Jump to content
Wanze

Module: TemplateEngineFactory

Recommended Posts

Nevermind.  Rookie mistake.  I just needed to check if the post.template == "calendar-posting" before trying to access post.event_description.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Exception: An exception has been thrown during the rendering of a template ("Method Page::event_description does not exist or is not callable in this context") in "search.twig" at line 50. (in /Users/glenn/websites/mysite/wwwroot/site/assets/cache/FileCompiler/site/modules/TemplateEngineTwig/TemplateEngineTwig.module line 110)

@gmclelland

Twig sometimes has problems when you try to access a property via magic getter. I consistently use $page->get('my_field') to avoid this issue. So in your example, you could use {{ post.get('event_description') }}.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks @Wanze, I haven't ran into any issues so far, but that's good to know.  The only thing I'm currently stuck on right now is trying to figure out how to get the TwigExtensions module to work with the latest versions of TemplateEngineTwig.  It was working previously before TemplateEngineTwig 1.1.0.  Any help testing is appreciated.

Are you using TwigExtensions library at all in your projects?  If not, don't you need the date functions and text truncating functions?

After I get my sites upgraded to the latest version of TemplateEngineFactory and TemplateEngineTwig, I can start checking into a possible bug I think I see with the new changes to handle Wire404Exception.

Side note:  I really appreciate the work you've done on this module.  To me it is so much cleaner looking at Twig code than looking at a php mixed with html.   I like that in Processwire, I can simply build up my variables in the template to be sent to the view.  That way my views(Twig files) are very simple and contain simple logic only.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi @Sipho

Sorry I missed your post. I don't know/use markup regions myself, so it's hard for me to help. Does your code work if you disable the TemplateEngineFactory module? If it works, then somehow markup regions are not respected when your ProcessWire templates are getting rendered by this module. I try to look into this at the end of this week.

Cheers

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Wanze It does work when I disable TemplateEngineFactory (and move my home.php file back into templates/).

I don't really know how ProcessWire renders templates under the hood but it could be that it only renders markup regions of files under templates/.

I would greatly appreciate it if you could take a look at it. You can take a look at this tutorial to get started using markup regions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi @Wanze

I don't know if it's possible in the current state of the module to disable "Global File Template" for a given template file.

I needed this feature in order to work with a REST API endpoint. The problem is when I try to get JSON data from http://my.sites.sek/api, the markup of the global template file is sent.

 

I forked your module and added an option to ignore the global template file on given template. If it make sense, I can send a pull request.

 

gft.png.0cee3346e719a4379fd2ff9d5db5f4e6.png

 

 

tef.thumb.gif.c676ea77fbb91688138eae7a995315af.gif

 

 

Edited by flydev
screencast

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi @Sipho

MarkupRegions is currently only processed during Page::render(). TemplateEngineProcessWire uses TemplateFile::render() to return the markup, where MarkupRegions are not recognized/populated.

Here are the relevant lines: https://github.com/processwire/processwire/blob/master/wire/modules/PageRender.module#L521-L526

It should be possible to integrate this logic into TemplateFile::render via hooks. Unfortunately I do not have much time for ProcessWire these days 😕
I'm happy to accept a pull request though :)

Cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello @Wanse and all of you,

This plugin is a must, thank you Wanse.

For 2 days I have been searching, I guess I have a pattern problem with my twig templates.

  1. My global template is base.twig
  2. Inside I have {% block home %}{% endblock %} and several includes parts.
  3. Nothing from this block is displayed. It works only if I keep my global template file field empty.
  4. In my home.twig I have
{% extends 'base.twig' %}
{% block home %}
<div id="corps"> <div id="titres">
<div id="titre">{{ page.title }}</div>
</div>
 <div class="hr"></div>
<br>
{% block engagement %}{% endblock %}
{% endblock %}

What do you think ?

In my base.twix I have all my html code...

Thank you

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello @Sten So what exactly is the problem? Don't you get any output? What happens? What is you path to templates in the config of the module? I have /templates/views and with my twig files in this directory everything works fine. Did you choose twig as the template files suffix?
Your code and extend seem to be correct.
The global template file field has to be empty so you can work with extends like you do

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Sten

Your twig templates look fine, the problem is the global template file setting. Just leave that config empty. This is a "global setting" of the TemplateEngineFactory which is supported by all engines, but actually makes no sense in Twig and generally in engines supporting template inheritance. It was introduced by a feature request, but now I think it's more confusing than useful.

Cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Jmartsch and Wanze,

It is great to be assisted, thank you 😊. I changed my config to have the global file field empty. So I put all my *.twig files in the views directory. I created partials directory for parts included in base.twig.
So I keep home.twig and engagement.twig in views.

in home.twig I have
 

{% block home %}
<div id="corps"> <div id="titres">
<div id="titre">{{ page.title }}</div>
</div>
 <div class="hr"></div>
<br>
{% block engagement %}{% endblock %}
{% endblock %}

In engagement.twig, I have
 

{% extends 'home.twig' %}
{% block engagement %}
<p>His cognitis Gallus ut serpens adpetitus telo vel saxo iamque spes extremas opperiens et succurrens saluti suae quavis ratione colligi omnes iussit armatos et cum starent attoniti, districta dentium acie stridens adeste inquit viri fortes mihi periclitanti vobiscum.</p>
<p>Mensarum enim voragines et varias voluptatum inlecebras, ne longius progrediar, praetermitto illuc transiturus quod quidam per ampla spatia urbis subversasque silices sine periculi metu properantes equos velut publicos signatis quod dicitur calceis agitant, familiarium agmina tamquam praedatorios globos post terga trahentes ne Sannione quidem, ut ait comicus, domi relicto. quos imitatae matronae complures opertis capitibus et basternis per latera civitatis cuncta discurrunt.</p>
{% endblock %}

But still engagement block is not displayed.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Sten In home.twig, the block engagement block is nested inside the home block. In engagement.twig, this is not the case. Does it work if you either move it out of the home block in your parent template; or recreate the nested block structure in engagement.twig.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes Thank you Wanse. Yes it works. Well I will use this way.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

I'm trying out TemplateEnginePug, and I get a blank page. I have a empty home.php and a views/home.pug. This one has a very basic paragraph. Still I get a blank page, without any error. Same with TemplateEngineJade. Can't manage to see a byte on screen no matter what.

Tested other template languages (twig, processwire, latte), and it works fine. Config debug is `true`.

Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey @Manaus 

I updated the Pug Engine to work with the latest version, it should work now again, please try!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi folks!

I just released a new major (2.x) version of the module. Important things first: This version includes backwards compatibility breaks. At the moment, only Twig and the bundled ProcessWire engine work with the 2.0 version. I will now contact maintainers that implemented other engines (Pug, Jade etc.) and ask them to release a 2.x version as well. The 1.x version of the module is still available on the 1.x branch and continues to exist.

So why a version 2.x? Basically it's the same concept, but done in the right way. 😉

  • The rendering via template engine is now integrated correctly into Page::render(). You can call the render() method on any page, and the module will render it via template engine. In version 1.x, this is only true for the current page.
  • Automatic page rendering is now optional, you can use the module to only integrate a template engine, without hooking into Page::render at all.
  • There are settings to enable/disable the automatic page rendering for templates. Because there might be templates where Page::render should not be replaced.
  • The module provides hooks to customize it for your needs.
  • I wrote a bunch of unit tests and use Travis for CI. Problems like "the 404 page is not displayed if a Wire404Exception is thrown in a controller" are now tested properly.

I am writing a documentation on everything, you can read it here: https://github.com/wanze/TemplateEngineFactory/blob/master/DOCUMENTATION.md

One important part is how to update from 1.x to 2.x. Depending on the feature usage of the module, this might involve some manual update steps, because the public API changed. If you try to update, please let me know about any issues you are encountering, so that we can add them to the documentation. Don't worry, you do not have to update, as the 1.x version continues to exist. For a new project, definitely start with 2.x!

Last but not least, modules providing template engines must be updated too, but this should be quite easy. For Twig, I decided to support installations only via Composer, and I think that this should be the way to go for the other modules. 3rd party dependencies must be manageable in a reliable way, and Composer is the right tool for this job.

Cheers

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, tiefenbacher_bluetomato said:

Nice! will you upgrade TemplateEngineSmarty also soon?

Actually I wanted to ask you if you would like to develop the 2.x version of TemplateEngineSmarty, and if you like, maintain the project? The implementation itself is really easy, you can basically copy + past from Twig and tweak/change things for Smarty. I only use Twig these days, so I might miss some useful/important stuff for Smarty. What do you think? 😄

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, Wanze said:

Actually I wanted to ask you if you would like to develop the 2.x version of TemplateEngineSmarty, and if you like, maintain the project? The implementation itself is really easy, you can basically copy + past from Twig and tweak/change things for Smarty. I only use Twig these days, so I might miss some useful/important stuff for Smarty. What do you think? 😄

Sure we can do that 🙂 Do you want to transfer the repo to our account: https://github.com/blue-tomato ?

You can write me also via email for the details: markus.tiefenbacher {at} blue-tomato.com

Edited by tiefenbacher_bluetomato

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't use this module if select any parser (smarty or twig)
Fatal Error: Uncaught Error: Class 'Twig_Loader_Filesystem' not found

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By MoritzLost
      This is a new module that provides a simple solution to clearing all your cache layers at once, and an extensible interface to perform various cache-related actions.
      The simple motivation behind this module was that I was tired of manually clearing caches in several places after deploying a change on a live site. The basic purpose of this module is a simple Clear all caches link in the Setup menu which clears out all caches, no matter where they hide. You can customize what exactly the module does through it's configuration menu:
      Expire or delete all cache entries in the database, or selectively clear caches by namespace ($cache API) Clear the the template render cache. Clear out specific folders inside your site's cache directory (/site/assets/cache) Refresh version strings for static assets to bust client-side browser caches (this requires some setup, see the full documentation for details). This is the basic function of the module. However, you can also add different cache management action through the API and execute them through the module's interface. For this advanced usage, the module provides:
      An interface to see all available cache actions and execute them. A system log and logging output on the module page to see verify what the module is doing. A CacheControlTools class with utility functions to clear out different caches. An API to add cache actions, execute them programmatically and even modify the default action. Permission management, allowing you granular control over which user roles can execute which actions. The complete documentation can be found in the module's README.
      Beta release
      Note that I consider this a Beta release. Since the module is relatively aggressive in deleting some caches, I would advise you to install in on a test environment before using it on a live site.
      Let me know if you're getting any errors, have trouble using the module or if you have suggestions for improvement!
      In particular, can someone let me know if this module causes any problems with the ProCache module? I don't own or use it, so I can't check. As far as I can tell, ProCache uses a folder inside the cache directory to cache static pages, so my module should be able to clear the ProCache site cache as well, I'd appreciate it if someone can test that for me.
      Future plans
      If there is some interest in this, I plan to expand this to a more general cache management solution. I particular, I would like to add additional cache actions. Some ideas that came to mind:
      Warming up the template render cache for publicly accessible pages. Removing all active user sessions. Let me know if you have more suggestions!
      Links
      https://github.com/MoritzLost/ProcessCacheControl ProcessCacheControl in the Module directory

    • By joshua
      This module is (yet another) way for implementing a cookie management solution.
      Of course there are several other possibilities:
      - https://processwire.com/talk/topic/22920-klaro-cookie-consent-manager/
      - https://github.com/webmanufaktur/CookieManagementBanner
      - https://github.com/johannesdachsel/cookiemonster
      - https://www.oiljs.org/
      - ... and so on ...
      In this module you can configure which kind of cookie categories you want to manage:

      You can also enable the support for respecting the Do-Not-Track (DNT) header to don't annoy users, who already decided for all their browsing experience.
      Currently there are four possible cookie groups:
      - Necessary (always enabled)
      - Statistics
      - Marketing
      - External Media
      All groups can be renamed, so feel free to use other cookie group names. I just haven't found a way to implement a "repeater like" field as configurable module field ...
      When you want to load specific scripts ( like Google Analytics, Google Maps, ...) only after the user's content to this specific category of cookies, just use the following script syntax:
      <script type="optin" data-type="text/javascript" data-category="statistics" data-src="/path/to/your/statistic/script.js"></script> <script type="optin" data-type="text/javascript" data-category="marketing" data-src="/path/to/your/mareketing/script.js"></script> <script type="optin" data-type="text/javascript" data-category="external_media" data-src="/path/to/your/external-media/script.js"></script> <script type="optin" data-type="text/javascript" data-category="marketing">console.log("Inline scripts are also working!");</script> The type has to be "optin" to get recognized by PrivacyWire, the data-attributes are giving hints, how the script shall be loaded, if the data-category is within the cookie consents of the user. These scripts are loaded asynchronously after the user made the decision.
      If you want to give the users the possibility to change their consent, you can use the following Textformatter:
      [[privacywire-choose-cookies]] It's planned to add also other Textformatters to opt-out of specific cookie groups or delete the whole consent cookie.
      You can also add a custom link to output the banner again with a link / button with following class:
      <a href="#" class="privacywire-show-options">Show Cookie Options</a> <button class="privacywire-show-options">Show Cookie Options</button> This module is still in development, but we already use it on several production websites.
      You find it here: https://github.com/blaueQuelle/privacywire/tree/master
      Download: https://github.com/blaueQuelle/privacywire/archive/master.zip
      I would love to hear your feedback 🙂
      Edit: Updated URLs to master tree of git repo
       
    • By David Karich
      Admin Page Tree Multiple Sorting
      ClassName: ProcessPageListMultipleSorting
      Extend the ordinary sort of children of a template in the admin page tree with multiple properties. For each template, you can define your own rule. Write each template (template-name) in a row, followed by a colon and then the additional field names for sorting.
      Example: All children of the template "blog" to be sorted in descending order according to the date of creation, then descending by modification date, and then by title. Type:
      blog: -created, -modified, title  Installation
      Copy the files for this module to /site/modules/ProcessPageListMultipleSorting/ In admin: Modules > Check for new modules. Install Module "Admin Page Tree Multible Sorting". Alternative in ProcessWire 2.4+
      Login to ProcessWire backend and go to Modules Click tab "New" and enter Module Class Name: "ProcessPageListMultipleSorting" Click "Download and Install"   Compatibility   I have currently tested the module only under PW 2.6+, but think that it works on older versions too. Maybe someone can give a feedback.     Download   PW-Repo: http://modules.processwire.com/modules/process-page-list-multiple-sorting/ GitHub: https://github.com/FlipZoomMedia/Processwire-ProcessPageListMultipleSorting     I hope someone can use the module. Have fun and best regards, David
    • By dimitrios
      Hello,
      this module can publish content of a Processwire page on a Facebook page, triggered by saving the Processwire page.
      To set it up, configure the module with a Facebook app ID, secret and a Page ID. Following is additional configuration on Facebook for developers:
      Minimum Required Facebook App configuration:
      on Settings -> Basics, provide the App Domains, provide the Site URL, on Settings -> Advanced, set the API version (has been tested up to v3.3), add Product: Facebook Login, on Facebook Login -> Settings, set Client OAuth Login: Yes, set Web OAuth Login: Yes, set Enforce HTTPS: Yes, add "https://www.example.com/processwire/page/" to field Valid OAuth Redirect URIs. This module is configurable as follows:
      Templates: posts can take place only for pages with the defined templates. On/Off switch: specify a checkbox field that will not allow the post if checked. Specify a message and/or an image for the post.
      Usage
      edit the desired PW page and save; it will post right after the initial Facebook log in and permission granting. After that, an access token is kept.
       
      Download
      PW module directory: http://modules.processwire.com/modules/auto-fb-post/ Github: https://github.com/kastrind/AutoFbPost   Note: Facebook SDK for PHP is utilized.


×
×
  • Create New...