teppo

Version Control

Recommended Posts

This module is improved and extended successor to Version Control For Text Fields. It handles everything it's predecessor did -- providing basic version control features for page content -- and quite a bit more. Download or clone from GitHub: https://github.com/teppokoivula/VersionControl.

This module requires ProcessWire 2.4.1 or later, mostly because of the file features, which require certain Pagefile and Pageimage methods to be hookable. There's no sensible way around this limitation; for those stuck with < 2.4.1, Version Control For Text Fields will remain a viable option.

What does it do?

While editing pages, fields with old revisions available show up with a new icon in their header bars. By hovering that icon you get a list of available revisions and by clicking any one of those the value of that particular field is reverted to that revision. No changes are made to page until you choose a revision and save the page, which means that you can keep switching between revisions to get an idea what's really changed without inadvertently causing any content to change.

The module also adds a History tab to page edit. This tab opens a view to the history of current page in the form of "revisions" -- each of which is a group of changes to page fields processed during one page save (similar to revisions in various source control applications). There are three actions you can perform on these revisions: adding comments, live previewing what the page might've looked in that revision and restoring the page to specific revision.

One specific feature that has been a big thing for me personally is support for file (and image) fields, as the original version control module felt rather incomplete without it. I'm hoping to take this a lot further performance, stability and feature wise, but as it stands right now, it's already included here and should be fully functional.

Watch the video preview here

I prepared a little screencast outlining most of this: http://youtu.be/AkEt3W7meic. Considering that it was my first screencast ever, I'd like to think that it wasn't that bad.. but I might give it another shot at some point, this time planning a bit before hitting "record"  :)

Upgrading from Version Control For Text Fields

For those already using Version Control For Text Fields, I've added something extra. If you upgrade that module to it's latest version, you should see a new checkbox in it's settings screen saying "Don't drop tables during uninstall". If you check this, uninstall the module and then remove it's files (this is required in order to install Version Control), your old data should be automagically imported to Version Control.

Import has only been tested with limited amounts of demo data. Proper tests are yet to come, so please be careful with this feature!

Update, 21.6.2015: as of today, this module is no longer in beta. While all the regular warnings still apply (making changes, including installing any new modules, on a production site should always be considered risky) Version Control has gone through pretty extensive testing, and should be as stable as any other module out there.

Edited by teppo
Added a note about not being a beta release anymore
  • Like 32

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Amazing module with impressive ease of use! And really slick and jaw dropping inline-page-version preview!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is awesome Teppo!

Of course near the end it looks like many versions are created as adding images saves the page behind the scenes via Ajax so that's one way you'll end up with a lot of revisions (did I remember that correctly or make it up?). I'm wondering if it's worth making it so it only stores revisions when updating image and file fields AFTER the Save button is pressed? Or did you already take that into account?

Loving this module and it will be fascinating to see how you handled the image and file fields when I dig into the code :)

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys, really appreciate all the kind words! :)

@Pete: you're right, each AJAX upload creates new revision at the moment. This is difficult to circumvent without sacrificing reliability, but I'll give it some thought.

Since each asynchronous file upload creates separate POST request updating value of given field, it's actually logical that each of those would also create new revision. From technical point of view this is no different than doing something like "$page->title = 'foo'; $page->save('title');" via API, since the end result is exactly same; whether or not user actually realises it, page content changes instantly each time a file has been uploaded.

Anyway, I'll have to see if this could be somehow improved :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't see any other way for files really. Maybe bundling multiple (meaning no other changes in between and max few minutes time) additions or removes into same revision. That could be done in UI only.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My thinking was simply checking if the input button has been clicked and only creating a revision if $this->input->post->submit_save is present.

Along similar lines, it would be great to have the option of not creating a version of any field until the page is published (no versions for an unpublished page).

Both of these are useful/desirable in some scenarios and not in others so I'm happy for them to be configurable options - as it is the module is already awesome :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Pete: thanks for both suggestions. I'll have to see if I can find a way to add these without affecting current behaviour negatively and creating unwanted inconsistencies between API and GUI behaviour :)

This is getting slightly off-topic, but as I've been diving into various version and/or source control systems lately, I've started seeing them, first and foremost, as a way to keep track of what really happened, so that you can later review the full chain of events that led to current state and retrace your steps.

That's apparently not how everyone else feels, though. Even Pro Git, which I've been browsing every now and then for ideas as well as Git tips, has an entire chapter titled "Git Tools - Rewriting History", explaining how to alter (prettify, falsify, whatever you call it) local commit history.

I guess it's, in the end, all about finding the right balance between flexibility and consistency :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
as a way to keep track of what really happened, so that you can later review the full chain of events that led to current state and retrace your steps.

I hope that you will be able to stay faithful to some type of reliable transactional based version control.  I believe it will play a big part in where and how applications built on this can be deployed.

Anyway, I have always been impressed with your version control module.  Good Luck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow! This looks really amazing. Appears that I'll be having lunch at my desk today and testing this out. :)

I really like @pete's suggestions, and @antti's idea of a time interval for bundling. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
After a vanilla Processwire 2.4 install, I can't get Version Control module working fully...

Module compatibility is stated as Processwire 2.4 (current stable version).

After Version Control install, Page Snapshot dependancy is not installed and states it requires 2.4.1 minimum.

‘Preview revision’ on the ‘History’ tab gives:

'TemplateFile: Method Page::snapshot does not exist or is not callable in this context'

Upgrading to Processwire 2.4.4 (current dev) allows module and dependancies to install.

‘Preview revision’ on the ‘History’ tab gives:

'TemplateFile: SQLSTATE[HY093]: Invalid parameter number: number of bound variables does not match number of tokens'

and php error:

'Undefined variable: page_ids in site/modules/VersionControl/PageSnapshot.module on line 253'

Version Control 0.9.15 installed. 

Version Control history is enabled for basic-page template.

Any ideas? Have I missed something?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@sid: sounds kind of like you could have an earlier version of Page Snapshot module installed. Could please you check that you're running version 1.1.18 of it?

I'm sorry for the confusion about supported ProcessWire version. Dev branch is really needed to run this module. My original post mentioned that the module requires "2.4.1 or later, i.e. current dev branch", but since modules directory doesn't allow submissions unless you define a version ranging from 2.0 to 2.4 as compatible.. well, I can see how that could happen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply - I have:

Page Snapshot 1.1.18

Process Version Control 0.9.5

Version Control 0.9.15

All 3 PHP errors are:

Undefined variable: page_ids in site/modules/VersionControl/PageSnapshot.module on line 253

Undefined variable: page_ids in site/modules/VersionControl/PageSnapshot.module on line 261

array_merge(): Argument #2 is not an array in site/modules/VersionControl/PageSnapshot.module on line 261

all of which feed into the SQL query missing parameter error when the statement is executed on PageSnapshot.module line 263 I guess?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks! There was an issue in PageSnapshot.module preventing it from working properly unless FieldtypeRepeater was installed too.

I've just pushed fix for that to GitHub, so if you could fetch latest version and see if it works any better?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi teppo, is there a way to get the changes from the api?

$page->currentVersion->typicalFunctions;

$page->previousVersion->typicalFunctions;

I’m looking at implementing a status notification system for a project and this would be handy. For this I would need to grab different fields or a specific one and check for differences using a hook.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for the delayed answer, Pierre-Luc! Been busy with other stuff and this totally slipped my mind.
 
What you've described there wasn't really possible without direct SQL queries until just a few moments ago. I've just pushed to GitHub an update to VersionControl.module (0.10.0) that adds new $page->versionControlRevisions() method. This isn't properly tested yet, but something like this should work:

// current value of field 'headline'
echo "Headline for current revision: {$page->headline}<br />";

// value of field 'headline' in previous revision
$revisions = array_keys($page->versionControlRevisions(2));
$page->snapshot(null, $revisions[1]);
echo "Headline for previous revision: {$page->headline}<br />";

// return Page to it's original (current) state
$page->snapshot();
echo "Back to current revision: {$page->headline}<br />";

Since snapshot() returns Page object to given revision or point in time ($page->snapshot($time, $revision)) you'll want to make sure it's back to it's original state in case you're going to make changes and save the page -- otherwise the revision you fetched with snapshot will be returned from history once you save the page.
 
$page->versionControlRevisions() returns an array of revisions for current page and can optionally take one param, $limit, to fetch only that many revisions if more exist. It's return value is in the form of array([revision] => [timestamp]), i.e. array(4 => '2014-01-01 02:00:00', 3 => '2014-01-01 01:00:00') etc. so in order to get just the revision IDs out of that I'm using array_keys() in the example above.
 
You could probably also do something like this, if you want to make sure that Page doesn't get accidentally returned from history (this'll consume more memory, though):

$revisions = array_keys($page->versionControlRevisions(2));
$page->previousVersion = clone $page;
$page->previousVersion->snapshot(null, $revisions[1]);
echo "Headline for previous revision: {$page->previousVersion->headline}<br />";

Not sure if you're still working on this, but this kind of feature felt useful so I'm glad you brought it up.. :)

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That’s pretty neat teppo! The feature will be implemented a bit further down the road on this project so it’s far from too late! I’ll let you know when I’ll start playing with it. Awesome, thanks again!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ran into a snafu today, here's the setup and behavior:

- Page table field (called reviews)

when adding a review, the review would save but then the field itself wouldn't save so the related page wouldn't be added into the page table and there would be a 500 error;  tried uninstalling various modules, but in the end it came down to this one, when i removed the template from the selected list of templates, the field started saving again; i will try and provide more info, but the errors were not specific to anything other than setting output formatting as false for the the page table field before saving...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just unliked the first post just to like it again. silly.

Sorry Macrura, if that doesn't help with you problem :mellow:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Macrura: if I'm getting this right, you're just adding a page to a PageTable field, and when Version Control is installed, this fails with a 500 error (internal server error). The page (review) itself gets added and saved properly, apparently.

To be clear, which template did you remove from Version Control enabled templates -- the one used for reviews or the one containing the PageTable field? Also, is there anything added to the error logs of Apache or PW?

I was kind of assuming that this module would attempt to store values for the PageTable field itself, which could've easily resulted in an error (don't think that I ever tested that), but since it's not in the supported fields by default, that's unlikely. Unless you've manually added PageTable to the list of supported fields? :)

Any additional info would be helpful. I'll continue testing, but at the moment I'm kind of lost here, and haven't been able to reproduce this issue.

Edit: added PageTable to supported fieldtypes locally. Doesn't work (as expected), but doesn't seem to break anything either. Will continue debugging.

Edited by teppo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@teppo - many thanks for replying and sorry for the vagueness of my bug report;

to clarify, yes, there is a page table field where the ajax saving of the field fails when the Version Control is enabled for this template; i only have 3 fields enabled for VC, which are all simple text and body fields.

I removed the template of the containing page from the VC preferences and that allowed the pt field to be saved.

there were errors in the error log (cleared it though), but I'm not sure if they would help, but if so i can re-enable the VC on this template to generate the error if that would help... this site is still in testing, not live, so it's no problem to do that; i can probably get to that later today...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

there were errors in the error log (cleared it though), but I'm not sure if they would help, but if so i can re-enable the VC on this template to generate the error if that would help... this site is still in testing, not live, so it's no problem to do that; i can probably get to that later today...

Thanks. That would be very helpful (probably), since right now I'm kind of out of ideas here. It's probably something simple, I'm just failing to see what it could be.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Robin S
      Some introduction...
      This module is experimental and there are probably bugs - so treat it as alpha and don't use it on production websites.
      I started on this module because there have been quite a few requests for "fake" or "invisible" parent functionality and I was curious about what is possible given that the idea sort of goes against the PW page structure philosophy. I'm not sure that I will use this module myself, just because I don't really see a long list of pages under Home (or anywhere else) as untidy or cluttered. I would tend to use Lister Pro when I want to see some set of pages as a self-contained group. But maybe others will find it useful.
      At the moment this module does not manipulate the breadcrumb menu in admin. So when you are editing or adding a virtual child the real location of the page is revealed in the breadcrumb menu. That's because I don't see the point in trying to comprehensively fool users about the real location of pages - I think it's better that they have some understanding of where the pages really are. But I'm open to feedback on this and it is possible to alter the breadcrumbs if there's a consensus that it would be better that way.
       
      Virtual Parents
      Allows pages in Page List to be grouped under a virtual parent.
      This module manipulates the page list and the flyout tree menu to make it appear that one or more pages are children of another page when in fact they are siblings of that page.
      Why would you do that instead of actually putting the child pages inside the parent? Mainly if you want to avoid adding the parent name as part of the URL. For example, suppose you have some pages that you want to be accessed at URLs directly off the site root: yourdomain.com/some-page/. But in the page list you want them to be appear under a parent for the sake of visual grouping or to declutter the page list under Home.
      Example of how the page structure actually is

      Example of how the page structure appears with Virtual Parents activated

      How it works
      This module identifies the virtual parents and virtual children by way of template. You define a single template as the virtual parent template and one or more templates as the virtual child templates. Anytime pages using the child template(s) are siblings of a page using the parent template, those child pages will appear as children of the virtual parent in the page list and tree menu.
      You will want to create dedicated templates for identifying virtual parents and virtual children and reserve them just for use with this module.
      Features
      Adjusts both page list and tree flyout menu to show the virtual parent/child structure, including the count of child pages. Works everywhere page list is used: Page List Select / Page List Select Multiple (and therefore CKEditor link dialog). Intercepts the "Add page" process in admin, so that when an attempt is made to add a child to a virtual parent, the child is added where it belongs (the next level up) and the template selection is limited to virtual child templates. Intercepts moving and sorting pages in the page list, to ensure only virtual children may be moved/sorted under the virtual parent. Superusers have a toggle switch at the bottom of the page list to easily disable/enable Virtual Parents in order to get a view of what the real page structure is. Usage
      Install the Virtual Parents module.
      In the module config, enter pairs of parent/child template names in the form virtual_parent_template=virtual_child_template. If needed you can specify multiple pipe-separated child templates: virtual_parent_template=child_template_1|child_template_2. One pair of template names per line.
      There is a checkbox in the module config to toggle Virtual Pages on and off, but it's more convenient to use this from the page list.
      Notes
      It's important to keep in mind the real location of the virtual child pages. This module is only concerned with adjusting the appearance of page list and tree menu for the sake of visual grouping and tidiness. In all other respects the virtual children are not children of the virtual parent at all.
      It's recommended to select an icon for the virtual parent template (Advanced tab) so virtual parents are marked out in the page list as being different from normal parent pages.
      Do not place real children under a virtual parent. There is some protection against this when moving pages in the page list, but when it comes to changing a page's parent via the Settings tab the only protection is common sense.
       
      https://github.com/Toutouwai/VirtualParents
    • By horst
      Wire Mail SMTP

      An extension to the new WireMail base class that uses SMTP-transport

      This module integrates EmailMessage, SMTP and SASL php-libraries from Manuel Lemos into ProcessWire. I use this continously evolved libraries for about 10 years now and there was never a reason or occasion not to do so. I use it nearly every day in my office for automated composing and sending personalized messages with attachments, requests for Disposition Notifications, etc. Also I have used it for sending personalized Bulkmails many times.

      The WireMailSmtp module extends the new email-related WireMail base class introduced in ProcessWire 2.4.1 (while this writing, the dev-branch only).
       
      Here are Ryans announcement.



      Current Version 0.2.7
      get it from the Modules Directory Install and Configure

      Download the module into your site/modules/ directory and install it.

      In the config page you fill in settings for the SMTP server and optionaly the (default) sender, like email address, name and signature.
      You can test the smtp settings directly there. If it says "SUCCESS! SMTP settings appear to work correctly." you are ready to start using it in templates, modules or bootstrap scripts.


      Usage Examples
      The simplest way to use it:
      $numSent = wireMail($to, $from, $subject, $textBody); $numSent = wireMail($to, '', $subject, $textBody); // or with a default sender emailaddress on config page This will send a plain text message to each recipient.
       
      You may also use the object oriented style:
      $mail = wireMail(); // calling an empty wireMail() returns a wireMail object $mail->to($toEmail, $toName); $mail->from = $yourEmailaddress; // if you don't have set a default sender in config // or if you want to override that $mail->subject($subject); $mail->body($textBody); $numSent = $mail->send(); Or chained, like everywhere in ProcessWire:
      $mail = wireMail(); $numSent = $mail->to($toEmail)->subject($subject)->body($textBody)->send(); Additionaly to the basics there are more options available with WireMailSmtp. The main difference compared to the WireMail BaseClass is the sendSingle option. With it you can set only one To-Recipient but additional CC-Recipients.
      $mail = wireMail(); $mail->sendSingle(true)->to($toEmail, $toName)->cc(array('person1@example.com', 'person2@example.com', 'person3@example.com')); $numSent = $mail->subject($subject)->body($textBody)->send(); The same as function call with options array:
      $options = array( 'sendSingle' => true, 'cc' => array('person1@example.com', 'person2@example.com', 'person3@example.com') ); $numSent = wireMail($to, '', $subject, $textBody, $options); There are methods to your disposal to check if you have the right WireMail-Class and if the SMTP-settings are working:
      $mail = wireMail(); if($mail->className != 'WireMailSmtp') { // Uups, wrong WireMail-Class: do something to inform the user and quit echo "<p>Couldn't get the right WireMail-Module (WireMailSmtp). found: {$mail->className}</p>"; return; } if(!$mail->testConnection()) { // Connection not working: echo "<p>Couldn't connect to the SMTP server. Please check the {$mail->className} modules config settings!</p>"; return; } Following are a ...


      List of all options and features


      testConnection () - returns true on success, false on failures


      sendSingle ( true | false ) - default is false

      sendBulk ( true | false ) - default is false, Set this to true if you have lots of recipients (50+)


      to ($recipients) - one emailaddress or array with multiple emailaddresses

      cc ($recipients) - only available with mode sendSingle, one emailaddress or array with multiple emailaddresses

      bcc ($recipients) - one emailaddress or array with multiple emailaddresses

       
      from = 'person@example.com' - emailaddress, can be set in module config (called Sender Emailaddress) but it can be overwritten here

      fromName = 'Name Surname' - optional, can be set in module config (called Sender Name) but it can be overwritten here


      priority (3) - 1 = Highest | 2 = High | 3 = Normal | 4 = Low | 5 = Lowest

      dispositionNotification () or notification () - request a Disposition Notification


      subject ($subject) - subject of the message

      body ($textBody) - use this one alone to create and send plainText emailmessages

      bodyHTML ($htmlBody) - use this to create a Multipart Alternative Emailmessage (containing a HTML-Part and a Plaintext-Part as fallback)

      addSignature ( true | false ) - the default-behave is selectable in config screen, this can be overridden here
      (only available if a signature is defined in the config screen)

      attachment ($filename, $alternativeBasename = "") - add attachment file, optionally alternative basename


      send () - send the message(s) and return number of successful sent messages


      getResult () - returns a dump (array) with all recipients (to, cc, bcc) and settings you have selected with the message, the message subject and body, and lists of successfull addresses and failed addresses,


      logActivity ($logmessage) - you may log success if you want

      logError ($logmessage) - you may log warnings, too. - Errors are logged automaticaly
       
       
      useSentLog (true | false) - intended for usage with e.g. third party newsletter modules - tells the send() method to make usage of the sentLog-methods - the following three sentLog methods are hookable, e.g. if you don't want log into files you may provide your own storage, or add additional functionality here

      sentLogReset ()  - starts a new LogSession - Best usage would be interactively once when setting up a new Newsletter

      sentLogGet ()  - is called automaticly within the send() method - returns an array containing all previously used emailaddresses

      sentLogAdd ($emailaddress)  - is called automaticly within the send() method
       
      Changelog: https://github.com/horst-n/WireMailSmtp/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md
       
    • By ukyo
      Call ProcessWire API Functions Inside STRING
      Github Repo
      Current status : BETA
      Each called method must return string value !
      I added all functions, but not tested all. I focused page(), page()->render and field properties (label, description and notes). I also tested some basic pages() api calls.
      Your API calls must start with { and must end with }. For use multiple arguments inside functions, separate arguments with ~ char.
      NOTE If you pass directly arguments to api {page(title)}, this call will check for requestedApiCall()->get(arguments).
      USAGE
      processString(string, page, language); Get page title <?php $str = "You are here : {page:title}"; echo processString($str); ?> Get page children render result <?php $str = "Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.<hr>{page:render:children}"; echo processString($str); ?> Get homepage title <?php $str = "You can visit our <a hre='{pages(1):url}'>{pages:get(1):title}</a>"; echo processString($str); ?> Get title field label, description or notes <?php $str = "Our title field properties are : label: {label(title)} - description: {description(title)} - notes: {notes(title)}"; echo processString($str); ?> Multiple examples <?php $str = " <ul class='uk-list uk-list-striped'> <li><b>01: GET FIELD LABEL</b> <code>&#123;label(title)&#125;</code> <b>RESULT :</b> <code>{label(title)}</code></li> <li><b>02: GET FIELD LABEL WITH PREFIX</b> <code>&#123;label(title~=> )&#125;</code> <b>RESULT :</b> <code>{label(title~=> )}</code></li> <li><b>03: GET FIELD LABEL WITH SUFFIX</b> <code>&#123;label(title~~ <=)&#125;</code> <b>RESULT :</b> <code>{label(title~~ <=)}</code></li> <li><b>04: GET FIELD DESCRIPTION</b> <code>&#123;description(title)&#125;</code> <b>RESULT :</b> <code>{description(title)}</code><br> <li><b>05: GET FIELD DESCRIPTION WITH PREFIX</b> <code>&#123;description(title~=> )&#125;</code> <b>RESULT :</b> <code>{description(title~=> )}</code></li> <li><b>06: GET FIELD DESCRIPTION WITH SUFFIX</b> <code>&#123;description(title~~ <=)&#125;</code> <b>RESULT :</b> <code>{description(title~~ <=)}</code></li> <li><b>07: GET FIELD NOTES</b> <code>&#123;notes(title)&#125;</code> <b>RESULT :</b> <code>{notes(title)}</code><br> <li><b>08: GET FIELD NOTES WITH PREFIX</b> <code>&#123;notes(title~=> )&#125;</code> <b>RESULT :</b> <code>{notes(title~=> )}</code></li> <li><b>09: GET FIELD NOTES WITH SUFFIX</b> <code>&#123;notes(title~~ <=)&#125;</code> <b>RESULT :</b> <code>{notes(title~~ <=)}</code></li> <li><b>10: GET PAGE TITLE</b> <code>&#123;page(title)&#125;</code> <b>RESULT :</b> <code>{page(title)}</code></li> <li><b>11: GET PAGE TITLE</b> <code>&#123;page:title&#125;</code> <b>RESULT :</b> <code>{page:title}</code></li> <li><b>12: GET PAGE RENDER TITLE</b> <code>&#123;page:render:title&#125;</code> <b>RESULT :</b> <code>{page:render:title}</code></li> <li><b>12: GET HOMEPAGE TITLE</b> <code>&#123;pages:get(template=home):title&#125;</code> <b>RESULT :</b> <code>{pages:get(template=home):title}</code></li> <li><b>13: GET HOMEPAGE TEMPLATE ID</b> <code>&#123;pages:get(template=home):template:id&#125;</code> <b>RESULT :</b> <code>{pages:get(template=home):template:id}</code></li> </ul> "; echo processString($str); ?>
    • By Robin S
      This module corrects a few things that I find awkward about the "Add New Template" workflow in the PW admin. I opened a wishlist topic a while back because it would good to resolve some of these things in the core, but this module is a stopgap for now.
      Originally I was going to share these as a few standalone hooks, but decided to bundle them together in a configurable module instead. This module should be considered alpha until it has gone through some more testing.
      Add Template Enhancements
      Adds some efficiency enhancements when adding or cloning templates via admin.

      Features
      Derive template label from name: if you like to give each of your templates a label then this feature can save some time. When one or more new templates are added in admin a label is derived automatically from the name. There are options for underscore/hyphen replacement and capitalisation of the label. Edit template after add: when adding only a single template, the template is automatically opened for editing after it is added. Copy field contexts when cloning: this copies the field contexts (a.k.a. overrides such as column width, label and description) from the source template to the new template when using the "Duplicate/clone this template?" feature on the Advanced tab. Copy field contexts when duplicating fields: this copies the field contexts if you select the "Duplicate fields used by another template" option when adding a new template. Usage
      Install the Add Template Enhancements module.
      Configure the module settings according to what suits you.
       
      https://github.com/Toutouwai/AddTemplateEnhancements
    • By AAD Web Team
      Hi,
      I've put in a support request (as a followup on an existing one) for this but it's nearly 10pm Ryan's time, so I thought I'd ask on here just in case someone can help...
      Yesterday we purchased ProDrafts, but I couldn't get the key to validate. Every time I hit submit on the module settings screen the key would be removed from the field I entered it in, and then it would complain about the missing value. I put in a support request and Ryan responded last night. It turned out it was because we're behind a proxy/firewall. He gave me a fix to get around that issue - some code to go into admin.php. I put that code in and saved admin.php, but now I can't even get into our admin anymore!
      (Just to clarify, I took the code back out and saved admin.php but that made no difference. It's definitely not the new code causing the error.)
      The errors relate to a lack of permission on the ProDrafts module (see attached screenshot). We do have a key, but evidently the code Ryan gave me to add the key in via admin.php isn't taking effect before the error is thrown...?
      I tried removing the ProDrafts directory from the modules directory, but that hasn't helped.
      Is there a hook I can put in somewhere to tell it not to load ProDrafts at all, or not check the permissions? Or is there some way to manually uninstall it from the file system?
      Thanks!
      Margaret