szabesz

Welcome to the forums @matt.bryant You mean something like this, or maybe something else? https://processwire.com/talk/topic/8234-community-rules-guidelines/

Yep, why does it include each machine running Windows? ? +1 They call them "updates" but I'd call them replacing the complete system... Since MS can no longer directly connect to the treasuries of governments around the globe, they need to connect directly to the wallets of people.

Yes I did, I just did not have the time to report and later on forgot to. I did not do any extensive testing, I just checked if the issue was gone on that particular machine or not. Since the issue had never showed up again, I guess the changes applied were the cause of it.

It was fixed today, see: https://github.com/processwire/processwire-issues/issues/598

Hello @Michael and welcome to ProcessWire, What you are aiming for is not a pretty easy project but if you really want to learn and have the time to spend on it then you can start learning by doing it especially if it's a family project which means all your users should be patient, cooperative and help you by testing ? Read up on permissions and roles. Beside the docs I also recommend a google search in the Blog posts, something like this: https://www.google.hu/search?q=access+permissions+roles+site%3Aprocesswire.com%2Fblog You probably want to stick to backend – that is the PW's administration area – for user management features and do not want to implement front-end user management features because that is not something for complete beginners, at least there is a lot more to learn before I can recommend for you to do that. This is sort of provided by the admin but I guess you are talking about the frontend. To make things easier, you might want to install ProcessWire by also installing this site profile: https://processwire.com/talk/topic/13572-bootstrap-4-minimal-site-profile/ by @flydev This way you can rely on Bootstrap 4 which can help a lot if you are new to CSS and SASS. For showcasing images on the front-end, here are some libraries to pick from: http://photoswipe.com/ http://chocolat.insipi.de/#demo http://dimsemenov.com/plugins/magnific-popup/ Hope this helps! Happy developing ?

Sure, implementing a complex module and maintaining it requires a lot more time than "simply" wiring things together in ProcessWire. However, you might want to share a site profile with dummy data if that is ok with you (and if you have the time to prepare it...). What do you think? BTW, thanks for the showcase and the insight!

What do you mean by this? Is this a website from 2014 which has not been updated since then? What happens if you manually import the SQL file (with the help of phpMyAdmin, for example) and put back all the files/directories to the site root directory? If I understand you correctly, your files/directories are from a backup but the database file (install.sql) is a leftover from a site profile export operation. Have you read this one? https://processwire.com/talk/topic/121-custom-install-profiles/

Depending on the actual contents of /site and /wire it might be possible that you have all the files in them. Do you also happen to have a copy of the database? In your opening post you stated that: "I had a copy but only of the templates folder" The question is: what do you actually still have? What are the possible missing files/directories and what about the database? What exactly did you delete accidentally?

just for cross reference: https://processwire.com/blog/posts/processwire-2.5.3-master-2.5.4-dev/ and

In addition to this, I can also recommend @flydev's Duplicator module: https://modules.processwire.com/modules/duplicator/ it is not just for cloning a site but for creating full backups (files + database). For example, before performing actions to the site you are not really comfortable with or you just want to make sure you have a current backup then Duplicator can be very useful.

Sorry for the OT question but are you referring to GDPR?

It should be optional/temporary so that there is no extra markup generated when it is not needed. Tracy already outputs a lot... Anyway, I like the idea ?

I do not have too much extra time these days so I postponed testing it, also because you mentioned possible idrive support and I thought I would wait for that too, I was thinking about testing both "parallel".

An interesting read about the dumb way autoplay restrictions are implemented in mayor browser these days: https://www.construct.net/hu/blogs/ashleys-blog-2/how-browsers-should-handle-autoplay-restrictions-954

BTW, Priority Nav will be part of UIkit 3: https://yootheme.com/blog/2018/01/11/uikit-3-beta-36-released "We are now on the homestretch for the final UIkit 3 Stable release. Masonry Grid and Priority Nav are next, which will complete UIkit 3."

It cannot hurt for sure (that is why I also put it there whenever I can) but on small mobile viewports it might be problematic to also use the word "menu", however if the hamburger menu is prominent then people will find and use it as they have gotten used to it by now. Sure, there are alternatives but I do not think the hamburger icon is that bad and the alternatives are not better either. It just depends on the design context what works best. It is funny that in the "5 smart alternatives to the hamburger menu" article the hamburger icons are still used.

+1 For example it is good for pages containing not too sensitive data, such as work in progress – soon to be made public – pages some people need access to, etc...

I guess it depends on the file size of the ZIP file. Big files cannot be downloaded for example if not enough memory is allocated for the process. I always download the ZIP files via FTP which is reliable in my case.

I always insist on having SSH no matter what because BASH is also in my toolset. I either clone a complete site with my own script or just the database. I make admin changes in production (if I'm not sure about the results in advance, then I perform tests in dev first) and after that I use my cloning script to replace the dev database from prod which takes only a few (4-7) seconds to do if one does not have to deal with a huge dbs (which I currently don't). https://processwire.com/talk/topic/14837-best-practise-to-implement-changes-in-pw-from-development-to-production/?do=findComment&comment=133726 https://processwire.com/talk/topic/14837-best-practise-to-implement-changes-in-pw-from-development-to-production/?do=findComment&comment=133741

It all depends on your workflow. Also, Duplicator is not just about cloning a site but for creating backups. Normally I use it for daily backups and/or for quick backups before "performing sensitive changes", just to be on the safe side...

I am running version 1.2.9 without issues on two sites. You might want to double check and re-save your settings. There might have been changes regarding the way the module stores what to include and what not to.

Looks like a useful module indeed. Would you please at least share it in the Forum's Module/Plugin Development section?

Thanks for the quick reply, based on it found this article: https://www.20spokes.com/blog/what-to-do-when-chrome-ignores-autocomplete-off-on-your-form This is also what you suggest, right? The thing is that it is not my Mac which has this issue but a Windows machine I do not have access to right now. Hopefully I can test it on that machine on Tuesday. I want to make sure I test it with that setup too.

Hi Adrian, I have not yet installed the 3.0 branch because I though before I spend time on it I ask you about an issue we have. So we still have version 2.0.15 and the field is added to users (dunno if it matter as at all...) When the inputbox of the "core" number (not country, area nor extension) is empty then Chrome automatically fills it in with the username used for logging into ProcessWire on the standard login screen and letting Chrome save the credentials. In other words, if we have Chrome save the login info, the current user's name gets injected into the inputbox when editing a user with an empty number, and this is an annoying issue because the inputbox must be manually cleared if we want to save the user. Have you any idea how to stop this behavior?

Very welcome additions, thank you to all who participated!