Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 06/12/2021 in all areas

  1. Hi, I used this one a lot, but before you go further with it: It has one disadvantage. You have to use one type for all fields (subfields). So, pretty fine to use textarea for text and textarea, but there is already a new fieldtype out that makes the textareas obsolete. It is called Combo and since yesterday available in version v6beta. As you said: So.Many.Options! ? The only part that seems to be different, what I got so far til now, (started exploring / reading with / about COMBO two weeks ago), is a difference with searching / finding results in multi language sites. Whereas all (?) other (text)fields have a sort of scoped language pools where the search engine by default only searches in one language, the current active language, with the Combofield this is not possible. With other fields you can manage from the API site to search in more than one language of course, or in another then the current language. So ATM I stuck at if I should call this an advantage of the Combofield (in some situations) or more a disadvantage. At least, ATM it seems a significant difference that needs attention when planning a sites field setup in multi language sites with FE search functionality. S.M.O!
    3 points
  2. Today a new version of FormBuilder has been released in the FormBuilder support board (our 50th version) and it has a lot of interesting new features, which we’ll take a closer look at in this post— https://processwire.com/blog/posts/formbuilder-v50/
    3 points
  3. Regarding: SOLVED That doesn't matter that much. Maybe @Pete can tell us where to mark a topic as SOLVED. Ok... I thought of a file of some kind the hosting company provides or such. Fine! To be really honest here: ProcessWire works way easier and with less problems than WordPress even in regards to inital setups and installations - at least thats my experience for the last 6 years or so. But ok... yes... sometimes it can be difficult. ProcessWire isn't perfect by any means but at least there is more freedom in it (in my opinion). Glad you still use ProcessWire, want to use ProcessWire and take part in this community. You won't regret it!
    1 point
  4. couldn't find it so I **update** can't change the title... With this section removed, PW doesn't detect mod_rewrite: # 8B. Set an environment variable so the installer can detect that mod_rewrite is active. # ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- # Note that some web hosts don't support this. If you get a (500) error, try commenting out this # SetEnv line below. <IfModule mod_env.c> SetEnv HTTP_MOD_REWRITE On </IfModule> Without this help, a person like me wasn't able to use processwire.
    1 point
  5. Where and how? Don't know what you mean with this. As author of this thread you can either mark the thread or an answer as solution - I guess. I haven't seen it by now. You could change the title to [SOLVED] ... as well. Which works fine here as well. Hey... ProcessWire has the best community from all! And I've seen a lot.
    1 point
  6. Thanks again, @wbmnfktr! Hidden characters was one of my thoughts too. I see that all the hidden characters exposed by these two sites are also visible by default in my Vim configuration: spaces and linefeeds. Comparing both the original content and the version that works after my unsubstantial revisions using those two sites, I don't see any significant difference between the problem version and the working version. The problem version didn't have any suspicious hidden unicode characters or sequences that these tools exposed. I'm still stumped, but at least now I know some new angles for troubleshooting that I didn't know before!
    1 point
  7. In case you tried all solutions found here and on the web, already using redirects that work... stop thinking about that message. I've seen it so many times but never had an issue. As it's Strato... it will work. You might have to change RewriteBase (around line 172 in /.htaccess) but that's it. The question @BillH asked regarding Check again and a possible error 500 is a good point.
    1 point
  8. What happens when you try "Check again"? The same message, error 500 or something else? If error 500, there's probably something in .htaccess that your server doesn't like. It might be worth installing a fresh .htaccess, just in case an error has crept in. Other than that, if you've tried everything in the discussion mentioned above, this starts to go beyond my knowledge!
    1 point
  9. If you haven't found it, this discussion might help:
    1 point
  10. Lol yea my excitement got ahead of me before thinking that through.
    1 point
  11. There shouldn't be anything else. While Strato wouldn't be my first choice it's a fairly good option. I maintain a few ProcessWire sites on Strato hosting and they work flawlessly. Migration is easy and the more often you do it, it will become super easy and kind of a routine. The Duplicator module might be the best option here. A local dev environment makes it so much easier and more fun to work with ProcessWire.
    1 point
  12. Just a totally different approach in terms of ... creating a new template of some kind. Whenever I start a new project I look up possible definitions, and standards I could need and use within that project. For example schema.org, microformats, and similar... events, corporations, business, personal data, whatever... most of the time I find things I could use from all around the web. In some cases I call our chamber of commerce and similar for details about things they save, have to save or need to save about companies of all kind. Sometimes I even talk to my accountant, my lawyer and other similar "institutions"... whoever can help me. Sometimes the niche even has standards defined I can use and therefore I use them (for example: book stores). Then... whenever I set up a new templates for whatever data-object I need to save... I keep it flat... I don't care if a template has 10 or 100 fields... (books are a perfect example here). I need those details each and everywhere therefore I don't want to work with if/else, case, joins or whatever to get my details. I only reference small bits and only those I really have to and want to reference (authors of books, form of organization, and similar). Just my two cents.
    1 point
  13. More fun (can't upload animated gif) with style switcher... style-switcher.mp4
    1 point
  14. Hey Adrian, I like the idea! But I'm not sure what would really be the best way to achieve something like this. I've created a module for my style to make it easy for me to maintain it and also it has lots of helpful background information about admin themes/styles: https://github.com/baumrock/AdminStyleRock The main reason for putting everything into a module is my git submodule based setup. So I can simply add my theme as submodule and pull and push changes to any of my projects. My module can also serve as an example for others that want to provide a style for AdminThemeUikit. It could be simplified even more, but maybe it's good to wait a little to see how and if the community will come up with other styles at all? I think what we have now is only a first step. But I'm really not sure what would be a good next step as there are many good options... ?
    1 point
  15. @ryan - what about a dedicated "Skins" section - maybe within the modules directory. Perhaps the requirement for adding a skin to the directory would be to link to a Github repo with the admin.less and also an admin.png file which could be used on the skin's page in the directory. Ideally I think it would be nice if it was possible to view all skin screenshots via a gallery of thumbnails to make it easy to browse visually.
    1 point
  16. I had some fun too. Created another theme/style based on default reno style but tried to add more contrast (WCAG AA). It's also more in blue tones (but I kept PW pinky color) to match our website color theme. There are also some other tweaks. admin.less
    1 point
  17. https://github.com/chrisbennett-Bene/AdminThemeTweaker Inspired by @bernhard's excellent work on the new customisable LESS CSS getting rolled into the core soon, I thought I would offer up the module for beta testing, if it is of interest to anyone. It takes a different approach to admin styling, basically using the Cascade part of CSS to over-ride default UiKit values. Values are stored in ModuleConfig Module creates a separate AdminThemeTweaker Folder at root, so it can link to AdminThemeTweaker.php as CSS AdminThemeTweaker.php reads the module values, constructs the CSS variables then includes the CSS framework Can be switched on and off with a click. Uninstall removes everything, thanks to bernhard's wonderful remove dir & contents function. It won't touch your core. It won't care if stuff is upgraded. You won't need to compile anything and you don't need to touch CSS unless you want to. It won't do much at all apart from read some values from your module config, work out the right CSS variables to use (auto contrast based on selected backgrounds) and throw it on your screen. You can configure a lot of stuff, leave it as it comes (dark and curvy), change two main colors (background and content background) or delve deep to configure custom margins, height of mastheads, and all manner of silly stuff I never use. Have been developing it for somewhere around 2 years now. It has been (and will continue to be) constantly tweaked over that time, as I click on something and find something else to do. That said, it is pretty solid and has been in constant use as my sole Admin styling option for all of those 2 years. If nothing else, it would be great if it can provide any assistance to @bernhard or other contributor's who may be looking to solve some of the quirkier UiKit behavior. Has (in my opinion) more robust and predictable handling of hidden Inputfields, data-colwidths and showIf wrappers. I am very keen to help out with that stuff in any way I can, though LESS (and any css frameworks/tools basically) are not my go. I love CSS variables and banging-rocks-together, no-dependency CSS you can write with notepad.
    1 point
  18. Thanks to the excellent feedback from @matjazp , have re-vamped way the whole module works. Minimizes potential conflicts and was just a better idea. Now draws CSS variables, conditionally loaded source CSS and framework CSS together to generate single minified CSS file, with version control link to refresh cache for other pages. Only occurs when the module is visited, as it should, and after that other pages draw the minifed CSS straight from cache. Now loads in parallel with other CSS. at somewhere around 30ms, same as other CSS files. First load (in the module itself, not subsequent pages) comes in around 17 kB compressed (somewhere around 96kB uncompressed and with all options selected), so considerable improvement, especially given the elimination of almost all processing overhead. Very happy I was prodded into action. Took a little time, but I am much happier going forward. As part of the re-working, I am in the process of splitting up CSS for conditional loading according to user selections. Opens up a far greater range of user options, which I am rolling out to module as I go. As a bonus, splitting the source CSS up is making it easier for me to track and alter, allowing me to simplify the CSS and balance specificity better. Always nice when file sizes are going down, not up even though you are adding new stuff :)
    1 point
  19. Hi everyone. It's been a while. A little update. There has been a delay, again, unfortunately! Lockdown hit really hard. There were also a number of technical issues but these have since been resolved. Finally, a number of you (having seen the preview videos) strongly expressed the need for the Padloper UI to resemble the ProcessWire admin theme even in the alpha stage. The message I got was that this was more important to them from the get-go than having advanced Padloper features. I accepted their reasoning but this came at a cost. Padloper 2 has been re-themed to look like the ProcessWire admin. Given that we are using third-party libraries to build Padloper 2, this took a lot of time. Focus was placed on basic features only, for now, in order to expedite the first release of Padloper 2. This means that some advanced features will be missing from the first release of Padloper 2. As for a release date, I was hoping for a 'spring baby'. That won't happen. I am now working hard toward a 'summer baby'. Screenshots Have a nice and safe day.
    1 point
  20. Just a quick test: dark theme. For anyone interested, here's the admin.less file: admin.less
    1 point
  21. @ryan - wondering if you could perhaps start providing a changelog for pro modules. I know this request might seem a bit OT here, but I am a huge fan of @netcarver's ModuleReleaseNotes module with the way it integrates into the module update process. It shows the git commits and the contents on a CHANGELOG file if it exists. I know that because these aren't hosted on publicly accessible repos, this might be difficult, but it would be really helpful because I always like to review what has changed about a module before updating in case it looks like there might be something that needs testing and also just to know what new features I should look out for.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...