apeisa

I think more direct workflow would be from template - possibility to create a new field and attach it directly to a template. I mean you pretty much always want to order the field, so you need to be on template view anyways.

Is there any reason for empty lang pack now that PW scans all lang files?

Now.

How about version history? I mean if I edit PageTable page, should that change be versioned along the parent page?

Mr. Cramer is guilty for that. And his brother.

Nope - there is also view access.

There are many ways of finding out whether site runs on pw or not. That is just one of those. Pw doesn't try to hide it's existence. Isit.pw is done to help maintaining the sites section on this site easier. So intentionally hiding your site just for this tool might make your approval process longer

Tom, do you have more than one languages?

Sorry, there has been little delay to get back on working with this, but dev on this will be continued soon after 2.5 release.

http://www.schumacher-visuell.de/blog/processwire-usability-cms/ (in German, but Google translates nicely to English).

Markku from Developers.fi contacted me and is scheduling the next meetup. More information (not much yet, but throw your ideas) from here: http://www.meetup.com/Processwire-Users-Finland/events/203449372/ Through meetup.com we might get some people outside of the forum to find out about PW.

I wouldn't build non-mobile optimized site at all (well, maybe some very specific application). And for the mobile optimization: responsive is way to go about 90% of times.

Just had nice session with new installer (localhost, win7, wamp), also tested new db backups module. Everything worked very smoothly!

How about something like $pages->get("/www.mainsite.com/page-needed/")->render(); Of course probably not render, but outputting the fields etc.

Is the template access denied from guest user? Public pages will still use normal "unsecure" folders, only the templates that are restricted get secure files.

What is air mode?

No need to vote in all categories. I voted in only one. I agree about the form - it was horrible, even with desktop browser...

See the advanced mode - there are all kinds of "system" settings for fields and templates. (sorry in hurry now)

I have hard time understanding difference between free and open source here. I know the difference, but all the "best free php cms" are open source too.

Maybe PW could be compared against Drupal and WP. Build a simple blog with each and look how fast each view (list, search, post with comments) is generated on all those systems. Framework comparisons are difficult beast, since it's mainly testing for the architecture (how much stuff they load automatically). PS: Not that I would be very interested in that kind of comparison - but it would give us great headlines ("ProcessWire is even faster than WordPress")

Why on earth you want to do that? Why not just call you field firstname?

Sorry, never really tried this with multilang site. @soma might have better understanding of these? This is probably the problematic line: https://github.com/apeisa/Shop-for-ProcessWire/blob/master/ShoppingCheckout.module#L546 Could that ->get() work differently on non-default lang?

Something like here? https://processwire.com/talk/topic/711-release-schedulepages/?p=54304

Yep, pw has this supported. Just create permission called page-publish and then that is required.

How many templates you have? I think maximum amount of template files I have had is around 20. Its possible to use same template file for multiple templates - see the alternative template file setting.