Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


arjen last won the day on October 17 2018

arjen had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

1,362 Excellent

About arjen

  • Rank
    Hero Member
  • Birthday 03/10/1982

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
  • Skype

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
    Hoogeveen, The Netherlands

Recent Profile Visitors

18,760 profile views
  1. Agreed. It makes sense from a security point of view, but I've encoutered numerous people who browse in one browser while their default browser is another one. They are not even aware.
  2. I don't think Ryan will read this. You would have more luck if you create a request on Github.
  3. Hi, I agree it is a bit hidden, but it is here -> https://processwire.com/api/ref/page/#pwapi-methods-constants.
  4. Thanks for getting back on this. I'll try some stuff out.
  5. You can use the Connect Page Fields module by @Robin S. This makes it easy to connect both page fields.
  6. Thanks! This is what got me thinking as well since I use a lot of generated classes (also in PHP and JS). How well a job does purgecss do with those? I know you can whitelist classes, but it feels cumbersome to maintain it.
  7. Great looking site! I'm pretty interested in Tailwind too. I'd love to hear some pointers on your set-up and workflow? How do you guys handle the filesize? I've read about Purgecss and I'm curious how integrate this with ProcessWire.
  8. The map still seems broken. It would be really sweet if Ryan could put the website code on Github so other people can contribute as well through PR's.
  9. Sounds like a great week ๐Ÿ™‚
  10. Ah, the or groups selector post ๐Ÿ™‚ We really needed this a few years ago. Unfortunately Ryan did not manage to implement this. No hard feelings though since this is not an easy task. But I do believe it should be developed since this is a big USP over other rule builders. ProcessWire can really shine with these kind of data structures. I eventually created a Process module which created pages has a sort of multiplier field of InputfieldSelector. The client could scope the main selector and add groups by adding more selectors. - Main Selector template=foo (InputfieldSelector) |-- Selector 1 (OR) somevalue=bar (repeatable field with InputfieldSelector) |-- Selector 2 (OR) someothervalue=foobar (etc) This fields eventually resolved in: "template=foo, (somevalue=bar), (someothervalue=foobar)". I created another Process Module we rendered these selectors in a list and created urls (using the great ProcessPageListerUrls). This might feel like overkill, but the client wanted to query complex selectors.
  11. This seems like a really nice ux update. I really like you improving existing functionality. Thanks!
  12. Thanks @tiefenbacher_bluetomato really looking forward to the demo.
  13. I don't think I would build such a system in ProcessWire. Money stuff I would prefer to be handled by a system which has some kind of Event Sourcing. But I get your idea ๐Ÿ™‚ True. When you have 300+ fields it will become a tedious job to add another role and assign all fields. And than another role. We only needed certain fields were editable and some not. I can see your point. That being said maybe a better solution would be to create a Process module which can handle these bulk actions. Currently I'm not working on that project anymore, but I've developed the basic batch functionality in a few days work. I would love to do a UI/UX/mock-up on how this could work.
  • Create New...