Jump to content

jploch

Members
  • Posts

    244
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

jploch last won the day on January 26

jploch had the most liked content!

About jploch

  • Birthday 05/02/1985

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://janploch.de/

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests
    Graphic Design, Web Design, HTML/CSS, Javascript

Recent Profile Visitors

4,190 profile views

jploch's Achievements

Sr. Member

Sr. Member (5/6)

168

Reputation

  1. Today I used this module for the first time to implement an RSS feed into an exiting website. On my local dev enviroment, everything worked well. But on the live website I get a error, when umlaute (ä,ö,ü) are present in the title field. The error looks like this: This page contains the following errors: error on line 4 at column 51: Entity 'uuml' not defined Below is a rendering of the page up to the first error. Here is the code to render the RSS feed (if I comment out the part $rss->title and $rss->description, it works) <?php namespace ProcessWire; // retrieve the RSS module $rss = $modules->get("MarkupRSS"); // configure the feed. see the actual module file for more optional config options. $rss->title = "ATLAS ist das Kundenmagazin von Gebrüder Weiss"; $rss->description = "ATLAS ist das Kundenmagazin von Gebrüder Weiss."; $rss->itemDescriptionField = 'textarea'; // find the pages you want to appear in the feed. // this can be any group of pages returned by $pages->find() or $page->children(), etc. $items = $pages->find("template=artikel, limit=10, sort=-parent, sort=sort"); // send the output of the RSS feed, and you are done $rss->render($items); ?> EDIT: My local PW version is 3.0.150 and my live PW version is 3.0.165. After replacing the module file (MarkupRSS.module) from the live site with the older version from my local site, everything is working fine. So there seems to be an issue with the newer version.
  2. still it would be nice to just use the title field as the block id without the need for an additional custom field. The title is not really needed in the context of the block, so I could just hide it in the editor. Since the block pages are hidden under the admin page in the tree (this can be changed in field settings, but maybe I will remove that setting and make that the default), there is no real danger to acidentally change the title of a block manually. That way I don't have to take care of installing/uninstalling the custom field. I guess the main question is if it should be possible to add existing pages to my grid, that do not use the block templates but are just regular pages in the tree. For those cases the title field would not be a good option. However it would still be possible to include those pages with a block that has a page reference field. This would also be a better option to include existing pages, since it's much more clear there is an actual connection to another page.
  3. I tried to keep it simple and was also concerned with performance. Updating the JSON field on the parent page is easy. Storing the data on the children/blocks would mean I have to update the JSON via ajax every time the blocks style is updated (not a big deal). Also there are some settings for the parent page I need to save as well, so it seemed like a good approach to have just one JSON field to keep all the data in one place. Maybe I will consider moving the JSON to each block instead, but that would mean a lot of refactoring needs to be done. Also what will happen if the same block page is added to two different grid fields/parent pages, then it could only have one style that is associated with the block. With my current approach, it would be possible to have different styles for the same block, since the JSON is stored on the parent. I have to think about this a little. Thanks for looking into this! I have a tunnel vision by now, and there are so many things to consider, it's very helpful to get a fresh perspective on it.
  4. Thx for your input! Just to be sure we are on the same page here. Iam talking about the parent page with my grid field, that holds all the childpages, lets call them blocks. So cloning this parent page from the page tree with the copy button, causes all the blocks on the clone to change their page id (need to be unique) and page name, the page title however will not change, so setting the title as the JSON ID will keep the styling information without any need for a comparison of IDs or additional fields. As I understand it, going with ids would need a hook on page add/clone to handle the switch of IDs or all the styling information is lost. Using the title field or a custom field to simply copy the same JSON id to the new page (page clone does this automatically) worked well so far. Iam worried when external pages that already exists in the page tree are added to the page grid field (eg. via api) it would not be a good idea to use the title field here, because it maybe be accidentally changed by the user and lose its connection with the JSON id. Also not sure I was clear, the JSON data lives on the parent page, I only need a way to connect the blocks with the JSON id. Hope that makes sense 🙂
  5. Hey folks! Just wanted to give you an update on this. Iam close to an alpha release now. I added a lot of features (containers/groups, more styling options, api functions, optional webfonts/google fonts integration, UI improvments etc.) and bug fixes and now it feels quite stable. I still have to do some testing and some UI stuff. Iam really exited to show you the new version soon! 🤩 Before I can post a final release date I have to think a little bit about how the JSON for the styling is saved and make sure that it's solid. I have two approaches and can't decide which one is best. Maybe someone, who used page table (my module uses templates/fields just like page table), can help me figure this out. It works like this: When a new block/page is added to the page table, my module auto generates a title and a name. The title is generated based on the name of the template the page item is using plus the page id. I title could look like this: block_image_5143 This title (with sanitizer) is then used as an ID to save all the styling information for that item/page to my JSON field (it's also used to generate a css class name). The ID has to be unique in the context of the page containing the page table items. I figured I can't use the page id or the page name, because when a page containing a page table grid is cloned, all the items/pages added to the page table get duplicated and change their name and ids, so the clone loses all the styling information. So while it works great with the title field, it has the downside, that when the user changes the title, the connection to the ID/title in the JSON gets lost. So an alternative approach Iam considering now is to add an extra field to every page table item template automatically via api (pupulated on item/page creation), eg. pgrid_id. This field only has superuser access or is completly hidden. While this adds a little more overhead, it may be the better approach. What do you guys think is better?
  6. Gumroad looks very promising! Will take a closer look, that might just be what I need. From what I can see it's even possible to inform the customer of new versions of the module and adding subscriptions for support etc. Sweet!
  7. That seems simple enough, but that would not prevent the use of my module on multiple unregistered domains. Also not sure what you mean with "compare with your database entry at some future date"?
  8. @rick thanks! Seems like there is no easy solution. I would rather like to focus on the module itself, than on the protection of it. Maybe I will use a ready made solution like Easy Digital Downloads, but that seems to be made for wordpress. Is there anything similar that someone has used to sell digital products with licensing?
  9. Hi folks, Iam working on a rather complex pagebuilder module, which took a lot of time to build. Now the module is almost ready and my plan is to release it as a commercial module at some point. This will help me to support the module in the future as well as cover some of the time/costs it took to make it. There will be 3 licenses: - Single website – 3 websites – 10 websites To protect the module from being used without a license, Iam looking for a simple way to generate a license key, that is tied to a domain. It don't has to be the most secure methode. If possible it will work without making a connection to an external server to check the key? I have no experience with this but I picture it may work like this: 1. When the user buys the module, he/she needs to enter a domain, or multiple domains (based on the license). 2. The user can download the module and gets a license key (generated based on the domains entered?) 3. After installing the module in the backend, the user needs to enter the license key 4. The module checks if the url matches the key and grant/denies acess. Another idea might be to use the userAuthSalt stored in the config file of PW to generate the key. But then the key needs to be generated after the module is installed. How would you generate the license key?
  10. Doing a redirect would be an easy solution. As I understand it, Google allows two redirects without a penalty. The only other redirect that could happen is the http to https or www to non-www. There are no subdomains planned, it's a very small website that is unlikely to grow much in the future. Do you think in this case the redirect would be ok?
  11. That will work, exept that the URL for the homepage would be casamani.com and not casamani.com/location-1. Or is there any way around this? Not sure Iam thinking it through.
  12. Hey folks, currently Iam working on a website for one of my clients and I need some advice on how to approach this in PW. The website is for a company, that offers holiday houses in two locations. The client wants the homepage to show the first location. Normally I just have a home template for the first page, but here the URL should reflect that you are in Location 1. So when you visit the URL casamani.com it should redirect to casamani.com/location-1. Not sure if this makes sense at all. Whould it be bad for SEO and performance reasons to redirect home to the Location-1 page? Another approach would be to render the Location-1 template on the home template or do an include like discussed here. Here is how the tree looks: – Home – Location 1 (Homepage) – Creation – Adventure – Sustainability – Location 2 – Creation – Adventure – Sustainability Thanks for looking into this!
  13. thx! it's working now calling the function like this. Cool! $CssClasses = $modules->get('InputfieldPageGrid')->getCssClasses();
  14. One more question to finally understand php classes a little bit better: If I have this simple class: class PageGridCSS { public $cssClasses = 'test classes'; public function getCssClasses() { return $this->cssClasses; } } How can I call the function getCssClasses from outside the file it is declared in? So far I was able to call it from within the same file only by doing this: $PageGridCSS = new PageGridCSS(); $PageGridCSS->getCssClasses();
×
×
  • Create New...