Jump to content
teppo

SearchEngine

Recommended Posts

SearchEngine 0.10.0 was just released. Not a whole lot of stuff in this release – basically just one new feature, one minor addition to the default theme CSS, and some PHPDoc improvements.

### Added
- New Renderer::___renderResultsJSON() method for rendering search results as a JSON string.
- Additional CSS rules to make sure that visited links appear correctly in the default output.

While building an AJAX suggest search feature it occurred to me that it would be nice if SearchEngine could return search results as JSON out of the box. Newly added renderResultsJSON() method provides this capability, and new settings results_json_fields and results_json_options allow customising what gets returned, and how.

More details (and an example of using this feature) in the README: https://github.com/teppokoivula/SearchEngine#json-output.

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello - Thanks for your great module!

I have a special need for the side, I'm working on right now:  Is there a possibility not to show the "result_summary_field" in the rendered results, but the 'near' content of the search-match in the search field itself - with the match highlited?

So lets say there is this content in the search_index field: ' Hey - this is just a simple little test for the search engine!'
I am searching for the phrase 'little'.
The rendered result now should show me lets say: '... just a simple little  test for the s...'

To be honest: My php-skills are not that good to understand all the files of your module -  but as far as I can see, I am afraid that it will not be possible in an easy way to change the code for my needs!? 

Thanks for any reply! 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/24/2019 at 11:02 PM, planmacher said:

I have a special need for the side, I'm working on right now:  Is there a possibility not to show the "result_summary_field" in the rendered results, but the 'near' content of the search-match in the search field itself - with the match highlited?

Assuming that I correctly understood your need, this would require dynamically generating the descriptions. Technically it should be doable by hooking into Renderer::RenderResultDesc(), but you'd have to provide the entire description generation and highlighting logic yourself, so it might be a bit difficult to achieve in practice.

This is actually something that I've got planned, but I'm not really sure when I'll get to it. Anyway, it's good to know that there's demand for it.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Couple of updates during the past week, 0.11.0 and 0.11.1. I'll attach the changelog below, but here's a summary of changes:

  • Saving just a single field (via API or perhaps some async feature) should now correctly regenerate the search index.
  • Page Reference fields are supported: the title and name values of referenced pages are stored in the index. Page names can also be search with the field name; if, say, you have a Page Reference field called "tags", you can find specific matches by searching for "tags:[tag-name]" ("tags:tailwind" etc.)
  • One relatively big change behind the scenes is that now the search index is generated after page has been saved, by hooking into Pages::savedPageOrField and triggering a new save for just the index field, quietly and with hooks disabled.

Originally the module hooked into Pages::saveReady and generated the index so that it got saved along with any user-provided changes, but it turns out that this could result in some rather obscure bugs due to output formatting being enabled on the fly (which is intentional, and required for the most representative search index) which in turn was triggering interesting side effects under some specific conditions. So far the new method hasn't resulted in any unexpected side effects as far as I can tell, but it's worth pointing out this is a pretty big update.

## [0.11.1] - 2019-09-26

### Changed
- Index value gets saved in Pages::savedPageOrField instead of Pages::saved.

## [0.11.0] - 2019-09-26

### Added
- Support for indexing Page Reference fields.
- Support for indexing non-field Page properties (id, name).
- New hookable method Indexer::___getPageReferenceIndexValue().

### Changed
- Index value gets saved in Pages::saved instead of Pages::saveReady so that we can avoid messing with the regular save process.

### Fixed
- Fixed the "save" behaviour of the Indexer::indexPage() method.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Teppo, is there a way to make the search language aware? - I mean getting the right context from mutilanguage fields per active language? Probably this would mean an indexing per language?

If not, I wonder if at least all language text entries from a multi language field get indexed? - so a search in the non default language might find maybe too much, but not too little?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/30/2019 at 11:01 AM, ceberlin said:

Hi Teppo, is there a way to make the search language aware? - I mean getting the right context from mutilanguage fields per active language? Probably this would mean an indexing per language?

Sorry for the late reply. This is definitely something I'll have to figure out, one way or another, just haven't had the time (or need for that matter) yet.

I'll have to do some testing first and get back to this later 🙂

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Teppo, I'm close to build my first-time-ever search engine in processwire and wonder if you have made progress into the multilanguage side of your cool module 🙂
Not a big deal anyway, otherwise I will try another approach 🙂

Thanks!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a FYI @teppo I'll definitely need a site search on my next project so I'll try your module soon. I've found https://markjs.io/ today and it seems to be great (and MIT). Maybe this could be implemented into your module for highlighting the results? Or did you have any other solutions in mind?

Would you be interested in me bringing markjs into your module or would you prefer if I build something seperate?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, bernhard said:

Just a FYI @teppo I'll definitely need a site search on my next project so I'll try your module soon. I've found https://markjs.io/ today and it seems to be great (and MIT). Maybe this could be implemented into your module for highlighting the results? Or did you have any other solutions in mind?

Would you be interested in me bringing markjs into your module or would you prefer if I build something seperate?

Hey Bernhard!

SearchEngine already provides a way to highlight hits found from the generated summary, but since there's currently no built-in way to show dynamic summaries on the search page, this doesn't apply to the entire index. See here for an example: https://wireframe-framework.com/search/?q=wireframe.

Please let me know if I've completely misunderstood what markjs does – I'm interested, but not quite sure if it would be beneficial, and/or how it would differ from current situation 🙂

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, 3fingers said:

Hi Teppo, I'm close to build my first-time-ever search engine in processwire and wonder if you have made progress into the multilanguage side of your cool module 🙂
Not a big deal anyway, otherwise I will try another approach 🙂

This is on the top of my to-do list now 🙂

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, teppo said:

Hey Bernhard!

SearchEngine already provides a way to highlight hits found from the generated summary, but since there's currently no built-in way to show dynamic summaries on the search page, this doesn't apply to the entire index. See here for an example: https://wireframe-framework.com/search/?q=wireframe.

Please let me know if I've completely misunderstood what markjs does – I'm interested, but not quite sure if it would be beneficial, and/or how it would differ from current situation 🙂

Thx, seems that I missed that 🙂 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@ceberlin @3fingers

As of 0.12.0 SearchEngine now supports multi-language indexing and searching. This is based on the native language features, so the results you see depend on the language of current user etc. While I don't have a good test case at hand right now, I did some quick testing on one of my own sites and it seemed to work pretty much as expected – though please let me know if there are problems with the latest version 🙂

What you need to do to enable this is convert the index field (which is by default called search_index) from FieldtypeTextarea to FieldtypeTextareaLanguage.

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks @teppo ! You rock! 🙂

I will report back my experience with your module as soon as my client give me the ok with the implementation.

Once again, thanks!

Edit:

I found couple typos in the README inside the "manual approach" section (a double echo and a $searchEngine declaration referenced as $searchengine w/o camel casing), I paste the correction below as hidden:

Spoiler

<?php namespace ProcessWire;
$searchEngine = $modules->get('SearchEngine');
?>
<head>
    <?= $searchEngine->renderStyles(); ?>
    <?= $searchEngine->renderScripts(); ?>
</head>

<body>
    <?php
    // Note: results are rendered before form because this way the form instantly
    // has access to whitelisted query string (if a search was already performed).
    $results = $searchEngine->renderResults();
    $form = $searchEngine->renderForm();
    echo $form . $results;
    ?>
</body>

 

Also, in the "Advanced Use" :

Spoiler

if ($q = $sanitizer->selectorValue($input->get->q)) {
    // This finds pages matching the query string and returns them as a PageArray:
    $results = $pages->find('search_index%=' . $query_string . ', limit=25');

    // Render results and pager with PageArray::render() and PageArray::renderPager():
    echo $results->render(); // PageArray::render()
    echo $results->renderPager(); // PageArray::renderPager()

    // ... or you iterate over the results and render them manually:
    echo "<ul>";
    foreach ($results as $result) {
        echo "<li><a href='{$result->url}'>{$result->title}</a></li>";
    }
    echo "</ul>";
}

 

the "$query_string" variable declaration...shouldn't be "$q" or I am missing something?

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm making progresses!

Everything is working fine except for the renderPager, which loose the query string on subsequential pages:

$searchEngine = $modules->get('SearchEngine');
$form = $searchEngine->renderForm();
echo $form;

$out= '';
if ($q = $sanitizer->selectorValue($input->get->q)) {
    $results = $pages->find('search_index%=' . $q . ', limit=25');
	foreach ($results as $result) {
	$out.= // my code here, everything is great and populated, even repeater matrix elements whaoo! :)
	}
}
$out.= $results->renderPager();
echo $out;

On page http://localhost:7880/my_url/root/it/search/?q=my_query everything is ok.
As soon as I go to page2 the url is http://localhost:7880/my_url/root/it/search/page2 (the query is gone and nothing more is shown).

Btw my "search.php" template has "Allow page numbers" in the backend set to ON.

Any clue? 🙂

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, 3fingers said:

On page http://localhost:7880/my_url/root/it/search/?q=my_query everything is ok.
As soon as I go to page2 the url is http://localhost:7880/my_url/root/it/search/page2 (the query is gone and nothing more is shown).

Btw my "search.php" template has "Allow page numbers" in the backend set to ON.

Any clue? 🙂

The trick is to whitelist "q", after which MarkupPagerNav automatically sticks with it. Add this after you've validated the $q variable:

$input->whitelist('q', $q);

Note also that if this is your literal code, you should move the renderPager call in the if statement – if $q isn't set or validated, $results will be null, and this will cause an error 🙂

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I will do that on Monday, in the meantime thanks for your support and kindness :)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just released SearchEngine 0.13.0. This version adds more validation regarding the search index field: there's a warning if the field is of wrong type, an option to automatically create it if it doesn't exist (i.e. it has been removed after the module was installed), and there's a notice in the module settings screen if the index field exists and is valid but hasn't been added to any templates yet.

Additionally there's a fix for an issue where FieldtypeTextareaLanguage wasn't recognised as a valid index field type in module settings. This could've resulted in the index field setting getting unintentionally cleared if/when module settings were saved.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi @teppo, another gentle question for you 🙂

I'm trying to style the pagination, using this code:

$config->SearchEngine = [

    // This are the settings I already used, successfully, elsewhere in the site to style my pagination.

    'pager_args' => [
        'nextItemLabel' => "Next",
        'previousItemLabel' => "Prev",
        'listMarkup' => "<ul class='pagination'>{out}</ul>",
        'itemMarkup' => "<li class='pagelink {class}'>{out}</li>",
        'linkMarkup' => "<a href='{url}'>{out}</a>",
        'currentLinkMarkup' => "{out}",
        'currentItemClass' => "current",
    ],

	// other settings here stripped out in this example.
];

Those settings seem to be ignored though. I'm surely missing something, can you point me in the right direction? 🙂

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, 3fingers said:

Those settings seem to be ignored though. I'm surely missing something, can you point me in the right direction? 🙂

If you're using the code you posted earlier, i.e. "$results = $pages->find(...)" and "$out.= $results->renderPager()", SearchEngine settings won't kick in at all. This is plain old native ProcessWire stuff, so you'd have to provide pager settings directly to the renderPager() method 🙂

SearchEngine pager_args only apply if you're using it's native rendering features. Though please let me know if I'm missing the point here!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You right! Passing them directly to the renderPager() method now works. Just to clarify, SearchEngine settings kick in, but not those dedicated to pagination 🙂

Thanks @teppo, glad you're on the same time-zone as mine, you're always super fast 🙂

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey @teppo great module thanks!

Would it be possible to add support for ProFields: Table fields? 

Also is there / can I request a method to get the whole index for json output. I want to use this with a client side fuzzy search library.

Currently my needs aren't that complicated, I am indexing two templates so I can just get the index field from those and the other data I need around it manually which is perfectly fine. Perhaps this is the correct way to do it.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks @Mikie!

I'll definitely look into the table part.

There's no built-in way to get the entire index at the moment, but it might make sense to have one -- though what you're doing sounds like a perfectly good way to solve this for the time being. Anyway, I'll look into this as well.

Just for the record, the renderResultsJSON method was added primarily to solve client side search needs (but I'm guessing that's not exactly what you're after) 🙂

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, teppo said:

I'll definitely look into the table part.

Cheers! I am storing magazine style story credits (role, name, website url etc) in the Table. I feel that since Table only accepts text based fields this is an ok candidate for indexing. Can try to hack away at your module myself for now, no rush.

9 minutes ago, teppo said:

Just for the record, the renderResultsJSON method was added primarily to solve client side search needs (but I'm guessing that's not exactly what you're after) 🙂

Yeah I originally was thinking I wanted to use a client side library like to handle the search itself (fuzzy style to handle mis-spellings eg https://rawgit.com/farzher/fuzzysort/master/test.html ), but now I am thinking that is overboard and probably confusing. Will most likely stick with your module / pw search, and just do client side querying / rendering.

Cheers!

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi @teppo come up against a weird bug with certain special characters. Its hard to isolate but for example the character à is throwing "SQLSTATE[22007]: Invalid datetime format: 1366 Incorrect string value" in ckeditor fields (but not title fields).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually this isn't occurring on staging server. Feel link something is up with my mysql.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By bernhard
      DEPRECATED
      I'm using this module in several projects, but it will likely not see any updates in the future. I'm not happy with it and I'm looking for ways to develop better solutions. RockTabulator was my first try, but I'm also not 100% happy with that. The tabulator library is great, but my module implementation is not. I hope to get a good solution soon, but it will be a lot of work...
      ---
      Some of you might have followed the development of this module here: https://processwire.com/talk/topic/15524-previewdiscussion-rockdatatables/ . It is the successor of "RockDataTables" and requires RockFinder to get the data for the grid easily and efficiently. It uses the open source part of agGrid for grid rendering.
       
      WHY?
      ProcessWire is awesome for creating all kinds of custom backend applications, but where it is not so awesome in my opinion is when it comes to listing this data. Of course we have the built in page lister and we have ListerPro, but none of that solutions is capable of properly displaying large amounts of data, for example lists of revenues, aggregations, quick and easy sorts by the user, instant filter and those kind of features. RockGrid to the rescue 😉 
       
      Features/Highlights:
      100k+ rows Instant (client side) filter, search, sort (different sort based on data type, eg "lower/greater than" for numbers, "contains" for strings) extendable via plugins (available plugins at the moment: fullscreen, csv export, reload, batch-processing of data, column sum/statistics, row selection) all the agGrid features (cell renderers, cell styling, pagination, column grouping etc) vanilla javascript, backend and frontend support (though not all plugins are working on the frontend yet and I don't plan to support it as long as I don't need it myself)  
      Limitations:
      While there is an option to retrieve data via AJAX the actual processing of the grid (displaying, filtering, sorting) is done on the client side, meaning that you can get into troubles when handling really large datasets of several thousands of rows. agGrid should be one of the most performant grid options in the world (see the official example page with a 100k row example) and does a lot to prevent problems (such as virtual row rendering), but you should always have this limitation in mind as this is a major difference to the available lister options that do not have this limitation.
      Currently it only supports AdminThemeUikit and I don't plan to support any other admin theme.
       
      Download: https://gitlab.com/baumrock/FieldtypeRockGrid
      Installation: https://gitlab.com/baumrock/RockGrid/wikis/Installation
      Quikckstart: https://gitlab.com/baumrock/RockGrid/wikis/quickstart
      Further instructions: https://gitlab.com/baumrock/RockGrid/wikis/quickstart#further-instructions
      German Translation File: site--modules--fieldtyperockgrid--fieldtyperockgrid-module-php.json
      Changelog: https://gitlab.com/baumrock/FieldtypeRockGrid/raw/master/changelog.md
       
      Module status: alpha, License: MIT
      Note that every installation and uninstallation sends an anonymous google analytics event to my google analytics account. If you don't want that feel free to remove the appropriate lines of code before installation/uninstallation.
       
      Contribute:
      You can contribute to the development of this and other modules or just say thank you by
      testing, reporting issues and making PRs at gitlab liking this post buying me a drink: paypal.me/baumrock/5 liking my facebook page: facebook.com/baumrock hiring me for pw work: baumrock.com  
      Support: Please note that this module might not be as easy and plug&play as many other modules. It needs a good understanding of agGrid (and JavaScript in general) and it likely needs some looks into the code to get all the options. Please understand that I can not provide free support for every request here in the forum. I try to answer all questions that might also help others or that might improve the module but for individual requests I offer paid support (please contact me via PM).
       
      Use Cases / Examples:
      Colored grid cells, Icons, Links etc. The Grid also has a "batcher" feature built in that helps communicating with the server via AJAX and managing resource intensive tasks in batches:

      Filters, PW panel links and instant reload on panel close:

      You can combine the grid with a chart library like I did with the (outdated) RockDataTables module:

    • By Paul Greinke
      Hi there. I wrote a custom module for one of my projects. In fact I maybe want to use my module in other projects too. In order to be variable and customizable  I need to implement some custom hooks into my module. So I can afterwards hook into the my functions in order to modify them to match the needs of the new project.
      I tried simply defining functions with the '__' prefix. But that did not work. I'm imagining something like the following:
      <?php class MyClass { public function ___someFunction() { // Do something } } // ready.php $this->addHookBefore('MyClass::someFunction', function($event) { // some customization }); Is there a way to accomplish that? 
    • By adrian
      Hi everyone,
      Here's a new module that I have been meaning to build for a long time.
      http://modules.processwire.com/modules/process-admin-actions/
      https://github.com/adrianbj/ProcessAdminActions
       
      What does it do?
      Do you have a bunch of admin snippets laying around, or do you recreate from them from scratch every time you need them, or do you try to find where you saw them in the forums, or on the ProcessWire Recipes site?
      Admin Actions lets you quickly create actions in the admin that you can use over and over and even make available to your site editors (permissions for each action are assigned to roles separately so you have full control over who has access to which actions).
       
      Included Actions
      It comes bundled with several actions and I will be adding more over time (and hopefully I'll get some PRs from you guys too). You can browse and sort and if you have @tpr's Admin on Steroid's datatables filter feature, you can even filter based on the content of all columns. 

      The headliner action included with the module is: PageTable To RepeaterMatrix which fully converts an existing (and populated) PageTable field to either a Repeater or RepeaterMatrix field. This is a huge timesaver if you have an existing site that makes heavy use of PageTable fields and you would like to give the clients the improved interface of RepeaterMatrix.
      Copy Content To Other Field
      This action copies the content from one field to another field on all pages that use the selected template.
      Copy Field Content To Other Page
      Copies the content from a field on one page to the same field on another page.
      Copy Repeater Items To Other Page
      Add the items from a Repeater field on one page to the same field on another page.
      Copy Table Field Rows To Other Page
      Add the rows from a Table field on one page to the same field on another page.
      Create Users Batcher
      Allows you to batch create users. This module requires the Email New User module and it should be configured to generate a password automatically.
      Delete Unused Fields
      Deletes fields that are not used by any templates.
      Delete Unused Templates
      Deletes templates that are not used by any pages.
      Email Batcher
      Lets you email multiple addresses at once.
      Field Set Or Search And Replace
      Set field values, or search and replace text in field values from a filtered selection of pages and fields.
      FTP Files to Page
      Add files/images from a folder to a selected page.
      Page Active Languages Batcher
      Lets you enable or disable active status of multiple languages on multiple pages at once.
      Page Manipulator
      Uses an InputfieldSelector to query pages and then allows batch actions on the matched pages.
      Page Table To Repeater Matrix
      Fully converts an existing (and populated) PageTable field to either a Repeater or RepeaterMatrix field.
      Template Fields Batcher
      Lets you add or remove multiple fields from multiple templates at once.
      Template Roles Batcher
      Lets you add or remove access permissions, for multiple roles and multiple templates at once.
      User Roles Permissions Batcher
      Lets you add or remove permissions for multiple roles, or roles for multiple users at once.
       
      Creating a New Action
      If you create a new action that you think others would find useful, please add it to the actions subfolder of this module and submit a PR. If you think it is only useful for you, place it in /site/templates/AdminActions/ so that it doesn't get lost on module updates.
      A new action file can be as simple as this:
      class UnpublishAboutPage extends ProcessAdminActions { protected function executeAction() { $p = $this->pages->get('/about/'); $p->addStatus(Page::statusUnpublished); $p->save(); return true; } } Each action:
      class must extend "ProcessAdminActions" and the filename must match the class name and end in ".action.php" like: UnpublishAboutPage.action.php the action method must be: executeAction() As you can see there are only a few lines needed to wrap the actual API call, so it's really worth the small extra effort to make an action.
      Obviously that example action is not very useful. Here is another more useful one that is included with the module. It includes $description, $notes, and $author variables which are used in the module table selector interface. It also makes use of the defineOptions() method which builds the input fields used to gather the required options before running the action.
      class DeleteUnusedFields extends ProcessAdminActions { protected $description = 'Deletes fields that are not used by any templates.'; protected $notes = 'Shows a list of unused fields with checkboxes to select those to delete.'; protected $author = 'Adrian Jones'; protected $authorLinks = array( 'pwforum' => '985-adrian', 'pwdirectory' => 'adrian-jones', 'github' => 'adrianbj', ); protected function defineOptions() { $fieldOptions = array(); foreach($this->fields as $field) { if ($field->flags & Field::flagSystem || $field->flags & Field::flagPermanent) continue; if(count($field->getFieldgroups()) === 0) $fieldOptions[$field->id] = $field->label ? $field->label . ' (' . $field->name . ')' : $field->name; } return array( array( 'name' => 'fields', 'label' => 'Fields', 'description' => 'Select the fields you want to delete', 'notes' => 'Note that all fields listed are not used by any templates and should therefore be safe to delete', 'type' => 'checkboxes', 'options' => $fieldOptions, 'required' => true ) ); } protected function executeAction($options) { $count = 0; foreach($options['fields'] as $field) { $f = $this->fields->get($field); $this->fields->delete($f); $count++; } $this->successMessage = $count . ' field' . _n('', 's', $count) . ' ' . _n('was', 'were', $count) . ' successfully deleted'; return true; } }  
      This defineOptions() method builds input fields that look like this:

      Finally we use $options array in the executeAction() method to get the values entered into those options fields to run the API script to remove the checked fields.
      There is one additional method that I didn't outline called: checkRequirements() - you can see it in action in the PageTableToRepeaterMatrix action. You can use this to prevent the action from running if certain requirements are not met.
      At the end of the executeAction() method you can populate $this->successMessage, or $this->failureMessage which will be returned after the action has finished.
       
      Populating options via URL parameters
      You can also populate the option parameters via URL parameters. You should split multiple values with a “|” character.
      You can either just pre-populate options:
      http://mysite.dev/processwire/setup/admin-actions/options?action=TemplateFieldsBatcher&templates=29|56&fields=219&addOrRemove=add
      or you can execute immediately:
      http://mysite.dev/processwire/setup/admin-actions/execute?action=TemplateFieldsBatcher&templates=29|56&fields=219&addOrRemove=add

      Note the “options” vs “execute” as the last path before the parameters.
       
      Automatic Backup / Restore
      Before any action is executed, a full database backup is automatically made. You have a few options to run a restore if needed:
      Follow the Restore link that is presented after an action completes Use the "Restore" submenu: Setup > Admin Actions > Restore Move the restoredb.php file from the /site/assets/cache/AdminActions/ folder to the root of your site and load in the browser Manually restore using the AdminActionsBackup.sql file in the /site/assets/cache/AdminActions/ folder I think all these features make it very easy to create custom admin data manipulation methods that can be shared with others and executed using a simple interface without needing to build a full Process Module custom interface from scratch. I also hope it will reduce the barriers for new ProcessWire users to create custom admin functionality.
      Please let me know what you think, especially if you have ideas for improving the interface, or the way actions are defined.
       
       
    • By joshua
      ---
      Module Directory: https://modules.processwire.com/modules/privacy-wire/
      Github: https://github.com/blaueQuelle/privacywire/
      Packagist:https://packagist.org/packages/blauequelle/privacywire
      Module Class Name: PrivacyWire
      Changelog: https://github.com/blaueQuelle/privacywire/blob/master/Changelog.md
      ---
      This module is (yet another) way for implementing a cookie management solution.
      Of course there are several other possibilities:
      - https://processwire.com/talk/topic/22920-klaro-cookie-consent-manager/
      - https://github.com/webmanufaktur/CookieManagementBanner
      - https://github.com/johannesdachsel/cookiemonster
      - https://www.oiljs.org/
      - ... and so on ...
      In this module you can configure which kind of cookie categories you want to manage:

      You can also enable the support for respecting the Do-Not-Track (DNT) header to don't annoy users, who already decided for all their browsing experience.
      Currently there are four possible cookie groups:
      - Necessary (always enabled)
      - Functional
      - Statistics
      - Marketing
      - External Media
      All groups can be renamed, so feel free to use other cookie group names. I just haven't found a way to implement a "repeater like" field as configurable module field ...
      When you want to load specific scripts ( like Google Analytics, Google Maps, ...) only after the user's content to this specific category of cookies, just use the following script syntax:
      <script type="text/plain" data-type="text/javascript" data-category="statistics" data-src="/path/to/your/statistic/script.js"></script> <script type="text/plain" data-type="text/javascript" data-category="marketing" data-src="/path/to/your/mareketing/script.js"></script> <script type="text/plain" data-type="text/javascript" data-category="external_media" data-src="/path/to/your/external-media/script.js"></script> <script type="text/plain" data-type="text/javascript" data-category="marketing">console.log("Inline scripts are also working!");</script> The data-attributes (data-type and data-category) are required to get recognized by PrivacyWire. the data-attributes are giving hints, how the script shall be loaded, if the data-category is within the cookie consents of the user. These scripts are loaded asynchronously after the user made the decision.
      If you want to give the users the possibility to change their consent, you can use the following Textformatter:
      [[privacywire-choose-cookies]] It's planned to add also other Textformatters to opt-out of specific cookie groups or delete the whole consent cookie.
      You can also add a custom link to output the banner again with a link / button with following class:
      <a href="#" class="privacywire-show-options">Show Cookie Options</a> <button class="privacywire-show-options">Show Cookie Options</button>  
      I would love to hear your feedback 🙂
      CHANGELOG
      You can find the always up-to-date changelog file here.
    • By joshua
      As we often use Matomo (former known as Piwik) instead of Google Analytics we wanted to embed Matomo not only in the template code but also via the ProcessWire backend.
      That's why I developed a tiny module for the implementation.
      The module provides the possibility to connect to an existing Matomo installation with the classical site tracking and also via the Matomo Tag Manager.
      If you have also PrivacyWire installed, you can tell MatomoWire to only load the script, if the user has accepted cookies via PrivacyWire.
      To offer an Opt-Out solution you can choose between the simple Opt-Out iFrame, delivered by your Matomo installation, or a button to choose cookies via PrivacyWire.
      You'll find the module both in the module directory and via github:
      ProcessWire Module Directory MatomoWire @ GitHub MatomoWire @ Packagist ->installable via composer require blauequelle/matomowire I'm looking forward to hear your feedback!


×
×
  • Create New...