dotnetic

Thanks for your continued development on this. I still need to have a look at it.

You found the solution just 4 years after posting this thread?! Wow. That's fast ?

The problem is, that you forgot to insert the {class} placeholder in the itemMarkup option which inserts the active class to the active element. It has to look like this <li class='page-item {class}'>{out}</li> so that the active class can be added.

Thank you @Pete for your work on the forum.

Open your dev tools and inspect the active element. Which CSS classes does it have? If it doesn't have "page-item active" then something is wrong. If it has these classes, then maybe you need to use some different code for the bootstrap styling. Maybe provide the HTML code, that is outputted in dev tools, so we can help you more

@Mike-it could you add an issue to github, if it does not exist yet?

Wow. This looks so cool. The creation of fields and templates via the admin might not be for everyone, but I think you can generate the migration file also by hand, right? A feature that has been requested multiple time, is that all changes that you do in the admin should be tracked and added to a migration. I like the basic idea behind it, and think of a hook, that gets triggered after creating a field/template, or making modifications to a field, which automatically or after confirmation modifies or adds a migration file. As you are also running a diff, you might create a migration automatically, to see what changes have been made to templates/fields/contents since the last migration. Then you would just choose which templates/fields/contents should be included in the migration. For example you added a new field, added it to two templates and created a new page with one of the templates. Now your module could run a "Get changes" command, that fetches all differences since the migration and asks which of them you want to integrate. With this behaviour you would not have to remember and "define the affected elements" as in your video. What you think about this approach? I am also happy to have a look at your code and try it out, because I think migrations is a major issue with ProcessWire right now. I am using @bernhards RockMigration atm, but also like your approach. Migrations should be an important part of the core IMHO.

Thanks @bernhard. Problem solved

I added this example code taken from ProcessWire 3.0.173 core updates: New URL hooks to my site/_init.php // _init.php wire()->addHook('/hello/world', function($event) { return 'Hello World'; }); and get the following error: So what is wrong? As I am in the _init.php the hook should be attached during init, right?

@dlen I forgot, that the name of the default language is always default and can not be changed. Please try this updated code. BTW: where did you took that code example from? <?php $alternate_languages = ''; foreach ($languages as $language) { // if this page is not viewable in the language, skip it if (!$page->viewable($language)) { continue; } // get the http URL for this page in the given language $url = $page->localHttpUrl($language); // output the <link> tag: note that this assumes your language names are the same as required by hreflang. if ($language->name === 'default') { $alternate_languages .= "\n\t<link rel='alternate' hreflang='x-default' href='$url' />"; } else{ $alternate_languages .= "\n\t<link rel='alternate' hreflang='{$language->name}' href='$url' />"; } } echo $alternate_languages; ?>

Please check if the name of your german language is really "de", if not, please add it. I am not talking about the de name of the homepage, but the name of the language

Please show us the code that you use to generate the hreflang output.

Hey, sure, as I find the time. But could you please create an issue on github, so it is easier for me to track. PR's are also always welcome.

I am looking for an output strategy for repater fields or Repater Matrix fields (Pro fields) in my case. I would like to replicate the approach Ryan described in the blog post https://processwire.com/blog/posts/more-repeaters-repeater-matrix-and-new-field-rendering/ , but using Template Engine Factory (because I want to use Smarty or another template language). In short: Instead of a foreach loop that then uses many if clauses to distinguish the type, I would like to have a separate controller and template for each repeater matrix item. The controller should be used to modify the output before. Here is my working code, but I wonder if it might be better to use hooks like Template Engine Factory's hookBeforePageRender, or something else? //_init.php $factory = $this->modules->get('TemplateEngineFactory'); // check if the actual page has a modules_repeater (Repeater Matrix field) // and provide the output of the different modules as a variable if ($this->page->hasField('modules_repeater')) { // now get the output based on the type foreach ($this->page->modules_repeater as $module) { // Get the controller, to render a repeater item. $controller = $factory->controller("modules_controllers/{$module->type}.php", "modules/{$module->type}.tpl"); // You might pass some data via to the controller file, which you find at site/templates/modules_controller/nameOfTheRepeaterMatrixItem. // We assign the module repeater item to the $page variable so we can use it in our template and controller like this // $page->hero_headline $controller->page = $module; $controller->execute(); $output = $factory->render("modules/{$module->type}", ['page' => $module]); // Executing the controller renders the associated template via template engine. $this->view->set('modules_repeater', $output); } } Any suggestions?

@bernhard Is there a way to generate and insert content into a repeater matrix item via RockMigrations? First I generate the fields needed for the repeater matrix and add the repeater matrix field to a page. Then I want to create a new hero item on that page and insert some contents in it.

I try to setup a repeater matrix field. Can anybody like @aComAdi provide a working example, how to do this? EDIT: It turned out, that I needed version 5 of the RepeaterMatrix field.

ProcessJumplinks could be modified to use this. Don't know if @Mike Rockett is still working on v2?

Thanks. Great addition. It's like routes in Laravel. Much needed

That was my first thought

This could be because TracyDebugger loads Logfiles (by default?), namely Tracy Logs and ProcessWire Logs. If these files are large, it could take a while and make the site unresponsive. Try to disable them in Tracy's panel selector and see if that helps.

Please provide the code that you use. The error says, that it is trying to read the property of a null object. That means, that $my_page is not a page and therefore ProcessWire can't get the id of this page. If you have an id for the page do `$pages->get(insertIdHere)->trash();`

Thanks for all your work on the community requests. I would recommend to close issues/requests instead of adding the completed label for them (or does this label has some automation behind it?). The advantage of this is, that the list of issues get smaller and the issuer knows that the issue/request is fixed. Are you waiting for feedback for "completed" requests? If not, it's just fine to close the issue. If the OP has something to add he can still add a comment or reopen the issue. But thanks again for your efforts on this. I really feel like involving the community more, like you do now, can take take ProcessWire to new heights and make it even more one of the best CMS out there. Keep up the good work.

Your example pdf.php looks absolutely fine. Please try to save the PDF file via $pdf->save() or $pdf->download() and then take a look if the PDF is generated.

@Ralf Which error do you get? Does the page render correctly without using RockPDF?

I am willing to help with that. I also know the pains of npm, but also know (sometimes) how to tackle them.