Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


AndZyk last won the day on May 4

AndZyk had the most liked content!

About AndZyk

  • Birthday 09/12/1987

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
    Furtwangen, Germany

Recent Profile Visitors

5,141 profile views

AndZyk's Achievements

Hero Member

Hero Member (6/6)




Community Answers

  1. You can reduce unused CSS in UIkit if you manually only import the needed component partials from _import.scss. But yeah it would be nice if UIkit would have a automatic way to reduce unused CSS like PostCSS. I hope this will be a feature of UIkit 4. πŸ˜€
  2. One more thing if you are building your own form: You can clean every data entered in the form by sanitizing every input. πŸ˜‰ https://processwire.com/api/ref/sanitizer/ $fullname = $sanitizer->text($input->post->fullname); // Long $fullname = $input->post->text("fullname"); // Short https://processwire.com/blog/posts/processwire-2.6.14-brings-major-enhancements-to-sanitizer-and-input-api-variables/#sanitizer-and-input-are-now-a-couple
  3. That is also a option. πŸ˜€ If you just want to exclude search engines, you could make your page hidden and exclude it in your robots.txt But if you wan to protect your page, a .htaccess protection works as well. You could try the free LoginRegister module, if you want a better looking login form integrated with PW: https://github.com/ryancramerdesign/LoginRegister There is also a commercial successor of this module: https://processwire.com/store/login-register-pro/ Regards, Andreas
  4. Hello @zx80, I would go with a module for forms like the commercial FormBuilder or aformentioned FrontendForms. I have build forms in the past, but nowadays I use FormBuilder for every form, because forms can be complex to develop and maintain. Both FormBuilder and FrontendForms have protection well covered: https://processwire.com/store/form-builder/#spam-filtering-features https://github.com/juergenweb/FrontendForms#spam-protection-and-security-features For protection I am always using a honeypot and Google reCAPTCHA field with filtering by specific mail addresses or keywords, when I still get Spam. FormBuilder has an extra module for a Google reCAPTCHA field. Regards, Andreas
  5. Hello @Boost, have you seen this page: https://processwire.com/about/wordpress-vs-processwire/ ? πŸ˜‰ Regards, Andreas
  6. Hi @franciccio-ITALIANO, it seems, that you always have the same ID "block01" for all your modals, so only one modal will always be opened? You should make the ID dynamic. <?php foreach($page->box_ripetitore as $b => $boxrip):?> <!-- INIZIO BLOCCO RIPETUTO --> <div class="<?php echo $boxrip->box_ripetitore_colore?>"> <div class="uk-tile" id="op31h2"> <a href="#block<?=$b?>" uk-toggle> <h2 style="font-family: Anton; font-size: 3em; color: white;"><?php echo $boxrip->box_ripetitore_tit?></h2> </a> <div style="font-family: Oswald; color: gold; font-size: 1.5rem;"><?php echo $boxrip->box_ripetitore_sottotitolo?></div> <!-- SEZIONI FOGLIA --> <div id="block<?=$b?>" class="uk-modal-container" uk-modal> Regards, Andreas
  7. Future Bass + World Music = Jungle Bass CloZee: Queen of Jungle Bass πŸ”₯😍🀩
  8. Hello @Roope, first of all thank you for your module. I am a long time user of your module and so far it has been working really fine. πŸ˜€ With PHP 8.2 I get following warning: Other than that the module is working normal. If you please could fix this warning that would be great. There is already a pull request for this warning, but I have not tested it. Regards, Andreas
  9. Thank you @bernhard for pointing me to this thread. This explains why this behaviour is necessary, although I wish it wouldn't. πŸ˜€ Then I will stick to my hook solution, if this is a recommended solution for this case. So far I haven't used custom page classes, but thanks for the hint.
  10. I have figured out which hook suits my case and decided to pre-select the options with the pages added hook: // Hook after page added $this->addHookAfter('Pages::added', function(HookEvent $event) { $page = $event->arguments(0); if ($page->template->name === "job") { // Pre-select job buttons $page->setAndSave("jobButtons", [1, 2]); } }); But I find this solutions still not very satisfying, because I think it should be possible to pre-select options without having the field to be required. Unless there is a reason behind, that I am not able to see.
  11. Hello, a client wanted to have the option to activate/deactivate two buttons on a page. But the default behaviour should be that both buttons are activated. So I have added a select options field with two options, which control if the buttons are visible or not. Now I can set both options to be preselected, but in order to makes this work, the field has to be required. But I don't want this to be a required field, because pages also should have the option to show no buttons. I honestly don't understand what's the reason, why this field has to be required, in order to show preselected options. Now I could add a third option "No buttons" or flip the logic to use this field for hiding butttons or I could use a hook for preselecting the options. But I am not sure which hook to use. But I hope there is a more elegant solution. Had somebody else this case before? I think this should be a common case. Regards, Andreas
  12. If the customer only wants to control the first level, then a page reference field should be enough. If the customer wants to control everything, then maybe a repeater with depth and page reference field should do the trick: https://processwire.com/blog/posts/pw-3.0.44-repeaters/ But I never had this case. Most clients want just rarely changes, which you can update in your code.
  13. As in my experience the menu usually doesn't change much, except maybe for submenus, I define the navigation in the _init.php and loop through the items and children: $homepage = pages()->get("/"); $nav = $homepage->children("template=foo|bar, sort=sort"); I try to keep the navigation connected to the page tree as close as possible.
  14. Hi @jetag, you could look here if there is still something: Source: https://documentation.mamp.info/en/MAMP-PRO-Mac/Servers-and-Services/MySQL/ This folder is hidden, so you would have to use for example your terminal: open /Library/Application\ Support/appsolute/MAMP\ PRO/db/ If you have a TimeMachine backup, you could restore the folder from your backup. Regards, Andreas
  15. The fieldtype repeater module is a core module and located under https://github.com/processwire/processwire/tree/master/wire/modules/Fieldtype/FieldtypeRepeater It should not be in the site/modules folder, you can just install it under Modules => Core.
  • Create New...