All Activity

Looks like this is a good one that never comes to fruitful....what a pity. @kongondo Any plan to release this one even if it is not perfect?

@FireWire, a million thanks for that beautiful answer. Even if I have been programming since 1986 I would not consider myself a pro-developer what is why I asked for help here. My frustration is especially with Ryan's Pro Modules as the documentation (and knowing if something can or cannot be achieved with a tool is documentation) is hidden behind a paywall. I just wanted to avoid to pay another year of support just to learn again, that my request is simply not doable. (I had a couple of issues with the Pro Tools, anyway). Thanks again for your answer!

Thanks, that worked!

I think this could be a really great addition to LoginRegisterPro.

Maybe take a crack at building a form module. Probably save some time. You might want to consider using features Tailwind makes available to style with utility classes outside of markup. This is the most efficient way to apply consistent styling to markup you aren't generating or don't control. This is for v3 but there are options in v4 to do the same. @layer base { label { @apply mb-1.5; } input[type="text"], input[type="email"], input[type="url"], input[type="password"], input[type="number"], input[type="date"], input[type="datetime-local"], input[type="month"], input[type="search"], input[type="tel"], input[type="time"], input[type="week"], [multiple], textarea, select { @apply border-neutral-400; } button, [type='text'], [type='email'], [type='url'], [type='password'], [type='number'], [type='date'], [type='datetime-local'], [type='month'], [type='search'], [type='tel'], [type='time'], [type='week'], textarea, select, select[multiple], [type='checkbox'], [type='radio'] { @apply focus-visible:ring-2; @apply focus-visible:outline-none; @apply focus-visible:ring-cerulean-600; @apply focus-visible:ring-offset-2; @apply focus-visible:border-inherit; } [type='checkbox'], [type='radio'] { @apply focus:ring-cerulean-600; @apply cursor-pointer; } [type='checkbox']:checked, [type='radio']:checked { @apply bg-cerulean-600; @apply focus-visible:bg-cerulean-600; @apply focus:bg-cerulean-600; @apply hover:bg-cerulean-600; } select { @apply focus:ring-2; @apply focus:outline-none; @apply focus:ring-cerulean-600; @apply focus:ring-offset-2; @apply focus:border-inherit; } [type='submit'] { @apply px-6; @apply text-lg; @apply tracking-widest; @apply bg-cerulean; @apply text-white; } } Assuming you're a developer- get creative, build something, find a workaround. It's part of the job. After 10 years I would think that you'd have more of a "I gave this a shot but couldn't get it to work" approach to the question, especially given that the members of the PW forums are overwhelmingly positive and here to help.

Download latest dev: https://github.com/processwire/processwire-issues/issues/2181

Then I must have done everything wrong over the last three years, because I added the field, expanded it in the template, updated the hash, and everything worked fine. In my opinion, a real tailwind theme makes no sense at all, because do we really want all forms to look the same? For that reason alone, option D is the best choice.

Hey thanks @elabx I guess so! If other people find it useful and can build upon it then that would be great. I've just added support for Matrix items and a related Module, which is essentially a front-end (in Processwire) for managing import and export. The only issue is I'm not very familiar with open-sourcing a Module and all the pull requests etc etc. But I suppose if it's open source then other people can handle that too?

Since I upgraded to ProcessWire master 3.0.255 (from 3.0.246) any main Admin Modules page now shows a blank page and gives me an error like this via dev tools console: Uncaught TypeError: $(...).WireTabs is not a function at HTMLDocument.<anonymous> (ProcessModule.min.js?v=121-3.0.255:1:657) at fire (JqueryCore.js?v=1.12.4:1:43765) at Object.fireWith [as resolveWith] (JqueryCore.js?v=1.12.4:1:44935) at jQuery.ready (JqueryCore.js?v=1.12.4:1:47825) at HTMLDocument.completed (JqueryCore.js?v=1.12.4:1:48339) Any thoughts as to why this might be occurring?

First of all, thank you for the detailed answer. Even if you did not like the tone of my post. I did not ask anyone in this forum whether they like my tone. My frustration with paid Processwire modules has a long history, so I allow myself to be direct. Second, thank you for confirming that FormBuilder is not suitable for my use case. The Embed Option D is exactly what I wanted to avoid, because every new field forces me to start from scratch. So thanks for saving me from paying for another year.

Even though I don't like the tone of your posts, I'll respond anyway. With Embed Option D your completly free to use whatever you want.

@taotoo avec grand plaisir 🙂

First of all, I know that there is a dedicated Formbuilder forum but after ten years of paying for it I do not want to pay just to learn that there is no answer ;). I just want to know if there is any possibility to use formbuilder together with Tailwind.css as CSS framework. Thanks in advance, Bernhard

Massive Update. Thank you!

This is the error I get, just after the installation routine (DB connection, Profile import, cleanup) Fatal Error: Uncaught Error: Class 'ProcessWire\Pages' not found in /home/mysite/domains/domain.mysite.it/public_html/wire/core/ProcessWire.php:526 Stack trace: #0 /home/mysite/domains/domain.mysite.it/public_html/wire/core/ProcessWire.php(302): ProcessWire\ProcessWire->load(Object(ProcessWire\Config)) #1 /home/mysite/domains/domain.mysite.it/public_html/index.php(52): ProcessWire\ProcessWire->__construct(Object(ProcessWire\Config)) #2 /home/mysite/domains/domain.mysite.it/public_html/install.php(119): require('/home/mysite/...') #3 /home/mysite/domains/domain.mysite.it/public_html/install.php(1809): ProcessWire\Installer->execute() #4 {main} thrown (line 526 of /home/mysite/domains/domain.mysite.it/public_html/wire/core/ProcessWire.php) The only error I get from the logs. Attached is same but with colors Thank you very much

Huzzah! After what feels like years of digging, I think I finally found the culprit. On the config.php file, I had: $config->pageNumUrlPrefix = 'Seite'; Not sure how this made it to multiple projects of mine and why I thought it had to be there. Without that line, the pager on admin pages works fine. And the pagination using German "seite" instead of "page" works in the frontend too because I think it's defined somewhere in the database. Anyways, case closed, happy days. @ryan @kongondo

I have been using Netcup’s vServers for a very long time, as well as the Webhosting 8000. On the vServer – currently a VPS 2000 ARM G11 – I have ISPConfig (open source) installed and use it to manage numerous domains and email accounts. So far, I’ve actually had no problems at all, everything has been very reliable.

I’ve been using Contabo since March 2015. My journey started with a VPS M + cPanel setup, later upgrading to VPS L. When cPanel changed its pricing policy, I switched to a VPS XL paired with RunCloud. Handling email support directly from the server was a major time drain and source of headaches for me. One of the main reasons I chose RunCloud was to strictly host websites on the server. This allowed me to focus on my actual work without getting bogged down by email delivery issues. However, I eventually started experiencing sporadic issues with shared resources (RAM, CPU, network speed) on the standard VPS instances. I switched to their VDS (Virtual Dedicated Server) solutions and used them problem-free for a long time. Later, I needed a panel that could manage Docker, Node.js, and PHP all in one place, which led me to Ploi.io. After testing it thoroughly, I cancelled my long-standing RunCloud service and fully migrated to Ploi. During this transition, I took advantage of a Black Friday deal at Contabo where I could get a Dedicated Server for the same price I was paying for the VDS. Right now, I manage 3 servers via Ploi: Contabo Dedicated (Germany location) Contabo VDS (Australia location) SH VDS (Turkey location) My advice: You might run into "noisy neighbor" issues with Contabo's standard VPS plans, but in my experience, their VDS servers offer a great price/performance ratio. If you are planning to host 40 sites with heavy traffic on a single machine, I strongly recommend choosing between a VDS or a Dedicated server rather than a standard VPS. If you decide to give Ploi.io a try, feel free to use my referral link: https://ploi.io/register?referrer=3XC1ka9hnGeqGiAPX5va Also, if you need the Nginx configuration for ProcessWire, let me know—I can share the specific template I created for Ploi.

Hi, I am running a PW site with about 3000 frontend-users and medium traffic on all-inkl.com without issues for over a year now. Performance and response times are quite good. Switched the site last year from Strato due to slow DB queries on higher traffic. No issues with PW on all-inkl so far. Cheers

Amazing! Definitely needed, will you release this as open source? Was about to put my hand into building something like this.

You could try all-inkl.com (Premium+). Their performance is on par with my Hetzner Dedi. And very reliable, too.

Hi folks, I am currently in search for a new hosting solution for my processwire client-websites (40 websites) with a strong focus on loading performance. Right now, the websites are hosted on an old Hosteurope shared hosting with HDD - which is going to be closed down this year. The new cPanel shared hosting Hosteurope offers in order to replace the old one has some strange weaknesses/limitation (I have tested it deeply). So I am forced to leave Hosteurope after many many years. Right now, I am testing varios hosting provider - for various reasons it must be form Germany. For testing I am comparing a live-website running on my old Hosteurope shared hosting with a duplicate of the live-website running on the new hosting provider. The testing tool I am using: Pagespeed Insights (https://pagespeed.web.dev/) In the past weeks I have tested webgo.de's managed vServer with ssd/nvme. But it was really disappointing: the websites loading performance was weaker than on my old Hosteurope shared hosting. And, they didn't even managed to activate http2. So right now, I am testing the managed server from Hetzner (product name MA80 with really strong physical stats). Even here, the websites loading performance is weaker than on my old Hosteurope shared hosting. And so far, the Hetzner support didn't help me to configure the server the for more performance. I am no server expert, can anyone recommend a hosting solution that has a really good loading performance? Best Nomak

Great looking module, @markus-th I might need this type of functionality in a potential upcoming project, will be following your progress on this one :) For me, Tailwind isn't a direct dealbreaker, however I tend to use custom CSS for my projects, so any independent styling options would be very welcome!

I would call the module stale, @Gadgetto hasn't visited the forum in 2.5 years.