MadeMyDay

Module: PageTableExtended

Recommended Posts

PageTableExtended

 

Download here: http://modules.processwire.com/modules/fieldtype-page-table-extended/

 

Extends the Processwire PageTable field for rendering table row layouts. This is great for editors, because they actually see at a glance what the table rows consist of.

What it does

 

Turns the Processwire Fieldtype "Page Table" from this:

git1.jpg

 

into something like this (sorting capabilities of course still functional):

 

git2.jpg

See it in action:

Requirements

  • FieldtypePageTable installed (part of the core since Processwire 2.4.10.)
  • Templates used for PageTable need a file associated (otherwise nothing gets rendered)
  • This render method is meant for sites where the PageTable templates only render part of the layout, not complete websites. But you also can define what will be rendered (see below).

Options

git3.jpg

Render Layout instead of table rows

Check this for seeing the rows rendered. You can easily turn off the complete functionality by unchecking this.

Path to Stylesheet

Since the parts are unstyled by default, it is a good idea to define styles for them. All rendered templates are encapsulated in a div with the class "renderedLayout" so you can style them with:

div.renderedLayout h2{
color: green;
}

The path is to be set relative to your templates' folder.

Reset Admin CSS

Since the parts are rendered inside the Admin, common styles of the Admin Interface apply also to your layout parts. This is not a bad thing, because especially text styles are well integrated in your admin's theme. But if you like to override the admin styles in your table rows completely (more or less), just check this box. Don't forget to define a custom CSS then!

Advanced

 

Since this module is meant for parts of your layout you already have defined for your frontend templates, it is a good idea to use a preprocessor like Stylus, Sass or Less for building the custom CSS file. Just outsource your layout part definitions in an extra file, compile that in a separete CSS file and use this as custom CSS for this module. Since your CSS is should be built in a modular way, this works pretty well ;-) Will write a tutorial with a use case once finished testing.

 

Notes:

 

Github: https://github.com/MadeMyDay/PageTableExtended

 

If you want to get rid of the unnecessary step for entering a title before editing the page, just set the "autoformat" value as suggested in the PageTable settings. If you don't want to use a title field at all, see this post from Soma

 

Will put it in the module repository once finished testing. Please test it and give feedback. I haven't used GitHub for a long time, please check if everything is in place and if this will work with the modules manager and the new core module installer once added to the repository. Have fun :)

 

Module is in the repository now: http://modules.processwire.com/modules/fieldtype-page-table-extended/

 

Please use GitHub for instructions, I made some additions there.

  • Like 33

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Awesome! - only one suggestion - it would be great to have text fields editable inline, with ajax save - might be beyond the scope of what you want, but I think it would be cool :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Awesome! - only one suggestion - it would be great to have text fields editable inline, with ajax save - might be beyond the scope of what you want, but I think it would be cool :)

I am a bit ambivalent regarding such a feature. Of course it would be nice, but also would add a lot of overhead to this specific module. If there would be an existing solution for that (for the frontend), it would be easy to integrate it as well in this module (including necessary js and css files should be enough), because the layouts are rendered as in the frontend.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess I am mixing purposes a bit here - your goal was to style the output exactly as it will appear on the frontend, but I guess I am looking more for replicating the ease of editing that repeaters have. Maybe I'll make a different extension for PageTable that works more that way. Maybe not worry about the ajax saving and just use the page save to save each of PageTable components. I'll mull over it for a bit.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I totally agree. I was waiting for a configurable repeater (with different templates to choose from) for ages. Now PageTable has this feature, so I went with this ;) But hey, never say never. Question is... When do you want to save the changes? Autosave? No good idea as long there are no draft versions. So this is getting complicated. Either you provide a save button on each row (easy to implement, but hard to understand for editors) or you save the entries on page save (easier to understand but harder to implement). You then would have to monitor the changed fields, look for their page, save the fields on each page... well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Marc, you know - I don't have any experience with PageTable field.

I've installed the module and added the templates. Everything works fine for me. The Elements are there, I can add content und frontend shows everything.

In your folder are two Modules.

PageTable Renderer (Renders PageTable entries in admin) and PageTable render (Adds render functionality for PageTable fields). First one is installed. The second one requires InputFieldPageTable which I can't find. I thing thats the reason, why I have no settings.

The rendering doesn't work for me yet and I've a little understanding problem, how I got this working for me…

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@yesjoar

You need to install the dev version of 2.4 instead of the stable one. PageTable is a new Fieldtype which is only available with the dev version.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@yesjoar

You need to install the dev version of 2.4 instead of the stable one. PageTable is a new Fieldtype which is only available with the dev version.

I have the latest dev version. PageTable is installed and everything works fine for me. Like I said. ;)

But the rendering in the page itselfs doesn't work for me. Also I can't install the second rendering module.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you installed the new fieldtype FieldtypePageTableExtended? And then created/changed the field with "PageTableExtended" ? It's a new field.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Yesjoar,

PageTable Renderer (Renders PageTable entries in admin) and PageTable render (Adds render functionality for PageTable fields). First one is installed. The second one requires InputFieldPageTable which I can't find. I thing thats the reason, why I have no settings.

Okay, I pushed an update to GitHub. The dependencies of the modules were not clear and the titles misleading. Please try to override the modules with the new ones.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Tobaco,
 
my setup is always the same. Doesn't matter if I use PageTable or not. Here it goes (simplified):
 
/templates
- basic-page.php
- home.php
- /tpl 
   - main.php
   - mainnav.php
   - subnav.php
   - footer.php
 
 
The tpl/main.php is the overall template like:
 
<?php
include('tpl/mainnav.php');
include('tpl/subnav.php');
include('tpl/slider.php');
?>
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html class="no-js">
    <head>
        <meta charset="utf-8">
        <meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=edge,chrome=1">
        <title><?= $page->title ?></title>
        <!--- styles and scripts -->
    </head>
    <body class='<?= $bodyclass ?>'>
        <header>
            <div class='wrap'>
                <a href="/"><img src='/site/templates/img/logo.png' class='logo' alt="Logo"></a>
                <nav class='main'>
                    <?= $mainnav ?>
                </nav>
            </div>
        </header>
        <?= $slider ?>
        <?= $subnav ?>
<section class="content">
            <div class="wrap group">
                <h1 class='v2 hide'><span><?= $page->title ?></span></h1>
                <?= $content ?>
            </div>
        </section>
        <footer>
            <div class="group">
                <?php include ('tpl/footer.php'); ?>
            </div>
        </footer> 
        <script src="/site/templates/dist/all.min.js"></script>
    </body>
</html>

basic-page template looks like this (every template renders the content and then includes the main template):

<?php
/**
 * basic page template
 *
 */
$bodyclass='inner';

$content = $page->body;

include('tpl/main.php');
 
With PageTable the structure looks like this:
 
/templates
- basic-page.php
- home.php
- part_text.php
- part_columns.php
- part_gallery.php
- /tpl 
   - main.php
   - mainnav.php
   - subnav.php
   - footer.php

The part_* templates are templates only for PageTable. part_columns.php could look like this:

<?php
$headline1 = "";
$headline2 = "";
if(!$page->checkbox1) $headline1 = "<h2>{$page->title}</h2>";
if(!$page->checkbox2) $headline2 = "<h2>{$page->text1}</h2>";

// Output

echo "
<div class='pageTableSection {$page->template->name}'>
    <div class='inner'>
        <div class='col one-half'>
                {$headline1}
                {$page->body}
         </div>
        <div class='col one-half'>
            {$headline2}
            {$page->textarea1}
        </div>
    </div>
</div>

";

And the basic page template gets enhanced by ("layout" being the PageTableExtend field):

<?php 

/**
 * basic page template
 * including PageTable layout parts
 */
$bodyclass='inner';

$content = "{$page->body}";

if(count($page->layout)>0){
     foreach($page->layout as $l){
         $content .= $l->render();
     }
}

include('tpl/main.php');
 
That way, the layout parts are easily renderable in the Admin with PageTableExtended.
 
While writing this, I want to point to another feature of the module. If rendered by PageTableExtended, the template gets an option 'pageTableExtended' which you can use in your part template:
 
// Output

echo "
<div class='pageTableSection {$page->template->name}'>
    <div class='inner'>
        <div class='col one-half'>
                {$headline1}
                {$page->body}
         </div>
        <div class='col one-half'>
            {$headline2}
            {$page->textarea1}
        </div>
    </div>
</div>

";

if(!$options['pageTableExtended']){ 
    // we are not in the Admin, so we include our social media buttons which we only need in our frontend
    include('social/socialmediabuttons.php);
}

Hope that helps.

  • Like 12

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Since your CSS should be built in a modular way, this works pretty well ;-)

Ha! that *wink* should be bigger. :P

BTW, this is so awesome!

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hadn't actually realised you could specify more than one template for a PageTable field! Did that get snuck in after one of the early versions or am I just blind in general? :)

It actually makes an "article" system a lot easier to build where an editing user might want to dump in some text, then an image, then some more text exactly as you have, but with your module it's one step better as it's pretty much WYSIWIG.

Inline edits would be nice as folks have said, but this is still really, really useful!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I hadn't actually realised you could specify more than one template for a PageTable field! Did that get snuck in after one of the early versions or am I just blind in general?
 
Wasn't there from the beginning. But as owzim posted this: https://processwire.com/talk/topic/4189-flexibility-in-page-design/page-4#entry63924 I knew, this is the key to my always wanted flexible layout parts :)
 
It actually makes an "article" system a lot easier to build where an editing user might want to dump in some text, then an image, then some more text exactly as you have, but with your module it's one step better as it's pretty much WYSIWIG.
 
exactly.
 
Inline edits would be nice as folks have said, but this is still really, really useful!
 

Of course they would be. But as I said: If there would be a solution for the frontend, it could easily be applied to this module. I think developing a solution only for this module would be out of scope.

Will try to include Apeisa's Fredi. If that works without hazzle, any inline solution should work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So behind the times :(

@MadeMyDay - just submitted a pull request to fix some freaky things I was experiencing either due to a template delegation situation or some freaky admin code I've done but I think it could affect certain people in certain scenarios so best to be safe.

And because I'm nice I made sure it was all still compatible with your instructions afterwards ;)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Robin S
      Some introduction...
      This module is experimental and there are probably bugs - so treat it as alpha and don't use it on production websites.
      I started on this module because there have been quite a few requests for "fake" or "invisible" parent functionality and I was curious about what is possible given that the idea sort of goes against the PW page structure philosophy. I'm not sure that I will use this module myself, just because I don't really see a long list of pages under Home (or anywhere else) as untidy or cluttered. I would tend to use Lister Pro when I want to see some set of pages as a self-contained group. But maybe others will find it useful.
      At the moment this module does not manipulate the breadcrumb menu in admin. So when you are editing or adding a virtual child the real location of the page is revealed in the breadcrumb menu. That's because I don't see the point in trying to comprehensively fool users about the real location of pages - I think it's better that they have some understanding of where the pages really are. But I'm open to feedback on this and it is possible to alter the breadcrumbs if there's a consensus that it would be better that way.
       
      Virtual Parents
      Allows pages in Page List to be grouped under a virtual parent.
      This module manipulates the page list and the flyout tree menu to make it appear that one or more pages are children of another page when in fact they are siblings of that page.
      Why would you do that instead of actually putting the child pages inside the parent? Mainly if you want to avoid adding the parent name as part of the URL. For example, suppose you have some pages that you want to be accessed at URLs directly off the site root: yourdomain.com/some-page/. But in the page list you want them to be appear under a parent for the sake of visual grouping or to declutter the page list under Home.
      Example of how the page structure actually is

      Example of how the page structure appears with Virtual Parents activated

      How it works
      This module identifies the virtual parents and virtual children by way of template. You define a single template as the virtual parent template and one or more templates as the virtual child templates. Anytime pages using the child template(s) are siblings of a page using the parent template, those child pages will appear as children of the virtual parent in the page list and tree menu.
      You will want to create dedicated templates for identifying virtual parents and virtual children and reserve them just for use with this module.
      Features
      Adjusts both page list and tree flyout menu to show the virtual parent/child structure, including the count of child pages. Works everywhere page list is used: Page List Select / Page List Select Multiple (and therefore CKEditor link dialog). Intercepts the "Add page" process in admin, so that when an attempt is made to add a child to a virtual parent, the child is added where it belongs (the next level up) and the template selection is limited to virtual child templates. Intercepts moving and sorting pages in the page list, to ensure only virtual children may be moved/sorted under the virtual parent. Superusers have a toggle switch at the bottom of the page list to easily disable/enable Virtual Parents in order to get a view of what the real page structure is. Usage
      Install the Virtual Parents module.
      In the module config, enter pairs of parent/child template names in the form virtual_parent_template=virtual_child_template. If needed you can specify multiple pipe-separated child templates: virtual_parent_template=child_template_1|child_template_2. One pair of template names per line.
      There is a checkbox in the module config to toggle Virtual Pages on and off, but it's more convenient to use this from the page list.
      Notes
      It's important to keep in mind the real location of the virtual child pages. This module is only concerned with adjusting the appearance of page list and tree menu for the sake of visual grouping and tidiness. In all other respects the virtual children are not children of the virtual parent at all.
      It's recommended to select an icon for the virtual parent template (Advanced tab) so virtual parents are marked out in the page list as being different from normal parent pages.
      Do not place real children under a virtual parent. There is some protection against this when moving pages in the page list, but when it comes to changing a page's parent via the Settings tab the only protection is common sense.
       
      https://github.com/Toutouwai/VirtualParents
    • By horst
      Wire Mail SMTP

      An extension to the new WireMail base class that uses SMTP-transport

      This module integrates EmailMessage, SMTP and SASL php-libraries from Manuel Lemos into ProcessWire. I use this continously evolved libraries for about 10 years now and there was never a reason or occasion not to do so. I use it nearly every day in my office for automated composing and sending personalized messages with attachments, requests for Disposition Notifications, etc. Also I have used it for sending personalized Bulkmails many times.

      The WireMailSmtp module extends the new email-related WireMail base class introduced in ProcessWire 2.4.1 (while this writing, the dev-branch only).
       
      Here are Ryans announcement.



      Current Version 0.2.7
      get it from the Modules Directory Install and Configure

      Download the module into your site/modules/ directory and install it.

      In the config page you fill in settings for the SMTP server and optionaly the (default) sender, like email address, name and signature.
      You can test the smtp settings directly there. If it says "SUCCESS! SMTP settings appear to work correctly." you are ready to start using it in templates, modules or bootstrap scripts.


      Usage Examples
      The simplest way to use it:
      $numSent = wireMail($to, $from, $subject, $textBody); $numSent = wireMail($to, '', $subject, $textBody); // or with a default sender emailaddress on config page This will send a plain text message to each recipient.
       
      You may also use the object oriented style:
      $mail = wireMail(); // calling an empty wireMail() returns a wireMail object $mail->to($toEmail, $toName); $mail->from = $yourEmailaddress; // if you don't have set a default sender in config // or if you want to override that $mail->subject($subject); $mail->body($textBody); $numSent = $mail->send(); Or chained, like everywhere in ProcessWire:
      $mail = wireMail(); $numSent = $mail->to($toEmail)->subject($subject)->body($textBody)->send(); Additionaly to the basics there are more options available with WireMailSmtp. The main difference compared to the WireMail BaseClass is the sendSingle option. With it you can set only one To-Recipient but additional CC-Recipients.
      $mail = wireMail(); $mail->sendSingle(true)->to($toEmail, $toName)->cc(array('person1@example.com', 'person2@example.com', 'person3@example.com')); $numSent = $mail->subject($subject)->body($textBody)->send(); The same as function call with options array:
      $options = array( 'sendSingle' => true, 'cc' => array('person1@example.com', 'person2@example.com', 'person3@example.com') ); $numSent = wireMail($to, '', $subject, $textBody, $options); There are methods to your disposal to check if you have the right WireMail-Class and if the SMTP-settings are working:
      $mail = wireMail(); if($mail->className != 'WireMailSmtp') { // Uups, wrong WireMail-Class: do something to inform the user and quit echo "<p>Couldn't get the right WireMail-Module (WireMailSmtp). found: {$mail->className}</p>"; return; } if(!$mail->testConnection()) { // Connection not working: echo "<p>Couldn't connect to the SMTP server. Please check the {$mail->className} modules config settings!</p>"; return; } Following are a ...


      List of all options and features


      testConnection () - returns true on success, false on failures


      sendSingle ( true | false ) - default is false

      sendBulk ( true | false ) - default is false, Set this to true if you have lots of recipients (50+)


      to ($recipients) - one emailaddress or array with multiple emailaddresses

      cc ($recipients) - only available with mode sendSingle, one emailaddress or array with multiple emailaddresses

      bcc ($recipients) - one emailaddress or array with multiple emailaddresses

       
      from = 'person@example.com' - emailaddress, can be set in module config (called Sender Emailaddress) but it can be overwritten here

      fromName = 'Name Surname' - optional, can be set in module config (called Sender Name) but it can be overwritten here


      priority (3) - 1 = Highest | 2 = High | 3 = Normal | 4 = Low | 5 = Lowest

      dispositionNotification () or notification () - request a Disposition Notification


      subject ($subject) - subject of the message

      body ($textBody) - use this one alone to create and send plainText emailmessages

      bodyHTML ($htmlBody) - use this to create a Multipart Alternative Emailmessage (containing a HTML-Part and a Plaintext-Part as fallback)

      addSignature ( true | false ) - the default-behave is selectable in config screen, this can be overridden here
      (only available if a signature is defined in the config screen)

      attachment ($filename, $alternativeBasename = "") - add attachment file, optionally alternative basename


      send () - send the message(s) and return number of successful sent messages


      getResult () - returns a dump (array) with all recipients (to, cc, bcc) and settings you have selected with the message, the message subject and body, and lists of successfull addresses and failed addresses,


      logActivity ($logmessage) - you may log success if you want

      logError ($logmessage) - you may log warnings, too. - Errors are logged automaticaly
       
       
      useSentLog (true | false) - intended for usage with e.g. third party newsletter modules - tells the send() method to make usage of the sentLog-methods - the following three sentLog methods are hookable, e.g. if you don't want log into files you may provide your own storage, or add additional functionality here

      sentLogReset ()  - starts a new LogSession - Best usage would be interactively once when setting up a new Newsletter

      sentLogGet ()  - is called automaticly within the send() method - returns an array containing all previously used emailaddresses

      sentLogAdd ($emailaddress)  - is called automaticly within the send() method
       
      Changelog: https://github.com/horst-n/WireMailSmtp/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md
       
    • By ukyo
      Call ProcessWire API Functions Inside STRING
      Github Repo
      Current status : BETA
      Each called method must return string value !
      I added all functions, but not tested all. I focused page(), page()->render and field properties (label, description and notes). I also tested some basic pages() api calls.
      Your API calls must start with { and must end with }. For use multiple arguments inside functions, separate arguments with ~ char.
      NOTE If you pass directly arguments to api {page(title)}, this call will check for requestedApiCall()->get(arguments).
      USAGE
      processString(string, page, language); Get page title <?php $str = "You are here : {page:title}"; echo processString($str); ?> Get page children render result <?php $str = "Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.<hr>{page:render:children}"; echo processString($str); ?> Get homepage title <?php $str = "You can visit our <a hre='{pages(1):url}'>{pages:get(1):title}</a>"; echo processString($str); ?> Get title field label, description or notes <?php $str = "Our title field properties are : label: {label(title)} - description: {description(title)} - notes: {notes(title)}"; echo processString($str); ?> Multiple examples <?php $str = " <ul class='uk-list uk-list-striped'> <li><b>01: GET FIELD LABEL</b> <code>&#123;label(title)&#125;</code> <b>RESULT :</b> <code>{label(title)}</code></li> <li><b>02: GET FIELD LABEL WITH PREFIX</b> <code>&#123;label(title~=> )&#125;</code> <b>RESULT :</b> <code>{label(title~=> )}</code></li> <li><b>03: GET FIELD LABEL WITH SUFFIX</b> <code>&#123;label(title~~ <=)&#125;</code> <b>RESULT :</b> <code>{label(title~~ <=)}</code></li> <li><b>04: GET FIELD DESCRIPTION</b> <code>&#123;description(title)&#125;</code> <b>RESULT :</b> <code>{description(title)}</code><br> <li><b>05: GET FIELD DESCRIPTION WITH PREFIX</b> <code>&#123;description(title~=> )&#125;</code> <b>RESULT :</b> <code>{description(title~=> )}</code></li> <li><b>06: GET FIELD DESCRIPTION WITH SUFFIX</b> <code>&#123;description(title~~ <=)&#125;</code> <b>RESULT :</b> <code>{description(title~~ <=)}</code></li> <li><b>07: GET FIELD NOTES</b> <code>&#123;notes(title)&#125;</code> <b>RESULT :</b> <code>{notes(title)}</code><br> <li><b>08: GET FIELD NOTES WITH PREFIX</b> <code>&#123;notes(title~=> )&#125;</code> <b>RESULT :</b> <code>{notes(title~=> )}</code></li> <li><b>09: GET FIELD NOTES WITH SUFFIX</b> <code>&#123;notes(title~~ <=)&#125;</code> <b>RESULT :</b> <code>{notes(title~~ <=)}</code></li> <li><b>10: GET PAGE TITLE</b> <code>&#123;page(title)&#125;</code> <b>RESULT :</b> <code>{page(title)}</code></li> <li><b>11: GET PAGE TITLE</b> <code>&#123;page:title&#125;</code> <b>RESULT :</b> <code>{page:title}</code></li> <li><b>12: GET PAGE RENDER TITLE</b> <code>&#123;page:render:title&#125;</code> <b>RESULT :</b> <code>{page:render:title}</code></li> <li><b>12: GET HOMEPAGE TITLE</b> <code>&#123;pages:get(template=home):title&#125;</code> <b>RESULT :</b> <code>{pages:get(template=home):title}</code></li> <li><b>13: GET HOMEPAGE TEMPLATE ID</b> <code>&#123;pages:get(template=home):template:id&#125;</code> <b>RESULT :</b> <code>{pages:get(template=home):template:id}</code></li> </ul> "; echo processString($str); ?>
    • By Robin S
      This module corrects a few things that I find awkward about the "Add New Template" workflow in the PW admin. I opened a wishlist topic a while back because it would good to resolve some of these things in the core, but this module is a stopgap for now.
      Originally I was going to share these as a few standalone hooks, but decided to bundle them together in a configurable module instead. This module should be considered alpha until it has gone through some more testing.
      Add Template Enhancements
      Adds some efficiency enhancements when adding or cloning templates via admin.

      Features
      Derive template label from name: if you like to give each of your templates a label then this feature can save some time. When one or more new templates are added in admin a label is derived automatically from the name. There are options for underscore/hyphen replacement and capitalisation of the label. Edit template after add: when adding only a single template, the template is automatically opened for editing after it is added. Copy field contexts when cloning: this copies the field contexts (a.k.a. overrides such as column width, label and description) from the source template to the new template when using the "Duplicate/clone this template?" feature on the Advanced tab. Copy field contexts when duplicating fields: this copies the field contexts if you select the "Duplicate fields used by another template" option when adding a new template. Usage
      Install the Add Template Enhancements module.
      Configure the module settings according to what suits you.
       
      https://github.com/Toutouwai/AddTemplateEnhancements
    • By AAD Web Team
      Hi,
      I've put in a support request (as a followup on an existing one) for this but it's nearly 10pm Ryan's time, so I thought I'd ask on here just in case someone can help...
      Yesterday we purchased ProDrafts, but I couldn't get the key to validate. Every time I hit submit on the module settings screen the key would be removed from the field I entered it in, and then it would complain about the missing value. I put in a support request and Ryan responded last night. It turned out it was because we're behind a proxy/firewall. He gave me a fix to get around that issue - some code to go into admin.php. I put that code in and saved admin.php, but now I can't even get into our admin anymore!
      (Just to clarify, I took the code back out and saved admin.php but that made no difference. It's definitely not the new code causing the error.)
      The errors relate to a lack of permission on the ProDrafts module (see attached screenshot). We do have a key, but evidently the code Ryan gave me to add the key in via admin.php isn't taking effect before the error is thrown...?
      I tried removing the ProDrafts directory from the modules directory, but that hasn't helped.
      Is there a hook I can put in somewhere to tell it not to load ProDrafts at all, or not check the permissions? Or is there some way to manually uninstall it from the file system?
      Thanks!
      Margaret