adrian

Custom Upload Names

Recommended Posts

This module allows you to automatically rename file (including image) uploads according to a configurable format

This module lets you define as many rules as you need to determine how uploaded files will be named and you can have different rules for different pages, templates, fields, and file extensions, or one rule for all uploads. Renaming works for files uploaded via the admin interface and also via the API, including images added from remote URLs.
 

Github: https://github.com/adrianbj/CustomUploadNames

Modules Directory: http://modules.processwire.com/modules/process-custom-upload-names/

Renaming Rules

  • The module config allows you to set an unlimited number of Rename Rules.
  • You can define rules to specific fields, templates, pages, and file extensions.
  • If a rule option is left blank, the rule with be applied to all fields/templates/pages/extensions.
  • Leave Filename Format blank to prevent renaming for a specific field/template/page combo, overriding a more general rule.
  • Rules are processed in order, so put more specific rules before more general ones. You can drag to change the order of rules as needed.
  • The following variables can be used in the filename format: $page, $template, $field, and $file. For some of these (eg. $field->description), if they haven't been filled out and saved prior to uploading the image, renaming won't occur on upload, but will happen on page save (could be an issue if image has already been inserted into RTE/HTML field before page save). Some examples:
    • $page->title
    • mysite-{$template->name}-images
    • $field->label
    • $file->description
    • {$page->name}-{$file->filesize}-kb
    • prefix-[Y-m-d_H-i-s]-suffix (anything inside square brackets is is considered to be a PHP date format for the current date/time)
    • randstring[n] (where n is the number of characters you want in the string)
    • ### (custom number mask, eg. 001 if more than one image with same name on a page. This is an enhanced version of the automatic addition of numbers if required)
  • If 'Rename on Save' is checked files will be renamed again each time a page is saved (admin or front-end via API). WARNING: this setting will break any direct links to the old filename, which is particularly relevant for images inserted into RTE/HTML fields.
  • The Filename Format can be defined using plain text and PW $page variable, for example: mysite-{$page->path}
  • You can preserve the uploaded filename for certain rules. This will allow you to set a general renaming rule for your entire site, but then add a rule for a specific page/template/field that does not rename the uploaded file. Just simply build the rule, but leave the Filename Format field empty.
  • You can specify an optional character limit (to nearest whole word) for the length of the filename - useful if you are using $page->path, $path->name etc and have very long page names - eg. news articles, publication titles etc.

Acknowledgments

The module config settings make use of code from Pete's EmailToPage module and the renaming function is based on this code from Ryan: http://processwire.com/talk/topic/3299-ability-to-define-convention-for-image-and-file-upload-names/?p=32623 (also see this post for his thoughts on file renaming and why it is the lazy way out - worth a read before deciding to use this module). 

 

 

NOTE:

This should not be needed on most sites, but I work with lots of sites that host PDFs and photos/vectors that are available for download and I have always renamed the files on upload because clients will often upload files with horrible meaningless filenames like:

Final ReportV6 web version for John Feb 23.PDF

post-985-0-03753500-1392939647_thumb.png

  • Like 12

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just pushed a new version to Github that supports setting a filename length limit (to nearest whole word) for the length of the filename - useful if you are using 

$page->path, $path->name etc 

and have very long page names - eg. news articles, publication titles etc. The final filename will be truncated to this length if set.

I have also added support for jquery 'on' as well as 'live' depending on what is available.

I have one thing I'd like to sort out before releasing this if anyone has any ideas. I can't seem to get dynamically added (click "Add another rule") ASM fields to properly initialize. The:

<select class="asmSelect" name="asmSelect2" id="asmSelect2">

is not being setup, so the fields just looks like a standard html multi-select field until the config settings page gets saved, then it works fine. I am wondering if there is an easy way to fix this. I haven't looked through things thoroughly yet, but it seems weird that the InputfieldPageListSelectMultiple field is working properly.

Any ideas?

I have the ASM fields now mostly working (works almost every time a new rule is added, but not 100% for some reason). I resorted to a setTimeout to wait until the select form elements are created. I feel like there should be a better way to do this, but it is something I always struggle with a little in jquery. I have used this function in the past: https://gist.github.com/aziz/3792797 but I still think there should be a better way. Anyone?

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice job Adrian! Please add to the modules directory too, when you are ready. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great job Adrian!

Very useful, and works well with CropImage module also.

Two notice when there are no rules:

Notice: Undefined index: ruleData in .../site/modules/CustomUploadNames/ProcessCustomUploadNames.module on line 249
Notice: Undefined index: filenameLength in .../site/modules/CustomUploadNames/ProcessCustomUploadNames.module on line 264

And.. something to fix with new admin themes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi maba, 

Thanks for the positive feedback and picking up on those errors. Only catch is that line 249 doesn't refer to ruleData, so I am wondering if you are running the latest version (0.0.8). Can you please check again with the latest version and let me know what, if any messages you get. I don't get any notices show up at all.

Did you mean to attach a screenshot regarding the fix for the new admin theme?

Thanks,

Adrian

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

in attach some screenshot about theme issues. Some problem with margin and padding.

You are right, line 249 is not about ruleData, but with last dev and the last module version I catch this warning.

I'll try with a clean PW installation.
 

New problem: I cannot add rules (see image). Problem with ASM select.

Ooops.. probably you know this issue.

post-846-0-23322000-1384779616_thumb.png

post-846-0-02277500-1384779621_thumb.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the extra details. I know about the layout on the new theme - to be honest I haven't looked at this thoroughly yet as I wanted to make sure Ryan had finalized exactly what classes will be used in the layout of these things. I will definitely keep it on my list of things to tweak though.

As for the ASM issue. It currently seems random - sometimes it works as expected and other times it doesn't work properly. Regardless, you can use the field like a normal multiselect field and it will work fine and be converted to an ASM on save. I will look into this when I have some more time and see if I can solve it more reliably. The key thing is that it shouldn't affect the ability of the module to work until I get it sorted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

About new theme.. it is only a warning, you are right.  :rolleyes:

In my case I cannot save the second rule.

How can I test it?

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Based on your screenshot, I see that you haven't entered anything in the "Filename Format" field. Since the rule can't do anything without this field, this is a required field - the only one of fields which is, and the rule won't save unless it is filled out. 

Can you please try again with that field filled out.

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am really sorry you are having trouble with this. I can save multiple rules here no problem. I just pushed a small update to make the format field "required", but obviously that isn't your issue. I am curious if you are having the same problem saving when using other/older themes, and also what browser/OS you are on. Do you get any logged errors, or does the rule just not appear when the page reloads?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No problem Adrian, it is under development.

Tested also with standard theme, Safari and Chrome on OSX.

No errors, the rule not appear, like screenshot.

post-846-0-18005100-1384846545_thumb.png

post-846-0-29887100-1384846556_thumb.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Catched! #Inputfield_submit shoud be #Inputfield_sumbit_save_module in ProcessCustomUploadNames.js:

$('#Inputfield_submit_save_module').click(function(e) {
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much for the troubleshooting. I was testing with 2.3.5 and it was working fine. I see that with 2.3.7 the button now has that new id, whereas with 2.3.5, it was the containing <li> that had that id, but the button itself had #Inputfield_submit.

So I just pushed another update that lists both ids, comma separated so it should support old and new versions of PW. 

Thanks again for your help with this and please let me know if you find any other problems!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One more small update pushed to github to hopefully fix the ASM initialization issue.

maba - would you please mind checking to see if the new rules now consistently work as ASM fields please?

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Adrian, thanks for the updates.

Unfortunately the ASM problem persists. I'll made other test with clean PW installation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you do me a favor and try changing Line 15 of the .js file from 200 to 500 to see if that helps. The change from 100 to 200 seems to have made it work all the time at my end, but maybe there are other issues. 

EDIT: are you getting any related console errors?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, I have swapped out the timeout approach for a callback, so hopefully that will solve it in a much better way. 

I have pushed this fix to github and the module is also now approved in the modules directory, so you should be able to update much more easily now.

Please let me know if that works now.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Adrian,

I am wondering if the module is missing "Add another rule button". PW version 2.3.0.3 and I am using version 0.1.3 (the delete button is present though)

iz0a1gz.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like, jQuery cannot find the reference to this $('#RenameRules .InputfieldContent:first'), that's why the button is never added to the DOM :) Hope this can't be fixed :) Cheers

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the bug report. I was really only testing on the latest dev version of PW. I have just pushed a new version to github that seems to work fine with 2.3.

Please test and let me know how you go with it. 

I really should do some more tweaks on the css for this module, but am waiting till PW 2.4 and the new default admin theme are released as stable.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Adrian,


Thanks for making this changes - confirmed this is working for 2.3.0.3

Anyway, I am thinking and wishing if there is a support for preserving the original filename on top of what is already offered? :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Peter,

Are you suggesting you'd like two copies of the file then - one with the original name and one with the new custom name? My initial thought on this is that it will be problematic when you go to delete an image, as one version would be left behind. Of course it would be possible to extend the file fieldtype to store the original filename as well and either do a redirect, or keep record of the second version of the file. If two physical files were stored, it could be linked when deleting so both are deleted. I think at the moment these options are beyond the scope of this module. I think it is doable, but I think there might be some further thinking required to make sure there aren't any other complicating issues.

Can you please further explain your usage scenario for wanting to keep the original filename? Maybe that will better help me to figure out the best the approach.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By bernhard
      @Sergio asked about the pdf creation process in the showcase thread about my 360° feedback/survey tool and so I went ahead and set my little pdf helper module to public:
       
      Download & Docs: https://gitlab.com/baumrock/RockPdf
       
      You can combine it easily with RockReplacer: 
       
    • By Soma
      LogMaintenance
      A simple ProcessWire module to give some maintenance control over log files. I found myself often having lots of log files for different things that can grow more or less quickly to a size where they can be difficult to maintain. The built in Logger of PW does a good job of giving you the possibility to delete or prune logs. But it has to be done manually and sometimes a log grows into millions of lines, which makes it often impossible to even prune it as it's too large.
      LogMaintenance uses LazyCron to run the maintenance task and there's several settings you can setup on a global or per log basis.
      Archive: will create zip files for each log file in logs/archive/ folder and add the log each time the maintenance is run to a subfolder containing the datetime.
      Lines: keeps logs to a certain number of lines 
      Days: keeps the log to a certain number of days
      Bytes: keeps the log to a certain amount of bytes
      Each setting is checked from top down, the first setting to contain something is used. So if you check the "Archive" option, all other settings are ignored and logs are archived everytime the LazyCron is executed. If you want to keep your logs to a certain amount of bytes just leave all other settings to 0 or blank.
      Per Log Settings
      There's a textarea that you can use to setup a config for a specific log file one per line. All the logs you define here ignore the global settings above. The syntax for the settings is:
      logname:[archive]:[lines]:[days]:[bytes] 
      errors:1:0:0:0 // would archive the errors log messages:0:10000:0:0 // will prune the errors log to 10000 lines  
      The module can be found on github for you to check out. It's still fresh and I'm currently testing.
      https://github.com/somatonic/LogMaintenance
    • By teppo
      Fieldtype Page IDs is a third party Fieldtype that, simply put, stores Page references as integers (Page IDs).
      This fieldtype was built as a quick and dirty workaround for Page Reference fields' inability handle self-references due to circular reference issues. A project I've been working on for a while now includes a combination of RepeaterMatrix content blocks and tagging/categorization system that would've resulted in a lot of duplicate pages (and plenty of unnecessary manual work for content editors) had I used built-in Page Reference fields, and thus a new Fieldtype felt like the most sensible approach.
      Fieldtype Page IDs was designed to be loosely compatible with Page References in order to make conversions between the two feasible, but it is quite limited feature wise:
      largely due to the fact that stored values are actually just integers with no connection to Pages whatsoever some advanced selectors and related features are not supported, and page values can't be directly accessed configuration settings are limited to the bare essentials (selector string and Inputfield class) only a handful of Inputfields (AsmSelect, Checkboxes, Text) are (currently) supported Anyway, in case you need to store Page IDs (and Page IDs only) and are happy with the limitations mentioned above, feel free to give this Fieldtype a try. It has been working fine for me in one particular project, but hasn't been tested that much, so please tread carefully – and let me know if you run into any issues.
      GitHub repository: https://github.com/teppokoivula/FieldtypePageIDs
      Modules directory: https://modules.processwire.com/modules/fieldtype-page-ids/
    • By daniels
      This is a lightweight alternative to other newsletter & newsletter-subscription modules.
      You can find the Module in the Modules directory and on Github
      It can subscribe, update, unsubscribe & delete a user in a list in Mailchimp with MailChimp API 3.0. It does not provide any forms or validation, so you can feel free to use your own. To protect your users, it does not save any user data in logs or sends them to an admin.
      This module fits your needs if you...
      ...use Mailchimp as your newsletter / email-automation tool ...want to let users subscribe to your newsletter on your website ...want to use your own form, validation and messages (with or without the wire forms) ...don't want any personal user data saved in any way in your ProcessWire environment (cf. EU data regulation terms) ...like to subscribe, update, unsubscribe or delete users to/from different lists ...like the Mailchimp UI for creating / sending / reviewing email campaigns *I have only tested it with PHP 7.x so far, so use on owners risk
      EDIT:
      I've updated the module to 0.0.4. I removed the instructions from this forum, so I don't have to maintain it on multiple places. Just checkout the readme on github 🙂
      If you have questions or like to contribute, just post a reply or create an issue or pr on github. 
    • By bernhard
      WHY?
      This module was built to fill the gap between simple $pages->find() operations and complex SQL queries.
      The problem with $pages->find() is that it loads all pages into memory and that can be a problem when querying multiple thousands of pages. Even $pages->findMany() loads all pages into memory and therefore is a lot slower than regular SQL.
      The problem with SQL on the other hand is, that the queries are quite complex to build. All fields are separate tables, some repeatable fields use multiple rows for their content that belong to only one single page, you always need to check for the page status (which is not necessary on regular find() operations and therefore nobody is used to that).
      In short: It is far too much work to efficiently and easily get an array of data based on PW pages and fields and I need that a lot for my RockGrid module to build all kinds of tabular data.

      Basic Usage

       
      Docs & Download
      https://modules.processwire.com/modules/rock-finder/
      https://gitlab.com/baumrock/RockFinder/tree/master
       
      Changelog
      180528, v1.0.4 add custom select statement option 180516 change sql query method, bump version to 1.0.0 180515 multilang bugfix 180513 beta release <180513 preview/discussion took place here: https://processwire.com/talk/topic/18983-rocksqlfinder-highly-efficient-and-flexible-sql-finder-module/