Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Thanks for the info kongondo :)

For anyone wanting a 'quick hack for now' for setting the published date, run through the MarkupBlog.module file, and the template files and find:

find("template=blog-post

and immediately after add this:

, blog_date<=".date('Y-m-d G:i:s')."

This will basically add a condition to the post (aka page) lookup, to make sure the date field is set to now, or lower. I've run some tests on my local copy and it's working as expected.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Scheduled publishing is an integral part of the workflow for many bloggers, so this would definitely make sense. I couldn't live without such a feature anymore.. :)

@kongondo: if you're still pondering whether to use SchedulePages somehow or cook up your own method, I'd vote for SchedulePages. Admittedly I'm being somewhat selfish here (I'm sure we'll be using this module for our client sites and I don't like the idea of having to explain why and how scheduling posts is different from all other pages) but it's also a great module :)

I haven't made a decision on this yet. On the one hand I don't want to reinvent the wheel; why not just use SchedulePages. On the other, I am a bit wary of tying an important functionality of Blog to a third party module that is not part of the core. In case things were to break in the future and they were not fixed (no offence meant to Jasper), that would leave Blog users hanging.....Maybe I am being over cautious. I'll make a decision soon...

Sorry for spamming (sort of), but just wanted to comment on this one that most (quite possibly all) of the sites we've implemented a blog for have more than one blog. Doesn't sound that far fetched to me: one or more for internal use, one for each division (a lot of our blogging clients are municipalities and they've got a ton of these), one for CEO/mayor, one for each temporary project etc.

Also, if you were referring to creating a bunch of user-specific blogs: I've explained this sort of behaviour (in another system) to clients over and over and over and can assure you that, though it may sound like the logical solution, in real world it just doesn't work.. unless you also allow some sort of "blog superusers" to post with any user account, which could introduce an entire set of new problems :)

One typical situation is a CEO or mayor having his/her own blog. Most people of that caliber simply don't have much spare time and blogging is rarely considered a core task, so even if this person does really write his/her own posts, there's a very high probability that someone else handles posting them online.. which is where the trouble starts if each blog is tied to one user. I'm sure you get the point.

Anyway, I'd appreciate if you could consider this kind of feature, but I get that it's probably not too high in priority :)

Admittedly I currently have no idea how I could implement such a feature and to be honest, I haven't thought much about it. Where would the posts, tags and categories  live on the tree for the different blogs? It could get messy very quickly. Anyway, any and all ideas are welcome, thanks! 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the one hand I don't want to reinvent the wheel; why not just use SchedulePages. On the other, I am a bit wary of tying an important functionality of Blog to a third party module that is not part of the core. In case things were to break in the future and they were not fixed (no offence meant to Jasper), that would leave Blog users hanging.....Maybe I am being over cautious.

Nothing wrong with being careful, but luckily we're talking about free software here. If it's any more reassurance, we've got a lot of sites relying on this module already, so trust me: in the (unlikely) scenario that something was to happen and the module wasn't kept up to date, I for one would be more than happy (and forced, actually..) to catch the ball ;)

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...

This post is in response to this question posted on GitHub

Comment Layout

I'm using Foundation instead of Skeleton and need to tweak some of the layout.
Can you identify which file I would need to tweak to change the comments layout? I can do so much via CSS but not the bigger shifting around of content

First, I'd like to reiterate that this Blog Module does not use any CSS framework. The Blog (site) Profile (on which Blog Module is based) uses the Skeleton CSS framework. However, in this Module's demo/example output/template files, I have used PocketGrid CSS. It is not a requirement. You can use whichever CSS framework (or not) you wish. The following example is for this module (but is equally applicable to the Blog Profile).

It is very easy to style Blog's comments by targeting the output HTML IDs and Classes in your CSS. In my example template files, my custom styles are in blog.css. The example code below is an HTML output of Comments where 'comments are allowed'.

<div id="comments">
	<span class="num-comments-icon">2</span>
	<h4>Comments</h4>
	<ul class="comments CommentList">
		<li class="comment CommentListItem" id="comment1">
			<p class="comment-head CommentHeader">Comment by kongondo on 13 April 2014 11:16 pm</p>
			<div class="comment-body CommentText"><p>Simply the best CMS.</p></div>
		</li>

		<li class="comment CommentListItem" id="comment10">
			<p class="comment-head CommentHeader">Comment by kongondo on 23 May 2014 2:42 pm</p>
			<div class="comment-body CommentText"><p>ProcessWire rocks, yeah!</p></div>
		</li>

	</ul>
	<!--CommentForm-->
	<div id="CommentForm" class="CommentForm_new">
		<h4>Post a comment</h4>
		<form id="CommentForm_form" action="./#CommentForm" method="post">
			<p class="CommentForm_cite">
				<label for="CommentForm_cite">Your Name</label>
				<input type="text" name="cite" class="required" required="required" id="CommentForm_cite" value="" maxlength="128">
			</p>
			<p class="CommentForm_email">
				<label for="CommentForm_email">Your E-Mail</label>
				<input type="text" name="email" class="required email" required="required" id="CommentForm_email" value="" maxlength="255">
			</p>
			<p class="CommentForm_text">
				<label for="CommentForm_text">Comments</label>
				<textarea name="text" class="required" required="required" id="CommentForm_text" rows="5" cols="50"></textarea>
			</p>
			<p class="CommentForm_submit">
				<button type="submit" name="CommentForm_submit" id="CommentForm_submit" value="1">Submit</button>
				<input type="hidden" name="page_id" value="2488">
			</p>
		</form>
	</div><!--/CommentForm-->
</div> 

So, you do not need to tweak any file. All you need is to style the output.

For the PHP stuff, I am in the process of writing some documentation...

Hope this answers your query. Thank you for using Blog :-)

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers for the reply and apologies re the framework mixup.

I guess I'm approaching this with a few expectations picked up from my other blogging platform. Within that, almost every part of the blog was a mini template which you could tweak to make fundamental layout changes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sparrow, no need to apologise for anything :-). Your question will help the next guy. Once I write the API documentation, you'll realise that you can also tweak this Blog to make fundamental layout changes. You can output bits and pieces (tags, posts, categories, authors, comments, etc) anywhere using its API since it is a PW module. All these bits and pieces are independent of each other. This is similar to PW pages in the sense that you can output page fields anywhere in any order in your site or even not output any of the fields.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Update:

Minor version bump to 1.2.1 after some minor styling issues updates.

Documentation:

I am taking a short break from writing code to write some badly needed documentation for Blog (and some other PW tutorials if I get time :-)). I am writing this documentation as tutorials which I will post on my website soon. I'll keep you updated. I haven't forgotten any Blog features pending requests :-)

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Kongondo and Ryan for these excellent modules!

I've implemented this into a site I'm developing and am having an issue... The blog posts are not truncating. I have the summary length set to 150 , but nothing is being truncated. I know when i created a post I'm populating the "blog_body" field and these settings seem to be for the "blog_summary" field (which does is not one of the fields for the template).. From what I can see in the MarkupBlog.module, there is a conditional if summary is empty to pull from the blog_body and truncate.

The blog I'm working on is here: http://shootkta.info/blog/ .. If you have any thoughts, please let me know.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Webweaver,

Glad you like the module.

It is truncating fine for me here. The code is pulling text to truncate from blog_body. I decided to skip over using a blog_summary since truncation can be done from blog_body. I am guessing it is not truncating because you have not set the second parameter/argument of renderPosts() to true. The default is false (i.e. do not truncate). Apologies for this; I have delayed with documentation but I am currently writing this. Here's example code to make it truncate.

$blog = $modules->get("MarkupBlog");
$limit = 10;
//limit will be passed to the selector fetching blog posts;
//'true' will truncate posts to what we have set in blog_quantity but default to 450 if this is not set
$content = $blog->renderPosts("limit={$limit}", true);
echo $content;
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

@Kongondo - Thank you very much for the explanation to fix. Next time I'll know not to pull my hair out for 2 hours and just ask the question and wait for the reply :)

Btw, the generated summary strips out all tags so the posts in the blog list looked pretty bad.. So I removed the strip tags.. But then had another problem - if the cutoff was in the middle of an anchor tag, the "view more" anchor tag would become nested and didn't work.. So I put back in the strip tags but allowed <p> and <img> tags.. The summaries in the blog list look much nicer now.

ex: Line 543 in MarkupBlog.module now reads:

$summary = strip_tags(substr($page->blog_body, 0, $summaryLimit), '<p><img>');
Link to post
Share on other sites

As for <p></p>, those are added back later. See line 602 of the code

if($small) {

  $out .= "<p>" . $page->summary . "… <a class='more' href='{$page->url}'>" . __('View More') . "</a></p>";
} 

Hadn't considered images in the summary.... :-)..Maybe I'll need to add at blog_summary [non-rich text area] to the blog template.

Edit

Or, for now, maybe not. I don't want to add too many fields...I'll have a think

Edit 2:

We now have this feature inbuilt in renderPosts(). You can specify tags that should not be stripped as indicated in this post:

https://processwire.com/talk/topic/7403-module-blog/?p=78227 (see  post_small_allowable_tags)

Edited by kongondo
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ya, I hesitated on the img tag :) Basicly I want them to see a majority of the post in full formatting (as much as possible) while they are on the blog listing page.

But line 602 is surrounding the entire post in a paragraph, so there is still no formatting within it. The paragraphs within the post itself were getting stripped.

I should mention also that I enabled CKEditor in for the blog_body field and changed the code in ProcessBlog.module for quickpost_body to use CKEditor also (line 387), but the tags were being stripped from the quickpost CKEditor, so had removed the sanitizer from quickpost (line 1441).

Link to post
Share on other sites

More on Date sorting.. It seems once I open a post, then close, it sorts correctly in descending order. But I can't sort by ascending and when I click on the Date column header it doesn't sort on the fly. All the other columns work fine.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Forgot to ask, if I install a fresh processwire 2.4 and the 2 blog modules,

how does the blog show up on the front ? I mean a fresh pw 2.4 install

has it´s own default front with nav, body and sidebar. How does the blog

integrate with this ?

Edit1:

Got it, installing and just saw the blog template files, css and js.

It is really complete !

How can I disable the default front that came during the processwire install

and only have the basic blog front ?

uploaded all the php blog files to /site/templates/

and in admin tried to change template for home to blog.php

but didn´t allow me.

Ok dumb me, just had to delete home.php and rename blog.php to home.php

Now I can start building up :) it´s using pocketgrid so that is a real bonus.

In the admin I saw a new tab named Blog will all the great config in it.

kongondo.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys, apologies for not responding earlier.

@Webweaver

I've had a thought about the 'summary' text and I want to leave it as is for now. My reckoning is that a summary is just that; a blurb of text (usually one paragraph)...

Thanks for reporting the issue with sorting the 'date' field. The Posts Table is being generated from ProcessWire (MarkupAdminDataTable). So, this is not an issue with ProcessBlog per se but thanks for catching that. I have actually been considering using other tables (e.g. DataTable) that are capable of dynamic sorting (i.e. sorting from the database). The sorting your see now is static and does not draw from the database. 

As for quickpost I have been wavering between making it RTE or not. I reckoned that many people would not be using it often for post creation. If there's sufficient demand I might change it back to RTE.

@Pwired

Glad you find the module useful. As stated in the first post, I intentionally used lots of template files in an attempt to make it easier for folks to see what's going on in the code. It is definitely not the recommended templating approach. In addition, using the Blog API, the user would be able to use the templating approach they wanted (as well as the CSS framework they wanted). However, documentation to assist users with the API is badly needed (and I am working on this at the moment). So in time, you will be able to 'disable the default front' that comes with MarkupBlog. This means basically deleting the template files :-). Technically, Blog does not need any of those template files. They are just there to showcase its capabilities. 

OK, back to writing.... :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

@kongondo: sorry if this is unrelated (I don't have a proper test environment at hand right now) but sorting by dates is entirely doable using MarkupAdminDataTable too. It just requires a bit of extra work: prefixing actual, visible value with hidden, sortable value; something like yyyy-mm-dd etc.

This is how I solved it in ProcessLoginHistory.

Sorting multi-page values is another issue entirely, but as far as sorting visible results is good enough, no need to complicate things with new 3rd party components :)

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By FireWire
      Hello community!

      I want to share a new module I've been working on that I think could be a big boost for multi-language ProcessWire sites.

      Some background, I was looking for a way for our company website to be efficiently translated as working with human translators was pretty laborious and a lack of updating content created a divergence between languages. I, and several other devs here, have talked about translation integrations and have recognized the power that DeepL has. DeepL is an AI deep learning powered service that delivers translation quality beyond any automated service available. After access to the API was opened up to the US, I built Fluency, a DeepL translation integration for ProcessWire.
      Fluency brings automated translation to every multi-language field in the admin, and also provides a translation tool allowing the user to translate their text to any language without it being inside a template's field. With Fluency you can:
      Translate any plain textarea or text input Translate any CKEditor content (yes, with markup) Translate page names for fully localized URLs on every page Translate your in-template translation function wrapped strings Translate modules Fluency is free, and now so is DeepL
      Since this module was first built DeepL has introduced free Developer accounts that allow anyone to start using Fluency at zero cost and beginning with the version 0.3.0 release Fluency now supports free DeepL accounts. As of June 2021 DeepL supports translation to 26 languages and continues to offer more!
      Installation and usage is completely plug and play. Whether you're building a new multi-language site, need to update a site to multi-language, or simply want to stop manually translating a site and make any language a one-click deal, it could not be easier to do it. Fluency works by having you match the languages configured in ProcessWIre to DeepL's. You can have your site translating to any or all of the languages DeepL translates to in minutes (quite literally).
      Let's break out the screenshots...
      When the default language tab is shown, a message is displayed to let users know that translation is available. Clicking on each tab shows a link that says "Translate from English". Clicking it shows an animated overlay with the word "Translating..." cycling through each language and a light gradient shift. Have a CKEditor field? All good. Fluency will translated it and use DeepL's ability to translate text within HTML tags. CKEditor fields can be translated as easily and accurately as text/textarea fields.

      Repeaters and AJAX created fields also have translation enabled thanks to a JavaScript MutationObserver that searches for multi-language fields and adds translation as they're inserted into the DOM. If there's a multi-language field on the page, it will have translation added.

      Same goes for image description fields. Multi-language SEO friendly images are good to go.

      Creating a new page from one of your templates? Translate your title, and also translate your page name for native language URLs. (Not available for Russian, Chinese, or Japanese languages due to URL limitations). These can be changed in the "Settings" tab for any page as well so whether you're translating new pages or existing pages, you control the URLs everywhere.

      Language configuration pages are no different. Translate the names of your languages and search for both Site Translation Files (including all of your modules)

      Translate all of the static text in your templates as well. Notice that the placeholders are retained. DeepL is pretty good at recognizing and keeping non-translatable strings like that. If it is changed, it's easy to fix manually.

      Fluency adds a "Translate" item to the CMS header. When clicked this opens up a modal with a full translation tool that lets the user translate any language to any language. No need to leave the admin if you need to translate content from a secondary language back to the default ProcessWire language. There is also a button to get the current API usage statistics. DeepL account owners can set billing limitations via character count to control costs. This may help larger sites or sites being retrofitted keep an eye on their usage. Fluency can be used by users having roles given the fluency-translate permission.

      It couldn't be easier to add Fluency to your new or existing website. Simply add your API key and you're shown what languages are currently available for translation from/to as provided by DeepL. This list and all configuration options are taken live from the API so when DeepL releases new languages you can add them to your site without any work. No module updates, just an easy configuration. Just match the language you configured in ProcessWire to the DeepL language you want it to be associated with and you're done. Fluency also allows you to create a list of words/phrases that will not be translated which can prevent items such as brands and company names from being translated when they shouldn't

       
      Limitations:
      No "translate page" - Translating multiple fields can be done by clicking multiple translation links on multiple fields at once but engineering a "one click page translate" is not feasible from a user experience standpoint. The time it takes to translate one field can be a second or two, but cumulatively that may take much longer (CKEditor fields are slower than plain text fields). There may be a workaround in the future but it isn't currently on the roadmap. No "translate site" - Same thing goes for translating an entire website at once. It would be great, but it would be a very intense process and take a very (very) long time. There may be a workaround in the future but it isn't on the roadmap. No current support for Inline CKEditor fields - Handling for CKEditor on-demand hasn't been implemented yet, this is planned for a future release though and can be done. I just forgot about it because I've never really used that feature personally.. Alpha release - This module is in alpha. Releases should be stable and usable, but there may be edge case issues. Test the module thoroughly and please report any bugs via a Github issue on the repository or respond here. Please note that the browser plugin for Grammarly conflicts with Fluency (as it does with many web applications). To address this issue it is recommended that you disable Grammarly when using Fluency, or open the admin to edit pages in a private window where Grammarly may not be loaded. This is an issue that may not have a resolution as creating a workaround may not be possible. If you have insight as to how this may be solved please visit the Github page and file a bugfix ticket.
      Requirements:
      ProcessWire  3.0+ UIKit Admin Theme That's Fluency in a nutshell. A core effort in this module is to create it so that there is nothing DeepL related hard-coded in that would require updating it when DeepL offers new languages. I would like this to be a future-friendly module that doesn't require developer work to keep it up-to-date.
      The Module Is Free
      This is my first real module and I want to give it back to the community as thanks. This is the best CMS I've worked with (thank you Ryan & contributors) and a great community (thank you dear reader).
      DeepL Developer Accounts
      In addition to paid Pro Developer accounts, DeepL now offers no-cost free accounts. Now all ProcessWire developers and users can use Fluency at no cost.
      Learn more about free and paid accounts by visiting the DeepL website. Sign up for a Developer account, get an API key, and start using Fluency today.
      Download & Feedback
      Download the latest version here
      https://github.com/SkyLundy/Fluency-Translation/archive/main.zip
      Github repository:
      https://github.com/SkyLundy/Fluency-Translation
      File issues and feature requests here (your feedback and testing is greatly appreciated):
      https://github.com/SkyLundy/Fluency-Translation/issues
       
      Thank you! ¡Gracias! Ich danke Ihnen! Merci! Obrigado! Grazie! Dank u wel! Dziękuję! Спасибо! ありがとうございます! 谢谢你!

    • By monollonom
      (once again I was surprised to see a work of mine pop up in the newsletter, this time without even listing the module on PW modules website 😅. Thx @teppo !)
      Github: https://github.com/romaincazier/FieldtypeQRCode
      Modules directory: https://processwire.com/modules/fieldtype-qrcode/
      This is a simple module I made so a client could quickly grab a QR Code of the page's url in the admin.
      There's not much to it for now, but if need be you can output anything using a hook:
      $wire->addHookAfter("FieldtypeQRCode::getQRText", function($event) { $event->return = "Your custom text"; }) You can also output the QR code on your front-end by calling the field:
      echo $page->qr_code_field; The module uses the PHP library QR Code Generator by Kazuhiko Arase. When looking for a way to generate a QR Code in PW I came across @ryan's integration in his TFA module. I'm not very familiar with fieldtype/inputfield module development so I blindly followed @bernhard (great) tutorial and his BaseFieldtypeRuntime. At some point I'll take a deeper look to make a module on my own.
      Some ideas for improvements :
      add the ability to choose what to ouput : page's url / editUrl / file(s) / image(s) / ... allow to output multiple QR codes ?
    • By Chris Bennett
      https://github.com/chrisbennett-Bene/AdminThemeTweaker
      Inspired by @bernhard's excellent work on the new customisable LESS CSS getting rolled into the core soon, I thought I would offer up the module for beta testing, if it is of interest to anyone.

      It takes a different approach to admin styling, basically using the Cascade part of CSS to over-ride default UiKit values.
      Values are stored in ModuleConfig Module creates a separate AdminThemeTweaker Folder at root, so it can link to AdminThemeTweaker.php as CSS AdminThemeTweaker.php reads the module values, constructs the CSS variables then includes the CSS framework Can be switched on and off with a click. Uninstall removes everything, thanks to bernhard's wonderful remove dir & contents function.
      It won't touch your core. It won't care if stuff is upgraded. You won't need to compile anything and you don't need to touch CSS unless you want to.

      It won't do much at all apart from read some values from your module config, work out the right CSS variables to use (auto contrast based on selected backgrounds) and throw it on your screen.
      You can configure a lot of stuff, leave it as it comes (dark and curvy), change two main colors (background and content background) or delve deep to configure custom margins, height of mastheads, and all manner of silly stuff I never use.

      Have been developing it for somewhere around 2 years now. It has been (and will continue to be) constantly tweaked over that time, as I click on something and find something else to do.
      That said, it is pretty solid and has been in constant use as my sole Admin styling option for all of those 2 years.

      If nothing else, it would be great if it can provide any assistance to @bernhard or other contributor's who may be looking to solve some of the quirkier UiKit behavior.
      Has (in my opinion) more robust and predictable handling of hidden Inputfields, data-colwidths and showIf wrappers.
      I am very keen to help out with that stuff in any way I can, though LESS (and any css frameworks/tools basically) are not my go.
      I love CSS variables and banging-rocks-together, no-dependency CSS you can write with notepad.



       

    • By opalepatrick
      I see old posts saying that repeaters are not the way to go in Custom Process Modules. If that is the case, when using forms (as I am trying to do) how would one tackle things like repeat contact fields where there can be multiple requirements for contact details with different parameters? (Like point of contact, director, etc) or even telephone numbers that have different uses?
      Just for background I am creating a process module that allows me to create types of financial applications in the admin area (no need to publish any of this, pure admin) that require a lot of personal or company information.
      Maybe I am thinking about this incorrectly?
    • By HMCB
      I ran across a reference to IftRunner module. The post was 6 years ago. I cant find it in available modules. Has it been pulled?
×
×
  • Create New...