-
Posts
2,924 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
19
Everything posted by szabesz
-
+1 @bernhard Who is this clever developer you are referring to?
-
During the installation process ProcessWire needs write access, however, after you have installed PW, it is time to be more strict, and remove as much permission as you can on the server in question. http://processwire.com/docs/security/file-permissions/#securing-writable-directories-and-files "If the installer populates 777 and 666 permissions, this translates to directories and files that are readable and writable to everyone, which is not a good scenario in shared environments. But without knowing more about the hosting environment, they may be the only permissions that we know for certain will enable ProcessWire to run. In either case, please read on for more details. In most cases you can further lock down these permissions with a little more information."
- 9 replies
-
- 3
-
- config
- site/config.php
-
(and 7 more)
Tagged with:
-
I see. So you gave r/w permission to "other", in other words to anybody, so probably that is why it does not complain.
- 9 replies
-
- config
- site/config.php
-
(and 7 more)
Tagged with:
-
You mean 600, right? If so, that should be considered to be secure. If others than the owner can manage to write files set to 600 [rw-------], then it does not matter too much if it is 400 or 600, I suppose.
- 9 replies
-
- config
- site/config.php
-
(and 7 more)
Tagged with:
-
Hi, Have you followed this: http://processwire.com/docs/security/file-permissions/ ?
- 9 replies
-
- 4
-
- config
- site/config.php
-
(and 7 more)
Tagged with:
-
Well, I know this idea will be against simplifying things, but what if this behavior can be turned on optionally, so it is not completely removed?
-
I do like (and use solely) the Detect Mode being on, so I'm against of removing it even tough I also see that it can lead to confusion. Tracy has so many options to choose from in a diversity of areas that it has become quite a challenge to familiarize ourselves with it anyway. However, I do not think getting rid of functionality is the way to go, although probably it is the easiest solution sometimes, so it is you who needs to decide in the long run. So we might be able to clear things up a bit by using different terms, not enable/disable. What if we come up with some flowchart like setup-help, something like this: I use yEd to draw things like that and would be happy to do its first version if you think it might help. (You could even build a "setup wizard" based on it, but that might be overkill and a lot of work.) Or, we can just make a table like chart to summarize the various states and results of the settings, something like this "Value of variable" chart in this post: https://www.virendrachandak.com/techtalk/php-isset-vs-empty-vs-is_null/
-
Create a directory website with process wire, need help
szabesz replied to Enrico's topic in Getting Started
Besides @kongondo's evergreen post, I also recommend this one: -
Yeah, this is what we've been discussing for a while in different topics. And there have been various proposals to move forward in this area, like yours. eg:
-
Which one is the recommended repo to report issues currently? ryancramerdesign/ProcessWire or processwire/processwire ? Do we have a guideline to choose between the two? I do not remember seeing one.
-
Definitely! Thank you. I think it also helped a lot in being able to more easily find the panel one needs to spot, the alphabetical order might be the one to keep, and probably there is no need for "arbitrary" grouping (at least I was not able to suggest groups, because of the diversity of the functions the panels represent).
-
If you need an easy way to backup the db, you can use the module called Database Backups (its class is ProcessDatabaseBackup, not installed by default but made by Ryan and works with ProcessWire 3.x too). With a few clicks we can have a snapshot in /site/assets/backups/database/ . I always use it before updating or installing modules and/or a new version of ProcessWire (update).
-
Good question... To tell the truth, I've lost track of the features the module has to offer and only use a small set of panels, so I'm not the one who could answer this easily, but they could be grouped by functionality if it is possible. No, I had this issue some time ago, but not recently. I will investigate and report should I see it again.
-
Thanks again Adrian! One issue with the Panel selector: we have "too many panels" On one hand this is awesome, on the other hand we are running out of space: And this is with a set of css rules that do not override the small line height + small font size. I also used "css frameworks" which blew it up and it took a lot more space than this. Since you added "Disable Tracy" to the bottom, we've lost valuable space. It's ok if you do not want to hack the System Info panel, I "had the feeling" it might not be supported to add anything to it, so that is out of the question. However, this panel should be laid out in a horizontal manner as much us possible, so that to make room for the other panels you are going to add in the near future Jokes aside, you might want to logically group panels in the list (you know I'm talking about @tpr's AOS-settings-like groupping) so that they can be found more easily. And this is true for the admin's setting, where a similar groupping can help too (we've already touched this topic).
-
I can confirm that it's speedy indeed BTW: while browsing, I spotted a 404: https://www.cmscritic.com/directory/cms/ linked from https://www.cmscritic.com/how-to-select-the-best-open-source-cms/
-
This one and a permanent disable feature is what I'm voting for. I mean the "System Info", since this is the one that cannot be turned off. "Disable Once" and "Disable Permanently" would do, I suppose.
-
Hi, Probably the simplest way to do this is to implement a simple import script, such as this one: Yeah, I know it's XML, but CSV should be simple too, eg: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9139202/how-to-parse-a-csv-file-using-php Hope this helps.
-
@Zeka How about unchecking "Frontend" in "Debug Bar and Panels > Show Debug Bar"?
-
"Valitron is a simple, minimal and elegant stand-alone validation library with NO dependencies." That's the way I like it Thanks for the detailed instructions. I will probably use it in one of my projects in the near future.
- 76 replies
-
- 3
-
As opposed to AOS, we can enable Tracy for both frontend and admin, so the disable feature would be nice to have on its main panel too, which I have already missed a few times.
-
Hello, Which one is the module in question? Module related questions should normally be asked in their own forum section. Anyway, don't you have a backup by any chance? The sort of problems you describe can be fixed most easily be reverting to a backed up version which you should always create right before trying out new modules or any other mayor changes to you site.
-
Wow, that's cool and quite useful too. Thanks for educating us!
-
Great showcase indeed! http://www.memelpower.com/en/technologies/ Does that mean that you are shifting emphasis from ModX to ProcessWire?
-
Impressive However, since you do not use checkboxes, there is no way to perform a batch operation (at least I cannot see it in the screengrab). Is this intentional?
-
Thanks Can! We might want to add: "This method does not need output formatting to be turned off first, so make sure that whatever value(s) you set are not formatted values.", which is not the case with languages but worth mentioning nonetheless: https://processwire.com/api/ref/page/set-and-save/
- 12 replies
-
- 1