Robin S

You can use a hook like this in /site/ready.php: $wire->addHookBefore('InputfieldPageAutocomplete(name=link_page_url)::render', function(HookEvent $event) { $inputfield = $event->object; // Get the page being edited $page_id = $event->wire('input')->get->int('id'); $edited_page = $event->wire('pages')->get($page_id); // If the edited page is one that you want to target if($edited_page->template == 'basic_page') { // Append to the findPagesSelector property to exclude pages you don't want to match $inputfield->findPagesSelector .= ', has_parent!=/menus/'; } });

Also see $page->rootParent if($page->rootParent->id === 1116) { echo "My conditional content"; }

Seems like a bug, or something that should be documented if "parent" is a special case for selectors. I opened a GitHub issue: https://github.com/processwire/processwire-issues/issues/838 As an alternative you can use OR-groups: $pages->find("(id=$page), (parent=$page)")

You can install the predefined page-publish system permission: https://processwire.com/docs/user-access/permissions/#page-publish Then do not give the role that permission for the template of the page in question.

It seems that the user needs to have the page-edit permission for both the parent page and the child page in order to sort the child page. I hadn't noticed this before. It's a shame that the page-sort permission can't be granted independently of page-edit as it seems like they involve quite different levels of risk/responsibility. I opened a request at GitHub: https://github.com/processwire/processwire-requests/issues/290 As for a hook you could use this in/site/ready.php: // Just for your target role if($user->hasRole('editor')) { $wire->addHookAfter('ProcessPageEdit::execute', function(HookEvent $event) { /* @var ProcessPageEdit $ppe */ $ppe = $event->object; $page = $ppe->getPage(); // The names of templates that the user is not allowed to edit $disallowed_templates = ['colours', 'colour']; if(in_array($page->template->name, $disallowed_templates)) { // Replace the Page Edit markup $event->return = 'You do not have permission to edit this page.'; } }); } This may not be 100% secure in that a person could theoretically create their own edit form in their browser dev tools (although I think that's a very unlikely possibility). But if you wanted to be extra safe you could follow an alternative approach of limiting access at the field level for all the fields in the relevant templates. Depending on the number of fields that could be a hassle via the admin interface so you could look into doing it via the API.

I have added support for this in v0.1.19. The scenario of editing user pages is a different kettle of fish than "normal" pages because you are then outside the structure of what are normally considered editable pages. So there isn't much that's useful in the dropdowns apart from the last dropdown.

A recent GitHub request got me thinking about ways to get an overview of which fields are using which Textformatter modules. Here are a couple of approaches... 1. For all Textformatter modules that are in use, show the fields they are applied to Execute the following code in the Tracy Debugger console: // Loop over fields and get their Textformatters $textformatters = array(); foreach($fields as $field) { if(empty($field->textformatters)) continue; foreach($field->textformatters as $textformatter) { $textformatters[$textformatter][] = $field->name; } } d($textformatters); Any Textformatter modules that are not included in the dump output are not applied to any fields. 2. In the config screen for a Textformatter module, show the fields where the module is applied Add the following to /site/ready.php $wire->addHookBefore('ProcessModule::executeEdit', function(HookEvent $event) { // Get the module name $module_name = $this->wire('input')->get->name('name'); // Return if it's not a Textformatter module if(strpos($module_name, 'Textformatter') !== 0) return; // Add field to module edit form $event->wire()->addHookBefore('InputfieldForm(id=ModuleEditForm)::render', function(HookEvent $event) use ($module_name) { $value = ''; // Find any fields using this Textformatter and build markup value foreach($this->wire('fields') as $field) { if(empty($field->textformatters)) continue; foreach($field->textformatters as $textformatter) { if($textformatter === $module_name) { $value .= "<a href='{$this->wire('config')->urls->admin}setup/field/edit?id={$field->id}#fieldtypeConfig' target='_blank'>$field->name</a><br>"; } } } if(!$value) $value = 'No fields are using this Textformatter module'; // Add markup field to form $form = $event->object; $f = $this->wire('modules')->InputfieldMarkup; $f->label = 'Fields using this Textformatter module'; $f->value = $value; $form->insertAfter($f, $form->children->get('id=ModuleInfo')); }); });

The padding around quoted text is a bit much, as can be seen in the quote immediately above. Seems to be coming from Uikit styles, which I guess are being included in their entirety just for the header. Could we strip it back a bit so only the needed styles are included? Or iframe the header part to avoid the styling conflicts? Another issue I've noticed since the upgrade: in iOS Safari (older versions) links are triggered on release of long touch (to open the context menu). This makes it difficult to open links in a new tab - you have to slide your finger away from the link before you release in order to select an item in the context menu, or else you navigate away within the current tab. This only applies to Safari and only on older Safari/iOS versions so perhaps it doesn't affect too many people. It's a pretty big annoyance to me though because you cannot select an alternative default browser on iOS (thanks Apple) and I don't want to have to buy a new iPad.

The easiest way to implement this would be via a Repeater field containing a Text Unique field. But it feels a little wrong to me to use a Repeater for just a single repeating field (that might just be me) and the UI would be a bit more bulky than necessary. So personally I would be inclined to use a more streamlined repeating fieldtype such as Multiplier or Table. Then in a Pages::saveReady hook you do a $pages->count($selector) to check if any stores are using any of the submitted phone numbers and if so you reset the value for that number and show an inputfield error. If you need any tips for coding that just ask when you get to it. P.S. It seems like you could use Multiplier with Text Unique specified as the field type to multiply, but I tested it and the uniqueness is not enforced when these modules are combined.

No problem here finding matches for a Page Reference field containing pages whose title starts with numbers. If the search value only contains numbers then the value will be interpreted as a page ID. In any case it's good to be specific about what you are wanting to match against to avoid any confusion. So if you want to match against the title use tags.title as $filter in your example.

For me Tracy is showing a page load time of 163ms for the Home page on the front-end with the core blank profile. It would of course depend on how much you have going on in your site (template, modules, ready.php, etc) but your load time does sound slow. I'm running 5.7.19. I believe it's a matter of making sure your Apache and MySQL versions are compatible. Here are mine in case it helps:

I don't know much about encryption, but if the email address is the entirety of the field value (i.e. there is a dedicated field that holds the email address and nothing but the email address) then couldn't you encrypt the search value and then match that encrypted value in the DB to find subscribers who have that exact email address? Of course this wouldn't be a solution if you wanted to match a part value (e.g. all subscribers with somedomain.com in their email address) but it would be something at least.

Thanks for the info. From the discussion you linked to it sounds like the LIVE/LAZY features are still a work-in-progress and subject to change. So will wait a while before I delve into it. The thing that was confusing me was that the previous barDumpLive() didn't take any $options argument for maxDepth or maxLength which made me think there is no limit for these when a live dump is used. But no problem to keep using bdb() for larger dumps.

Hi Adrian, Now that "live" is used as the default dump method there's an item in the shortcut methods description that should be deleted: And maybe in the docs too? https://adrianbj.github.io/TracyDebugger/#/debug-methods?id=bardumplive Or maybe move the explanation of live dumping to the intro of this section. Also, I'm trying to get my head around how this live dump works. Are you able to point me to a page in the Nette docs that covers this feature? I've been looking but haven't been able to find it. And if the dump data is loaded in realtime as the levels are expanded then how come there is truncation in the example shown below? Thanks.

I think the DkCore module would need to create the parent page manually in the install() method (assuming DkCore is not a Process module). Then the other modules would specify the parent page by path as the "parent" within "page" within getModuleInfo(). But have you considered combining these three Process modules into a single Process module with several executeSomething() methods? Then you would create just a single page that uses this process and create a flyout menu for the other "execute" URL segments via the executeNavJSON() method. If you look at how some of the core Process modules that use flyout menus do this you'll get the gist of it.

Me too, it's an essential module. I hesitate to say "should be in the core" because I know the PW philosophy on such things. But I wonder if certain modules that are widely needed and used could be highlighted somewhere within the core. So for instance there could be a link to PageRenameOptions from the PagePathHistory module config, so that when you install that module you get a heads-up that there is a useful related third-party module that you might want to consider also.

Sounds like the Multisite module could be a contender: https://github.com/somatonic/Multisite/ And you'll want to read the support thread to get an idea of the current status of the module:

Thanks for for the write-up of how you got this working. I've tried many different AMP stacks for Windows over the years and Laragon is the best. Among the useful features is a built-in mail sender: I recommend it to any Windows user - you'll be sending email from your local dev environment within minutes rather than days. ?

The hook code definitely needs to be in /site/ready.php or /site/init.php. It won't work in your template-prepended _init.php file - the page is already rendering by the time that code executes.

To see all the places where a particular method is called by the core you would need to search the core code. In the case of Fieldtype::getInputfield the most significant places are in Field::getInputfield, which returns the inputfield according to the fieldtype of that field, which in turn is called by Fieldgroup::getPageInputfields, which loops through all the fields that belong to a fieldgroup (you can think of a fieldgroup as being sort of the same as the template) to get and populate their inputfields so they can be displayed in Page Edit (for instance). But you probably don't need to spend time working through all of that in order to successfully create a Fieldtype module. An important thing to understand if you don't already is that your Fieldtype module extends the Fieldtype class. This is called Object Inheritance: http://php.net/manual/en/language.oop5.inheritance.php So all the methods in the Fieldtype class also belong to your module, and the code for those methods is what you see in Fieldtype.php unless you override the method by including it in your module. To illustrate with an example, we can see that Fieldtype::getBlankValue returns an empty string: https://github.com/processwire/processwire/blob/cbfe97de207e3166451f16865429c02c081791e8/wire/core/Fieldtype.php#L494 If we look at FieldtypeText we see that it doesn't include a getBlankValue() method - it doesn't need to because the getBlankValue() method of Fieldtype already returns the right value for a blank text field. But if we look at FieldtypeCheckbox we see it does include a getBlankValue() method - that's because an empty string isn't the right type of value for a blank (unchecked) checkbox, so it implements its own method to return 0.

The naming of the OR-groups is not correct. You only name OR-groups if there is more than one set of OR-groups and one group in each named set must match. Your selector here is saying that both (date<$start,date_end='') and (date<$start,date_end>=$start) must match which is impossible because these contradict each other. Wrong use of OR-group syntax with only one OR condition. Wrong use of pipe character. The pipe character can only go between field names in a selector clause... field_a|field_b~=foo ...or between values in a selector clause... field_a%=foo|bar

@Elchin, try: $results = $page->children("date<today, (date_end>today), (date_end=''), sort=-date, limit=12"); You can use "today" in place of your timestamp.

Should this have been $this->sanitizer->int() ? It would be awesome to be also able to pass a selector string to the method (e.g. "some_field%=value") but I guess it would get quite involved to translate that into SQL.

Here are links for a few different approaches to the general question: https://github.com/LostKobrakai/Paginator https://gist.github.com/somatonic/5420536 https://processwire.com/talk/topic/5558-adding-pagination-after-merging-two-pagearrays/?do=findComment&amp;comment=54122 And my own suggestion: // Find all the matches, but only find the IDs to reduce memory overhead $matchest = $pages->findIDs("title~=$q, template=BN-article|BN-infopage"); $matchest_str = implode('|', $matchest); $matchesb = $pages->findIDs("body~=$q, template=BN-article|BN-infopage, id!=$matchest_str"); $match_ids = array_merge($matchest, $matchesb); // Define some pagination settings $items_per_page = 10; $start = ($input->pageNum - 1) * $items_per_page; $total = count($match_ids); // Get the IDs for this page of the pagination $item_ids = array_slice($match_ids, $start, $items_per_page); // Get the pages using the IDs $items = $pages->getById($item_ids); // Apply the pagination settings to the pager $items->setTotal($total); $items->setLimit($items_per_page); $items->setStart($start); // Output the items as needed foreach($items as $item) { echo "{$item->title}<br>"; } // Output the pager echo $items->renderPager();

The key thing is to make sure $matchesb does not contain any of the pages in $matchest - otherwise the order will not be what you expect when you join the PageArrays together. So you could use removeItems() as per my reply in the thread @szabesz linked to, or you could exclude the $matchest items in the selector for $matchesb: $matchest = $pages->find("title~=$q, template=BN-article|BN-infopage"); $matchesb = $pages->find("body~=$q, template=BN-article|BN-infopage, id!=$matchest"); $entries = $matchest->and($matchesb);