flydev

Hi @dragan sorry for this late answer. Yes the vendor folder need to be uploaded and do not need to be moved elsewhere. As a quick fix, you could try to remove the HookEvent type from line 175 : https://github.com/flydev-fr/OAuth2Login/blob/master/Oauth2Login.module#L175 Let me know if it worked, else I will test it at the end of the day, thanks.

Hi, you should consider adjusting innodb_buffer_pool_instances and innodb_buffer_pool_size : How much memory is available on the server ?

Hi @sodesign , interesting, did your issue is fixed ? if yes, how ? thanks; And to answer the two questions : Yes, but it should only do that if you tell NGINX to do it. About the issue, and based on your post, it look like a cache issue where cookies has been cached. The official statement say that by default, NGINX respects the Cache-Control headers from origin servers. It does not cache responses with Cache-Control set to Private, No-Cache, or No-Store or with Set-Cookie in the response header. This is the current behavior; I will add that before the version 0.8.44, the header was stripped then the request cached. All that to say that theses parameters can be overridden, and you should show us your NGINX config file before we go further.

So yes, the credentials are shown on the terminal of the VM at the end of the install : credentials in yellow

mmmh ok, downloading and trying, stay tuned ? And what give this command-line ? sudo cat /home/bitnami/bitnami_credentials

Generally the username and password are shown on the terminal, on top of the shell in the disclaimer at the end of the installation typically giving you the scheme, IP and the credentials. Try user as username and bitnami as password. Edit: https://docs.bitnami.com/virtual-machine/faq/get-started/find-credentials/

My bet, it's spam, they are totally trying to extorque bitcoin. It look like an automated message. And from what we can read from there on Internet, they are sending this message to owners of google blogs ? and we know that for hacking a google blog, they require your google account, which I doubt it was hacked. Anyway, you can look at your file structure, DNS records, etc to see if something is weird but in every case, DO NOT PAY ?? I am quite confident to say that your are still safe ? make your best poker face ?

What @teppo said, also, what is returning error or response ? Admin markup ? If yes, you might need to set the Content-Type header. Can you post your request headers here ? What is /post/ ? Can we see a chunk code ?

Today, I am glad to announce that the module support the native image field ??

Do you have withCredentials: true in your app config or in your request ? Without it, cookies are not saved.

Screencast updated - import of an entire article ☝?️ Still dealing with media files.

Hi @joer80 In the top of the post.php file, you can write your logic to check which user is allowed to post or not xhr request. Example : <?php namespace ProcessWire; // if the page is viewed wihtout ajax, return if(!$config->ajax) return; // if the user is a superuser, return if($user->isSuperuser()) return; // only editor can post request to this page if(!$user->hasRole('editor')) return; // other checks if needed, CORS check, Custom header check, etc // rest of code - access granted // ... then, for example in your component , but anyway you already know how to do it : // example editPage() { this.$store.dispatch('setEditPage', this.$route.path).then(() => { axios .post(config.apiEditPageURL) .then(response => { this.data = response.data }) .catch(error => { this.errored = error }) .finally(() => { this.$store.dispatch('loading', false) }) }) },

@encho you pointed to something I hadn't thought of before reading your comment. I then tried all the afternoon to work on that - I have to brainstorm more about that, but I think we could have something which works. In this sample, you can see a heading and a paragraph written in a CKEditor field. You can then change the fieldtype to EditorJS and get you saved data. As you can see - and as you stipulated as well in your last comment - the strong tag isn't taken into account. Anyway, I am quite confident to get a parser working here. I still take into account that I am not aware of how/which DOM are inserted on every CKEditor for a given user. I was thinking to alert the user if his content couldn't be parsed entirely, or something like that, and so, a manual intervention will be needed in this case. And this is how look the paragraph with inner DOM elements, should be "easy" to insert them :

@JeevanisM I don't know what's going on with the Site Profile Exporter, but for Duplicator, you need to install the ProcessDuplicator module (Modules > Install > ProcessDuplicator).

Indeed, it will work on front-end editing for defined roles ??

I think I get what you mean @Guy Incognito Actually, you can move every single paragraph independently - BUT, you can also copy/cut all the selected paragraphs and move them as it was a "one-block".

Thanks for getting into this - I will test with that password and will let you know whats going on.

Hi @antpre by looking at the exception, you are using the wrong credentials to access the database. But at the same time, the connection seem successful. Could you check the credentials in the config.php ? If you feel confident, I can take a look at it more closely, you can send me the FTP access and the url through private message here in the forum.

Not yet, when the website used to promote the module will be ready, the release date will posted here. Same here, and what I can say/confirm, is that once you get your hand into the editor, you will want to use it ? Thanks you for your interest. PS: If you think onto something that should be indispensable and that need to be implemented, please do not hesitate to ask/discuss the feature here.

@fruid I am not used to install PW on a subfolder, but I think that adjusting the htaccess should be enough. How does look your htaccess section 8A ? Section 8A : # Examples of RewriteBase (root and subdirectories): # RewriteBase / # RewriteBase /pw/ # RewriteBase /~user/

FIY, this file should have been renamed at the installation process. Without any server logs, hard to tell what have passed. Welcome here mate ! Cool first project ! ??

Forgot to put a note on what is currently supported : Features Auto-save Medias upload support HannaCode support Blocks Implemented Heading Image Paragraph Embed Quote Code Link Table (beta) Block Delimiter Raw HTML Note (custom block markup)

Thanks @teppo for your insight, as always highly appreciated. I got what you mean. I think that there is a part of question of taste but also depending on the task on which the user is involved/focused. In first instance, while discussing with the colleague, I started to insist that he could use the CKEditor to write his articles; The point is here, he is specialised in content creation. I also suggested MS Word as tool - but no, the UI is not soft as Gutenberg. Then I abdicated and told him to write his articles on Gutenberg and a local install of Wordpress, after all, I will not touch at it, and I can import the content of a Wordpress page to ProcessWire. I don't know if you guys are used to write content, but this guy showed me also the editor that was crafted for the big site Medium. It's something similar, polished, the editor contain an inline toolbar and some blocks. I understood then that it's like an "new" category of users, they are used to write content in a modern environment. I was not even aware of those type of editor / blocks approach ? . So yes, I can understand that it can be "intimidating". Yes! First mission that was to bring back this guy to use ProcessWire is almost done ?? @Pixrael Yes it could. The module you would like to see was already mentioned and I remember that Theo, Elabx and Joshua worked on something. It was not grapejs but the idea remain the same. If you really want to give a try and invest some time the community will help you ! @bernhard wrote nice tutorials on modules creation you could begin with, then start a new thread here in the modules/dev forum. There are some hard works in perspective and I think that a module like that should be taken by a group with dev and designers ?

If I got what you mean (compatible Fieldtype ?) it's already the case, you can drop a textarea then choose EditorJS, CkEditor or the vanilla textarea as field. Sure ! On my side, it's the possibility to fetch those JSON data directly into the third party apps (mobile, desktop, etc). Glad to hear that someone tried to implement this editor solution. Could you elaborate on why it wasn't a great success ? As a non-editor who I am, I really like what I feel writing thing on this fieldtype. About RepeaterMatrix, I think (and we already saw some posts here in the forum) that it could be used to make a page builder, but thats not intended by this module.

Sorry @rick not yet, there is a chance that the module will be released as ProModule with refund policy to be able to try the module.