Jump to content
adrian

Admin Actions

Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, tpr said:

I think the admin UI could be re-arranged into a table layout:

  • first column: action names
  • second column: description/notes
  • third column: applied roles + and Edit button, that opens a modal or perhaps only unhides the role asmSelector. Alternatively you can set the asmSelect to operate in "inline" mode, I've experimented with that and it worked.

I know it would take some time, but sooner or later this has to be done :)

 

You like to keep me busy don't you :)

How's this?

Screen Shot 2016-12-21 at 4.26.13 PM.png

That along with a few tweaks/fixes has been committed.

Don't forget to fork and contribute :)

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks really sharp!  I'll print a screenshot and put it under the Christmas tree :)

One thing though. Doesn't cook coffee :)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here are is a SCSS snippet if you would like to use inline roles (I'm not liking those big green asm items). It also enables removing roles by clicking on its label (not only on its icon), "user" icon instead trash and there's a line-through effect on hover too. You can use an online tool to make CSS from it.

Spoiler

table.adminactionsconfig {
  .Inputfield[id^="wrap_"] {
    background: transparent !important;
  }
  .InputfieldContent, label {
    padding: 0.25em 0.25em 0 !important;
    border: none !important;
    background: transparent !important;
  }
  .asmList {
    margin-top: 0.25em !important;
  }
  .asmListItem {
    padding-left: 8px !important;
    margin-right: 8px;
    display: inline-block !important;
    width: auto !important;
    font-size: 14px;
    background: transparent !important;
    border-color: transparent !important;
    color: inherit !important;
    &:hover {
      .asmListItemLabel {
        text-decoration: line-through !important;
      }
    }
    .asmListItemRemove {
      left: 0 !important;
      right: 0 !important;
      bottom: 0;
      top: 1px;
      &:not(:hover) {
        i {
          &:before {
            content: '\f007';
          }
        }
      }
    }
    i {
      margin-left: 2px;
      &:not(:hover) {
        color: #EA2262;
      }
    }
  }
}

 

 

adminactions-roles.gif

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks @tpr - I have implemented that, although I was a little hesitant. I certainly like the look, but I was worried about the consistency of the interface compared to what we're used to with ASM Selects. Curious why you haven't done this for the roles settings in AOS?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks! Good question - actually I haven't thought about that before your question. Perhaps because I didn't know that asmSelects can be used without the sort feature (although there's no need for that in AOS at all).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The latest AOS contains this tweaked role selector appearance. Thanks for the tip! :)

The only difference is that I use the "user" icon even on hover, I think the line-through is enough signal for the removal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Merry Christmas, @adrian!

Want to try to use your action module in a slightly different way. I need to be able to execute actions from outside of PW (from emails). I am planning to solve this task kind of like in this module: I will have a page for each callable-from-outside action with some random security string and some options.

But I want to try to make it a little more customizable. I plan to write new actions for Admin Actions module, call them from API like you said it is possible to and pass options stored in some field of the callable-from-outside action page.

Do you see any caveats? Can you suggest a field to store options? Is there a way to turn off auto-backup feature (at least for the from-API usage or by configuration)?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi @Ivan Gretsky

I think I would store the options in a textarea in json format so you can easily convert to an array to pass to the action via the API call.

Are you planning on having the security string in the link from the email and handling the authentication in the logic on your pages? 

Currently the automatic backup can't be turned off, but I agree that this should be possible. I'll do it as a configurable option and also add an option to turn it off via an API call.

Let me know if you come across any issues once you start setting this up and I'll see what I can do to make AdminActions work as needed for you.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I did already managed to write a simple action and launch it via the API. I am currently going with a json in a textarea (but also looking at this field).

  1. Mandatory backup is problem 1.
  2. I had to give admin-action permission to the guest user. Not sure how dangerous is that. Is there a way to get around it?
  3. I am planning to have some security string stored in a dedicated field on the callable-from-outside action page which the token input value will have to match. Is there anything else you recommend?
  4. Not sure what you mean under handling authentication. Currently the script is running from the guest user.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi @Ivan Gretsky - I've added some options for controlling the automatic backup (not committed yet) and I am thinking about the guest user access for making calls to actions via the API. I am considering a couple of different options and will put together something in the next couple of days. Hope that works for your timeframe?

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi @Ivan Gretsky - ok, a new version has been committed that adds a new module config setting for determining whether database backups will be automatic, optional, or disabled.

1) Automatic - database backup will happen without user intervention.

2) Optional - adds a new checkbox at the bottom of every action's "options" form before the user clicks "Execute Action". 

3) Disabled - this means no database backup will occur.

If you do want to do a backup when calling an action via the API, simply add a new item to the options array: 

'dbBackup' => true

 

I am still working on figuring out the best approach for guest access. The biggest problem I see is that adding the "admin-actions" permission to the guest role means that any logged in user can now see the Setup > Admin Actions menu, even though they don't have permission to view or execute any of the actions.

I have been playing around with adding a new helper module to handle the API calls, rather than calling the main ProcessAdminActions module directly, but there are a couple of inheritance issues I am not thrilled about, so looking into other options. Will hopefully have a good solution soon.

Please let me know if the backup side of things handles your needs on that front.

 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone,

I have committed a new version that takes care of @Ivan Gretsky's issues with guest access for calling actions via the API.

The new version also includes the ability to add actions to the Setup > Admin Actions submenu which could be really handy for quick access to key actions that you use regularly. At the moment you could add them all if you want, but perhaps in the future we'll have too many to make this usable, which is why I have made these configurable.

Screen Shot 2017-01-02 at 7.52.53 AM.png

 

See the new "In Menu" column:

Screen Shot 2017-01-02 at 7.53.40 AM.png

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you @adrian! It is amazing to watch something being created with such an amazing pace by people like you and ryan. And so much to learn from. I recommend everybody to go through these guys' code to learn how you can be really powerful using ProcessWire.

Another little idea. Not sure it is necessary, but seems logical to me to separate "core" actions and those specific to the site. Like core ans site modules. I can see this module to be a base to easily create little things that would other way need their own process modules. In that case, most of the time I would use only custom actions... A filter option or a tab. What do you think?

I know, that for everybody but admin I can achieve about the same with by-action role assignment. But as I almost always login a superuser myself...

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Martijn Geerts said:

Just to chime in: Fantastic Module @adrian

Thanks @Martijn Geerts - glad you're finding it useful - I appreciate the feedback!

 

20 hours ago, Ivan Gretsky said:

Another little idea. Not sure it is necessary, but seems logical to me to separate "core" actions and those specific to the site. Like core ans site modules. I can see this module to be a base to easily create little things that would other way need their own process modules. In that case, most of the time I would use only custom actions... A filter option or a tab. What do you think?

Hi @Ivan Gretsky - just to clarify - are you talking about simply separating the "core" actions in the module's "action" folder from those "site specific" ones in the /site/templates/AdminActions/ folder?

I think tabs sounds like a good approach - I'll take a look at doing that. Also something else to consider is the tables filter feature of @tpr's awesome AOS module - that will make finding actions nicer once there are lots more, although to be honest sometimes I just like good old CTRL/CMD + F :)

 

20 hours ago, Ivan Gretsky said:

I know, that for everybody but admin I can achieve about the same with by-action role assignment. But as I almost always login a superuser myself...

Just an FYI - if you don't want certain/any core actions available, you can remove the superuser role from those actions and they won't clog up your list of actions.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How about letting a dedicated AdminActions.module handle all the serious work (e.g. like WireActions), so actions are also triggerable via the api? I can imagine that some actions might be useful to be run as part of a migration (shameless plug :D) and not just via the backend.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, LostKobrakai said:

How about letting a dedicated AdminActions.module handle all the serious work (e.g. like WireActions), so actions are also triggerable via the api? I can imagine that some actions might be useful to be run as part of a migration (shameless plug :D) and not just via the backend.

 

They are already triggerable via the API: 

$options = array(
   'field' => 99, 
   'sourcePage' => 1131, 
   'destinationPage' => 1132
);
$modules->get("ProcessAdminActions")->CopyFieldContentToOtherPage($options);

I did think about separating into a core AdminActions.module and then have the ProcessAdminActions.module run on top of that, but went for the self-contained approach.

Let me know if this doesn't suit your needs though and I can revisit separating them out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/2/2017 at 11:01 AM, Ivan Gretsky said:

Another little idea. Not sure it is necessary, but seems logical to me to separate "core" actions and those specific to the site.

Hi @Ivan Gretsky - I have implemented this - now both the modules settings and the Setup > AdminActions are split into "Site" and "Core" tabs. I haven't committed just yet. I will PM you the new version. Would appreciate it if you could test and let me know if it suits your needs and if you find any problems.

Thanks!

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Ivan Gretsky - I ended up doing some more tweaking on this and decided to commit it so you can get the new version from the modules directory now. Here's a screenshot of the tabs in action:

Screen Shot 2017-01-06 at 10.57.11 PM.png

 

I have also added a new: FTP Files to Page action based on this request: 

It works with files and images and looks like this:

Screen Shot 2017-01-06 at 6.57.31 PM.png

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@adrian, I know function names are case-insensitive, but maybe you could change this line  from

 $destinationPage->$fieldName->add($item->getPathName());

to...

 $destinationPage->$fieldName->add($item->getPathname());// @note: lower 'n' in getPathname

to match what's in the docs...Just me being silly.:)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks @kongondo - I was PHP was strict on function name case!

I think I inadvertently copied the case of $fieldName through to the getPathname() method.

Anyway, it's fixed in the latest version - thanks for noticing and pointing it out.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just added a new "Email Batcher" action, which has the following features:

  • Select recipients by user role, or using a pages selector for any pages on the site
  • Parsing of field tags in the body so you can do something like: Dear {first_name}
  • Option to send a test email
  • HTML body, with automated text only version also sent
  • Special {fromEmail} and {adminUrl} tags.
  • Ability to hook EmailBatcher::parseBody to apply other custom replacements

Don't forget TracyDebugger's Mail panel when testing - it will capture the outgoing emails (so they won't actually be sent):
http://processwire.com/blog/posts/introducing-tracy-debugger/#mail-panel

joxi_screenshot_1484004786187.png

 

 

 

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just added a new "Copy Repeater Items To Other Page" action.

It lets you append or overwrite items from a repeater on one page to one on another.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another quick update. Both the new "Copy Repeater Items To Other Page" and "Copy Table Field Rows To Other Page" actions now include an optional selector so you can define what repeater items / table rows will be copied.

 

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By picarica
      so i am trying to put CustomHooksForVariations.module, a custom module, i am placing it into site/modules direcotry yet my modules page in admin panel gives me errors
      so this is the screen show when i refresh modules, i dont know why the shole hook is written on top of the page :||

      and this next image is when i try to install it, i saw that it is not defiuned modules.php but it shouldnt need to be ?, any ways i dont want to edit site's core just to make one moulde work there has to be a way

    • By David Karich
      ProcessWire InputfieldRepeaterMatrixDuplicate
      Thanks to the great ProModule "RepeaterMatrix" I have the possibility to create complex repeater items. With it I have created a quite powerful page builder. Many different content modules, with many more possible design options. The RepeaterMatrix module supports the cloning of items, but only within the same page. Now I often have the case that very design-intensive pages and items are created. If you want to use a content module on a different page (e.g. in the same design), you have to rebuild each item manually every time.
      This module extends the commercial ProModule "RepeaterMatrix" by the function to duplicate repeater items from one page to another page. The condition is that the target field is the same matrix field from which the item is duplicated. This module is currently understood as proof of concept. There are a few limitations that need to be considered. The intention of the module is that this functionality is integrated into the core of RepeaterMatrix and does not require an extra module.
      Check out the screencast
      What the module can do
      Duplicate multible repeater items from one page to another No matter how complex the item is Full support for file and image fields Multilingual support Support of Min and Max settings Live synchronization of clipboard between multiple browser tabs. Copy an item and simply switch the browser tab to the target page and you will immediately see the past button Support of multiple RepeaterMatrix fields on one page Configurable which roles and fields are excluded Configurable dialogs for copy and paste Duplicated items are automatically pasted to the end of the target field and set to hidden status so that changes are not directly published Automatic clipboard update when other items are picked Automatically removes old clipboard data if it is not pasted within 6 hours Delete clipboard itself by clicking the selected item again Benefit: unbelievably fast workflow and content replication What the module can't do
      Before an item can be duplicated in its current version, the source page must be saved. This means that if you make changes to an item and copy this, the old saved state will be duplicated Dynamic loading is currently not possible. Means no AJAX. When pasting, the target page is saved completely No support for nested repeater items. Currently only first level items can be duplicated. Means a repeater field in a repeater field cannot be duplicated. Workaround: simply duplicate the parent item Dynamic reloading and adding of repeater items cannot be registered. Several interfaces and events from the core are missing. The initialization occurs only once after the page load event Changelog
      2.0.0
      Feature: Copy multiple items at once! The fundament for copying multiple items was created by @Autofahrn - THX! Feature: Optionally you can disable the copy and/or paste dialog Bug fix: A fix suggestion when additional and normal repeater fields are present was contributed by @joshua - THX! 1.0.4
      Bug fix: Various bug fixes and improvements in live synchronization Bug fix: Items are no longer inserted when the normal save button is clicked. Only when the past button is explicitly clicked Feature: Support of multiple repeater fields in one page Feature: Support of repeater Min/Max settings Feature: Configurable roles and fields Enhancement: Improved clipboard management Enhancement: Documentation improvement Enhancement: Corrected few typos #1 1.0.3
      Feature: Live synchronization Enhancement: Load the module only in the backend Enhancement: Documentation improvement 1.0.2
      Bug fix: Various bug fixes and improvements in JS functions Enhancement: Documentation improvement Enhancement: Corrected few typos 1.0.1
      Bug fix: Various bug fixes and improvements in the duplication process 1.0.0
      Initial release Support this module
      If this module is useful for you, I am very thankful for your small donation: Donate 5,- Euro (via PayPal – or an amount of your choice. Thank you!)
      Download this module (Version 2.0.0)
      > Github: https://github.com/FlipZoomMedia/InputfieldRepeaterMatrixDuplicate
      > PW module directory: https://modules.processwire.com/modules/inputfield-repeater-matrix-duplicate/
      > Old stable version (1.0.4): https://github.com/FlipZoomMedia/InputfieldRepeaterMatrixDuplicate/releases/tag/1.0.4
    • By Robin S
      A new module that hasn't had a lot of testing yet. Please do your own testing before deploying on any production website.
      Custom Paths
      Allows any page to have a custom path/URL.
      Note: Custom Paths is incompatible with the core LanguageSupportPageNames module. I have no experience working with LanguageSupportPageNames or multi-language sites in general so I'm not in a position to work out if a fix is possible. If anyone with multi-language experience can contribute a fix it would be much appreciated!
      Screenshot

      Usage
      The module creates a field named custom_path on install. Add the custom_path field to the template of any page you want to set a custom path for. Whatever path is entered into this field determines the path and URL of the page ($page->path and $page->url). Page numbers and URL segments are supported if these are enabled for the template, and previous custom paths are managed by PagePathHistory if that module is installed.
      The custom_path field appears on the Settings tab in Page Edit by default but there is an option in the module configuration to disable this if you want to position the field among the other template fields.
      If the custom_path field is populated for a page it should be a path that is relative to the site root and that starts with a forward slash. The module prevents the same custom path being set for more than one page.
      The custom_path value takes precedence over any ProcessWire path. You can even override the Home page by setting a custom path of "/" for a page.
      It is highly recommended to set access controls on the custom_path field so that only privileged roles can edit it: superuser-only is recommended.
      It is up to the user to set and maintain suitable custom paths for any pages where the module is in use. Make sure your custom paths are compatible with ProcessWire's $config and .htaccess settings, and if you are basing the custom path on the names of parent pages you will probably want to have a strategy for updating custom paths if parent pages are renamed or moved.
      Example hooks to Pages::saveReady
      You might want to use a Pages::saveReady hook to automatically set the custom path for some pages. Below are a couple of examples.
      1. In this example the start of the custom path is fixed but the end of the path will update dynamically according to the name of the page:
      $pages->addHookAfter('saveReady', function(HookEvent $event) { $page = $event->arguments(0); if($page->template == 'my_template') { $page->custom_path = "/some-custom/path-segments/$page->name/"; } }); 2. The Custom Paths module adds a new Page::realPath method/property that can be used to get the "real" ProcessWire path to a page that might have a custom path set. In this example the custom path for news items is derived from the real ProcessWire path but a parent named "news-items" is removed:
      $pages->addHookAfter('saveReady', function(HookEvent $event) { $page = $event->arguments(0); if($page->template == 'news_item') { $page->custom_path = str_replace('/news-items/', '/', $page->realPath); } }); Caveats
      The custom paths will be used automatically for links created in CKEditor fields, but if you have the "link abstraction" option enabled for CKEditor fields (Details > Markup/HTML (Content Type) > HTML Options) then you will see notices from MarkupQA warning you that it is unable to resolve the links.
      Installation
      Install the Custom Paths module.
      Uninstallation
      The custom_path field is not automatically deleted when the module is uninstalled. You can delete it manually if the field is no longer needed.
       
      https://github.com/Toutouwai/CustomPaths
      https://modules.processwire.com/modules/custom-paths/
    • By teppo
      Hey folks!
      I'm happy to finally introduce a project I've been working on for quite a while now: it's called Wireframe, and it is an output framework for ProcessWire.
      Note that I'm posting this in the module development area, maily because this project is still in rather early stage. I've built a couple of sites with it myself, and parts of the codebase have been powering some pretty big and complex sites for many years now, but this should still be considered a soft launch 🙂
      --
      Long story short, Wireframe is a module that provides the "backbone" for building sites (and apps) with ProcessWire using an MVC (or perhaps MVVM... one of those three or four letter acronyms anyway) inspired methodology. You could say that it's an output strategy, but I prefer the term "output framework", since in my mind the word "strategy" means something less tangible. A way of doing things, rather than a tool that actually does things.
      Wireframe (the module) provides a basic implementation for some familiar MVC concepts, such as Controllers and a View layer – the latter of which consists of layouts, partials, and template-specific views. There's no "model" layer, since in this context ProcessWire is the model. As a module Wireframe is actually quite simple – not even nearly the biggest one I've built – but there's still quite a bit of stuff to "get", so I've put together a demo & documentation site for it at https://wireframe-framework.com/.
      In addition to the core module, I'm also working on a couple of site profiles based on it. My current idea is actually to keep the module very light-weight, and implement most of the "opinionated" stuff in site profiles and/or companion modules. For an example MarkupMenu (which I released a while ago) was developed as one of those "companion modules" when I needed a menu module to use on the site profiles.
      Currently there are two public site profiles based on Wireframe:
      site-wireframe-docs is the demo&docs site mentioned above, just with placeholder content replaced with placeholder content. It's not a particularly complex site, but I believe it's still a pretty nice way to dig into the Wireframe module. site-wireframe-boilerplate is a boilerplate (or starter) site profile based on the docs site. This is still very much a work in progress, but essentially I'm trying to build a flexible yet full-featured starter profile you can just grab and start building upon. There will be a proper build process for resources, it will include most of the basic features one tends to need from site to site, etc. --
      Requirements and getting started:
      Wireframe can be installed just like any ProcessWire module. Just clone or download it to your site/modules/ directory and install. It doesn't, though, do a whole lot of stuff on itself – please check out the documentation site for a step-by-step guide on setting up the directory structure, adding the "bootstrap file", etc. You may find it easier to install one of the site profiles mentioned above, but note that this process involves the use of Composer. In the case of the site profiles you can install ProcessWire as usual and download or clone the site profile directory into your setup, but after that you should run "composer install" to get all the dependencies – including the Wireframe module – in place. Hard requirements for Wireframe are ProcessWire 3.0.112 and PHP 7.1+. The codebase is authored with current PHP versions in mind, and while running it on 7.0 may be possible, anything below that definitely won't work. A feature I added just today to the Wireframe module is that in case ProcessWire has write access to your site/templates/ directory, you can use the module settings screen to create the expected directories automatically. Currently that's all, and the module won't – for an example – create Controllers or layouts for you, so you should check out the site profiles for examples on these. (I'm probably going to include some additional helper features in the near future.)
      --
      This project is loosely based on an earlier project called pw-mvc, i.e. the main concepts (such as Controllers and the View layer) are very similar. That being said, Wireframe is a major upgrade in terms of both functionality and architecture: namespaces and autoloader support are now baked in, the codebase requires PHP 7, Controllers are classes extending \Wireframe\Controller (instead of regular "flat" PHP files), implementation based on a module instead of a collection of drop-in files, etc.
      While Wireframe is indeed still in a relatively early stage (0.3.0 was launched today, in case version numbers matter) for the most part I'm happy with the way it works, and likely won't change it too drastically anytime soon – so feel free to give it a try, and if you do, please let me know how it went. I will continue building upon this project, and I am also constantly working on various side projects, such as the site profiles and a few unannounced helper modules.
      I should probably add that while Wireframe is not hard to use, it is more geared towards those interested in "software development" type methodology. With future updates to the module, the site profiles, and the docs I hope to lower the learning curve, but certain level of "developer focus" will remain. Although of course the optimal outcome would be if I could use this project to lure more folks towards that end of the spectrum... 🙂
      --
      Please let me know what you think – and thanks in advance!
    • By tcnet
      PageViewStatistic for ProcessWire is a module to log page visits of the CMS. The records including some basic information like IP-address, browser, operating system, requested page and originate page. Please note that this module doesn't claim to be the best or most accurate.
      Advantages
      One of the biggest advantage is that this module doesn't require any external service like Google Analytics or similar. You don't have to modify your templates either. There is also no JavaScript or image required.
      Disadvantages
      There is only one disadvantage. This module doesn't record visits if the browser loads the page from its browser cache. To prevent the browser from loading the page from its cache, add the following meta tags to the header of your page:
      <meta http-equiv="Cache-Control" content="no-cache, no-store, must-revalidate" /> <meta http-equiv="Pragma" content="no-cache" /> <meta http-equiv="Expires" content="0" /> How to use
      The records can be accessed via the Setup-menu of the CMS backend. The first dropdown control changes the view mode. There are 4 different view modes.
      View mode "Day" shows all visits of the selected day individually with IP-address, browser, operating system, requested page and originate page. Click the update button to see new added records. View mode "Month" shows the total of all visitors per day from the first to the last day of the selected month. View mode "Year" shows the total of all visitors per month from the first to the last month of the selected year. View mode "Total" shows the total of all visitors per year for all recorded years. Please note that multiple visits from the same IP address within the selected period are counted as a single visitor.
      Settings
      You can access the module settings by clicking the Configuration button at the bottom of the records page. The settings page is also available in the menu: Modules->Configure->ProcessPageViewStat.
      IP2Location
      This module uses the IP2Location database from: http://www.ip2location.com. This database is required to obtain the country from the IP address. IP2Location updates this database at the begin of every month. The settings of ProcessPageViewStat offers the ability to automatically download the database monthly. Please note, that automatically download will not work if your webspace doesn't allow allow_url_fopen.
      Dragscroll
      This module uses DragScroll. A JavaScript available from: http://github.com/asvd/dragscroll. Dragscroll adds the ability in view mode "Day" to drag the records horizontally with the mouse pointer.
      parseUserAgentStringClass
      This module uses the PHP class parseUserAgentStringClass available from: http://www.toms-world.org/blog/parseuseragentstring/. This class is required to filter out the browser type and operating system from the server request.
      Special Feature
      PageViewStatistic for ProcessWire can record the time a visitor viewed the page. This feature is deactivated by default. To activate open the module configuration page and activate "Record view time". If activated you will find a new column "S." in the records which means the time of view in seconds. With every page request, a Javascript code is inserted directly after the <body> tag. Every time the visitor switches to another tab or closes the tab, this script reports the number of seconds the tab was visible. The initial page request is recorded only as a hyphen (-).
       
×
×
  • Create New...