szabesz

Hello @renobird, Any news on this?

Hi, I recommend a google search first: https://www.google.com/search?q=this+request+was+aborted+because+it+appears+to+be+forged+site%3Aprocesswire.com%2Ftalk you can find a bunch of threads, with crosslinks like: If you cannot find the solution, please proved more info base on what you've read in the other threads.

I was referring to your last screenshot of Extra Allowed Content: img(*) instead of img[*] I have not used the site profile export feature for years, so I do not have recent experience. Maybe others use it more often than me.

If you want to allow css classes, you need parentheses and not brackets. Are you sure you configured both sites the same (dev vs production)?

Can you please provide screenshots and/or screengrabs (e.g. by using https://www.cockos.com/licecap/) ? Also, is HTML Purifier on or off?

That's right.

Almost but you need to extract the zip file. Your exported site profile should look like as if it was just another one bundled with ProcessWire. Eg.: site-beginner site-blank site-classic site-default site-languages site-myexportedprofile site-regular

"Is HTML Purifier configurable in PW?" I searched the forum for this a few days ago, and the answer to this question was: NO. We do need core support for this, preferably in the admin. And it is not just data- attributes, but a class attribute not set by CKE was stripped too in my case.

Hello, You can use a site profile (even an exported one) only during the installation process of ProcessWire, that is why you need to put your exported and extracted site profile in the root directory of the site next to install.php, meaning alongside with all the other site profiles ProcessWire comes with. Start the installation process as normal and pick your exported site profile when prompted to choose one.

Excellente! We cannot thank you for all the hard work you share with us. Where is the donate button, btw? ?

How about doing it only for objects with ID and Array/WireArray? Just a simple isset/instanceof to decide what to do?

Another UX thing is that icons on the left require shorter mouse movements, well most of the time ? Sure... I am really thinking of the basics here, nothing more: id, count() that's all that comes to my mind ?

@LostKobrakai shared a paginator module two years ago: https://github.com/LostKobrakai/Paginator

Hello, I have not used it but you might want to give it a shot: http://modules.processwire.com/modules/markup-processwire-photoswipe/

Thanks, looks ok, except the possibility of the icons "jumping" because of the scrollbar. Is it possible to move them to the left instead? If it's a collection of pages (WireArray and derived) then we could see the number of pages, for example. My idea is to see the basics so that there is no need to click on anything if that is enough. BTW, it will also work with bd(), won't it?

Your idea is to stick to "dump", while Adrian's idea is different. Let's not try to merge the two ideas, but come up with a solution to support Adrian's original idea which is great, I think.

Then let's not call it "dump" ? Seriously, we need debug info and not "dumps". I'm longing for a version which outputs both so there is no need to use options or different method calls, and I really do not mind if that one is not d() but maybe i() (short for info) or whatever, if d for dump is misleading.

I agree, we should avoid making this "impression". However, UI-wise I like the first approach a lot more: more compact and makes a group of the two. Cannot you somehow output this:

@adrian Hi, If using Toggle All to turn on all panels, then when not enough memory is available we only get this in the source code of the page: Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 33554432 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate 3008800 bytes) in .../site/modules/TracyDebugger/tracy-master/src/Tracy/Helpers.php on line 133 Could there be a more graceful way to notify the developer? Since it is in the HTML output, I had to dig it up to figure out why the debugbar "disappeared" while the rest of the page was rendered ok.

I do not think making the devbar pop-out is a good idea, at least I keep it always on even when I'm dealing with design so it is good to have it sit there while not distracting the general look of the page. Therefore the not inverted version is good for bright page designs, while the inverted one would be OK for dark page designs. Maybe automatic switching and/or option to set which one to use? Regarding the color of the inverted one, a good compromise could be using goldish yellow and magenta like colors (and with not so blue color but slightly bluish gray background instead): also, if the other icons are not white then colored ones pop-out more:

not sure how that should look like exactly but it sounds good to me ? Would it mean that we have to click twice to see one of them? First a click on the arrow next to the class name, after that another click on either debugInfo or PW object? Or maybe you "extend" debug info and PW object gets injected into it? Either way, I think it would be nice to see the id of a Page object without clicking on anything, somewhere between the class name and the arrow. Is that possible?

Depends on how you look at it ? Strictly speaking it was a Notice, for sure. However, it turned out that it was also a "copy/paste error"... ?

Great looking site builder, thanks for sharing the screenshots too! Personally I do not like stuffing too much code into the database but a page/site builder can only do that. However, I guess there are loads of folks out there who definitely like to use such setups. Would it be possible for you to share the site specific global LESS/SCSS code? I would love to see how you did it under the hood.

+1 I don wanna reinvent the wheel ? but even free ones should be used as starting points only and most importantly they must look like one family, so that is where most efforts should be put into (besides pleasing the eye, of course...).

I can do it on a one-by-one basis. Not too much free time these days but if we are not in a hurry... ?