky

Top one is 62 (+23 repeaters). Regular ones are 15 to 25.

AFAIK Incus is a community fork of LXD developed (partly) by same people. So not so new actually)

Now when they're all pinged, we need to have something for them... Something to do or to write about... Maybe just say hello and share where they're at now...

I can't see the video. Is it just from where I'm at?

Cool @Jonathan Lahijani! So you are still using apache on those LXC instances, right? Have you considered Incus instead of Proxmox? I've read it is more easy to setup and manage if you're good with cli. And is "more native" for LXC's.

This is really cool and migrations is a proper test case for AI as they should touch upon almost every part of PW. I am as excited about all this as everyone else here! And this part (quoted above) of the blog post obviously made me and probably @Jonathan Lahijani and @gebeer think about migrations. Though I can imagine that @ryan himself didn't think about this in quite that context. I myself too was not so long ago questioning Claude Desktop about almost the same thing. How to track and migrate all changes from one installation (dev) to another (prod). How to commit, examine and review in-admin-made changes when working with the same PW site in a team. And I asked to compare with Rock Migrations and to propose something superior. The answer was in fact to offload "the entire scope of a ProcessWire installation (pages, templates, fields, modules, etc.)" to a file with a predefined schema. Then to build a tool to compare and to produce a diff, which could be applied to another installation. So today's blog post actually seems like a ground floor for this. I can present this document later if needed (but nowadays you can produce such for yourself in minutes) But me too wouldn't want to have AI be required to run these migration / apply those diffs. It might be true but still doesn't fit in team development workflow (if there will be one in the new brave AI coding world))) So maybe this is a time for us, humans and robots, to unite and create something awesome in joint effort? Humans may be not as productive. But they are imaginative. And they are the end users of PW still) P.S. Claude knows how to position himself correctly with all these compliments. I think we need to be careful with AI. Communicating with real people is, of course, less pleasant. But for now, it's still a necessity.

Good day! One of my templates has a list of allowed (whitelisted) url segments set (via "Which URL Segments do you want to allow?") . And all of them but one should end with a trailing slash for SEO reasons. The new url segment (called `sitemap.xml`) should work without trailing slash. Could you please suggest how this could be done?

This start to look like "The Expendables". The superheroes are back 😎

It is really a pleasure and an excitement to see you back, @Soma! I am sure something great is going to happen soon!

Thanks @robert! You support is lightning fast ⚡! I was just writing the 2nd issue in github when the 1st one was resolved)))

And about Repeater Matrix page classes. There were discussions to have custom classes for RM types... Is this possible?

Awesome! Want more of those! ‐-- Custom page classes really aren't a "view" layer in any form, and I suggest keeping all markup generation code within /site/templates/ and subdirectories within it. Would love to know more about how you implement the view layer. Components with several views.. Controllers for url segments and stuff like that...

Good day, @bernhard! First of all, I have to thank you for being who you are. A lone talented enthusiast trying to build a sustainable living on top of our beloved CMS. But not just making sites like the rest of us. But creating your little module-selling empire))) Taking on every hard problem ever put in front of a PW developer and solving it in no time. You have leaded the way for us for some many years. Everyone here has been following you in one way or another. And thus I feel sad about you taking this decision. Yet in the same time I can imagine the freedom you should feel after it. I really wish you good luck in any place your future journey will take you! I sounds like I am saying goodbye to someone leaving, but I am not. I am just saying that every end is the new beginning. What else I would love to invite you into doing is to analyze why this path of yours (creating a bunch of super cool module) didn't lead you to the place expected. Recently @kongondo, the only other prominent paid module creator I can remember, has done the same exit as you. Why is this? This question is of interest to me because I have many times thought about how I myself could build my income upon what I love and know - ProcessWire. Could it be, that PW is so much a DIY kind of thing, that most of us want to build something of our own and are not ready to subdue to modules authors' way of doing things (other than @ryan himself)? Or does everyone here enjoys opensource so much that proprietary is something to avoid? Or is it just simply not enough of target audience?

Hmm. I took that for granted. Though that existing data structure could be used. Visually mapped to. Sorry for asking questions without doing my part to investigate first.

Wow! Looks super cool! 🎉 Well, reads) Could you please add some screenshots or a video? And a questions right away (I have not install or use the module yet). Are Repeater and Repeater Matrix fields handled somehow? We've got content builder builder based on Repeater Matrix.

Good day, PWmates! I just had a super productive and mega fast support session with @FireWire. Great thanks to you, man! I almost forgot how pleasant is it to be here, in the supportive and friendly PW community. I am 12 year around and this great spirit is not going nowhere) Happy New Year to all of us here, where we unite and make at least a little corner of the world a better place! P.S. And if you think this post is late to the party check this out))

Good day, @robert! Thanks for the module! @FireWire has updated Fluency for DeepL API v. 2.0 which uses different authentication method. Could you please write if ProcessTranslatePage has already done that in v. 1.0? If not are you planning to update?

That is what I thought. Thanks for extra research and tips.

What I was thinking about is PW image field creates variations of image (scaled down, resized and so on). And it does so not on image load, but during render. @maximus, you surely know about this. And PW puts all those into the same folder for all image fields of the same page. So I was wondering if and how this field handles those cases. I guess it does not as it is file field, not image. Or am I wrong?

Hmm, I must have imagined your field was an image field, not a file field. My bad.

Haven't tried the profile or field, but the walks in Switzerland videos are truly awesome) Wonder if page variations are being created well on the fly. Is it taken care of?

Thanks, @teppo! This is cool reminder about the Wireframe::page() function. This is super useful to render repeaters as part of another page. I am rendering RepeaterMatrix page for a login (another take on this one). So I was hoping to create a controller and set of views for a RM page to separate the logiс. I cannot use a dedicated page for this. I am wondering, maybe there is a way to render custom content Wireframe way without being tied to a page? I am in a PageRender hook trying to change the output for the unauthorized. Would like to render custom view in a custom layout without a page (and a template). Now I try to have this stuff in another template's controller in a url segment handler. But this doesn't feel right)

Thank you friends! This approach works. The only thing I had to change using $input->setUrlSegment(1, "segment"); instead of dynamic property setting to get rid of warnings in PHP 8.2.

Thanks Iskender! But that is not exactly what I am after. I need to render a page Page::renderPage hook and replace the output with another page render. wire()->addHookBefore('Page::renderPage', function (HookEvent $event) { /* CONDITIONS CHECKING */ $event->removeHook(null); // Remove this hook so we do not get caught up in a loop. See https://processwire.com/api/ref/wire/remove-hook/ $someOtherPage = wire()->pages->get(...); // Get the page to be rendered instead of the current one $event->return = $someOtherPage->render(); // HERE I NEED TO RENDER A PAGE OTPUT FOR AN URL SEGMENT INSTEAD OF REGULAR RENDER $event->replace = true; ...

Good day @teppo and fellow wireframers. I would like to render RepeaterMatrixPage items with wireframe. Tried to do it the regular way by adding wireframe as an alternative template file to their system templates and creating a contoller. But that didn't work out. Just maybe it is easy to achieve with some additional hook?