AndZyk

Thank you. Its my office office. Would like to have a view with nature like you, but it is in city centre. At least I have a quiet workplace. My home office has a better view on nature. 😊

My workplace at the moment 😊

"Claude please convert for me the processwire.com/talk IP.Board into a native ProcessWire CMS/CMF application. Make no mistakes." 😊

Awesome, thank you. Yes I tried out putting my page engineer field at the end of the editor first and for this case the notification is useful. But then I switched my field to a tab and for this case the notification is a little bit redundant. 😀 Nice 😀 Thank you, right now I prefer the field visibility as tab for the page engineer field. But maybe a new field visibility setting, f.e. off-canvas or modal could help to not scroll or switch to much between the fields. That makes totally sense and you need this for long requests. Actually the animation is growing on me, I was just a little bit overwhelmed by the flying words. 😅 That is understandable. Reliability is more important than convenience. I guess it will be difficult to implement a Ajax driven page engineer field that is reliable. Ah thank you, I have not tried this out yet. I only gave page engineer an external image and this worked well. Nice to hear it already works with different file fields.

@ryan Thank you for your continued progress on the Agent Tools module. It is amazing to see how well ProcessWire is capable to work with AI already. 🙂 Here are some thoughts/suggestions I had while using the Page Engineer module: After submitting a prompt you get the answer two times: As notification and in the page engineer field. Wouldn't it be better to just get the answer one time? After submitting a prompt you cannot see the prompt anymore. Maybe it would be nice to have the prompt above the answer, f.e. for screenshots or context. Field visibility: Currently the field is either at the beginning/between/end of the other fields or as tab. Maybe it would be nice to have a fixed field visibility (in the corner) that you can toggle via icon. But I know that would be a new general field visibility. Prompt animation: The new prompt animation is cool, but maybe a little too much for my taste. It feels like entering the matrix after submitting a prompt. But that is just my taste and this is really subjective. 😅 Would it be possible for the Page Engineer to display results that don't change the page without reloading the page editor via Ajax? I guess that will be hard to manage, which result changes the page or not, but right now the page gets saved even without changes. I mentioned this a while back and this would be a general suggestion for the Agent Tools module: It would be cool, if the engineer would have a file field to directly give the engineer files. For example "Create a new image element in the content field with this image." The new tab navigation is nice to switch between the categories. In the Migrations tab a little space for the button would be nice, if you have no migrations. I am exited about the future of the Agent Tools module. 😀

@jploch You could search the icon on Font Awesome (https://fontawesome.com/search?s=solid&ic=free-collection), but yes it would be more convenient to have a grid view. 🙂

I can recommend OpenCore Legacy Patcher for upgrading macOS on older Macs. You could upgrade your iMac to Sonoma with it. 😉

@ryan I reproduced it on a fresh install this way: Install PW 3.0.260 or earlier Install module Jumplinks Upgrade to PW 3.0.261 Refresh modules Delete compiled files Error: Class "ModuleConfig" not found I only tested it with this module. Hope this helps to reproduce it.

This helps only temporary for me. As soon as you delete the compiled files (which is something I like to do 😅) the error reoccurs.

It could be that Modules that use class TestConfig extends ModuleConfig Have the error "Class "ModuleConfig" not found" with the newest update. https://processwire.com/blog/posts/new-module-configuration-options/ I have this with the old Jumplinks module now and I guess some modules use this module config. Can anybody verify this please? 🙂

Hello @rushy, I think it only matters if you want the correct created and modified timestamp when creating or editing pages. I don't think there are any further implications. You could try this script in your config.php. It worked for me:

@MrSnoozles Have you tried this GitHub repository? https://github.com/uiii/processwire 🙂

@ryan One suggestion: What do you think about adding a file field to the engineer for asking questions with files? For example: Create me a page with the contents of this Word file. Also it I noticed that questions that take longer will end in an internal server error because of the long execution time. In this case one would better use the terminal, because I think there is no easy solution around this except for increasing the server time limits? Very interesting development. I just created a homepage and a subpage on a fresh install without writing a single line of code. 😅 One issue Claude Sonnet 4.6 had was the concept of Markup Regions. It had problems with the main-tags and disabled Markup Regions in the end. 😄 But maybe it can understand Markup Regions better with a more precise prompt. I have no tested that yet.

@ryan Thank you for the explanation. When I try to enter all values manually in the primary agent: It mixes the values after saving: I cannot leave all fields empty, because then it throws an error. My module config is correct, but ignored because of the primary agent setting. I hope this helps.

Thank you for adding the multi agent feature. For me it doesn't work with OpenRouter, because the model should be for example anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-6 instead of claude-sonnet-4-6. But if I change the model manually it messes app the fields, because of the predefined options I think. It mixes values in other fields. Could you please fix this? 🙂 Regards, Andreas