Jump to content
teppo

SearchEngine

Recommended Posts

On 5/31/2020 at 12:29 PM, dynweb said:

Using the module on a multi-language site. When saving a page, I get the following error: "Call to a member function setLanguageValue() on string", File: .../modules/SearchEngine/lib/Indexer.php:99


 98:                        if ($index_field_exists) {
 99:                            $page->get($index_field)->setLanguageValue($language, $index[$language->id]);
101:                        }

I suppose we need a $page->of(false) here before calling setLanguageValue() ?

Actually it sounds like your search_index field could be single-value textarea, instead of textarea (multi-language). If so, you'll have to change the type of the field manually.

Could you check if this is the case?

Either way I should probably add some extra checks to make sure that this doesn't happen.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, teppo said:

Actually it sounds like your search_index field could be single-value textarea, instead of textarea (multi-language). If so, you'll have to change the type of the field manually.

It is multi-language.

As far as I understand, $page->get($field) returns the field value (a string) if output formatting is true, and a field object if output formatting is false (what we need here).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/9/2020 at 1:49 PM, dynweb said:

It is multi-language.

As far as I understand, $page->get($field) returns the field value (a string) if output formatting is true, and a field object if output formatting is false (what we need here).

Right — looks like I skimmed too quickly over this part. Was also pretty sure that I had tested this before, but you're right that it doesn't seem to work at the moment. Thanks, I'll take a closer look soon!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm quite new to ProcessWire and never finished to learn new things about web development so forgive me if this is a stupid question. What is the exact advantage of this module to the native search function within PW? Because it feels like I could build on the "search"-template and get pretty much the same results.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/24/2020 at 3:36 AM, fruid said:

I'm quite new to ProcessWire and never finished to learn new things about web development so forgive me if this is a stupid question. What is the exact advantage of this module to the native search function within PW? Because it feels like I could build on the "search"-template and get pretty much the same results.

I'm curious as well.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/9/2020 at 1:49 PM, dynweb said:

As far as I understand, $page->get($field) returns the field value (a string) if output formatting is true, and a field object if output formatting is false (what we need here).

In the end I couldn't reproduce this issue: when a page is indexed, output formatting should be disabled, and thus this sort of problem shouldn't happen. Likely there's some scenario I've missed, so in 0.24.0 I switched that get() to getUnformatted(). I hope that resolves the problem — but if not, I may need a bit more information on how to reproduce it 🙂

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/24/2020 at 12:36 PM, fruid said:

I'm quite new to ProcessWire and never finished to learn new things about web development so forgive me if this is a stupid question. What is the exact advantage of this module to the native search function within PW? Because it feels like I could build on the "search"-template and get pretty much the same results.

Don't worry, it's not a stupid question 🙂

You can definitely build a custom search feature and get great results with that, but things tend to get a little more complicated if your site contains a larger amount of fields, and particularly if you're using Repeater, RepeaterMatrix, PageTable, or other types of fields with repeatable content — or perhaps page reference fields gluing content from different pages together. In other words content that isn't technically (directly) part of the page, but needs to be tied with the page in the context of site search.

Although in many cases you could no doubt include all those fields in your search queries, this can result in pretty complex queries, and such queries also tend to become inefficient. Generally speaking the more fields you join in the query, the more complex the resulting SQL query will get, and the more time and resources it'll take to process. Not a great thing for scalability.

First version of SearchEngine was really just an easy way to reuse bits and pieces of code that were developed over time to mash field values together so that they could be searched more efficiently. Soon after along came the markup generating parts (which now make up a notable portion of the module), a set of features for automatically filtering and sanitizing queries and processing the index, JSON output option (mostly for AJAX requests), indexing support for field types requiring specific handling (core ones as well as third party), etc.

From the initial post in this thread:

Quote

Though the API and selector engine make it really easy to create site search pages, I pretty much always end up duplicating the same features from site to site. Also – since it takes a bit of extra time – it's tempting to skip over some accessibility related things, and leave features like text highlighting out. Overall I think it makes sense to bundle all that into a module, which can then be reused over and over again 🙂

These days in my projects I install SearchEngine, set it up, and trigger the render function. The module takes care of everything else and "just works". In a nutshell SE bundles most of the stuff a typical site search will need into one package, and tries to do it efficiently and following best practices 🙂

Hope this answered your question!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, teppo said:

when a page is indexed, output formatting should be disabled, and thus this sort of problem shouldn't happen. 🙂

This put me on the right track 🙂 I had a Pages::saved hook that set output formatting to true (when it shouldn't). Thank you!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick heads-up: SearchEngine 0.25.0 was just released. This version adds support for the new selector operators added in ProcessWire 3.0.160, and also adds a new details section below the selector operator setting.

If someone has defined the operator in site config ($config->SearchEngine), that's still a valid option and new operators can be used there as well.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just started tinkering around with this haven't haven't looked under the hood a ton. Is the _auto_desc using a method to generate on the fly or is this being populated in the results somewhere that I can refer to?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I got this error during install (pw 3.0.159 dev)

Edit: apparently I solved updating to the latest dev version 3.0.160
image.thumb.png.78bbcaa3b512c65033e2a959aaadf57d.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/15/2020 at 4:03 AM, gornycreative said:

I just started tinkering around with this haven't haven't looked under the hood a ton. Is the _auto_desc using a method to generate on the fly or is this being populated in the results somewhere that I can refer to?

This is generated on the fly when a result is rendered. Behind the scenes Renderer::renderResultDesc() and Renderer::renderResultsJson() both get field values using Renderer::getResultValue(), which in turn calls Renderer::getResultAutoDesc _auto_desc "pseudo field" (as in: not a real field) is requested.

There's currently no public API for accessing this directly, but if you've got a use case that can be solved by adding one, I wouldn't be against it. Though in that case I'd like to know a bit more about the context 🙂

16 hours ago, Sevarf2 said:

I got this error during install (pw 3.0.159 dev)

Edit: apparently I solved updating to the latest dev version 3.0.160
image.thumb.png.78bbcaa3b512c65033e2a959aaadf57d.png

Sorry! Accidentally introduced a dependency for ProcessWire 3.0.160 in the Config class.

This is now fixed: latest module version (0.25.1) provides proper fallbacks for core versions prior to that.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi @teppo!
I have just installed / downloaded SeachEngine Module on my PW 3.0.148.
I got the error: 
 

Quote

Parse Error: syntax error, unexpected '?' (line 269 of /var/www/admin/www/*******/site/modules/SearchEngine/SearchEngine.module.php)

It's bloked PW module area.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, Alkrav said:

Hi @teppo!
I have just installed / downloaded SeachEngine Module on my PW 3.0.148.
I got the error: 
 

It's bloked PW module area.

Are you using PHP 7 or above?

'??' is a null coalescing operator added in PHP 7. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi @Outward. Thanks for the answer.
I use 5.6 version. But now i have changed to 7, than it works.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello everybody. Nice module look like good continuation of method fieldtype_cache of 2016 .
Is it possible to realize showing results with AJAX like on the pics.
Results is appearing under input, and last searches stored in the same style and showing when mouse click on input field.
And it is good idea for logging searching data for next analize or it can be stored localy.

 

Livesearch_pic.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Hi. I'll try use jQuery for realize live search on this module. But it doesn't work.
I took these code:
 

$(document).ready(function() {	
	var $result = $('#se-results');
	
	$('#se-form').on('keyup', function(){
		var q = $(this).val();
		if ((q != '') && (q.length > 1)){
			$.ajax({
				type: "POST",
				url: "./",
				data: {'q': q},
				success: function(msg){
					$result.html(msg);
					if(msg != ''){	
						$result.fadeIn();
					} else {
						$result.fadeOut(100);
					}
				}
			});
		 } else {
			$result.html('');
			$result.fadeOut(100);
		 }
	});
 
	$(document).on('click', function(e){
		if (!$(e.target).closest('.search-form').length){
			$result.html('');
			$result.fadeOut(100);
		}
	});
});


What i do wrong? Maybe i use not supported method?

Edited by Alkrav
Changed data: {'q': q},

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you are sending 'search' which is null, you have to send q

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Sevarf2 thanks.
Interesting reaction: If i delete frome page code  <?= $searchEngine->renderResults() ?> string (beacause there is no reaction) and add <div id="se-results"></div> i'll get loaded the same page in the div.
To whitch URL i need send POST query to get results (url: "./",)?



 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Alkrav said:

@Sevarf2 thanks.
Interesting reaction: If i delete frome page code  <?= $searchEngine->renderResults() ?> string (beacause there is no reaction) and add <div id="se-results"></div> i'll get loaded the same page in the div.
To whitch URL i need send POST query to get results (url: "./",)?



 

I'm sorry but this is going outside this forum scope, I suggest you study php, these are basic issues.

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Alkrav said:

@Sevarf2 thanks.
Interesting reaction: If i delete frome page code  <?= $searchEngine->renderResults() ?> string (beacause there is no reaction) and add <div id="se-results"></div> i'll get loaded the same page in the div.
To whitch URL i need send POST query to get results (url: "./",)?

Not sure I fully understand what you're doing, but if you want to submit a search query with AJAX you need to post it to the same URL that you normally would post it to — if your search page is /search/, then that's where the AJAX query should go as well.

Note, though, that by default SearchEngine responds to GET requests, not POST requests, so that may be one reason why you're not getting the results you'd expect. Might want to switch to jQuery.get() or change the method from POST to GET in your jQuery.ajax() call.

Just for the record, SearchEngine has a built-in way to render results as JSON. This is what I typically use for AJAX search features. JSON data is pretty easy to handle with JS, and this way I'm not stuck with whatever markup the search results list on the regular ("full") page is using. When you asked if "Is it possible to realize showing results with AJAX like on the pics", the short answer is "it sure is" — but you'll have to create the markup and the JS parts yourself, since SE doesn't provide those out of the box 🙂

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for useful answer.  And i understood that you gave base functions for extended using. And logically i tried to implement live search with stadart jQuery function + your module and its must give waited result, but don't.

Thanks for the tip about GET, and i tried and it worked not good and only if i placed result php-string from module and separately <div id="se-results"></div>.
Sorry for my newbie mistakes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Alkrav said:

Thank you for useful answer.  And i understood that you gave base functions for extended using. And logically i tried to implement live search with stadart jQuery function + your module and its must give waited result, but don't.

Thanks for the tip about GET, and i tried and it worked not good and only if i placed result php-string from module and separately <div id="se-results"></div>.
Sorry for my newbie mistakes.

I must admit that I can't understand all of this. Are you still having problems with the AJAX search feature?

If so, it would be helpful to see a bit of code, to see what you're actually doing. Perhaps you could post your search template code and the JavaScript part via https://gist.github.com/ or something?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/9/2020 at 9:32 AM, xportde said:

I have a question concerning the savePageIndex-Hook: It works perfectly on saving a single page, but not, when I use the "Index pages now"-function in module settings page. How could I achieve this?

I am also really interested in this concern (and have not found an answer yet). Is it possible to have savePageIndex hooks run on a manual index rebuild? Would be awesome!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry @snck and @xportde, looks like I completely missed this question. Just to be clear, you mean the ___savedPageIndex() method?

Running this when the entire index is being rebuilt should be doable, but it looks like I'll have to move a few bits and pieces to another class. I'll take a closer look at this — hopefully later today, or perhaps tomorrow.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By David Karich
      ProcessWire InputfieldRepeaterMatrixDuplicate
      Thanks to the great ProModule "RepeaterMatrix" I have the possibility to create complex repeater items. With it I have created a quite powerful page builder. Many different content modules, with many more possible design options. The RepeaterMatrix module supports the cloning of items, but only within the same page. Now I often have the case that very design-intensive pages and items are created. If you want to use a content module on a different page (e.g. in the same design), you have to rebuild each item manually every time.
      This module extends the commercial ProModule "RepeaterMatrix" by the function to duplicate repeater items from one page to another page. The condition is that the target field is the same matrix field from which the item is duplicated. This module is currently understood as proof of concept. There are a few limitations that need to be considered. The intention of the module is that this functionality is integrated into the core of RepeaterMatrix and does not require an extra module.
      Check out the screencast
      What the module can do
      Duplicate multible repeater items from one page to another No matter how complex the item is Full support for file and image fields Multilingual support Support of Min and Max settings Live synchronization of clipboard between multiple browser tabs. Copy an item and simply switch the browser tab to the target page and you will immediately see the past button Support of multiple RepeaterMatrix fields on one page Configurable which roles and fields are excluded Configurable dialogs for copy and paste Duplicated items are automatically pasted to the end of the target field and set to hidden status so that changes are not directly published Automatic clipboard update when other items are picked Automatically removes old clipboard data if it is not pasted within 6 hours Delete clipboard itself by clicking the selected item again Benefit: unbelievably fast workflow and content replication What the module can't do
      Before an item can be duplicated in its current version, the source page must be saved. This means that if you make changes to an item and copy this, the old saved state will be duplicated Dynamic loading is currently not possible. Means no AJAX. When pasting, the target page is saved completely No support for nested repeater items. Currently only first level items can be duplicated. Means a repeater field in a repeater field cannot be duplicated. Workaround: simply duplicate the parent item Dynamic reloading and adding of repeater items cannot be registered. Several interfaces and events from the core are missing. The initialization occurs only once after the page load event Changelog
      2.0.0
      Feature: Copy multiple items at once! The fundament for copying multiple items was created by @Autofahrn - THX! Feature: Optionally you can disable the copy and/or paste dialog Bug fix: A fix suggestion when additional and normal repeater fields are present was contributed by @joshua - THX! 1.0.4
      Bug fix: Various bug fixes and improvements in live synchronization Bug fix: Items are no longer inserted when the normal save button is clicked. Only when the past button is explicitly clicked Feature: Support of multiple repeater fields in one page Feature: Support of repeater Min/Max settings Feature: Configurable roles and fields Enhancement: Improved clipboard management Enhancement: Documentation improvement Enhancement: Corrected few typos #1 1.0.3
      Feature: Live synchronization Enhancement: Load the module only in the backend Enhancement: Documentation improvement 1.0.2
      Bug fix: Various bug fixes and improvements in JS functions Enhancement: Documentation improvement Enhancement: Corrected few typos 1.0.1
      Bug fix: Various bug fixes and improvements in the duplication process 1.0.0
      Initial release Support this module
      If this module is useful for you, I am very thankful for your small donation: Donate 5,- Euro (via PayPal – or an amount of your choice. Thank you!)
      Download this module (Version 2.0.0)
      > Github: https://github.com/FlipZoomMedia/InputfieldRepeaterMatrixDuplicate
      > PW module directory: https://modules.processwire.com/modules/inputfield-repeater-matrix-duplicate/
      > Old stable version (1.0.4): https://github.com/FlipZoomMedia/InputfieldRepeaterMatrixDuplicate/releases/tag/1.0.4
    • By Robin S
      A new module that hasn't had a lot of testing yet. Please do your own testing before deploying on any production website.
      Custom Paths
      Allows any page to have a custom path/URL.
      Note: Custom Paths is incompatible with the core LanguageSupportPageNames module. I have no experience working with LanguageSupportPageNames or multi-language sites in general so I'm not in a position to work out if a fix is possible. If anyone with multi-language experience can contribute a fix it would be much appreciated!
      Screenshot

      Usage
      The module creates a field named custom_path on install. Add the custom_path field to the template of any page you want to set a custom path for. Whatever path is entered into this field determines the path and URL of the page ($page->path and $page->url). Page numbers and URL segments are supported if these are enabled for the template, and previous custom paths are managed by PagePathHistory if that module is installed.
      The custom_path field appears on the Settings tab in Page Edit by default but there is an option in the module configuration to disable this if you want to position the field among the other template fields.
      If the custom_path field is populated for a page it should be a path that is relative to the site root and that starts with a forward slash. The module prevents the same custom path being set for more than one page.
      The custom_path value takes precedence over any ProcessWire path. You can even override the Home page by setting a custom path of "/" for a page.
      It is highly recommended to set access controls on the custom_path field so that only privileged roles can edit it: superuser-only is recommended.
      It is up to the user to set and maintain suitable custom paths for any pages where the module is in use. Make sure your custom paths are compatible with ProcessWire's $config and .htaccess settings, and if you are basing the custom path on the names of parent pages you will probably want to have a strategy for updating custom paths if parent pages are renamed or moved.
      Example hooks to Pages::saveReady
      You might want to use a Pages::saveReady hook to automatically set the custom path for some pages. Below are a couple of examples.
      1. In this example the start of the custom path is fixed but the end of the path will update dynamically according to the name of the page:
      $pages->addHookAfter('saveReady', function(HookEvent $event) { $page = $event->arguments(0); if($page->template == 'my_template') { $page->custom_path = "/some-custom/path-segments/$page->name/"; } }); 2. The Custom Paths module adds a new Page::realPath method/property that can be used to get the "real" ProcessWire path to a page that might have a custom path set. In this example the custom path for news items is derived from the real ProcessWire path but a parent named "news-items" is removed:
      $pages->addHookAfter('saveReady', function(HookEvent $event) { $page = $event->arguments(0); if($page->template == 'news_item') { $page->custom_path = str_replace('/news-items/', '/', $page->realPath); } }); Caveats
      The custom paths will be used automatically for links created in CKEditor fields, but if you have the "link abstraction" option enabled for CKEditor fields (Details > Markup/HTML (Content Type) > HTML Options) then you will see notices from MarkupQA warning you that it is unable to resolve the links.
      Installation
      Install the Custom Paths module.
      Uninstallation
      The custom_path field is not automatically deleted when the module is uninstalled. You can delete it manually if the field is no longer needed.
       
      https://github.com/Toutouwai/CustomPaths
      https://modules.processwire.com/modules/custom-paths/
    • By teppo
      Hey folks!
      I'm happy to finally introduce a project I've been working on for quite a while now: it's called Wireframe, and it is an output framework for ProcessWire.
      Note that I'm posting this in the module development area, maily because this project is still in rather early stage. I've built a couple of sites with it myself, and parts of the codebase have been powering some pretty big and complex sites for many years now, but this should still be considered a soft launch 🙂
      --
      Long story short, Wireframe is a module that provides the "backbone" for building sites (and apps) with ProcessWire using an MVC (or perhaps MVVM... one of those three or four letter acronyms anyway) inspired methodology. You could say that it's an output strategy, but I prefer the term "output framework", since in my mind the word "strategy" means something less tangible. A way of doing things, rather than a tool that actually does things.
      Wireframe (the module) provides a basic implementation for some familiar MVC concepts, such as Controllers and a View layer – the latter of which consists of layouts, partials, and template-specific views. There's no "model" layer, since in this context ProcessWire is the model. As a module Wireframe is actually quite simple – not even nearly the biggest one I've built – but there's still quite a bit of stuff to "get", so I've put together a demo & documentation site for it at https://wireframe-framework.com/.
      In addition to the core module, I'm also working on a couple of site profiles based on it. My current idea is actually to keep the module very light-weight, and implement most of the "opinionated" stuff in site profiles and/or companion modules. For an example MarkupMenu (which I released a while ago) was developed as one of those "companion modules" when I needed a menu module to use on the site profiles.
      Currently there are two public site profiles based on Wireframe:
      site-wireframe-docs is the demo&docs site mentioned above, just with placeholder content replaced with placeholder content. It's not a particularly complex site, but I believe it's still a pretty nice way to dig into the Wireframe module. site-wireframe-boilerplate is a boilerplate (or starter) site profile based on the docs site. This is still very much a work in progress, but essentially I'm trying to build a flexible yet full-featured starter profile you can just grab and start building upon. There will be a proper build process for resources, it will include most of the basic features one tends to need from site to site, etc. --
      Requirements and getting started:
      Wireframe can be installed just like any ProcessWire module. Just clone or download it to your site/modules/ directory and install. It doesn't, though, do a whole lot of stuff on itself – please check out the documentation site for a step-by-step guide on setting up the directory structure, adding the "bootstrap file", etc. You may find it easier to install one of the site profiles mentioned above, but note that this process involves the use of Composer. In the case of the site profiles you can install ProcessWire as usual and download or clone the site profile directory into your setup, but after that you should run "composer install" to get all the dependencies – including the Wireframe module – in place. Hard requirements for Wireframe are ProcessWire 3.0.112 and PHP 7.1+. The codebase is authored with current PHP versions in mind, and while running it on 7.0 may be possible, anything below that definitely won't work. A feature I added just today to the Wireframe module is that in case ProcessWire has write access to your site/templates/ directory, you can use the module settings screen to create the expected directories automatically. Currently that's all, and the module won't – for an example – create Controllers or layouts for you, so you should check out the site profiles for examples on these. (I'm probably going to include some additional helper features in the near future.)
      --
      This project is loosely based on an earlier project called pw-mvc, i.e. the main concepts (such as Controllers and the View layer) are very similar. That being said, Wireframe is a major upgrade in terms of both functionality and architecture: namespaces and autoloader support are now baked in, the codebase requires PHP 7, Controllers are classes extending \Wireframe\Controller (instead of regular "flat" PHP files), implementation based on a module instead of a collection of drop-in files, etc.
      While Wireframe is indeed still in a relatively early stage (0.3.0 was launched today, in case version numbers matter) for the most part I'm happy with the way it works, and likely won't change it too drastically anytime soon – so feel free to give it a try, and if you do, please let me know how it went. I will continue building upon this project, and I am also constantly working on various side projects, such as the site profiles and a few unannounced helper modules.
      I should probably add that while Wireframe is not hard to use, it is more geared towards those interested in "software development" type methodology. With future updates to the module, the site profiles, and the docs I hope to lower the learning curve, but certain level of "developer focus" will remain. Although of course the optimal outcome would be if I could use this project to lure more folks towards that end of the spectrum... 🙂
      --
      Please let me know what you think – and thanks in advance!
    • By tcnet
      PageViewStatistic for ProcessWire is a module to log page visits of the CMS. The records including some basic information like IP-address, browser, operating system, requested page and originate page. Please note that this module doesn't claim to be the best or most accurate.
      Advantages
      One of the biggest advantage is that this module doesn't require any external service like Google Analytics or similar. You don't have to modify your templates either. There is also no JavaScript or image required.
      Disadvantages
      There is only one disadvantage. This module doesn't record visits if the browser loads the page from its browser cache. To prevent the browser from loading the page from its cache, add the following meta tags to the header of your page:
      <meta http-equiv="Cache-Control" content="no-cache, no-store, must-revalidate" /> <meta http-equiv="Pragma" content="no-cache" /> <meta http-equiv="Expires" content="0" /> How to use
      The records can be accessed via the Setup-menu of the CMS backend. The first dropdown control changes the view mode. There are 4 different view modes.
      View mode "Day" shows all visits of the selected day individually with IP-address, browser, operating system, requested page and originate page. Click the update button to see new added records. View mode "Month" shows the total of all visitors per day from the first to the last day of the selected month. View mode "Year" shows the total of all visitors per month from the first to the last month of the selected year. View mode "Total" shows the total of all visitors per year for all recorded years. Please note that multiple visits from the same IP address within the selected period are counted as a single visitor.
      Settings
      You can access the module settings by clicking the Configuration button at the bottom of the records page. The settings page is also available in the menu: Modules->Configure->ProcessPageViewStat.
      IP2Location
      This module uses the IP2Location database from: http://www.ip2location.com. This database is required to obtain the country from the IP address. IP2Location updates this database at the begin of every month. The settings of ProcessPageViewStat offers the ability to automatically download the database monthly. Please note, that automatically download will not work if your webspace doesn't allow allow_url_fopen.
      Dragscroll
      This module uses DragScroll. A JavaScript available from: http://github.com/asvd/dragscroll. Dragscroll adds the ability in view mode "Day" to drag the records horizontally with the mouse pointer.
      parseUserAgentStringClass
      This module uses the PHP class parseUserAgentStringClass available from: http://www.toms-world.org/blog/parseuseragentstring/. This class is required to filter out the browser type and operating system from the server request.
      Special Feature
      PageViewStatistic for ProcessWire can record the time a visitor viewed the page. This feature is deactivated by default. To activate open the module configuration page and activate "Record view time". If activated you will find a new column "S." in the records which means the time of view in seconds. With every page request, a Javascript code is inserted directly after the <body> tag. Every time the visitor switches to another tab or closes the tab, this script reports the number of seconds the tab was visible. The initial page request is recorded only as a hyphen (-).
       
    • By MoritzLost
      This module allows you to integrate hCaptcha bot / spam protection into ProcessWire forms. hCaptcha is a great alternative to Google ReCaptcha, especially if you are in the EU and need to comply with privacy regulations.

      The development of this module is sponsored by schwarzdesign.
      The module is built as an Inputfield, allowing you to integrate it into any ProcessWire form you want. It's primarily intended for frontend forms and can be added to Form Builder forms for automatic spam protection. There's a step-by-step guide for adding the hCaptcha widget to Form Builder forms in the README, as well as instructions for API usage.
      Features
      Inputfield that displays an hCaptcha widget in ProcessWire forms. The inputfield verifies the hCaptcha response upon submission, and adds a field error if it is invalid. All hCaptcha configuration options for the widget (theme, display size etc) can be changed through the inputfield configuration, as well as programmatically. hCaptcha script options can be changed through a hook. Error messages can be translated through ProcessWire's site translations. hCaptcha secret keys and site-keys can be set for each individual inputfield or globally in your config.php. Error codes and failures are logged to help you find configuration errors. Please check the README for setup instructions.
      Links
      Github Repository and documentation InputfieldHCaptcha in the module directory Screenshots (configuration)

      Screenshots (hCaptcha widget)

       
       

       
×
×
  • Create New...