Ivan Gretsky

Thanks for the reply. Reading it I am happy I got the way it works right. But I need to automatically install the modules not available via url and not already installed. My use case is the initial system setup. I need some paid modules installed and do not want to do it manually, but rather in an after install script (install profile). I am thinking to have the Pro modules installation packages downloaded as zipped files and put in the web root folder or above (along with some other stuff I need during the install). I then I would install them from there with installModule(). The show-stopper is that I can't do it as there is no option to get module not from the url, but from the local path... Ok. now I just realized that I can just extract those zips to site/modules and just run installModule() without the url param, right?

Good day! Is there a way to install modules that are not accessible via direct link like Pro modules and other commercial modules? It could be done by getting a module from a local path. But there seems to be no such option for this method. Am I missing something obvious? Could an install from local path option be (please))) added? Thanks!

@szabesz, I am quite with you as I have been toying with unpoly and htmx a bit, and understand quite well that one should sometimes work hard to achieve with htmx something that comes with unpoly out of the box. I was just saying that AlpineJs has a different purpose (Js sprinkles, jQuery replacement) and is used with either htmx or unpoly.

AFAIK unpoly does not have an analogue to AlpineJs. In fact, unpoly users seem to also adopt AlpineJs for the frontend stuff. It is more a complete (and more opinionated) replacement for htmx though.

@bernhardis so productive I must have missed the RockPageBuilder thing. Can't find it on github. @Stefanowitsch, where did you get it?)) Ahh. Should've read it from the start) It is explained earlier in this thread.

@Jonathan Lahijani, would you mind elaborating on this a bit? How do you manage your frontend without node based build chain? I am very interested as I am moving along a similar path, having ditched gulp. Now I do not even concatenate my js leaving it to http2. The only thing i still compile is scss) How do you do it nowadays?

I am long-time used to writing bem classes. They feel natural to me. But earlier this year I was also looking for more modern alternatives (that could be used without build step). Here is a nice article by Dave Rupert I've found on the topic. Didn't try any of it (yet?) though.

Looks cool! Could you attach full screenshots of admin pages styled this way? Just for fun)

Hi @joer80! AFAIK this feature is still missing due to the way ProcessWire works with files. It has been requested and discussed lot of times thought. Read this whole thread for example. There is a module that claims to help with AWS S3. Haven't tried it myself.

Sounds super cool! The wire shell project was one of the greatest tools in the PW ecosystem. Glad it is reborn! Especially great to hear that there are plans to work on a unified solution with @bernhard's RockShell. A true community spirit! AFAIK RockShell has a lot of Rock*-specific stuff. So maybe need to think about the expandable architecture right away? Would love to test and contribute. P.S. Can't save wire shell in a single word. Is there some smart spell checking and correction going on now and how do I get around it, @Pete)))

They are on github first.

Let me encourage you to create a PR) I promise to work with it.

Congrats to your daughter! And looking forward for the next master.

Had same problem recently. P.S. @horst, it is page 17 of WireMailSmtp support thread. Maybe it is time to split it in Module-Specific Support section?

Super! Need to keep everything in order. A Higher Order of Perfection, nothing less)

Ahh! Reading this in the early morning laying in bed. Almost always start the weekend with PW blog. What I read makes me smile. A great weekend indeed! Thanks!

Those are awesome news for us! We've had a long standing problem with moving ProcessWire installations from one server to another concerning the caches table. It would be great to completely decouple the modules cache from the user generated cache. Maybe move the modules cache to a separate db table. It seems intuitive (and most administrators seem to take this as granted) that you can simply purge the caches table to reduce the database dump size. But it is not like that ATM. Just had this problem yesterday with an experienced ops engineer, who doesn't have any PW experience... so your are magically right on time @ryan, as multiple times before!

I have installed the modified module. But there was no records in session-errors logs file. In fact it has not even been created. And it didn't solve the issue as far as I can tell as the mentioned error didn't go away. With Tracy turned off it appeared less often but still did. I think that long and heavy DB queries do cause this.

Good day, @bernhard, @gebeer and everyone! There was a question about Repeater Matrix support in the old main topic. And @gebeer wrote he had some code that could handle it and he was going to share it with a PR. What is the state of this feature, friends?

Great stuff! Good to stay up to date!

I still use jquery a lot and started to use alpinejs. Tailwind also has js part that could be run with vite. My best wish was to have vite as a standalone executable so it could be run on a prod. Not sure if it is even possible.

Good day, @adrian! Today I am having some large traffic on a project. And there stated to appear a lot of 500 errors like this: Error: Exception: Unable to obtain lock for session (retry in 30s). I have found this thread, turned off Tracy (which was id Development mode, but limited with tracy-debugger permission) and it seemed to help. Could you please explain if that is expected. Do we need to fix Tracy? Or the best practice is to have it off/in PRODUCTION mode on prod? Thanks!

We need to think about pros and cons when choosing. The pro arguments for 1 is that you have all data in a page tree visually related and that you can easily delete all related data deleting the corresponding order branch. As always, these pros are also the cons for the the opposite solution (3). Choosing 3 you can more easily see the lists of payments and fulfillments records. You can delete orders without deleting connected payments and fulfillments records if you need, but you also have to deal with the housekeeping when deleting by yourself. If you build the dedicated UI for all that in admin it might not even matter. As for me, feel inclined to go the 3rd root and do not see any arguments going the 2nd.

Good day @teppo and all the Wireframe fans! I am creating an authorization system to restrict some pages from unauthorized access. It should work like this. At some point in the page rendering process the code should check user auth (not PW native) and either proceed with normal page rendering process or show an authorization form. The auth form should render at the same url as the normal page and should have access to this page's data and custom methods. But it looks completely different and should have custom methods of its own. That's why I want to take the page object and render it with another Wireframe controller/layout/view. This controller should not be connected to any PW template and should have some independent name. How can I do it? Please help! P.S. I have some templates working under Wireframe and some with their own template files. But the authorization system should be based on wireframe and work for both of these. That kind of limits the possible options (like having a common trait in all Wireframe controllers) if I understand it correctly.

Hey, @wbmnfktr! Thanks for taking care of this project. Hope under your governance it will grow and thrive! I spotted some issues with responsive design. You get a horizontal scroll on some pages like this one. Take a look when you got time.