szabesz

Awesome, thanks a lot!

@LexSanchez Thanks for sharing, but please follow the "The forum language is English. We really appreciate the effort everyone makes from countries around the world to post in English. After careful consideration and experience on other forums, it makes sense to have one common language for discussion here so that ideas can be shared and not missed in language-specific forums - the same applies for debates that might get out of hand as we do not want to miss those either."

https://github.com/clipmagic/ProcessPromptManager @psy Thanx for sharing!

Hi, it might be a browser extension causing this. Do you have any extensions installed? If so, you can try a different browser or an incognito/private window, provided extensions are not allowed to run in that mode.

Useful utility indeed, thanks for sharing! Are you planning to add TinyMCE support as well? Given that CKEditor has been replaced by TinyMCE as the default RTE, on new sites I always use TinyMCE.

top 3: 42 20 12

Thank you for sharing! Are you planning to add it to the Module Directory?

And when they do, they treat it as the "global context", while /.agent/ is the "project context". At least that's what Cline does, so ProcessWire should not automatically touch ~/.agents/ and should warn about such an action in the first place. see: https://docs.cline.bot/customization/skills#skills Quote: "You can also create skills manually by creating the directory structure in your file system. Place skill directories in .cline/skills/ (workspace) or ~/.cline/skills/ (global) and Cline will detect them automatically." Since Cline supports both .cline/skills/ and ~/.cline/skills/ the same is true for storing skills in .agent folders as well.

This is a good workaround, I think, especially if the target directory can be configured in the module's settings. .agent/ in the site root could be the default path. BTW, some AI agent tools support both the .agent/ location and have their own preference, like Cline suggests .cline/. I use .agent/ with Cline, and it works well.

@tpr @Martijn Geerts @renobird @cstevensjr @Wanze @pwired @Mike Rockett @Zeka @SiNNuT @DaveP @justb3a @nik @MadeMyDay and so many others...

Thanks @ryan for the "$20/month" vs "pay-as-you-go plan" comparison. Since my experience is very similar (using Cline Bot's "pay-as-you-go" credits), it appears that Anthropic does prefer to employ a vendor lock-in strategy. "Wow this sounds like a really good deal." It was a Black Friday deal, their standard prices are higher, but still affordable (currently $84 for a year). I prefer OpenAI compatible APIs, and IDE plugins that support it. That way I can pay for the subscription I can afford, and use that. That is why currently my favorite tool is the Cline plugin, available for, quote: "VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf, Antigravity, a JetBrains IDE, or Node.js 20+ (for CLI)". Thanks @gebeer for drawing my attention to AGENTS.md, I have so far overlooked it. There is so much to learn. Just like Ryan, I have also recently started testing/using AI-assisted development tools, and Cline for ProcessWire development is what I am most comfortable with at the moment. Now reading the docs for Cline's Rules page, I see that it also supports AGENTS.md, and optionally others as well. So my understanding is that AGENTS.md should be the general guide for AI that comes with the ProcessWire core (or currently through the Agent Tools module), but I can augment it with my other rule files, like the ones I already have: processwire-project.md. This file should only contain project-specific default guidelines that are in addition to the ProcessWire official AGENTS.md. I will need to refactor my rules and skills, cleaning them for contradictions and redundancy. Cline extends that with its Memory Bank feature. I've just started to use it, but I don't have much experience yet. Seems to be a good tool, though.

All LLMs are trained(?) to be super polite, as we all know. Especially recently, I get so many "that's a brilliant observation/thought etc..." on a daily bases, that I almost started to be proud of the questions and remarks I can phrase :D

Not everyone can afford Claude, including me. I tested Claude Opus 4.6 (for Plan mode) and Claude Sonnet 4.6 (for Act mode) "via" my Cline Bot account, and while it solved the issue I presented it with in one go, it cost me about $1. One prompt only and $1 was gone... So that is why I use z.ai with GLM 5.1 for the fraction of the cost. Not as fast, not as feature rich, not as powerful, but still very capable and I paid only $25.20 for a one year subscription which suits my needs, as I can prompt it all day long and I never run out of my quota. I hope that a "SKILLs standard" will emerge soon, as currently most agents prefer their own "schema" , or rather, their lack of adherence to a schema.

Can't wait! Thanks a million, as always, Ryan!

It is obvious that AI/LLMs/agents, etc..., should be used for development with frameworks the developer already has at least a basic understanding of, and the agent should not be allowed to generate code the developer cannot understand, otherwise the whole project will fail in the end. These are new tools, they are constantly changing, and we need to learn how to utilize them best. I am trying to find the optimal balance between tinkering, learning, and doing actual work. This has always been the case whenever I started using a new piece of software or system for the first time. There is no change in that regard.