szabesz

Hello, I'd recommend implementing your own solution based on ProcessWire and various other helper modules that are being maintained, as all webshop solutions for ProcessWire are no longer maintained. You can get inspirations from @Mikel's modules such as: https://processwire.com/talk/topic/31455-stripepaymentlinks-–-simple-checkout-integration-for-processwire/ And from other community examples such as: https://github.com/mugdhachavan/cake-shop-processwire https://github.com/lombervid/shoppingcart Also Ryan's https://processwire.com/store/form-builder/stripe/ can simplify Stripe integration a lot.

Visiting https://www.kimi.com/membership/pricing a modal pops up for me and its top part looks like this: To tell the truth, I will probably use it for browser-based prompting, and it shows how many such tasks are still available for that day. For example:

I just paid for 1 month of Allegretto ($39/month) and used it with a deep research prompt asking for an "Intermediate PHP developer who is new to PHP Swiss Ephemeris" demo project (with detailed requirements, of course). It produced runnable code with outstanding results in about an hour. That might seem slow, but for me, it would have taken at least two weeks to figure all that out. It also came with explanations, which provides me a good starting point to learn the topic. So Kimi 2.5's deep research is very impressive, especially regarding coding-related prompts. It performs much better than my (admittedly) cheap Gemini Pro plan. I prompted Gemini with the same request, and it produced half-baked code, clearly running out of "steam" (memory/context window, whatever...). Additionally, Kimi's deep research acts like a programmer, while Gemini's deep research behaves like a very important executive who happens to be good at coding but prefers to give unnecessary executive summaries on the topic. I dislike that as it just consumes "tokens" on something you do not need. Well, my comparison might not be fair, as my Gemini Plan is a lot cheaper than $39/month, but those Gemini deep research unnecessary executive summaries also come with higher plans, I guess. Edit: "unnecessary executive summaries" and yes, I always prompt it not to do that but it does so anyway. The only difference is that they are shorter than the summaries one gets without asking not to do them.

Yes, the issue with blog articles is that they are verbose, and there is no need for such verbosity for an LLM. However, instead of trying to squeeze blog posts and API docs content and examples into a context window, it would be better to do some "sort of LLM training". Like LoRAs for image models. Does anyone have an understanding of how such a thing could be done?

Sure thing ;) Thanks in advance if you make it public.

Same comments with like/dislike just like for processwire.com blogposts, perhaps?

https://processwire.com/talk/topic/31724-wip-wiremedia-–-concept-for-a-central-media-management-module/

You can probably find hundreds more examples, e.g.: https://www.facebook.com/groups/771395196543555/posts/2371859523163773/ or:

Similarly, custom page classes suffer from the same limitation. Their files can only be dumped in one directory, we have no options to organize them. I have also tried various workarounds ever since I started using ProcessWire, but none of them came even close to some sort of proper native support.

Happy 2026 Ryan and everyone, too! @ryan This issue is none of the above, and might be overkill for a GitHub issue, and could already be fixed in the current dev, but it exists in 3.0.251. That's a repeater with an image field, probably with a z-index issue. I did't want to update the site just to see if it's already fixed, but it would be nice if it were fixed in the next major version.

Hello @maximus Thanks for sharing! I will certainly give it a shot. Side note: the guys at LEGO "can get furious" when someone else uses their trademark in a way they consider inappropriate. As long as it is for something personal, that should be legally fine. I am not a lawyer, but letting us download your file in a forum post like this should be considered to be "for personal purposes". If you were to turn it into a "product" then that would be a different matter.

Sorry for the off topic reply, but I cannot help wondering what will Google do with WordPress sites which take up most of the personal and small company landscape? Will it hide them at the bottom of its search results, just because they fail to adhere to any kind of "Core Web Vitals"? Don't let me wrong, optimizing for performance is always a good thing, I just cannot imagine how Google envisions forcing everyone to do it according to its own taste.

Some of us (including me) are lucky enough to have clients who do not care about the look of processwire.com and trust us that ProcessWire is the best. Not all of us are that lucky. So for those who are not so lucky, it matters a lot what a potential future client perceives when visiting processwire.com.

I built "my" first website in `96 with Adobe PageMill, fighting with tables to craft the basic layout it had. It was for a bank, a handful of static pages. I had no prior experience with HTML... :P

No to mention other issues like the following. On my 2560x1440 monitor, while scrolling, I get views like: I guess I do not have to explain why this is far from ideal. Just a big bulge blob with a subscription form in it and that’s it? To whom does it look professional?