Peter Knight

@horst It's great to see croppableImage back and available again for 3.X Is this version here to stay or is there a risk that upcoming changes to get to 3.1 will break functionality?

That's a pretty generous allowance. I presume you could have multiple single-plan accounts if the client themselves signed up and you managed the service.

Hi @nico Did you ever get a chance to look into this? To be able to specify a NOINDEX or NOFOLLOW on a page by page basis would be great. I know the original request on GitHub is quite old but it's still a feature that IMHO would really enhance the Module.

That looks nice. I use Uptime Robot and it's been enlightening how much downtime one of my shared accounts goes down. The email feature IMHO is the most useful part.

Hey @Martijn Geerts No worries. In the end I upgraded and it worked with PW 3.X Soon after testing it, the project I was working on required functionality outside of the Modules scope. Thanks for replying though.

I'm running 0.8.7 right now and it doesn't seem like you can specify on a Index, noindex, follow, nofollow etc on a page by page basis. These setting should be showing up on the SEO tab of any page, right?

Hey Robin I don't want to move the dependent files around as each client also calls those files in an iFrame. They're not using PW so I need to keep 'em alone. I'm pretty sure I could hook up all the dependent files if I only had a field type that allowed me to freely browse through my public_html directory.

BTW you probably saw but there was a fix pushed for this. Worked for me.

Just popping in on some updates. I tried the SelectFile module and I'm glad I discovered it but it may not be applicable here. My actual folder structure is as follows /gallery/ /Location 1/ / Location 1 Pano 01/ - index.html / Location 1 Pano 02/ - index.html /Location 2/ / Location 2 Pano 01/ - index.html / Location 2 Pano 02/ - index.html So essentially even if I set ../../gallery as my source folder, I get a list of sub folders (great) but need to be able to then drill down into each to cherry pick a sub-folder or file within. I could of course create a free text field and manually enter the paths but I'm trying to future proof this a bit and make is scalable.

Hi @martijn-geerts I'm testing this for the first time on 2.8.29 and am getting the following error It doesn't say it's 2.8 compatible but was wondering if you had plans to try it? I can always revert to 2.7.3 etc but thought I'd ask. Many thanks P

Cheers guys. Both good suggestions. Yep thats part of the plan. And thinking about it, I can probably further break down the common files and make my own directory. Output folder is just the default from the 360 app. I don't need to stick with that as long as everything hooks up.

I'm redeveloping my photography site in PW. Most of the "photos" are 360 degree views so they're not single JPGs as such which I can manage traditionally in PW and add to a page. Each photo gets generated by a separate application which then outputs a wrapper folder for each photo. So I might have a photo called Beach01 and the corresponding Output folder contains -images (folder) -index.html - pano.xml - pano-player.js - skin.js - tiles (directory containing multi-resolution images) It's early days but I've uploaded a few of these wrapper folders onto my server. I've then created a PW page called Beach01 and I can embed the 360 image onto the page using an iframe called from a HannaCode. It works well but I know it's not very scalable. I don't really know what I'd like but I'd love to have some kind of PageSelect field that could I could point at a server directory (Beaches01 etc) instead of using HannaCodes and iFrames. Any high level thoughts on a good approach? At the same time, I don't want to complicate it too much either

Very cool. I've shortened some massive if/else statements since reading this.

Wow - I was surprised to read this and even thought it was a joke. I'm sorry to see CMS Critic go. They did a lot for ProcessWire in that short space of time. Then again, ProcessWire does a lot for ProcessWire too I'm sure both parties will survive their CMS Brexit! Regardless of the CMS which powers CMS Critic, I must admit I almost never visit the site. IMHO they primarily have a design and information architecture problem and not a CMS problem. Ok, they're running on WP now so they have a CMS problem once again but you know what I mean ...

@Ivan Gretsky me too! This might be covered already (I've been offline for a week) but you can use the newspaper icon on the top right to access the new content. Only noticed it this morning. Overall, I really like the new forum presentation. There's a little getting used to the new layout but that's only because I've used the old layout almost every day for the past 3 ish years. Well done @Pete and co.

I've an issue with ProcessChangelog right now which I originally thought was a 3.X issue. Actually, I'm having it across a few 2.7 sites too. I suspect I had tried to uninstall it the wrong way in the past and that's why I'm getting the following errors When I try to remove it via Modules, I get I'm relatively comfortable with directly editing the database directly via phpMyAdmin. Is manually deleting the module rows ProcessChangelogHooks the best way forward?

My mistake. I meant to refer to ProcessChangelog. I'll raise it and the error over on that support thread.

Thanks LostKobrakai I've never seen your code example in the wild before. It looks clever, interesting and less duplicate than mine. What's the "?" for. Is that some PHP shorthand for "if" ? My code worked once I took it out of a HannCode and applied it directly into a template instead. It might be something funky going on with the body field as I know HannaCode has a (probably unrelated issue with body fields.

Hi guys The following works properly within a HannaCode when I hit "Save and Test" and view the test results in the back end (HannaCode has a preview feature). However, when I view the page on the website, I get no output and no errors I might be outputting a few stray brackets but then again - no errors! Any ideas? If I don't get any progress, I'll try calling it directly within a template instead.

Hi Teppo Any plans to make this 3.0 compatible?

Yep - that's what I was leaning towards. And I think I'd prefer the client to work mainly with private pages as opposed to editing fields etc in the User template. So true. So much flexibility !

I've been using PW for about 2 or 3 years but have never really done anything with users (until now) apart from setting up users and roles for the background. I now have a project that requires following and am looking for some high level advice and an audit of my thinking. Client needs to set up users in the Admin and associate a private page with each user. Each user will have a different private page which we'll create. Users need to login via a form and be automatically directed to a private page Each user will only access a single private page BUT a private page may be associated with serveral users Requirements (for Client) A: Client needs to setup a user(s) in the admin. - No problems there and I'll just use the Access pages etc and create usergroups, roles and users. B: Client needs to associate a private page with a user - I'm thinking a user is just a page so I can add a field to a user admin template and let Client select the private page Requirements (for front end user) C: User needs to login via a web form - I'm pretty sure I can do this via the API and some sample code around the forums D: User should them be automatically redirected to a private page client setup in step A. Note: Each user has a different (and only 1) private page - I'm thinking that my login code has a reference to a variable ($privateURL) and once they're logged in, they get directed to that My biggest unknown is what might be best.... Should I create a PageSelect field within each private page which allows client to cherry pick which users can access this page OR Should I add a field called PrivateURL to the user templates and associate pages to users that way? Thanks for any advice.

Always great to read someone elses approach. Personally, I never noticed much of an SEO benefit from rich snippets and structured data but it was very early days when I first started evaluating them. At the time they were a new format and were considered to be a minor ranking signal to Google. I did read (somewhere) just this week that Google are about to give structured data much more weight as a ranking signal but can't find the article now. Will post here if I can locate it.

Hi Jan Just curious. Why is that?

Does anyone else here use the Fontastic font service? If you do, can you confirm it's current status on Android? Just noticed that a lot of my icons aren't working. There's some mentions around the internet of the service not working with Android but IMHO not to the volume I'd expect. Thanks