Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Thanks for the info kongondo :)

For anyone wanting a 'quick hack for now' for setting the published date, run through the MarkupBlog.module file, and the template files and find:

find("template=blog-post

and immediately after add this:

, blog_date<=".date('Y-m-d G:i:s')."

This will basically add a condition to the post (aka page) lookup, to make sure the date field is set to now, or lower. I've run some tests on my local copy and it's working as expected.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Scheduled publishing is an integral part of the workflow for many bloggers, so this would definitely make sense. I couldn't live without such a feature anymore.. :)

@kongondo: if you're still pondering whether to use SchedulePages somehow or cook up your own method, I'd vote for SchedulePages. Admittedly I'm being somewhat selfish here (I'm sure we'll be using this module for our client sites and I don't like the idea of having to explain why and how scheduling posts is different from all other pages) but it's also a great module :)

I haven't made a decision on this yet. On the one hand I don't want to reinvent the wheel; why not just use SchedulePages. On the other, I am a bit wary of tying an important functionality of Blog to a third party module that is not part of the core. In case things were to break in the future and they were not fixed (no offence meant to Jasper), that would leave Blog users hanging.....Maybe I am being over cautious. I'll make a decision soon...

Sorry for spamming (sort of), but just wanted to comment on this one that most (quite possibly all) of the sites we've implemented a blog for have more than one blog. Doesn't sound that far fetched to me: one or more for internal use, one for each division (a lot of our blogging clients are municipalities and they've got a ton of these), one for CEO/mayor, one for each temporary project etc.

Also, if you were referring to creating a bunch of user-specific blogs: I've explained this sort of behaviour (in another system) to clients over and over and over and can assure you that, though it may sound like the logical solution, in real world it just doesn't work.. unless you also allow some sort of "blog superusers" to post with any user account, which could introduce an entire set of new problems :)

One typical situation is a CEO or mayor having his/her own blog. Most people of that caliber simply don't have much spare time and blogging is rarely considered a core task, so even if this person does really write his/her own posts, there's a very high probability that someone else handles posting them online.. which is where the trouble starts if each blog is tied to one user. I'm sure you get the point.

Anyway, I'd appreciate if you could consider this kind of feature, but I get that it's probably not too high in priority :)

Admittedly I currently have no idea how I could implement such a feature and to be honest, I haven't thought much about it. Where would the posts, tags and categories  live on the tree for the different blogs? It could get messy very quickly. Anyway, any and all ideas are welcome, thanks! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On the one hand I don't want to reinvent the wheel; why not just use SchedulePages. On the other, I am a bit wary of tying an important functionality of Blog to a third party module that is not part of the core. In case things were to break in the future and they were not fixed (no offence meant to Jasper), that would leave Blog users hanging.....Maybe I am being over cautious.

Nothing wrong with being careful, but luckily we're talking about free software here. If it's any more reassurance, we've got a lot of sites relying on this module already, so trust me: in the (unlikely) scenario that something was to happen and the module wasn't kept up to date, I for one would be more than happy (and forced, actually..) to catch the ball ;)

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We (Avoine) have the (hairy) balls also in ScheludedPages basket.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This post is in response to this question posted on GitHub

Comment Layout

I'm using Foundation instead of Skeleton and need to tweak some of the layout.
Can you identify which file I would need to tweak to change the comments layout? I can do so much via CSS but not the bigger shifting around of content

First, I'd like to reiterate that this Blog Module does not use any CSS framework. The Blog (site) Profile (on which Blog Module is based) uses the Skeleton CSS framework. However, in this Module's demo/example output/template files, I have used PocketGrid CSS. It is not a requirement. You can use whichever CSS framework (or not) you wish. The following example is for this module (but is equally applicable to the Blog Profile).

It is very easy to style Blog's comments by targeting the output HTML IDs and Classes in your CSS. In my example template files, my custom styles are in blog.css. The example code below is an HTML output of Comments where 'comments are allowed'.

<div id="comments">
	<span class="num-comments-icon">2</span>
	<h4>Comments</h4>
	<ul class="comments CommentList">
		<li class="comment CommentListItem" id="comment1">
			<p class="comment-head CommentHeader">Comment by kongondo on 13 April 2014 11:16 pm</p>
			<div class="comment-body CommentText"><p>Simply the best CMS.</p></div>
		</li>

		<li class="comment CommentListItem" id="comment10">
			<p class="comment-head CommentHeader">Comment by kongondo on 23 May 2014 2:42 pm</p>
			<div class="comment-body CommentText"><p>ProcessWire rocks, yeah!</p></div>
		</li>

	</ul>
	<!--CommentForm-->
	<div id="CommentForm" class="CommentForm_new">
		<h4>Post a comment</h4>
		<form id="CommentForm_form" action="./#CommentForm" method="post">
			<p class="CommentForm_cite">
				<label for="CommentForm_cite">Your Name</label>
				<input type="text" name="cite" class="required" required="required" id="CommentForm_cite" value="" maxlength="128">
			</p>
			<p class="CommentForm_email">
				<label for="CommentForm_email">Your E-Mail</label>
				<input type="text" name="email" class="required email" required="required" id="CommentForm_email" value="" maxlength="255">
			</p>
			<p class="CommentForm_text">
				<label for="CommentForm_text">Comments</label>
				<textarea name="text" class="required" required="required" id="CommentForm_text" rows="5" cols="50"></textarea>
			</p>
			<p class="CommentForm_submit">
				<button type="submit" name="CommentForm_submit" id="CommentForm_submit" value="1">Submit</button>
				<input type="hidden" name="page_id" value="2488">
			</p>
		</form>
	</div><!--/CommentForm-->
</div> 

So, you do not need to tweak any file. All you need is to style the output.

For the PHP stuff, I am in the process of writing some documentation...

Hope this answers your query. Thank you for using Blog :-)

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers for the reply and apologies re the framework mixup.

I guess I'm approaching this with a few expectations picked up from my other blogging platform. Within that, almost every part of the blog was a mini template which you could tweak to make fundamental layout changes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sparrow, no need to apologise for anything :-). Your question will help the next guy. Once I write the API documentation, you'll realise that you can also tweak this Blog to make fundamental layout changes. You can output bits and pieces (tags, posts, categories, authors, comments, etc) anywhere using its API since it is a PW module. All these bits and pieces are independent of each other. This is similar to PW pages in the sense that you can output page fields anywhere in any order in your site or even not output any of the fields.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ABSO-FREAKING-LUTELY BEAUTIFUL!!!!!!!

Seeing all those screenshots gets me all excited amigo :) 

Thank you for a job well done. This comes in perfect timing for a new project that I started yesterday. GEEZZZ, p-e-r-f-e-c-t.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@OrganizedFellow

Thanks. Glad you like the module. You've been away a while... ;):)   

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@OrganizedFellow

Thanks. Glad you like the module. You've been away a while... ;):)   

Work. Lots of it. Two new PW sites. Hopefully worthy of sharing for the Showcase :) 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Update:

Minor version bump to 1.2.1 after some minor styling issues updates.

Documentation:

I am taking a short break from writing code to write some badly needed documentation for Blog (and some other PW tutorials if I get time :-)). I am writing this documentation as tutorials which I will post on my website soon. I'll keep you updated. I haven't forgotten any Blog features pending requests :-)

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Kongondo and Ryan for these excellent modules!

I've implemented this into a site I'm developing and am having an issue... The blog posts are not truncating. I have the summary length set to 150 , but nothing is being truncated. I know when i created a post I'm populating the "blog_body" field and these settings seem to be for the "blog_summary" field (which does is not one of the fields for the template).. From what I can see in the MarkupBlog.module, there is a conditional if summary is empty to pull from the blog_body and truncate.

The blog I'm working on is here: http://shootkta.info/blog/ .. If you have any thoughts, please let me know.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Webweaver,

Glad you like the module.

It is truncating fine for me here. The code is pulling text to truncate from blog_body. I decided to skip over using a blog_summary since truncation can be done from blog_body. I am guessing it is not truncating because you have not set the second parameter/argument of renderPosts() to true. The default is false (i.e. do not truncate). Apologies for this; I have delayed with documentation but I am currently writing this. Here's example code to make it truncate.

$blog = $modules->get("MarkupBlog");
$limit = 10;
//limit will be passed to the selector fetching blog posts;
//'true' will truncate posts to what we have set in blog_quantity but default to 450 if this is not set
$content = $blog->renderPosts("limit={$limit}", true);
echo $content;
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kongondo, is your blog module out of beta and can be used already safe ?

I read a lot of good things about your blog modules and are going to install

them this week-end.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Still in Beta but safe to use but I need to add some features before going stable (e.g. scheduled publishing, etc) :-). Other than that, it works fine...

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Kongondo - Thank you very much for the explanation to fix. Next time I'll know not to pull my hair out for 2 hours and just ask the question and wait for the reply :)

Btw, the generated summary strips out all tags so the posts in the blog list looked pretty bad.. So I removed the strip tags.. But then had another problem - if the cutoff was in the middle of an anchor tag, the "view more" anchor tag would become nested and didn't work.. So I put back in the strip tags but allowed <p> and <img> tags.. The summaries in the blog list look much nicer now.

ex: Line 543 in MarkupBlog.module now reads:

$summary = strip_tags(substr($page->blog_body, 0, $summaryLimit), '<p><img>');

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As for <p></p>, those are added back later. See line 602 of the code

if($small) {

  $out .= "<p>" . $page->summary . "… <a class='more' href='{$page->url}'>" . __('View More') . "</a></p>";
} 

Hadn't considered images in the summary.... :-)..Maybe I'll need to add at blog_summary [non-rich text area] to the blog template.

Edit

Or, for now, maybe not. I don't want to add too many fields...I'll have a think

Edit 2:

We now have this feature inbuilt in renderPosts(). You can specify tags that should not be stripped as indicated in this post:

https://processwire.com/talk/topic/7403-module-blog/?p=78227 (see  post_small_allowable_tags)

Edited by kongondo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ya, I hesitated on the img tag :) Basicly I want them to see a majority of the post in full formatting (as much as possible) while they are on the blog listing page.

But line 602 is surrounding the entire post in a paragraph, so there is still no formatting within it. The paragraphs within the post itself were getting stripped.

I should mention also that I enabled CKEditor in for the blog_body field and changed the code in ProcessBlog.module for quickpost_body to use CKEditor also (line 387), but the tags were being stripped from the quickpost CKEditor, so had removed the sanitizer from quickpost (line 1441).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

More on Date sorting.. It seems once I open a post, then close, it sorts correctly in descending order. But I can't sort by ascending and when I click on the Date column header it doesn't sort on the fly. All the other columns work fine.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Forgot to ask, if I install a fresh processwire 2.4 and the 2 blog modules,

how does the blog show up on the front ? I mean a fresh pw 2.4 install

has it´s own default front with nav, body and sidebar. How does the blog

integrate with this ?

Edit1:

Got it, installing and just saw the blog template files, css and js.

It is really complete !

How can I disable the default front that came during the processwire install

and only have the basic blog front ?

uploaded all the php blog files to /site/templates/

and in admin tried to change template for home to blog.php

but didn´t allow me.

Ok dumb me, just had to delete home.php and rename blog.php to home.php

Now I can start building up :) it´s using pocketgrid so that is a real bonus.

In the admin I saw a new tab named Blog will all the great config in it.

kongondo.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys, apologies for not responding earlier.

@Webweaver

I've had a thought about the 'summary' text and I want to leave it as is for now. My reckoning is that a summary is just that; a blurb of text (usually one paragraph)...

Thanks for reporting the issue with sorting the 'date' field. The Posts Table is being generated from ProcessWire (MarkupAdminDataTable). So, this is not an issue with ProcessBlog per se but thanks for catching that. I have actually been considering using other tables (e.g. DataTable) that are capable of dynamic sorting (i.e. sorting from the database). The sorting your see now is static and does not draw from the database. 

As for quickpost I have been wavering between making it RTE or not. I reckoned that many people would not be using it often for post creation. If there's sufficient demand I might change it back to RTE.

@Pwired

Glad you find the module useful. As stated in the first post, I intentionally used lots of template files in an attempt to make it easier for folks to see what's going on in the code. It is definitely not the recommended templating approach. In addition, using the Blog API, the user would be able to use the templating approach they wanted (as well as the CSS framework they wanted). However, documentation to assist users with the API is badly needed (and I am working on this at the moment). So in time, you will be able to 'disable the default front' that comes with MarkupBlog. This means basically deleting the template files :-). Technically, Blog does not need any of those template files. They are just there to showcase its capabilities. 

OK, back to writing.... :-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@kongondo: sorry if this is unrelated (I don't have a proper test environment at hand right now) but sorting by dates is entirely doable using MarkupAdminDataTable too. It just requires a bit of extra work: prefixing actual, visible value with hidden, sortable value; something like yyyy-mm-dd etc.

This is how I solved it in ProcessLoginHistory.

Sorting multi-page values is another issue entirely, but as far as sorting visible results is good enough, no need to complicate things with new 3rd party components :)

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Robin S
      Repeater Images
      Adds options to modify Repeater fields to make them convenient for "page-per-image" usage. Using a page-per-image approach allows for additional fields to be associated with each image, to record things such as photographer, date, license, links, etc.
      When Repeater Images is enabled for a Repeater field the module changes the appearance of the Repeater inputfield to be similar (but not identical) to an Images field. The collapsed view shows a thumbnail for each Repeater item, and items can be expanded for field editing.
      Screencast

      Installation
      Install the Repeater Images module.
      Setup
      Create an image field to use in the Repeater field. Recommended settings for the image field are "Maximum files allowed" set to 1 and "Formatted value" set to "Single item (null if empty)". Create a Repeater field. Add the image field to the Repeater. If you want additional fields in the Repeater create and add these also. Repeater Images configuration
      Tick the "Activate Repeater Images for this Repeater field" checkbox. In the "Image field within Repeater" dropdown select the single image field. You must save the Repeater field settings to see any newly added Image fields in the dropdown. Adjust the image thumbnail height if you want (unlike the core Images field there is no slider to change thumbnail height within Page Edit). Note: the depth option for Repeater fields is not compatible with the Repeater Images module.
      Image uploads feature
      There is a checkbox to activate image uploads. This feature allows users to quickly and easily add images to the Repeater Images field by uploading them to an adjacent "upload" field.
      To use this feature you must add the image field selected in the Repeater Images config to the template of the page containing the Repeater Images field - immediately above or below the Repeater Images field would be a good position.
      It's recommended to set the label for this field in template context to "Upload images" or similar, and set the visibility of the field to "Closed" so that it takes up less room when it's not being used. Note that when you drag images to a closed Images field it will automatically open. You don't need to worry about the "Maximum files allowed" setting because the Repeater Images module overrides this for the upload field.
      New Repeater items will be created from the images uploaded to the upload field when the page is saved. The user can add descriptions and tags to the images while they are still in the upload field and these will be retained in the Repeater items. Images are automatically deleted from the upload field when the page is saved.
      Tips
      The "Use accordion mode?" option in the Repeater field settings is useful for keeping the inputfield compact, with only one image item open for editing at a time. The "Repeater item labels" setting determines what is shown in the thumbnail overlay on hover. Example for an image field named "image": {image.basename} ({image.width}x{image.height})  
      https://github.com/Toutouwai/RepeaterImages
      https://modules.processwire.com/modules/repeater-images/
    • By EyeDentify
      Hello There Guys.

      I am in the process of getting into making my first modules for PW and i had a question for you PHP and PW gurus in here.

      I was wondering how i could use an external library, lets say TwitterOAuth in my PW module.
      Link to library
      https://twitteroauth.com/

      Would the code below be correct or how would i go about this:
      <?PHP namespace ProcessWire; /* load the TwitterOAuth library from my Module folder */ require "twitteroauth/autoload.php"; use Abraham\TwitterOAuth\TwitterOAuth; class EyeTwitter extends WireData,TwitterOAuth implements Module { /* vars */ protected $twConnection; /* extend parent TwitterOAuth contructor $connection = new TwitterOAuth(CONSUMER_KEY, CONSUMER_SECRET, $access_token, $access_token_secret); */ public function myTwitterConnection ($consumer_key, $consumer_secret, $access_token, $access_token_secret) { /* save the connection for use later */ $this->twConnection = TwitterOAuth::__construct($consumer_key, $consumer_secret, $access_token, $access_token_secret); } } ?> Am i on the right trail here or i am barking up the wrong tree?
      I don´t need a complete solution, i just wonder if i am including the external library the right way.
      If not, then give me a few hint´s and i will figure it out.

      Thanks a bunch.

      /EyeDentify
    • By Violet
      Here I'm introducing FlipFall Magazine, our multi-topic blog. It used to run on Wordpress but we recently switched it to ProcessWire. This was done the usual way we do it when converting our sites: install ProcessWire in a subfolder of the original Wordpress site under a hard-to-guess name, set up the new site there, then move content over manually, inspecting and updating each article as needed. After the ProcessWire site was ready, when we un-installed the Wordpress one and moved the ProcessWire site up one level to the document root, and... done.
      We used the W3CSS framework because it handles the responsive breakpoints so well (no extra work for us 😉), and it tends to default to a clean modern look.
      We wanted full control over the back end of the site and do customized things without having to hire a developer.  As FlipFall has grown, the ability to have in-house back-end control has become even more important.
      Case example: Ad partners - we now can quite easily, if we wish, place different ads on different topics on this blog at a moment's notice - no need to hire a developer. Changes like this can be implemented in-house right away. The fact that we can easily incorporate this sort of thing is really nice when we're talking with potential ad partners.
      Helpful features of ProcessWire during this experience:
      The ability to export and import fields in PW was key here. We had a few other article-style sites I had done in PW recently, so having the same types of templates was very helpful. We were able to export fields and templates from our existing sites and import into FlipFall as a starting base point. No need to re-invent the wheel here! Another helpful ability of PW was when we were dealing with the categories. We built the site without category templates (but with the category page field), then added the templates in later as needed - no disruption. In other words, a template-less page field worked perfectly for the categories until we needed the template, then we just created the template. Not every feature of the site needs to be thought out in absolute full beforehand, some can be added in later as needed. Very extensible and convenient. Internal links within blog posts worked well using the page select option in the link button on the editor. When moving out of staging folder and into document root, the links auto-updated, which was nice. Creating new articles is a breeze, because under PW our fields are now customized for our needs: we created all of the fields we need and none of the ones we don't. Again, this is unlike most blogging CMS's, where they try to guess what you want (and usually get it wrong). Even for people who are solely doing blogs/article sites, I feel that ProcessWire is a much better option than most blog-specific platforms, because of PW's flexibility.  The only thing I miss about Wordpress is the ability to auto-schedule post publication, which for the serious blogger is important. For example, there were some occasions on some of our other blogs where we needed to schedule posts to auto-publish at 3:01am Eastern Time to allow a time-sensitive post to come out as early in time of day as possible on publication date (3:01 am US Eastern time ensures it's that same day 12:01 am on Pacific time). We were delighted to see that ProcessWire is much, much lighter on resources of the hosting environment than the same site on Wordpress - we could see this empirically on our web hosting stats before and after the switch.
    • By dimitrios
      Hello,
      this module can publish content of a Processwire page on a Facebook page, triggered by saving the Processwire page.
      To set it up, configure the module with a Facebook app ID, secret and a Page ID. Following is additional configuration on Facebook for developers:
      Minimum Required Facebook App configuration:
      on Settings -> Basics, provide the App Domains, provide the Site URL, on Settings -> Advanced, set the API version (has been tested up to v3.3), add Product: Facebook Login, on Facebook Login -> Settings, set Client OAuth Login: Yes, set Web OAuth Login: Yes, set Enforce HTTPS: Yes, add "http://www.example.com/processwire/page/" to field Valid OAuth Redirect URIs. This module is configurable as follows:
      Templates: posts can take place only for pages with the defined templates. On/Off switch: specify a checkbox field that will not allow the post if checked. Specify a message and/or an image for the post.
      Usage
      edit the desired PW page and save; it will post right after the initial Facebook log in and permission granting. After that, an access token is kept.
       
      Download
      PW module directory: http://modules.processwire.com/modules/auto-fb-post/ Github: https://github.com/kastrind/AutoFbPost   Note: Facebook SDK for PHP is utilized.


    • By kongondo
      FieldtypeRuntimeMarkup and InputfieldRuntimeMarkup
       
      Modules Directory: http://modules.processwire.com/modules/fieldtype-runtime-markup/
      GitHub: https://github.com/kongondo/FieldtypeRuntimeMarkup
      As of 11 May 2019 ProcessWire versions earlier than 3.x are not supported
      This module allows for custom markup to be dynamically (PHP) generated and output within a page's edit screen (in Admin).
       
      The value for the fieldtype is generated at runtime. No data is saved in the database. The accompanying InputfieldRuntimeMarkup is only used to render/display the markup in the page edit screen.
       
      The field's value is accessible from the ProcessWire API in the frontend like any other field, i.e. it has access to $page and $pages.
       
      The module was commissioned/sponsored by @Valan. Although there's certainly other ways to achieve what this module does, it offers a dynamic and flexible alternative to generating your own markup in a page's edit screen whilst also allowing access to that markup in the frontend. Thanks Valan!
       
      Warning/Consideration
      Although access to ProcessWire's Fields' admin pages is only available to Superusers, this Fieldtype will evaluate and run the custom PHP Code entered and saved in the field's settings (Details tab). Utmost care should therefore be taken in making sure your code does not perform any CRUD operations!! (unless of course that's intentional) The value for this fieldtype is generated at runtime and thus no data is stored in the database. This means that you cannot directly query a RuntimeMarkup field from $pages->find(). Usage and API
       
      Backend
      Enter your custom PHP snippet in the Details tab of your field (it is RECOMMENDED though that you use wireRenderFile() instead. See example below). Your code can be as simple or as complicated as you want as long as in the end you return a value that is not an array or an object or anything other than a string/integer.
       
      FieldtypeRuntimeMarkup has access to $page (the current page being edited/viewed) and $pages. 
       
      A very simple example.
      return 'Hello'; Simple example.
      return $page->title; Simple example with markup.
      return '<h2>' . $page->title . '</h2>'; Another simple example with markup.
      $out = '<h1>hello '; $out .= $page->title; $out .= '</h1>'; return $out; A more advanced example.
      $p = $pages->get('/about-us/')->child('sort=random'); return '<p>' . $p->title . '</p>'; An even more complex example.
      $str =''; if($page->name == 'about-us') { $p = $page->children->last(); $str = "<h2><a href='{$p->url}'>{$p->title}</a></h2>"; } else { $str = "<h2><a href='{$page->url}'>{$page->title}</a></h2>"; } return $str; Rather than type your code directly in the Details tab of the field, it is highly recommended that you placed all your code in an external file and call that file using the core wireRenderFile() method. Taking this approach means you will be able to edit your code in your favourite text editor. It also means you will be able to type more text without having to scroll. Editing the file is also easier than editing the field. To use this approach, simply do:
      return wireRenderFile('name-of-file');// file will be in /site/templates/ If using ProcessWire 3.x, you will need to use namespace as follows:
      return ProcessWire\wireRenderFile('name-of-file'); How to access the value of RuntimeMarkup in the frontend (our field is called 'runtime_markup')
       
      Access the field on the current page (just like any other field)
      echo $page->runtime_markup; Access the field on another page
      echo $pages->get('/about-us/')->runtime_markup; Screenshots
       
      Backend
       

       

       
      Frontend
       

×
×
  • Create New...