Peter Knight

About as "managed" as the host gets Thanks abdus. I've solved it by copying back all my working files and re-installing the database and it worked.

That's the weird thing. There's no errors in the error logs and none in the PW logs either. I downloaded the site and database onto my own test server and it works fine so it must be some wierd GoDaddy setting.

I think I've been through every GoDaddy related post on the forum but not had any success so far with this. Basically, a client's site started to throw various errors after a failed SSL install by their host. Accessing https://www.domain.com results in an error and a redirect to https://www.domain.not/cgi-sys/defaultwebpage.cgi Accessing http://www.domain.not gives a blank 500 page Im happy to side step the SSL issue at the moment if I could get the site up. I'm pretty sure it's a .htaccess issue as adding "blahdhdgdgd" to the start of the .htaccess file results in an "internal Server Error" Tried every .htaccess tweak I could find to no avail. Even restored an older .htaccess file from last week before the SSL issue doesn't work. It's a "real doozy", this one

Never got round to Bootstrap 4. I used BS 2 and really liked it but the pace of development was pretty slow. Foundation were introducing some great features that I liked so I switched. I was probably a little hasty with the switch because I began to miss the simplicity of Bootstrap, it's much better docs and support for xs screens. What led me to UI Kit (V2 at the time) was a project I worked on really needed a native dynamic grid. UI Kit had that and it worked really well. I can recommend UI Kit 4 though. It's looking like a really advanced but simple to use system. Thanks for the BS 4 tip. Will have a look.

Looking forward to a few of the v2 components making it to UIKit 3. I've about 5 live sites running on it and it's very finished but missing a few sliders, dynamic grid etc. Well worth a look. Lovely framework.

I'm happy to contribute on planning and design. I won't really be able to get stuck in until sometime after Jan 2018.

These are just demos and often running the default skin. I think Ryan has mentioned a few times he's keen to stress that they're not design proposals.

Glad you go it sorted Sounds like a caching issue. Even with ProCache turned off, I generally have to resave a page and clear the cache etc.

BTW this might be some help in diagnosing page redirects https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/redirect-path/aomidfkchockcldhbkggjokdkkebmdll?hl=en

+1 What @bernhard mentions. If you're on Plesk there's a Hosting Settings option per website which might be affecting your redirects.

Do you literally mean a shop / retailer powered by Drupal or a web dev outfit?

Doesn't a selector only display X by default to prevent heavy server loads ?

Has there ever been a PW meetup? I know some of the other CMS guys do it. Organise a few days at a hotel with a meeting room. Get to chat with other developers, talk about the roadmap. See some presentations etc etc and examples of work.

That's an important point. Pixel & Tonic were already the developers of several of EEs most crucial extras and presumably had thousands of EE users on their database. When they started Craft they not only had a ready to go marketing list of people who were A) fed up with EEs development but also fans of Pixel and Tonic too. I wont go into details of how they announced Craft at an Expression Engine conference ? Anyway their climb to fame is well deserved but a little unnatural Vs how most CMS grow their profile.

MODX isn't paid. I was surprised to see it listed though as it's last big update was 2014-ish and is suffering as a result. Corresponding 5 year Google Trends chart attached.

Google Trends monitors search queries entered into it's own search engine. It's like a stripped down version of their keyword tool for Adwords where they can tell you that.

One of the easier ways to tell is to search Google Trends https://trends.google.co.uk/trends/explore?date=all&q=processwire Mod note: Hi all, The original poster was a spammer. He's been banned. The forum software has automatically promoted @Peter Knight as the new OP .

Hi all I have a requirement to outsource something. Can't place details here as it's private but you can view details on the Pub board.

I started using LazySizes recently and really like it for large image heavy pages. If you start with the basic lazy loading and get comfortable with it you can then look at the srcset feature which loads different sized images based on the user device.

These are from May 2015 but I think they're still relevant. By using tabs in the Modal marked Choose and Upload, it clarifies the 2 distinct actions available Vs 2 options under one confusing heading. The thing is (and I've yet to resolve), should the Upload tab be the default active one? I think there's an alternative combined version there too (not attached)

What's AOS?

That's an interesting one. I always tell my clients during training that they need to add an image to the images field first to make it available within the RTE. Your's seem to go down the opposite route by using the RTE insert image icon. The images part of Processwire is probably the only area of the CMS which my clients run into issues and always in two areas. 1. Image tags They often enter the wrong tag or are not sure which tag to assign to an image. This has been improved just recently with the latest image tagging commits. Haven't tried it yet but really looking forward to less UI friction there for my users. 2. Select V Upload Once a user enters the image modal, there's a very prominent 'Upload image" button and a very subtle "select image" instruction. This leads to a lot of confusion and clients uploading the same image twice. Could easily be solved with some simple changes but it's probably low priority. I hadn't come across your particular bug before but it's a nice find.

I don't find it long winded but appreciate it could be reviewed. Theres a paid media manager module available which stores all images In a single place.

I hope your dog isn't reading that

One of the most obvious uses of this is I can finally make my own bunch of SEO fields and apply them to multiple pages. SEO is a core part of every site I develop and MarkupSEO just isn't getting the development it requires.