szabesz

Sounds great, just one question: how will you decide which "warning color" to use, orange vs red? I guess red should not be used for warnings at all. On the same account: "something else that you should be aware of" will be "fail / error / you-MUST-be-aware-of", right?

There is one big issue with page builders: working with them can still be time consuming depending on the use case, quote: source: https://wordpress.org/support/topic/i-was-really-ready-to-give-this-a-good-shot/ https://wptavern.com/gutenberg-plugin-garners-mixed-reactions-from-new-wave-of-testers Being a designer I can cope with any page builder for sure, but lots of editing tasks are even more time consuming that way. A page builder and a rich text editor both have their shortcomings and strengths, none of them is superior to the other. For example, my current clients would have a hard time working with page builders, as they only need simple RTE features and do not want to "learn more than that" for sure.

Sure, and if they do not do anything except for providing a donate button and some "transparency" then probably only the most widely used projects such as Webpack can benefit from it. Thanks for pointing it out! EDIT: I also closed the issue at GitHub.

Currently ? It is just an idea, for consideration which might be worth evaluating...

I see. In an effort to help, I updated my signature: Please don't forget to give a star at GitHub to the best in the ProcessWire world: ProcessWire, Tracy Debugger and AdminOnSteroids. Anyone not using a signature just yet might want to copy me ?

Hi, I've just read about Open Collective: https://wptavern.com/new-backyourstack-tool-drives-financial-support-for-open-source-projects ProcessWire or the top 3 (or 4?) most popular ProcessWire modules might be able to utilize it. I opened a "request": https://github.com/processwire/processwire-requests/issues/218 Top modules: https://weekly.pw/issue/202/ Tracy Debugger by @adrian AdminOnSteroids by @tpr FormBuilder and ProCache by @ryan

Hello, I have something similar I hope you can adapt it to your needs. Mine is for user templates: <?php //adds a button to the end of the user edit page: $this->addHook('ProcessPageEdit::buildForm', function (HookEvent $event) { $current_page = $event->object->getPage(); if ($current_page->template->name != 'user') return; // this button is for the user edit page only if (empty($current_page->user_family_name)) return; // custom field is not yet filled in, which means the new User has not been saved but still being edited in the admin $id = (int) $current_page->id; if ($id != 0) { if ($current_page->hasRole('mycustomrole')) { $href = createLink($current_page); // this is a custom function to be implemented, it must generate and return the required URL $field = $this->modules->get('InputfieldButton'); $field->attr('class', $field->class . " my-custom-css-class-if-needed"); // this is just opitional, I left it here as an example $field->attr('value', 'Copy URL to clipboard...'); $field->attr('data-clipboard-text', $href); // data-clipboard-text is needed by https://clipboardjs.com/ $field->attr('href', ''); // $href $event->return = $event->return->append($field); } } }); The copy to clipboard action is performed by https://clipboardjs.com/ which can be loaded by the admin using various techniques or free modules (such as AdminOnSteroids or Admin Custom Files) or one can simply put this line into config.php: $config->scripts->add($config->urls->templates . "clipboard.min.js"); where clipboard.min.js is in the templates directory, for example. EDIT: I forgot to note that the hook goes into init.php

Tough question ? Have you seen this module? Edit: or this one as another related alternative:

It must be. ProcessWire almost never introduces breaking changes at API level. The API gets additions and bug fixes only.

I do not remember becoming it a reality, the most recent discussion seems to be this one: There are some other links in it pointing to other related topics.

Hello, If it is a fresh ProcessWire install then we are probably talking about a bug. If you have the time, could you please try it with the latest "stable" (3.0.98) too? And based on the results I guess you will be able to decide whether to report it or not.

I have ff Works too and often use it to covert video files. While I like its GUI and ffmpeg too, the fact that ff Work's GUI is not mac OS native makes it a bit cumbersome to use in some cases but for the price/features ratio I have not found a better alternative.

+1 I've been also wondering about this for a while ?

Have you heard of storage quota? ?

Hey @horst n @pwired How could you forget @bernhard's blog post? https://processwire.com/blog/posts/building-custom-admin-pages-with-process-modules/? @TheProcessWireLearner Welcome to the forums! Regarding PHP itself: https://www.tutorialspoint.com/php/php_constants.htm I like recommending this, as reading these tutorial pages is enough for anyone to get started, you do not need to know too much more PHP in order to achieve a lot with ProcessWire. I also recommend keeping an eye on: https://processwire.com/talk/discover/unread/?&amp;view=condensed in order to learn from others.

Pretty good article about jQuery and the craziness of rejecting it "no matter what": https://www.i-programmer.info/news/167-javascript/12017-github-removes-jquery-why.html

A joke? Sounds quite realistic to me ?

I agree that the description is a bit ambiguous, I've been also wondering how to properly interpret it but I came to a similar conclusion, ie. this option is for "front-end API calls only" meaning where output formatting is ON by default: Quote: "pages on the front-end of your site always have output formatting on, unless you've turned it off, with $page->of(false)." Output formatting is always off in a module by default, and the explanation in your screenshot has examples with $page and not $this->page. Also, it is talking about front-end API access checks only. As a result, if it does not affect backend (ie. admin) access checks, then you can use this option for what you are describing, At least I use it that way too ? However, maybe others can put together a better explanation than this one of mine ?

Hi, I always limit PW's Images inputfield to 50 images which is normally just enough for most sites and it also makes sure storage requirement does not skyrocket ... I guess it is not feasible for this site you mention, so you might want to consider using @kongondo's Media Manager module: https://mediamanager.kongondo.com/ sure it is commercial but at the same time feature rich and should not have problems dealing with lots and lots of images.

Exporting is a resource intensive task, if you have a lot to export.... In this case I would recommend cloning the site by copying all files, adjusting config.php and anything else that matters + simply cloning the database too. You can automate it by scripting or using a tool which supports such operations. There are various forum threads discussing it, for example: https://processwire.com/talk/topic/14837-best-practise-to-implement-changes-in-pw-from-development-to-production/ https://processwire.com/talk/topic/3998-your-deployment-process/ https://processwire.com/talk/topic/3113-how-to-transfer-processwire-from-local-installation-to-online/ etc...

I could track it down and reported it as it looks like a bug in the core: https://github.com/processwire/processwire-issues/issues/650 In short: If Inputfiled Images with "Overwrite existing files" is ON then creating a cropped image yields created=1970-01-01 01:00:10, ie. when this option is on, ProcessWire does not update the "created" field in the database. Thanks for the help guys!

I have uninstalled almost all third party stuff to no avail. I also tested another site of mine which was last updated half a year ago or so, and that site has the same issue even though that the "old" site was developed "from scratch" just as this one I am working on. So the relation between the two is that I use similar modules and settings, of course. I also installed a clean PW 3.0.108 which works as expected.

Thanks a lot! I've been hit by this "1970-01-01 01:00:10" issue for sure! If I manually change created in the db table, then all is good. Now I "just" have to track down what causes this. Since I do not even have any hooks added by me just yet, it is probably a module in action. At least this is where I look first. No, it' doesn't sound like that. I just forgot to state that it happens with all sorts of JPGs I tried.

Yep, they do look suspicious but I cannot see where to go from here... @ryan or @horst maybe? ? I need to go to bed now but in the morning I will try it out with a clean install. Thanks for your time!

Yes, that's what you can see in the screenshot. I've been fiddling with this issue for three hours by now ? I also created another one, I have them both along with the original one: