szabesz

You must be kidding ? It's a ProcessWire module, you know ?

In addition to Zeka's reply, 100 or 120 pixels are not really the dimensions where one can expect sharp images without additional sharpening, so using "none" is not a good idea. Also, you might want to serve @2x resolutions for retina displays.

Interesting read about "Golang vs PHP (Symfony4)". https://dannyvankooten.com/from-go-back-to-php-again/

I recommend using tools like: https://www.bluem.net/en/projects/plain-clip/ (macOS, I do use it) https://stevemiller.net/puretext/ (Windows, I've just goggled it ? ) more on this: https://www.makeuseof.com/tag/5-ways-strip-formatting-copy-paste-text/ (I've just goggled it ? ) For Plain Clip.app and similar one can setup a global shortcut launching some simple custom made script – I use the commercial Keyboard Maestro but there should be free alternatives out there – so that one can easily paste clean text no matter what the source is.

It would be great to be able to install the new version. Also, the old one keeps generating log entries ("Trying to get property of non-object..."). Maybe we could help somehow? Thanks in advance.

@Peter Knight Do you have the System Notifications module installed? As far as I know the module cannot be uninstalled so you need to live with this error. I have it too and I also get the message from time to time, however it seems to be "harmless".

I would skip this step for a while. Since he has just started to poke it with a stick, it is probably not recommended to start by updating things even though it is not WP so upgrades are generally safer in the case of ProcessWire than in the case of other CMSes, but still... If you do not give up poking it for a while, it is highly probable that you start converting your sites... Be careful though, ProcessWire is addictive ? Welcome aboard, BTW!

One can find even more similar ones ?

Techniques to use in order to cut down on new field creation: Free: https://processwire.com/blog/posts/making-efficient-use-of-fields-in-processwire/ https://processwire.com/blog/posts/processwire-3.0.73-and-new-fieldset-types/ https://processwire.com/blog/posts/pw-3.0.87/#new-field-template-context-settings https://processwire.com/blog/posts/processwire-3.0.14-updates-file-compiler-fields-and-more/#best-practices-with-fields-and-values https://processwire.com/blog/posts/pw-3.0.106/#a-new-way-to-search-with-upgraded-tags-for-fields Paid but this money supports the project ? https://processwire.com/store/pro-fields/ https://processwire.com/blog/posts/functional-fields/

@ryan I've just noticed that "tablet viewports" are odd. We get a huge decor image and a very long "footer" taking up more space than the actual content. Screenshot is inside the spoiler:

+1 These magic functions are "hard" to decode when reading, at least it is a syntax no one is used to, so when people come across things like this they will just get confused. Generally speaking, it is great to have options but if more and more ways are implemented to do very same thing, then when one is looking at someone else's source code it will become harder and harder to decode it if it was written in "another dialect" of the ProcessWire API than one is used to. If this trend continues, reading ProcessWire source code will become harder than it should be.

Thanks for sharing your modules today ? Just a quick note of a copy-paste error, this links to your other module:

However, there are exceptions as noted ? the max size image imagefiled constrain and/or client-side image resizing might result in having a different file stored instead of the original supplied.

You can learn about it in this post: Also note that since ProcessWire 3.0.63 client-side resize gives us another option in the mix https://processwire.com/blog/posts/processwire-3.0.63-adds-client-side-image-resizing/ So it all depends on how you set it up and implement it. It is possible to serve unaltered images if you make sure PW does not touch it in the first place. However, it is only recommended for tech tech-savvy users or for special use cases.

This is creepy... Luckily I've never had wifi issues with any of our Mac laptops and so far we've used eight of them in our family, five of them sill being used daily. However, _yesterday_ morning the wifi of my MBP 2015 started malfunctioning so I did not visit the forum because I was also troubleshooting.... I could not solve the issue even though I've read a ton of trouble shooting guides (I was still running Sierra for the last two years.). Late afternoon I decided to perform a clean install of Mojave 10.14.3 on an "empty" APSF volume just to see if its a hardware or software issue and it appears to be the latter because by running a clean install the wifi works fine. My issue is that the while the wifi connection seems to be still on, all network operations start to fail when a random period of time passed by after booting, and only restarting the system helps. I did not dig too much into the issue because my aging Sierra setup needs to be replaced with a new system anyway, it's just that normally it takes 2 or 3 weeks to install and configure _all_ the software I need so that is why I usually do it every two years. Sorry for not being able to help, but it is kinda strange that we ran into a similar issue nearly the same time. Regarding Mojave, I like it's performance. We have it installed on an 2013 MBP too and it performs well on both machines. Comparing to Sierra, it is sort of the same in the performance arena.

I know, however, @sforsman seems to have abandoned the project as he does not pay attention to our pings, while @arjen stated that he is happy to maintain his/their fork. ...and in the end, one will probably reinvent the decimal. The same goes for the module being recommended ?

Sorry for repeating myself, but:

Oooops ?

I have already mentioned this in the comment section of the very first blogpost of Ryan showcasing it. Luckily I use the Dark Reader chrome extension to browse most sites anyway, but it would be nice to see a lot less contrast. Better yet, a native dark mode for the site would be welcome. We have just been presented with a nice example: https://processwire.com/talk/topic/20584-schwarzdesign/ (click the sun icon of the site in the top right corner).

Well, test driven development would be useful for sure, so he is still talking about the topic even though the way he does so is not fruitful at all.

@cb2004 Hi, I recommend adding your case to the GutHub issue so that it gets more highlight this way. Could you please do that?

Hello, it doesn't sound like a solution to me. Probably this problem should be posted in the right GitHub issue: https://github.com/processwire/processwire-issues/issues?utf8=✓&q=windows+path whichever it is...

Thanks, sure, the wording "hasField" does indeed imply that, it is just that using "valid" in this context is not something I remember seeing before.

Me too, and even in the case of the blog listing and similar. To tell the truth, I never liked the current trend of putting everything into "cards" when a sidebar+vertical listing page is the most usable layout. Cards are stylish but at cost of usability and I think it is a high price to pay, in my designs I try not to use them without a serious and valid reason. For the time being, I started to browse the site under the 960px viewport by turning on the inspector so that I do not have to resize the whole window. This way I get one column only.

I wonder what "valid" mean in this context: https://processwire.com/api/ref/page/has-field/ $page->hasField() => "Returns whether or not $field is valid for this Page" Anyone can shed light on this for me?