adrian

Admin Actions

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

Here's a new module that I have been meaning to build for a long time.

http://modules.processwire.com/modules/process-admin-actions/

https://github.com/adrianbj/ProcessAdminActions

 

What does it do?

Do you have a bunch of admin snippets laying around, or do you recreate from them from scratch every time you need them, or do you try to find where you saw them in the forums, or on the ProcessWire Recipes site?

Admin Actions lets you quickly create actions in the admin that you can use over and over and even make available to your site editors (permissions for each action are assigned to roles separately so you have full control over who has access to which actions).

 

Included Actions

It comes bundled with a several actions and I will be adding more over time (and hopefully I'll get some PRs from you guys too). You can browse and sort and if you have @tpr's Admin on Steroid's datatables filter feature, you can even filter based on the content of all columns. 

Screen Shot 2016-11-29 at 11.30.44 AM.png

The headliner action included with the module is: PageTable To RepeaterMatrix which fully converts an existing (and populated) PageTable field to either a Repeater or RepeaterMatrix field. This is a huge timesaver if you have an existing site that makes heavy use of PageTable fields and you would like to give the clients the improved interface of RepeaterMatrix.

Copy Content To Other Field
This action copies the content from one field to another field on all pages that use the selected template.

Copy Field Content To Other Page
Copies the content from a field on one page to the same field on another page.

Copy Repeater Items To Other Page
Add the items from a Repeater field on one page to the same field on another page.

Copy Table Field Rows To Other Page
Add the rows from a Table field on one page to the same field on another page.

Create Users Batcher
Allows you to batch create users. This module requires the Email New User module and it should be configured to generate a password automatically.

Delete Unused Fields
Deletes fields that are not used by any templates.

Delete Unused Templates
Deletes templates that are not used by any pages.

Email Batcher
Lets you email multiple addresses at once.

Field Set Or Search And Replace
Set field values, or search and replace text in field values from a filtered selection of pages and fields.

FTP Files to Page
Add files/images from a folder to a selected page.

Page Active Languages Batcher
Lets you enable or disable active status of multiple languages on multiple pages at once.

Page Manipulator
Uses an InputfieldSelector to query pages and then allows batch actions on the matched pages.

Page Table To Repeater Matrix
Fully converts an existing (and populated) PageTable field to either a Repeater or RepeaterMatrix field.

Template Fields Batcher
Lets you add or remove multiple fields from multiple templates at once.

Template Roles Batcher
Lets you add or remove access permissions, for multiple roles and multiple templates at once.

User Roles Permissions Batcher
Lets you add or remove permissions for multiple roles, or roles for multiple users at once.

 

Creating a New Action

If you create a new action that you think others would find useful, please add it to the actions subfolder of this module and submit a PR. If you think it is only useful for you, place it in /site/templates/AdminActions/ so that it doesn't get lost on module updates.

A new action file can be as simple as this:

class UnpublishAboutPage extends ProcessAdminActions {

    protected function executeAction() {
        $p = $this->pages->get('/about/');
        $p->addStatus(Page::statusUnpublished);
        $p->save();
        return true;
    }

}

Each action:

  • class must extend "ProcessAdminActions" and the filename must match the class name and end in ".action.php" like: UnpublishAboutPage.action.php
  • the action method must be: executeAction()

As you can see there are only a few lines needed to wrap the actual API call, so it's really worth the small extra effort to make an action.

Obviously that example action is not very useful. Here is another more useful one that is included with the module. It includes $description, $notes, and $author variables which are used in the module table selector interface. It also makes use of the defineOptions() method which builds the input fields used to gather the required options before running the action.

class DeleteUnusedFields extends ProcessAdminActions {

    protected $description = 'Deletes fields that are not used by any templates.';
    protected $notes = 'Shows a list of unused fields with checkboxes to select those to delete.';
    protected $author = 'Adrian Jones';
    protected $authorLinks = array(
        'pwforum' => '985-adrian',
        'pwdirectory' => 'adrian-jones',
        'github' => 'adrianbj',
    );

    protected function defineOptions() {

        $fieldOptions = array();
        foreach($this->fields as $field) {
            if ($field->flags & Field::flagSystem || $field->flags & Field::flagPermanent) continue;
            if(count($field->getFieldgroups()) === 0) $fieldOptions[$field->id] = $field->label ? $field->label . ' (' . $field->name . ')' : $field->name;
        }

        return array(
            array(
                'name' => 'fields',
                'label' => 'Fields',
                'description' => 'Select the fields you want to delete',
                'notes' => 'Note that all fields listed are not used by any templates and should therefore be safe to delete',
                'type' => 'checkboxes',
                'options' => $fieldOptions,
                'required' => true
            )
        );

    }


    protected function executeAction($options) {

        $count = 0;
        foreach($options['fields'] as $field) {
            $f = $this->fields->get($field);
            $this->fields->delete($f);
            $count++;
        }

        $this->successMessage = $count . ' field' . _n('', 's', $count) . ' ' . _n('was', 'were', $count) . ' successfully deleted';
        return true;

    }

}

 

This defineOptions() method builds input fields that look like this:

Screen Shot 2016-11-29 at 12.32.59 PM.png

Finally we use $options array in the executeAction() method to get the values entered into those options fields to run the API script to remove the checked fields.

There is one additional method that I didn't outline called: checkRequirements() - you can see it in action in the PageTableToRepeaterMatrix action. You can use this to prevent the action from running if certain requirements are not met.

At the end of the executeAction() method you can populate $this->successMessage, or $this->failureMessage which will be returned after the action has finished.

 

Populating options via URL parameters
You can also populate the option parameters via URL parameters. You should split multiple values with a “|” character.

You can either just pre-populate options:

http://mysite.dev/processwire/setup/admin-actions/options?action=TemplateFieldsBatcher&templates=29|56&fields=219&addOrRemove=add

or you can execute immediately:

http://mysite.dev/processwire/setup/admin-actions/execute?action=TemplateFieldsBatcher&templates=29|56&fields=219&addOrRemove=add


Note the “options” vs “execute” as the last path before the parameters.

 

Automatic Backup / Restore

Before any action is executed, a full database backup is automatically made. You have a few options to run a restore if needed:

  • Follow the Restore link that is presented after an action completes
  • Use the "Restore" submenu: Setup > Admin Actions > Restore
  • Move the restoredb.php file from the /site/assets/cache/AdminActions/ folder to the root of your site and load in the browser
  • Manually restore using the AdminActionsBackup.sql file in the /site/assets/cache/AdminActions/ folder

I think all these features make it very easy to create custom admin data manipulation methods that can be shared with others and executed using a simple interface without needing to build a full Process Module custom interface from scratch. I also hope it will reduce the barriers for new ProcessWire users to create custom admin functionality.

Please let me know what you think, especially if you have ideas for improving the interface, or the way actions are defined.

 

 

  • Like 34
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is very cool. Both the module and the bundled actions will be super useful. Thanks! :)

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice!

Just an idea: could the actions accept url params? Eg. prefill the template selector with "basic-page" using this url:

/admin/setup/admin-actions/options?action=TemplateFieldsBatcher&templates=basic-page

This would enable linking the action from other places of the admin (eg. add right-click menu option on pagelist, etc).

Plus another idea: actions could be put into a subdir, if users start to contribute actions their number will increase.

Btw I see you haven't overcomplicated the UI of the roles :)

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whoa, Adrian you rock as usual :) thanks so much! And the idea of contribution to the actions is the best part of all.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Awesome idea and bad ass realization @adrian! (pardon my French)

I did not install yet but will do soon and check it out. As @szabesz said collaboration is the baddest part. I can expect a load of wise stuff to learn from those actions contributed by PW gurus. It just might happen that there will be a lot of actions - maybe put them in a folder?

And one question about the backup. It seems it is custom and not integrated with db backup module. Is there a reason for that?

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, tpr said:

Nice!

Just an idea: could the actions accept url params? Eg. prefill the template selector with "basic-page" using this url:


/admin/setup/admin-actions/options?action=TemplateFieldsBatcher&templates=basic-page

This would enable linking the action from other places of the admin (eg. add right-click menu option on pagelist, etc).

 

I like the idea - are you thinking that if all required options are passed it would be possible to run directly with no intermediate "Execute Action" button? Perhaps an additional url parameter: ?execute=true - without this, all options would be prefilled, but the user would still have the option to modify if needed before executing.

Any thoughts?

 

5 hours ago, tpr said:

Plus another idea: actions could be put into a subdir, if users start to contribute actions their number will increase.

Yeah, I did think about it, but I think you're right, it is probably a good idea.

 

5 hours ago, tpr said:

Btw I see you haven't overcomplicated the UI of the roles :)

I think you are being genuine and not sarcastic, but just wanted to clarify. I am actually wondering if maybe I should convert the config settings page to a DataTables layout (like how it is on the main module process page) - not sure how simple that would be to implement at this point, but might be nice if this starts to fill out with a lot of actions. Btw, in case you guys didn't realize, you can actually remove the superuser role from any actions you know you won't ever use so that you have a shorter list to choose/filter from when using the module.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Ivan Gretsky said:

Awesome idea and bad ass realization @adrian! (pardon my French)

Glad you like it :)

 

3 minutes ago, Ivan Gretsky said:

I did not install yet but will do soon and check it out. As @szabesz said collaboration is the baddest part. I can expect a load of wise stuff to learn from those actions contributed by PW gurus. It just might happen that there will be a lot of actions - maybe put them in a folder?

Definitely part of my goal! And yes, I agree with you and @tpr - a subfolder is the way to go.

 

3 minutes ago, Ivan Gretsky said:

And one question about the backup. It seems it is custom and not integrated with db backup module. Is there a reason for that?

Are you talking about this module: http://modules.processwire.com/modules/process-database-backups/ - what if users don't have it installed? 

At the moment it only stores the one version of the backup - it gets overwritten every time you run a new action. It would be no problem to store more backups, but I was worried that it might be tempting to restore an old backup which could take you back too far and you might lose some manually adjusted content etc. The idea of the automatic backup was to provide a quick recovery from an action that didn't do what you expected. I am definitely happy to revisit this though, so please everyone give me your ideas on this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, adrian said:

what if users don't have it installed? 

Let's inform them ;) Jokes aside, the db backup module is supported by Ryan, so it should be safe to rely on it.

10 minutes ago, adrian said:

which could take you back too far and you might lose some manually adjusted content etc.

Sensible use cases would dictate to try things out in a development environment not on a live site, so I would not worry too much about this.

Edited by szabesz
typo
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@adrian How about adding:

protected $authorForumsProfile = '985-adrian';

so that one can more easily identify the author? Should be used as trailing part of the href attribute, of course ;) 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, szabesz said:

Sensible use cases would dictate to try things out in a development environment not on a live site, so I would not worry too much about this.

Let me think about this a little more - even in a dev environment restoring to a really old backup could be disastrous if you're still developing the site. I guess that's the responsibility of the dev to be smart about things though.

 

29 minutes ago, szabesz said:

@adrian How about adding:


protected $authorForumsProfile = '985-adrian';

so that one can more easily identify the author? Should be used as trailing part of the href attribute, of course ;) 

I like it - I think giving authors proper credit will hopefully promote more contributions.

I have gone with PW developer directory link, PW forum profile, and also Github account, with linked icons.

Screen Shot 2016-11-30 at 7.28.31 AM.png

I could maybe provide the option for the author to fully customize their links, but don't want things getting too ugly. Any thoughts?

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, the optional author links are now available. These are the current options:

    protected $authorLinks = array(
        'pwforum' => '985-adrian',
        'pwdirectory' => 'adrian-jones',
        'github' => 'adrianbj',
    );

 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/30/2016 at 0:09 AM, tpr said:

Just an idea: could the actions accept url params? Eg. prefill the template selector with "basic-page" using this url:


/admin/setup/admin-actions/options?action=TemplateFieldsBatcher&templates=basic-page

This would enable linking the action from other places of the admin (eg. add right-click menu option on pagelist, etc).

Ok, this functionality is ready, although please test carefully at this stage.

You can populate the option parameters via URL parameters. You should split multiple values with a "|" character.

There are two options:

1) You can either just pre-populate the options values, but still showing the options page where you can make changes via the options form GUI:

http://mysite.dev/processwire/setup/admin-actions/options?action=TemplateFieldsBatcher&templates=29|56&fields=219&addOrRemove=add

2) or you can execute immediately with the passed options values:

http://mysite.dev/processwire/setup/admin-actions/execute?action=TemplateFieldsBatcher&templates=29|56&fields=219&addOrRemove=add


Note the "options" vs "execute" as the last path segment before the parameters. 

Please try it out and let me know what you think. Do you think it might also be nice to have an option to redirect to another page after it has executed, rather than showing the results page? With your suggestion of linking from other places in the admin are you thinking about maybe an ajax call to an action, rather than loading the page? I haven't tested this yet, but it might be a nice option. I might even be able to return a JSON formatted response if called via ajax?

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, it's a great step forward :) A JSON return would be great - I think a use case could be established first to see how this could work.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, tpr said:

I think a use case could be established first to see how this could work.

Well you should get to work on one then :)  

Send me a PR with a new action and I can work on the ajax response to suit your needs and we'll take it from there!

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't have any particular feature in mind now but I'm sure there will be one later :)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's now available in the modules directory: http://modules.processwire.com/modules/process-admin-actions/ 

It also includes a few new actions. The first post and the Github ReadMe give a small description of each action.

Hope you all find something useful among them.

Again, please feel free to contribute some actions, or if you have an idea but don't know how to build, let me know and maybe I can put it together.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, adrian said:

or if you have an idea but don't know how to build, let me know and maybe I can put it together.

Best service ever :rolleyes:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, adrian said:

if you have an idea but don't know how to build, let me know and maybe I can put it together.

<attempted geek joke> If you are into the new syntax of PHP 7.1, how about something like this...

public function declareBrexitReferendumResult() : void;     /* UK version */
public function declarePresidentialElectionResult() : void; /* US version */

...take your pick. :undecided: </attempted geek joke>

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For those of you who are experienced with the PW API (and those looking to learn), there is now an "Action Code" viewer that shows the executeAction() method of the action you are about to execute. It is of course collapsed by default and only available to superusers.

Anyway, hope you'll find it useful and either reassuring (if you're worried about what code it about to be executed on your site), or informative as to what can be done with the API.

Screen Shot 2016-12-04 at 12.19.22 PM.png

 

  • Like 10

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone,

To celebrate @teppo featuring this module in PW Weekly, I have added a new action: Create Users Batcher

It lets you quickly create many users by entering: "username, email address" on separate lines in a textarea.

This action requires the EmailNewUser module and it must be configured to automatically generate a user password. The action checks for this module and that setting before it will let you proceed. I also recommend that you install the PasswordForceChange module to reduce the risks of having emailed a password to a user.

You can set multiple roles to be added to each new user. Be aware that at least one of these roles must have the "profile-edit" permission so that the user has the ability to change their password when they first login.

Screen Shot 2016-12-10 at 10.05.07 PM.png

 

Note that EmailNewUser will report each successful user creation and email sent success.

Screen Shot 2016-12-10 at 10.05.34 PM.png

 

I hope that the next time you need to create several users for a new client that you'll give this a try.

And of course, don't forget to send me your own actions for inclusion with the module :) 

  • Like 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick update to the CreateUsersBatcher action. It now allows two options:

1) Define Username and email address (requires EmailNewUser to generate password).

2) Define additional user template fields (whichever ones you want). If you use this option and include the password, then you don't need the EmailNewUser module.

You could even given all staff at a client's office the same temp password and let me know by phone (this way there is no security risk with emailing even a temporary password that will be changed) - it's your choice.

Hopefully this screenshot will help to explain it better - note that the "New Users" textarea lists the fields from the user template and the order they need to be entered. In this example I have additional "first_name" and "last_name" fields, as well as the field added by the PasswordForceChange module which you can set to 1 to enforce this if you want.

Screen Shot 2016-12-11 at 1.33.57 PM.png

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

New version now supports running actions via the API. 

Here's an example of copying content of a field from one page to another.

Simply load the module, and call the action class name as a method while passing the required options as an array:

$options = array(
   'field' => 99, 
   'sourcePage' => 1131, 
   'destinationPage' => 1132
);
$modules->get("ProcessAdminActions")->CopyFieldContentToOtherPage($options);

Hopefully you'll find a use for this in your hooks or template files.

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the admin UI could be re-arranged into a table layout:

  • first column: action names
  • second column: description/notes
  • third column: applied roles + and Edit button, that opens a modal or perhaps only unhides the role asmSelector. Alternatively you can set the asmSelect to operate in "inline" mode, I've experimented with that and it worked.

I know it would take some time, but sooner or later this has to be done :)

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Sebi
      I've created a small module which lets you define a timestamp after which a page should be accessible. In addition you can define a timestamp when the release should end and the page should not be accessable any more.
      Github: https://github.com/Sebiworld/PageAccessReleasetime
      Usage
      PageAccessReleasetime can be installed like every other module in ProcessWire. Check the following guide for detailed information: How-To Install or Uninstall Modules
      After that, you will find checkboxes for activating the releasetime-fields at the settings-tab of each page. You don't need to add the fields to your templates manually.
      Check e.g. the checkbox "Activate Releasetime from?" and fill in a date in the future. The page will not be accessable for your users until the given date is reached.
      If you have $config->pagefileSecure = true, the module will protect files of unreleased pages as well.
      How it works
      This module hooks into Page::viewable to prevent users to access unreleased pages:
      public function hookPageViewable($event) { $page = $event->object; $viewable = $event->return; if($viewable){ // If the page would be viewable, additionally check Releasetime and User-Permission $viewable = $this->canUserSee($page); } $event->return = $viewable; } To prevent access to the files of unreleased pages, we hook into Page::isPublic and ProcessPageView::sendFile.
      public function hookPageIsPublic($e) { $page = $e->object; if($e->return && $this->isReleaseTimeSet($page)) { $e->return = false; } } The site/assets/files/ directory of pages, which isPublic() returns false, will get a '-' as prefix. This indicates ProcessWire (with activated $config->pagefileSecure) to check the file's permissions via PHP before delivering it to the client.
      The check wether a not-public file should be accessable happens in ProcessPageView::sendFile. We throw an 404 Exception if the current user must not see the file.
      public function hookProcessPageViewSendFile($e) { $page = $e->arguments[0]; if(!$this->canUserSee($page)) { throw new Wire404Exception('File not found'); } } Additionally we hook into ProcessPageEdit::buildForm to add the PageAccessReleasetime fields to each page and move them to the settings tab.
      Limitations
      In the current version, releasetime-protected pages will appear in wire('pages')->find() queries. If you want to display a list of pages, where pages could be releasetime-protected, you should double-check with $page->viewable() wether the page can be accessed. $page->viewable() returns false, if the page is not released yet.
      If you have an idea how unreleased pages can be filtered out of ProcessWire selector queries, feel free to write an issue, comment or make a pull request!
    • By David Karich
      Thanks to the great Pro module "RepeaterMatrix" I have the possibility to create complex repeater items. With it I have created a quite powerful page builder. Many different content modules, with many more possible design options. The RepeaterMatrix module supports the cloning of items, but only within the same page. Now I often have the case that very design-intensive pages and items are created. If you want to use this module on a different page (e.g. in the same design), you have to rebuild each item manually every time.
      With this proof of concept I have created a module which adds the feature to copy a repeater item to the clipboard so that you can paste this item to another page with the same repeater field. The module has been developed very rudimentarily so far. It is currently not possible to copy nested items. There is also no check of Min/Max. You can also only copy items that have the same field on different pages. And surely you can solve all this more elegantly with AJAX. But personally I lack the deeper understanding of the repeaters. Also missing on the Javascript side are event triggers for the repeaters, which would make it easier. Like e.g. RepeaterItemInitReady or similar.
      it would be great if @ryan would implement this functionality in the core of RepeaterMatrix. I think he has better ways to implement this. Or what do you think, Ryan?
      Everybody is welcome to work on this module and improve it, if it should not be integrated into the matrix core. Therefore I put it for testing and as download on GitHub: https://github.com/FlipZoomMedia/InputfieldRepeaterMatrixDublicate
      You can best see the functionality in the screencast: 
       
    • By anderson
      Hi,
      Please take a look at this:
      https://templatemag.com/demo/Good/
      The upper nav bar, including dropdowns like "pages" and "portfolios", what do you call this whole thing? At first I guess it's called "dropdown nav bar", but seems not.
      AND of course, what's the simplest way/module to achieve this in PW?
      Thanks in advance.
    • By Sebi2020
      Hey, I'm new and I created a simple module for tagging pages because I didn't found a module for it (sadly this is not a core feature). This module is licensed under the GPL3 and cames with absolutly no warranty at all. You should test the module before using it in production environments. Currently it's an alpha release. if you like the module or have ideas for improvements feel free to post a comment. Currently this fieldtype is only compatible with the Inputfield I've created to because I haven't found  an Inputfield yet, that returns arrays from a single html input.
      Greetings Sebi2020
      FieldtypeTags.zip.asc
      InputfieldTagify.zip
      InputfieldTagify.zip.asc
      FieldtypeTags.zip
    • By psy
      Background
      I'm creating a module to integrate https://pushalert.co/ into ProcessWire. You actually don't even need a module. You could just use the "Other Websites" javascript provided by PushAlert for basic functionality, ie send a broadcast notification to all subscribers. This is essentially what all the other integrations, including WordPress, do. The WP integration installs a widget with a form enabling the admin to enter details such as title, message, etc from a blog post. It does not:
      collect any statistics within the CMS about the notification enable audience fine tuning to eg a particular subscriber or subscriber segment within WP. The admin needs to use the PA dashboard for that functionality PushAlert has a javascript and REST API. It's intended that this module will use both. https://pushalert.co/documentation 
      What my module does so far:
      associate a subscription with a user. FE user clicks a button on the website front end to subscribe and/or agrees to the browser popup to accept notifications from this site send broadcast push alerts from a page within admin It doesn't have a 'widget' but easy enough to create a fieldsetpage with the relevant fields and add that fs page to any appropriate templates, then with a hook, send the notification. Need to be careful that once published/sent, the notification is not automatically re-sent on subsequent page edits.
      Looking for help/collaboration on how best:
      to send a notification, eg from a blog post, then track the statistics. Dilemma is that the push notification must come from the admin page. Responses go to the sending page which, as it's an admin page, is restricted and will not accept the https response. This is where the other CMS integrations stop. The only json response from PushAlert is the status, eg 'success', and the notification id. There is no opportunity at this point to capture the sending page id. handle, 'once sent on page publish', do not automatically resend on future page edits Am thinking along the lines that FS Page will have a @kongondo runtime markup field https://modules.processwire.com/modules/fieldtype-runtime-markup/ to pull the stats from PushAlert. Every time an admin visits the page, the stats will update.
      Once an admin checks the 'Send notification on page publish' checkbox, a hook creates new front end page that records the 'sender page', sends the notification request to PA, which then uses that newly created frontend page, as the response endpoint. Another rook re-associates the front end page with the admin page (eg blog post), to update the stats.
      Potential use cases:
      Notify individual and/or users with a particular role of an event, eg "New work opportunity" for job seekers; new blog post published; entries now open, etc...
      Looking for help/ideas/collaboration on this module. Please let me know if you're interested and as I do, believe this would be a great addition to ProcessWire