MadeMyDay

Module: PageTableExtended

140 posts in this topic

PageTableExtended

 

Download here: http://modules.processwire.com/modules/fieldtype-page-table-extended/

 

Extends the Processwire PageTable field for rendering table row layouts. This is great for editors, because they actually see at a glance what the table rows consist of.

What it does

 

Turns the Processwire Fieldtype "Page Table" from this:

git1.jpg

 

into something like this (sorting capabilities of course still functional):

 

git2.jpg

See it in action:

Requirements

  • FieldtypePageTable installed (part of the core since Processwire 2.4.10.)
  • Templates used for PageTable need a file associated (otherwise nothing gets rendered)
  • This render method is meant for sites where the PageTable templates only render part of the layout, not complete websites. But you also can define what will be rendered (see below).

Options

git3.jpg

Render Layout instead of table rows

Check this for seeing the rows rendered. You can easily turn off the complete functionality by unchecking this.

Path to Stylesheet

Since the parts are unstyled by default, it is a good idea to define styles for them. All rendered templates are encapsulated in a div with the class "renderedLayout" so you can style them with:

div.renderedLayout h2{
color: green;
}

The path is to be set relative to your templates' folder.

Reset Admin CSS

Since the parts are rendered inside the Admin, common styles of the Admin Interface apply also to your layout parts. This is not a bad thing, because especially text styles are well integrated in your admin's theme. But if you like to override the admin styles in your table rows completely (more or less), just check this box. Don't forget to define a custom CSS then!

Advanced

 

Since this module is meant for parts of your layout you already have defined for your frontend templates, it is a good idea to use a preprocessor like Stylus, Sass or Less for building the custom CSS file. Just outsource your layout part definitions in an extra file, compile that in a separete CSS file and use this as custom CSS for this module. Since your CSS is should be built in a modular way, this works pretty well ;-) Will write a tutorial with a use case once finished testing.

 

Notes:

 

Github: https://github.com/MadeMyDay/PageTableExtended

 

If you want to get rid of the unnecessary step for entering a title before editing the page, just set the "autoformat" value as suggested in the PageTable settings. If you don't want to use a title field at all, see this post from Soma

 

Will put it in the module repository once finished testing. Please test it and give feedback. I haven't used GitHub for a long time, please check if everything is in place and if this will work with the modules manager and the new core module installer once added to the repository. Have fun :)

 

Module is in the repository now: http://modules.processwire.com/modules/fieldtype-page-table-extended/

 

Please use GitHub for instructions, I made some additions there.

33 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Awesome! - only one suggestion - it would be great to have text fields editable inline, with ajax save - might be beyond the scope of what you want, but I think it would be cool :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Awesome! - only one suggestion - it would be great to have text fields editable inline, with ajax save - might be beyond the scope of what you want, but I think it would be cool :)

I am a bit ambivalent regarding such a feature. Of course it would be nice, but also would add a lot of overhead to this specific module. If there would be an existing solution for that (for the frontend), it would be easy to integrate it as well in this module (including necessary js and css files should be enough), because the layouts are rendered as in the frontend.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess I am mixing purposes a bit here - your goal was to style the output exactly as it will appear on the frontend, but I guess I am looking more for replicating the ease of editing that repeaters have. Maybe I'll make a different extension for PageTable that works more that way. Maybe not worry about the ajax saving and just use the page save to save each of PageTable components. I'll mull over it for a bit.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I totally agree. I was waiting for a configurable repeater (with different templates to choose from) for ages. Now PageTable has this feature, so I went with this ;) But hey, never say never. Question is... When do you want to save the changes? Autosave? No good idea as long there are no draft versions. So this is getting complicated. Either you provide a save button on each row (easy to implement, but hard to understand for editors) or you save the entries on page save (easier to understand but harder to implement). You then would have to monitor the changed fields, look for their page, save the fields on each page... well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Marc, you know - I don't have any experience with PageTable field.

I've installed the module and added the templates. Everything works fine for me. The Elements are there, I can add content und frontend shows everything.

In your folder are two Modules.

PageTable Renderer (Renders PageTable entries in admin) and PageTable render (Adds render functionality for PageTable fields). First one is installed. The second one requires InputFieldPageTable which I can't find. I thing thats the reason, why I have no settings.

The rendering doesn't work for me yet and I've a little understanding problem, how I got this working for me…

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@yesjoar

You need to install the dev version of 2.4 instead of the stable one. PageTable is a new Fieldtype which is only available with the dev version.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@yesjoar

You need to install the dev version of 2.4 instead of the stable one. PageTable is a new Fieldtype which is only available with the dev version.

I have the latest dev version. PageTable is installed and everything works fine for me. Like I said. ;)

But the rendering in the page itselfs doesn't work for me. Also I can't install the second rendering module.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you installed the new fieldtype FieldtypePageTableExtended? And then created/changed the field with "PageTableExtended" ? It's a new field.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Yesjoar,

PageTable Renderer (Renders PageTable entries in admin) and PageTable render (Adds render functionality for PageTable fields). First one is installed. The second one requires InputFieldPageTable which I can't find. I thing thats the reason, why I have no settings.

Okay, I pushed an update to GitHub. The dependencies of the modules were not clear and the titles misleading. Please try to override the modules with the new ones.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

nice module/feature!

i use PageTable for the same kind of modular content building.

how do you render your PageTable templates in the frontend?

thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Tobaco,
 
my setup is always the same. Doesn't matter if I use PageTable or not. Here it goes (simplified):
 
/templates
- basic-page.php
- home.php
- /tpl 
   - main.php
   - mainnav.php
   - subnav.php
   - footer.php
 
 
The tpl/main.php is the overall template like:
 
<?php
include('tpl/mainnav.php');
include('tpl/subnav.php');
include('tpl/slider.php');
?>
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html class="no-js">
    <head>
        <meta charset="utf-8">
        <meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=edge,chrome=1">
        <title><?= $page->title ?></title>
        <!--- styles and scripts -->
    </head>
    <body class='<?= $bodyclass ?>'>
        <header>
            <div class='wrap'>
                <a href="/"><img src='/site/templates/img/logo.png' class='logo' alt="Logo"></a>
                <nav class='main'>
                    <?= $mainnav ?>
                </nav>
            </div>
        </header>
        <?= $slider ?>
        <?= $subnav ?>
<section class="content">
            <div class="wrap group">
                <h1 class='v2 hide'><span><?= $page->title ?></span></h1>
                <?= $content ?>
            </div>
        </section>
        <footer>
            <div class="group">
                <?php include ('tpl/footer.php'); ?>
            </div>
        </footer> 
        <script src="/site/templates/dist/all.min.js"></script>
    </body>
</html>

basic-page template looks like this (every template renders the content and then includes the main template):

<?php
/**
 * basic page template
 *
 */
$bodyclass='inner';

$content = $page->body;

include('tpl/main.php');
 
With PageTable the structure looks like this:
 
/templates
- basic-page.php
- home.php
- part_text.php
- part_columns.php
- part_gallery.php
- /tpl 
   - main.php
   - mainnav.php
   - subnav.php
   - footer.php

The part_* templates are templates only for PageTable. part_columns.php could look like this:

<?php
$headline1 = "";
$headline2 = "";
if(!$page->checkbox1) $headline1 = "<h2>{$page->title}</h2>";
if(!$page->checkbox2) $headline2 = "<h2>{$page->text1}</h2>";

// Output

echo "
<div class='pageTableSection {$page->template->name}'>
    <div class='inner'>
        <div class='col one-half'>
                {$headline1}
                {$page->body}
         </div>
        <div class='col one-half'>
            {$headline2}
            {$page->textarea1}
        </div>
    </div>
</div>

";

And the basic page template gets enhanced by ("layout" being the PageTableExtend field):

<?php 

/**
 * basic page template
 * including PageTable layout parts
 */
$bodyclass='inner';

$content = "{$page->body}";

if(count($page->layout)>0){
     foreach($page->layout as $l){
         $content .= $l->render();
     }
}

include('tpl/main.php');
 
That way, the layout parts are easily renderable in the Admin with PageTableExtended.
 
While writing this, I want to point to another feature of the module. If rendered by PageTableExtended, the template gets an option 'pageTableExtended' which you can use in your part template:
 
// Output

echo "
<div class='pageTableSection {$page->template->name}'>
    <div class='inner'>
        <div class='col one-half'>
                {$headline1}
                {$page->body}
         </div>
        <div class='col one-half'>
            {$headline2}
            {$page->textarea1}
        </div>
    </div>
</div>

";

if(!$options['pageTableExtended']){ 
    // we are not in the Admin, so we include our social media buttons which we only need in our frontend
    include('social/socialmediabuttons.php);
}

Hope that helps.

12 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Since your CSS should be built in a modular way, this works pretty well ;-)

Ha! that *wink* should be bigger. :P

BTW, this is so awesome!

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Awesome stuff! This is one of the features i was always missing in pw. Great Job MadeMyDay.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hadn't actually realised you could specify more than one template for a PageTable field! Did that get snuck in after one of the early versions or am I just blind in general? :)

It actually makes an "article" system a lot easier to build where an editing user might want to dump in some text, then an image, then some more text exactly as you have, but with your module it's one step better as it's pretty much WYSIWIG.

Inline edits would be nice as folks have said, but this is still really, really useful!

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I hadn't actually realised you could specify more than one template for a PageTable field! Did that get snuck in after one of the early versions or am I just blind in general?
 
Wasn't there from the beginning. But as owzim posted this: https://processwire.com/talk/topic/4189-flexibility-in-page-design/page-4#entry63924 I knew, this is the key to my always wanted flexible layout parts :)
 
It actually makes an "article" system a lot easier to build where an editing user might want to dump in some text, then an image, then some more text exactly as you have, but with your module it's one step better as it's pretty much WYSIWIG.
 
exactly.
 
Inline edits would be nice as folks have said, but this is still really, really useful!
 

Of course they would be. But as I said: If there would be a solution for the frontend, it could easily be applied to this module. I think developing a solution only for this module would be out of scope.

Will try to include Apeisa's Fredi. If that works without hazzle, any inline solution should work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So behind the times :(

@MadeMyDay - just submitted a pull request to fix some freaky things I was experiencing either due to a template delegation situation or some freaky admin code I've done but I think it could affect certain people in certain scenarios so best to be safe.

And because I'm nice I made sure it was all still compatible with your instructions afterwards ;)

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By zlitrox
      Hi!
      I'm relatively new to the world of Processwire, but so far I'm really impressed by this CMS and its ease, power and speed.
      I've been looking at the different field types and also existing CKEditor modules (pwimage and pwlink).
      Here's what i want to achieve:
      I would like to use or create a own module which allows my admin users to upload pdf files inline in a CKEditor field (page content) the same way images are handled. It should be possible to upload a pdf file and specify its name and from the file uploaded and name i want to show an icon or image inline in editor and the output for that upload should be customized based on the module. Lets make it simple and say that i upload datasheet-1.pdf and want it to be named "My product datasheet", i want the output to be:
      <a href="{ link to uploaded pdf file }">My product datasheet</a>  
      Also the uploaded pdf files should be related to the page the user is editing.
       
      Is this doable? 
       
      Any guidance would be greatly appreciated! Thanks in advance.
      PS. I'm a PHP programmer so i know it would require some custom code, but the real question is where do i start, what should it take and is it even possible to do?
    • By flydev
      Auth2Login for ProcessWire
      A Module which give you ability to login an existing user using your favorite thrid-party OAuth2 provider (i.e. Facebook, GitHub, Google, LinkedIn, etc.)..
      You can login from the backend to the backend directly or render a form on the frontend and redirect the user to a choosen page.
      Built on top of ThePhpLeague OAuth2-Client lib.
      Registration is not handled by this module but planned.
       
      Howto Install
      Install the module following this procedure:
       - http://modules.processwire.com/modules/oauth2-login/
       - https://github.com/flydev-fr/OAuth2Login
      Next step, in order to use a provider, you need to use Composer to install each provider
      ie: to install Google, open a terminal, go to your root directory of pw and type the following command-line: composer require league/oauth2-google
      Tested providers/packages :
          Google :  league/oauth2-google     Facebook: league/oauth2-facebook     Github: league/oauth2-github     LinkedIn: league/oauth2-linkedin
      More third-party providers are available there. You should be able to add a provider by simply adding it to the JSON config file.

      Howto Use It
      First (and for testing purpose), you should create a new user in ProcessWire that reflect your real OAuth2 account information. The important informations are, Last Name, First Name and Email. The module will compare existing users by firstname, lastname and email; If the user match the informations, then he is logged in.
      ie, if my Google fullname is John Wick, then in ProcessWire, I create a new user  Wick-John  with email  johnwick@mydomain.com
      Next step, go to your favorite provider and create an app in order to get the ClientId and ClientSecret keys. Ask on the forum if you have difficulties getting there.
      Once you got the keys for a provider, just paste it into the module settings and save it. One or more button should appear bellow the standard login form.
      The final step is to make your JSON configuration file.
      In this sample, the JSON config include all tested providers, you can of course edit it to suit your needs :
      { "providers": { "google": { "className": "Google", "packageName": "league/oauth2-google", "helpUrl": "https://console.developers.google.com/apis/credentials" }, "facebook": { "className": "Facebook", "packageName": "league/oauth2-facebook", "helpUrl": "https://developers.facebook.com/apps/", "options": { "graphApiVersion": "v2.10", "scope": "email" } }, "github": { "className": "Github", "packageName": "league/oauth2-github", "helpUrl": "https://github.com/settings/developers", "options": { "scope": "user:email" } }, "linkedin": { "className": "LinkedIn", "packageName": "league/oauth2-linkedin", "helpUrl": "https://www.linkedin.com/secure/developer" } } }  
      Backend Usage
      In ready.php, call the module :
      if($page->template == 'admin') { $oauth2mod = $modules->get('Oauth2Login'); if($oauth2mod) $oauth2mod->hookBackend(); }  
      Frontend Usage
      Small note: At this moment the render method is pretty simple. It output a InputfieldForm with InputfieldSubmit(s) into wrapped in a ul:li tag. Feedbacks and ideas welcome!
      For the following example, I created a page login and a template login which contain the following code :
      <?php namespace ProcessWire; if(!$user->isLoggedin()) { $options = array( 'buttonClass' => 'my_button_class', 'buttonValue' => 'Login with {provider}', // {{provider}} keyword 'prependMarkup' => '<div class="wrapper">', 'appendMarkup' => '</div>' ); $redirectUri = str_lreplace('//', '/', $config->urls->httpRoot . $page->url); $content = $modules->get('Oauth2Login')->config( array( 'redirect_uri' => $redirectUri, 'success_uri' => $page->url ) )->render($options); }

       
      Screenshot
       



    • By Robin S
      First a note about my other modules...
      I have three existing modules that are similar in that they allow restrictions to be placed on repeating inputfields: Limit Repeater, Limit PageTable, Limit Table
      Restrict Repeater Matrix takes a different approach to the module configuration from those other modules. The module settings for Restrict Repeater Matrix are applied in the field settings rather in a module config screen. I think this new approach is better, but it means that it isn't practical to create different settings for different roles via the admin interface. Instead the module has a hookable method, allowing roles to be targeted and other advanced usages to be achieved via a hook. The result is that the module is more flexible.
      I intend to transition my other modules to the same approach over the coming weeks, but because this will result in breaking changes I will be releasing the updated modules under new names ("Restrict Repeater", etc) to avoid users upgrading via the Upgrades module without full awareness of the changes. The old modules will be marked as deprecated.
       
      Restrict Repeater Matrix
      A module for ProcessWire CMS/CMF. Allows restrictions and limits to be placed on Repeater Matrix fields. Requires FieldtypeRepeaterMatrix >= v0.0.4
      For any matrix type in a Repeater Matrix field you have the option to:
      Prevent drag-sorting of items Prevent cloning of items Prevent toggling of the published state of items Prevent trashing of items Limit the number of items that may be added to the inputfield Please note that restrictions and limits are applied with CSS/JS so should not be considered tamper-proof.
      Usage
      Install the Restrict Repeater Matrix module.
      For each matrix type created in the Repeater Matrix field settings, a "Restrictions" fieldset is added at the bottom of the matrix type settings:

      For newly added matrix types, the settings must be saved first in order for the Restrictions fieldset to appear. Set restrictions for each matrix type as needed. A limit of zero means that no items of that matrix type may be added to the inputfield.
      Setting restrictions via a hook
      Besides setting restrictions in the field settings, you can also apply or modify restrictions by hooking RestrictRepeaterMatrix::checkRestrictions. This allows for more focused restrictions, for example, applying restrictions depending on the template of the page being edited or depending on the role of the user.
      The checkRestrictions() method receives the following arguments:
      $field This Repeater Matrix field $inputfield This Repeater Matrix inputfield $matrix_types An array of matrix types for this field. Each key is the matrix type name and the value is the matrix type integer. $page The page that is open in ProcessPageEdit The method returns a multi-dimensional array of matrix types and restrictions for each of those types. An example of a returned array:

      Example hooks
      Prevent the matrix type "images_block" from being added to "my_matrix_field" in a page with the "basic-page" template:
      $wire->addHookAfter('RestrictRepeaterMatrix::checkRestrictions', function(HookEvent $event) { $field = $event->arguments('field'); $page = $event->arguments('page'); $type_restrictions = $event->return; if($field->name === 'my_matrix_field' && $page->template->name === 'basic-page') { $type_restrictions['images_block']['limit'] = 0; } $event->return = $type_restrictions; });  
      Prevent non-superusers from trashing any Repeater Matrix items in "my_matrix_field":
      $wire->addHookAfter('RestrictRepeaterMatrix::checkRestrictions', function(HookEvent $event) { $field = $event->arguments('field'); $type_restrictions = $event->return; if($field->name === 'my_matrix_field' && !$this->user->isSuperuser()) { foreach($type_restrictions as $key => $value) { $type_restrictions[$key]['notrash'] = true; } } $event->return = $type_restrictions; });  
      http://modules.processwire.com/modules/restrict-repeater-matrix/
      https://github.com/Toutouwai/RestrictRepeaterMatrix
    • By psy
      ProcessWire DropboxAPI on GitHub: https://github.com/clipmagic/DropboxAPI
       
      This module is a wrapper for Kunal Varma's Dropbox PHP SDK https://github.com/kunalvarma05/dropbox-php-sdk
      It was created to perform a specific function for a client, ie upload PDF files on a PW website to a specific Dropbox account folder.
      The PDF files, created using @Wanze's excellent PagesToPdf module using the WirePDF functions, are generated from Formbuilder forms completed by front-end site visitors.  Works a treat!
      There's more that could be done to allow ProcessWire to take advantage of all the features of the SDK, eg downloads, multiple Dropbox accounts, etc. You are welcome to request changes and/or fork the GitHub project to extend the feature set.
      Enjoy!
      System requirements
      PHP 5.6.4 or greater Composer The PHP mbstring extension General information
      This module enables you to access a single Dropbox (www.dropbox.com) account to upload files from a ProcessWire website.
      All kudos to (https://github.com/kunalvarma05/dropbox-php-sdk) for the PHP API.
      First steps
      Visit (https://www.dropbox.com/developers) and read the documentation. Log into Dropbox and create a new application. It's recommended to limit ProcessWire App access to a specified folder Make a note of the App key, the App secret and the name of the Dropbox folder Installation
      Download the zip file into your site/modules folder then expand the zip file. Next, login to ProcessWire > go to Modules > click "Refresh". You should see a note that a new module was found. Install the DropboxAPI module. Configure the module with your App key, App secret and your Call Back URL You need to generate a Dropbox access token to enable your site to communicate with the nominated Dropbox account. Dropbox will generate a token for you or you can create a page for the front end of your ProcessWire site with a template to submit the token request to Dropbox, eg:
      <?php namespace ProcessWire; $drop = $modules->get('ProcessDropboxAPI'); if ($input->get->code && $input->get->state) { $code = $sanitizer->text($input->get->code); $state = $sanitizer->text($input->get->state); //Fetch the AccessToken $accessToken = $drop->getAccessToken($code, $state); echo "Copy/paste this code into the module configuration: " . $accessToken; } else { echo "<p><a href='" . $drop->getAuthURL() . "'>Log in with Dropbox</a></p>"; } ?> Once you have entered the token in the module configuration, you can unpublish this page.
      Usage
      Read the dropbox-php-sdk documentation!
      An example template for sending a file to a Dropbox App folder from ProcessWire:
      <?php namespace ProcessWire; use Kunnu\Dropbox\Dropbox; use Kunnu\Dropbox\DropboxApp; use Kunnu\Dropbox\DropboxFile; // send pdf to Dropbox $drop = $modules->get('DropboxAPI'); $app = new DropboxApp($drop->app_key, $drop->app_secret, $drop->authorization_code); if ($app) { //Configure Dropbox service $dropbox = new Dropbox($app); $dropboxFile = new DropboxFile('/path/to/myfilename.pdf'); $file = $dropbox->upload($dropboxFile, "/myfilename.pdf", ['autorename' => true]); //Uploaded File meta data if ($file) { $success = $file->getName() . " uploaded to Dropbox"; $drop->log($success); } }  
       
    • By Sipho
      I recently needed a module that automatically fills the title field of a page using fields on that page. I couldn't see one that already existed so I made my own. This is mostly based on ProcessSetupPageName by @kixe which I use along with this module. Keep in mind I am very new to ProcessWire so perhaps somebody else can contribute or make a better one 
      Note: The title is automatically hidden when using this module
      You can enter any string. To add a fieldname, subfield or property, you surround the fieldname with {}. Dot syntax allowed. Example:
      Fish: {parent.title} {myfield}
      https://github.com/nextgensparx/AutoPageTitles