Christophe

I've just bookmarked this recently: https://rocket.chat/ "The Ultimate Open Source Web Chat Platform" "From group messages and video calls all the way to helpdesk killer features. Our goal is to become the number one cross-platform open source chat solution."

Perhaps he's talking about this: http://documentation.concrete5.org/developers/working-with-blocks https://www.concrete5.org/documentation/general-topics/blocks-and-areas But it could also have been this, for example: Mobile Web 2.0: Developing and Delivering Services to Mobile Devices https://goo.gl/nNGPhW (google book link) Service-Oriented Computing: 11th International Conference, ICSOC 2013 https://goo.gl/ubfTBJ (google book link) Differently in both cases, "on-the-fly"/"on the fly" is not necessarily better. It depends, like for a lot of things.

After a little research, it's correct in Brazilian Portuguese apparently. Not sure 100% for "Brasileia" (for Brazilian), for the moment. But it's a place that exists. And "seuinte" is used. But Google Translate doesn't have a Brazilian translator so, yes, it's better to use their Portuguese equivalents for better translations.

Hello saboor, Please don't update /wire/config.php. Update /site/config.php where you can add things found in /wire/config.php and modify them. You won't have to bother about the /wire/ folder upgrade.

"It can be a sub page of any ancestor, so a child of a "grandparent" or higher up works too." So it can be a direct child of the homepage (I was wondering while reading the sentence on github). But there could be too many images to choose from... Your module has a lot of use cases. I'll have to improve my (beginner) coding skills first . (I'm starting with JUMP START PHP ENVIRONMENT now.)

Hello, "Only libraries under the edited page itself or one of its parents are available to keep things organized." So, it means it can be under a direct parent (it will be a sibling of the edited page) or a child of the page itself, is that it? Also, as we can already, with ProcessWire by default, create a "Media Library" page anywhere, put images and files in it, and create sub-pages ("sub-sections", "sub-folders", "sub-categories"...) with images and files in it also, and already select them via CKEditor, would it be "difficult" to also have a "Media Library" tab (the "Media Library" page(s) (and/or template(s)) would be defined in a configuration page, etc.) and a way to (drop-down) select the "Media Library" page/"root" or one of its children in order to have only the images and files from a specific (sub-)section? (And perhaps a way to have only images or only files. But that could wait.) It's "already there"*, it's just that we only see, for example, the image thumbnails. Perhaps, for example, a "list mode" button in order to see the image names and/or descriptions could be added. (I'll have to check again how it is if they are files and not images). It's also that it can take quite some time sometimes to find/go to the "Media Library"/"root" page in this case*, so a way to have direct access to it via a tab, after having defined it(/them) would be nice. This module is a nice addition, it's just that I've been wondering this for some time. I've done it with a "root" page and sub-pages with one image/page (logos, etc.) and have realized (again) that it could also be simply done with several images/page where sub-pages would be (sub-)categories.

Thank you! I've implemented it very recently. Apparently, the only thing that is missing - but this is often missing (I had noticed it on the Foundation profile) - is the possibility (perhaps with a javascript/jquery script...) to change, in my case, from #mainMenu .sub-menu .sub-menu {left: 100%; top: -1px;} to #mainMenu .sub-menu .sub-menu {left: -101%; top: -1px;} to revert the direction when the third-level ul touches the right side (edge) of the browser window, otherwise, in some cases, a (big) part of it can be hidden.

I've just installed this module on ProcessWire 2.7.2. Another ProcessWire module that quickly gives me a solution to something asked for (at the last minute). I guess that it is correct that Tag Parser had to be added in the Details tab of the two fields that had to be monitored. Apparently it's not, it displays errors (messages) on the front-end. I had done it because at first I couldn't find where to set up things. Perhaps I hadn't clicked well on Configuration > Field Change Notifier. I guess that "changed from [something] to new" or "changed from old to new" is the normal message(s). By the way, (where) could "old" and "new" be translated (in order to "survive" updates)? At first I wanted to write this post to mention the possible option of notifying only if a certain role(s) has made the change(s). So that, for example, a role with higher permissions (not the superuser. In this case, one that can create these users with very limited permissions.) that first fills in/modifies the fields doesn't get notified each time he/she does it. Also, wanted to mention that in Administration > Configuration > Field Change Notifier, I've just noticed this displayed (in UPPERCASE in the Admin): When this field… changes from this value… to this value… notify user(s) … Thanks for this module!

Adrian, I've just "PMed" you!

Hello, I'm trying this module for the first time. In gallery.php I currently have: <?php include('./_head.php'); // include header markup ?> <!-- main content --> <h1 class='uk-width-1-1'><?php echo $title; ?></h1> <div id='photos' class='uk-width-medium-1-2'> <?php foreach($pages->get('/gallery/')->images as $image) { $thumb = $image->size(120,90); echo "<a href='$image->url' data-uk-lightbox=\"{group:'image-group'}\" title='$image->description'>"; echo "<img src='$thumb->url' width='$thumb->width' height='$thumb->height' alt='$thumb->description' />"; echo "</a>"; } ?> </div> <div id='videos' class='uk-width-medium-1-2'> <?php foreach($pages->get('/gallery/')->videos as $video) { echo "<a href='$video->video_url' data-uk-lightbox=\"{group:'video-group'}\">"; echo "<img src='{$video->video_thumbnail_image->url}' width='120' height='90' />"; echo "</a>"; } ?> </div> <?php include('./_foot.php'); // include footer markup ?> In the Gallery page (with the Gallery (gallery) template) I have : a Title field, an Images field, and a Videos (repeater) field. The Videos (repeater) field contains 2 fields: the video_thumbnail_image field, and the video_url field. In Admin > Modules > Get Video Thumbnails: for "Templates to search" -> repeater_videos and Gallery (I've tried with both, with none, and also with one or the other. Not sure if Gallery is enough.), for "Fields to search" -> video_url, for "Video Images Field" -> video_thumbnail_image. (I don't know why I don't see the labels added at the top of the pages for videos, video_thumbnail_image, and video_url.) I don't have thumbnail images added to video_thumbnail_image fields for the moment. Perhaps it's just due to one little thing. Edit: ProcessWire 2.7.2

Hello, I've just noticed that the form (and text above) at http://gsbelarus.com...bout/vacancies/ doesn't change its language when clicking on EN.

I'm trying to add a data-uk-lightbox (UIKit) attribute to a <a> tag (in a multilingual body field). I've allowed it in Allowed Content Rules: a[data-uk-lightbox]. I've even tried with a[*]. When I add it in the source code, go back to the wysiwyg editor, and then go back to the source code, it is there as data-uk-lightbox="". When the page is saved, it is removed... Is there a way to add a custom attribute like this one? Do I have to add it to another list somewhere? Edit: I've also tried with a[data-uk-lightbox]{*}. data-uk-lightbox="" gets removed only after saving the page.

Hi @adrian, This would be (very) good enough. (Using UIkit,) I could perhaps (also) add a lightbox (http://getuikit.com/docs/lightbox.html) I was thinking of perhaps inserting an image, and when clicking on it the lightbox would appear with the video, perhaps with a black background or another color before it (auto-)starts. Meanwhile, I've found another "solution". Using mp4 files (converted, optimized... by YouTube), they seem to be well played in different browsers. It seems good enough for this project. I'm using a file field (mp4 format only). I'm thinking about using UIKit's lightbox also. It can also just open in a new tab after clicking on a image. Before finding your module I had thought about using videojs, creating pages with a video template, and perhaps fetching a video with a page field(?). But, perhaps your module with your solution is better here.

Hello, For a current project (the same that is the first with so many specific requirements, and for which I use some of your modules), YouTube is ultimately not a (good) choice (viewers have to be blocked from being able to go to YouTube from the embedded video). So I've just installed FieldtypeVideo. I've tried to upload a 16.9 (Mo) mp4 video, but the "spinning-wheel" animated icon and the 100% on the red row are still there after several minutes. It doesn't change. I've also tried with a 12.4 (Mo) file. Apparently, the shared hosting (OVH) doesn't have ffmpeg and ffmpeg-php activated. So I guess it's probably the reason... (Or could it be because of the sizes of the files?) Does someone have (alternative) solutions? I know there's vimeo plus/pro (but it's not really a solution for the association). NB: I've tried to hide the YouTube icon at the bottom-right corner with css, but of course it doesn't work/is not "allowed". Perhaps with js(?) If I use Video.js, are ffmpeg and ffmpeg-php still needed? (Yes,) probably. If there's no solution, I'll just let them be downloadable as they were on the old website.

Just an idea. Perhaps you (simply) need (to) (add) :focus

I've implemented this in ProcessWire: https://processwire.com/talk/topic/6730-js-library-for-simple-product-image-gallery-with-thumbnails-no-lightbox-or-transitions-just-click-and-view/ The result is very nice. But the big image(s) was flickering. Some times the 2 same images, sometimes (also) others. I've tried different things to reduce/stop the flickering, but nothing has changed it. It has always/often been only when clicking the first time on an image (after cleaning the (browser) cache). So I've implemented this one. Having both has apparently stopped the flickering (if it's not due to something else). (Seems somehow logical, perhaps related to the cache...) But now, with this gallery system (which is also nice) it seems almost impossible to make it responsive (I hadn't noticed it wasn't). I'll probably have to find a third solution.

I've implemented it in ProcessWire. The result is very nice. But the big image(s) was flickering. Some times the 2 same images, sometimes (also) others. I've tried different things to reduce/stop the flickering, but nothing has changed it. It has always/often been only when clicking the first time on an image (after cleaning the (browser) cache). So I've implemented this one (the last code at the bottom): https://processwire.com/talk/topic/8909-add-simple-html-gallery/ Having both has apparently stopped the flickering (if it's not due to something else). (Seems somehow logical, perhaps related to the cache...) But now, with the other gallery system (which is also nice) it seems almost impossible to make it responsive (I hadn't noticed it wasn't). I'll probably have to find a third solution.

I'm sending you a PM.

Hello, Version 0.1.9. Now 0.2.0. I don't remember updating something. I've done what is here: https://processwire.com/talk/topic/2074-module-page-edit-field-permission/?p=110990 ready.php doesn't seem to change anything now. "Restricting to the homepage means they now have access to everything, but before they weren't getting access to anything" -> Yes (it's just one user account involved). It was only getting access to this: https://processwire.com/talk/topic/2074-module-page-edit-field-permission/?p=111223 (first two images attached). Coming back with "the contents of the data field for module's settings". Is this what you want?: {"matchType":"specified_parent","branchesParent":null,"phpCode":"","restrictType":"editing_and_view","branchExclusions":[]} Going to bed (it's very late/early). Perhaps going to eat before .

Hello, Do you mean the number of branches that are restricted? There was only one. I've just restricted the user (who has/had the issue) to the homepage and now it works. Edit: perhaps it is what should always be done if the user doesn't have the superuser role...(?) But I wonder why this happened, as, if I remember well, I had not changed anything for this user before I noticed this problem. (I'm a little bit "worried" something like that could reappear. But now it shouldn't.)

Hello Adrian, Sorry to bother you. References : https://processwire.com/talk/topic/2074-module-page-edit-field-permission/?p=110862 https://processwire.com/talk/topic/2074-module-page-edit-field-permission/?p=111223 All of a sudden, almost everything seems restricted for this user. "How to match user to branch" is set to "Specified Branch Parent". "Branch parent to restrict access to" is (still) set to nothing for this user. (Could it be that an old test setting has reappeared?) Perhaps I should reinstall it and see what happens. Edit: I've rapidly uninstalled it and then reinstalled it (without removing the folder via ftp). I've set it to "Specified Branch Parent". I've only restricted the access (to the "Membres" section of the tree) for 3 users (with the "membres" role). But the user (with the simpleuser role) that I haven't restricted to anything is restricted to almost everything now. It wasn't the case before.

Thank you Martijn for the information. I've had a solution starting here: https://processwire.com/talk/topic/2074-module-page-edit-field-permission/?p=111207 But now I have another problem :/. https://processwire.com/talk/topic/2074-module-page-edit-field-permission/?p=111223 ** All of a sudden another issue has appeared (I don't know if it's related in a way or not at all). Now when I log-in as the "manager" user (not the superuser), I don't have access anymore to the page(s) tree and to the users ("membres" role) that I could add or edit. When I click on the Users link I have the following message (translated): ProcessWire: You don't have permission to execute this module - ProcessPageLister I don't understand what has happened... ** I have added attached images. Edit: it's apparently due to Admin Restrict Branch. I have to find why, as it worked well before and I only restricted a Specified Branch Parent for the "Membres" role.

Another problem I've just discovered :/, now when I log-in as the "manager" user (not the superuser), I don't have access anymore to the page(s) tree and to the users ("membres" role) that I could add or edit. I've deactivated ready.php (ready_deactivated.php). I've disconnected and cleaned the browser's cache. Now when I click on the Users link I have the following message (translated): ProcessWire: You don't have permission to execute this module - ProcessPageLister What happened? I don't remember it not working before using ready.php (but I can't say I'm 100% sure). I haven't changed anything to this role recently. Edit: it's apparently due to Admin Restrict Branch. I have to find why, as it worked well before and I only restricted a Specified Branch Parent for the "Membres" role.

I can't use OR (or ||) in this case, as the template is for a type of page edited by other roles with more permissions. In this project, as it is, I can't currently see if/how (using) // limit code to one template if($page->template != 'planning-child') return; // limit it to user role if(!$user->hasRole("membres")) return; , // limit it to user role if(!$user->hasRole("membres")) return; // limit code to one template if($page->template != 'planning-child') return; or only // limit it to user role if(!$user->hasRole("membres")) return; would be different (or not). I'll test it in the future if I have the opportunity.

It works with only if(!$user->hasRole("membres")) return; if($page->template != 'planning-child' && !$user->hasRole("membres")) return; doesn't seem to work. (Perhaps there's a "conflict"...(?)) // limit code to one template if($page->template != 'planning-child') return; // limit it to user role if(!$user->hasRole("membres")) return; as you had put it seems to work. But does this block of code(s) (if used together) mean that both conditions have to be "ok" (or one or the other)? Edit: (or the first one that is "ok"...) For my project if(!$user->hasRole("membres")) return; is enough, but I'm wondering... Thank you so much! (It's one of the only things that last(ed) in order to finish the website.) NB: I'm leaving my "mistakes" in case it helps other people