Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Inspired by the "max megapixels" option for the client-side image resizer, I made a simple module that adds target megapixel resizing for Pageimages.

Image Megapixels

Adds a method for Pageimages that resizes to a target megapixel value.

Example use

You are creating a lightbox gallery of images with different aspect ratios. For the enlargements, rather than setting a fixed maximum width or height you want all the enlargements have the same size in terms of area, allowing a panoramic image to be wider than a square image, for instance.

The effect of resizing three different aspect ratios by the same megapixel target value can be seen in the screenshot below:

megapixels

Installation

Install the Image Megapixels module.

API

// basic usage
$pageimage = $pageimage->megapixels(float $megapixels);

// usage with all arguments
$pageimage = $pageimage->megapixels(float $megapixels, array $options = []);

Example:

foreach($page->images as $image) {
    echo "<img src='$image->megapixels(0.8)->url' alt='$image->description'>"
}

If needed you can supply an array of options for Pageimage::size() as a second argument.

 

https://github.com/Toutouwai/ImageMegapixels

  • Like 12

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for this, but for now I do not see in what situation would be useful to have images with different sizes but the same no of pixels (area)... what was your motivation for this module ? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@adrianromega, did you see the "Example use" section above?

To expand on this... it's useful in any situation where you want to be fair to a group of images with different aspect ratios. Take the three images shown in the screenshot above. If these images had been resized using maxSize(800,800) for instance, photo 2 (the square image) would be larger than the others in total area - it would contain the most image data.

Now suppose you're running a competition on your website where visitors can vote for the best photo. The three images above have been submitted by three different photographers. If you are resizing by maxSize() rather than megapixels then it's not fair on photographers 1 and 3 that their images are shown smaller than the image from photographer 2.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great for sponsor logos too so that no-one feels gipped.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi @Robin S, congrats to one more nice module! And I totally understand why you created it. I also (wanted to) use such a feature in different scenarios. Therefor once I added the "weighten" option to the PIA module.

Hopefully you don't mind my following propagation of an alternative way to apply such a functionality. Maybe it is usefull for some people to have a different way to define / calculate / imagine the resulting images.

You call it Megapixels, Pia uses image pixel dimensions for width & height or a single dimension for squares, defining a bounding box and get the images contained & weightened into that box. Additonally Pia handles one out of four values to the weighten-option to prioritize the landscape or portrait images in two ways: 

 

So, what you wanted was allready available in the modules directory for about three years. But I believe, when seeing all your modules, you have had fun building and sharing it.

OT:
For me, the last two years it is not possible to keep track of all the good new stuff coming into the core and from community members (like you). Some years ago, it felt doable for me. Lately I also found "a new possibility" to do things that was allready three years available. Even I had read it in the past and bookmarked it under my other several hundred PW links, it got out of focus. If somebody know a good way to keep track and or archive all the good stuff from here, (besides the few things that get mentions in the weekly news & blog posts), please share. :)

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, horst said:

So, what you wanted was allready available in the modules directory for about three years. But I believe, when seeing all your modules, you have had fun building and sharing it.

:). Yeah, @Robin S has been on fire! I've learnt a lot about Inputfields and Hooks from his work.

 

10 minutes ago, horst said:

For me, the last two years it is not possible to keep track of all the good new stuff coming into the core and from community members (like you). Some years ago, it felt doable for me. Lately I also found "a new possibility" to do things that was allready three years available. Even I had read it in the past and bookmarked it under my other several hundred PW links, it got out of focus.

That's me! :P.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, horst said:

Therefor once I added the "weighten" option to the PIA module.

Ah, I should have known there would be something in PIA for this - it's the real Swiss Army Knife for images. :-)
I really need to have a proper explore of that module. (I think it's the state of the docs that has been putting me off - maybe you could consolidate/tidy everything into the GitHub readme?)

11 hours ago, horst said:

For me, the last two years it is not possible to keep track of all the good new stuff coming into the core and from community members

I have a very primitive system. For modules I'm interested in I have a spreadsheet with name, category, link, brief description of what it does (in my own words). But I often forget to update it with new modules and just try to rely on memory.

For forum snippets (and links to the original post) I just have a folder with a bunch of text files in it. The text files are named according to what the snippet is about. Then when I'm looking for something I use the quick filter feature in my file manager (XYplorer).

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is OT, sorry, but if there is enough interest, the last few posts could be moved to a dedicated Topic...

12 hours ago, Robin S said:

I have a very primitive system. For modules I'm interested in I have a spreadsheet with name, category, link, brief description of what it does (in my own words). But I often forget to update it with new modules and just try to rely on memory.

I do not have to much spare time this year but I would love to help anyone interested in developing an alternative module directory. For example there are such things for WP:

ProcessWire is a native cataloging system, as we all know. So it would not take too much time for a few experienced devs to come up with something useful and opensource. What I could contribute is UI/UX design and creating and editing content, for example. We've read lots of other posts about willing to help to boost the ProcessWire documentation, so I guess there should be enough of us to turn it into a success story.

12 hours ago, Robin S said:

For forum snippets (and links to the original post) I just have a folder with a bunch of text files in it. The text files are named according to what the snippet is about. Then when I'm looking for something I use the quick filter feature in my file manager (XYplorer).

This site I propose could be a "module+snippets finder", ie. a "ProcessWire Solutions" site, meaning both modules and snippets could be in the database, making integrated "solution" searches possible.

Anybody up to the challenge?

Edited by szabesz
typos
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, szabesz said:

This is OT, sorry, but if there is enough interest, the last few posts could be moved to a dedicated Topic...

I have to agree: this is a good discussion, but doesn't belong to module support thread. Any mods up to that? ;)

22 hours ago, szabesz said:

This site I propose could be a "module+snippets finder", ie. a "ProcessWire Solutions" site, meaning both modules and snippets could be in the database, making integrated "solution" searches possible.

I hope I'm not causing any unnecessary confusion – and I may not see the full picture yet, so perhaps I'm missing the point entirely – but when it comes to snippets, there's already https://processwire-recipes.com/. If you have useful snippets for common tasks etc. I'd suggest submitting them there.

Similarly I'm leaning towards collecting ideas for improving the existing modules directory rather than creating a competing platform. In the 2018 roadmap post Ryan listed modules directory as one focus point for this year, and I'm sure he'd be happy to get some feedback on exactly how it could be improved.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, teppo said:

I have to agree: this is a good discussion, but doesn't belong to module support thread. Any mods up to that? ;)

I hope I'm not causing any unnecessary confusion – and I may not see the full picture yet, so perhaps I'm missing the point entirely – but when it comes to snippets, there's already https://processwire-recipes.com/. If you have useful snippets for common tasks etc. I'd suggest submitting them there.

Similarly I'm leaning towards collecting ideas for improving the existing modules directory rather than creating a competing platform. In the 2018 roadmap post Ryan listed modules directory as one focus point for this year, and I'm sure he'd be happy to get some feedback on exactly how it could be improved.

I agree that this is a good discussion and needs to be continued somewhere (I'm not the one for moving things, I haven't figured how to do it right yet). 

I have an upcoming blog project whose sole purpose is to talk about ProcessWire's many features.  Once someone has moved this conversation to a new area, I can further elaborate on what I am working towards.  With that said, I also agree with what @teppo seems to be saying.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Paul Greinke
      Hi there. I wrote a custom module for one of my projects. In fact I maybe want to use my module in other projects too. In order to be variable and customizable  I need to implement some custom hooks into my module. So I can afterwards hook into the my functions in order to modify them to match the needs of the new project.
      I tried simply defining functions with the '__' prefix. But that did not work. I'm imagining something like the following:
      <?php class MyClass { public function ___someFunction() { // Do something } } // ready.php $this->addHookBefore('MyClass::someFunction', function($event) { // some customization }); Is there a way to accomplish that? 
    • By adrian
      Hi everyone,
      Here's a new module that I have been meaning to build for a long time.
      http://modules.processwire.com/modules/process-admin-actions/
      https://github.com/adrianbj/ProcessAdminActions
       
      What does it do?
      Do you have a bunch of admin snippets laying around, or do you recreate from them from scratch every time you need them, or do you try to find where you saw them in the forums, or on the ProcessWire Recipes site?
      Admin Actions lets you quickly create actions in the admin that you can use over and over and even make available to your site editors (permissions for each action are assigned to roles separately so you have full control over who has access to which actions).
       
      Included Actions
      It comes bundled with several actions and I will be adding more over time (and hopefully I'll get some PRs from you guys too). You can browse and sort and if you have @tpr's Admin on Steroid's datatables filter feature, you can even filter based on the content of all columns. 

      The headliner action included with the module is: PageTable To RepeaterMatrix which fully converts an existing (and populated) PageTable field to either a Repeater or RepeaterMatrix field. This is a huge timesaver if you have an existing site that makes heavy use of PageTable fields and you would like to give the clients the improved interface of RepeaterMatrix.
      Copy Content To Other Field
      This action copies the content from one field to another field on all pages that use the selected template.
      Copy Field Content To Other Page
      Copies the content from a field on one page to the same field on another page.
      Copy Repeater Items To Other Page
      Add the items from a Repeater field on one page to the same field on another page.
      Copy Table Field Rows To Other Page
      Add the rows from a Table field on one page to the same field on another page.
      Create Users Batcher
      Allows you to batch create users. This module requires the Email New User module and it should be configured to generate a password automatically.
      Delete Unused Fields
      Deletes fields that are not used by any templates.
      Delete Unused Templates
      Deletes templates that are not used by any pages.
      Email Batcher
      Lets you email multiple addresses at once.
      Field Set Or Search And Replace
      Set field values, or search and replace text in field values from a filtered selection of pages and fields.
      FTP Files to Page
      Add files/images from a folder to a selected page.
      Page Active Languages Batcher
      Lets you enable or disable active status of multiple languages on multiple pages at once.
      Page Manipulator
      Uses an InputfieldSelector to query pages and then allows batch actions on the matched pages.
      Page Table To Repeater Matrix
      Fully converts an existing (and populated) PageTable field to either a Repeater or RepeaterMatrix field.
      Template Fields Batcher
      Lets you add or remove multiple fields from multiple templates at once.
      Template Roles Batcher
      Lets you add or remove access permissions, for multiple roles and multiple templates at once.
      User Roles Permissions Batcher
      Lets you add or remove permissions for multiple roles, or roles for multiple users at once.
       
      Creating a New Action
      If you create a new action that you think others would find useful, please add it to the actions subfolder of this module and submit a PR. If you think it is only useful for you, place it in /site/templates/AdminActions/ so that it doesn't get lost on module updates.
      A new action file can be as simple as this:
      class UnpublishAboutPage extends ProcessAdminActions { protected function executeAction() { $p = $this->pages->get('/about/'); $p->addStatus(Page::statusUnpublished); $p->save(); return true; } } Each action:
      class must extend "ProcessAdminActions" and the filename must match the class name and end in ".action.php" like: UnpublishAboutPage.action.php the action method must be: executeAction() As you can see there are only a few lines needed to wrap the actual API call, so it's really worth the small extra effort to make an action.
      Obviously that example action is not very useful. Here is another more useful one that is included with the module. It includes $description, $notes, and $author variables which are used in the module table selector interface. It also makes use of the defineOptions() method which builds the input fields used to gather the required options before running the action.
      class DeleteUnusedFields extends ProcessAdminActions { protected $description = 'Deletes fields that are not used by any templates.'; protected $notes = 'Shows a list of unused fields with checkboxes to select those to delete.'; protected $author = 'Adrian Jones'; protected $authorLinks = array( 'pwforum' => '985-adrian', 'pwdirectory' => 'adrian-jones', 'github' => 'adrianbj', ); protected function defineOptions() { $fieldOptions = array(); foreach($this->fields as $field) { if ($field->flags & Field::flagSystem || $field->flags & Field::flagPermanent) continue; if(count($field->getFieldgroups()) === 0) $fieldOptions[$field->id] = $field->label ? $field->label . ' (' . $field->name . ')' : $field->name; } return array( array( 'name' => 'fields', 'label' => 'Fields', 'description' => 'Select the fields you want to delete', 'notes' => 'Note that all fields listed are not used by any templates and should therefore be safe to delete', 'type' => 'checkboxes', 'options' => $fieldOptions, 'required' => true ) ); } protected function executeAction($options) { $count = 0; foreach($options['fields'] as $field) { $f = $this->fields->get($field); $this->fields->delete($f); $count++; } $this->successMessage = $count . ' field' . _n('', 's', $count) . ' ' . _n('was', 'were', $count) . ' successfully deleted'; return true; } }  
      This defineOptions() method builds input fields that look like this:

      Finally we use $options array in the executeAction() method to get the values entered into those options fields to run the API script to remove the checked fields.
      There is one additional method that I didn't outline called: checkRequirements() - you can see it in action in the PageTableToRepeaterMatrix action. You can use this to prevent the action from running if certain requirements are not met.
      At the end of the executeAction() method you can populate $this->successMessage, or $this->failureMessage which will be returned after the action has finished.
       
      Populating options via URL parameters
      You can also populate the option parameters via URL parameters. You should split multiple values with a “|” character.
      You can either just pre-populate options:
      http://mysite.dev/processwire/setup/admin-actions/options?action=TemplateFieldsBatcher&templates=29|56&fields=219&addOrRemove=add
      or you can execute immediately:
      http://mysite.dev/processwire/setup/admin-actions/execute?action=TemplateFieldsBatcher&templates=29|56&fields=219&addOrRemove=add

      Note the “options” vs “execute” as the last path before the parameters.
       
      Automatic Backup / Restore
      Before any action is executed, a full database backup is automatically made. You have a few options to run a restore if needed:
      Follow the Restore link that is presented after an action completes Use the "Restore" submenu: Setup > Admin Actions > Restore Move the restoredb.php file from the /site/assets/cache/AdminActions/ folder to the root of your site and load in the browser Manually restore using the AdminActionsBackup.sql file in the /site/assets/cache/AdminActions/ folder I think all these features make it very easy to create custom admin data manipulation methods that can be shared with others and executed using a simple interface without needing to build a full Process Module custom interface from scratch. I also hope it will reduce the barriers for new ProcessWire users to create custom admin functionality.
      Please let me know what you think, especially if you have ideas for improving the interface, or the way actions are defined.
       
       
    • By joshua
      ---
      Module Directory: https://modules.processwire.com/modules/privacy-wire/
      Github: https://github.com/blaueQuelle/privacywire/
      Packagist:https://packagist.org/packages/blauequelle/privacywire
      Module Class Name: PrivacyWire
      Changelog: https://github.com/blaueQuelle/privacywire/blob/master/Changelog.md
      ---
      This module is (yet another) way for implementing a cookie management solution.
      Of course there are several other possibilities:
      - https://processwire.com/talk/topic/22920-klaro-cookie-consent-manager/
      - https://github.com/webmanufaktur/CookieManagementBanner
      - https://github.com/johannesdachsel/cookiemonster
      - https://www.oiljs.org/
      - ... and so on ...
      In this module you can configure which kind of cookie categories you want to manage:

      You can also enable the support for respecting the Do-Not-Track (DNT) header to don't annoy users, who already decided for all their browsing experience.
      Currently there are four possible cookie groups:
      - Necessary (always enabled)
      - Functional
      - Statistics
      - Marketing
      - External Media
      All groups can be renamed, so feel free to use other cookie group names. I just haven't found a way to implement a "repeater like" field as configurable module field ...
      When you want to load specific scripts ( like Google Analytics, Google Maps, ...) only after the user's content to this specific category of cookies, just use the following script syntax:
      <script type="text/plain" data-type="text/javascript" data-category="statistics" data-src="/path/to/your/statistic/script.js"></script> <script type="text/plain" data-type="text/javascript" data-category="marketing" data-src="/path/to/your/mareketing/script.js"></script> <script type="text/plain" data-type="text/javascript" data-category="external_media" data-src="/path/to/your/external-media/script.js"></script> <script type="text/plain" data-type="text/javascript" data-category="marketing">console.log("Inline scripts are also working!");</script> The data-attributes (data-type and data-category) are required to get recognized by PrivacyWire. the data-attributes are giving hints, how the script shall be loaded, if the data-category is within the cookie consents of the user. These scripts are loaded asynchronously after the user made the decision.
      If you want to give the users the possibility to change their consent, you can use the following Textformatter:
      [[privacywire-choose-cookies]] It's planned to add also other Textformatters to opt-out of specific cookie groups or delete the whole consent cookie.
      You can also add a custom link to output the banner again with a link / button with following class:
      <a href="#" class="privacywire-show-options">Show Cookie Options</a> <button class="privacywire-show-options">Show Cookie Options</button>  
      I would love to hear your feedback 🙂
      CHANGELOG
      You can find the always up-to-date changelog file here.
    • By joshua
      As we often use Matomo (former known as Piwik) instead of Google Analytics we wanted to embed Matomo not only in the template code but also via the ProcessWire backend.
      That's why I developed a tiny module for the implementation.
      The module provides the possibility to connect to an existing Matomo installation with the classical site tracking and also via the Matomo Tag Manager.
      If you have also PrivacyWire installed, you can tell MatomoWire to only load the script, if the user has accepted cookies via PrivacyWire.
      To offer an Opt-Out solution you can choose between the simple Opt-Out iFrame, delivered by your Matomo installation, or a button to choose cookies via PrivacyWire.
      You'll find the module both in the module directory and via github:
      ProcessWire Module Directory MatomoWire @ GitHub MatomoWire @ Packagist ->installable via composer require blauequelle/matomowire I'm looking forward to hear your feedback!


    • By Robin S
      If your module has a lot of config fields you might want to divide them into groups inside a tabbed interface. Here is a demonstration module showing how this can be done.
      https://github.com/Toutouwai/ModuleConfigTabs

      Thanks to @kixe for providing my starting point in this forum topic.
×
×
  • Create New...