Jump to content
kongondo

Module: Matrix Fieldtype & Inputfield

Recommended Posts

Thanks Adrian!

  1. Modal: CSS: Let me start with this one. I hate CSS...there I said it!  >:(  :-X  :P  :lol: . OK, I don't hate it that much...But this drove me nuts for hours! OK, so PHP has its quirkiness too but goodness, CSS! OK, maybe am not just good at it and debugging it is a pain. The modal is a jQuery UI thing and overriding its defaults caused me more pain than I want to go through again :-)...So, if anyone can send me a PR, please do. Am serious, LoL. It's either this or I go back to browser default alert box (FF's is nice btw, but Chrome, urggh!).
  2. New Rows: Maybe there's two ways around this. In an earlier post I was wondering whether we need to use pages for Row and Column headers/labels (e.g. the Nitrogen, 1987 in your screenshot). In this option, we would let the first column and first row be the row and column headers respectively. That would mean, instead of using those columns (in the db) to store references to page IDs, we would use them to store Row and Column Labels. Alternatively, we could let the user choose whether they want labels to be existing pages or if they want to import custom strings as Row/Column headers.  That would make for easier appending new rows since it wouldn't need the existence of a page. The second option here is to automatically create new row and column pages on import by reading the row/label titles (or checking if that page exists and add it to the matrix if it does). The problem here is if auto-creating new pages, what templates will they use and what page(s) will be their parents.
  3. Ignore first column/row: Makes sense, will look into it -  if you can please submit a separate GitHub feature request, thanks
  4. Checking rows means they will be exported: Good idea, will look into it - if you can please submit a separate GitHub feature request, thanks
  5. Shift+Click: - ditto, thanks
  6. Natural/Normal way of structuring CSV data: I think you misunderstood me/I wasn't clear. This is what I meant. Consider the following data, including the row and column headers as it would appear in Excel:

    A                           B      C     D     E     F    G

1 Peter 35

2 Peter 80Kg

3 Peter $50,000

4 Peter Married

5 Peter Volvo

Mary etc as above

As you can see, the first 5 rows are all about Peter. If you get data like that, normally you would change it so that all of Peter's data is on one row, with the columns each storing one property like so:

            A             B             C             D                           E              F        G

1          Age       Weight   Salary    Marital Status   Vehicle

2 Peter 35         80 kg     $50,000   Married                Volvo

3 Mary  etc....

So, whilst example 1 would have better worked for finding out what was 'null', it is not the normal way of organising data. Anyway, it's not important now, since you meant something totally different by 'append'.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hate CSS too - not my strong point, that's for sure! Given that the PW core uses the brower's alert box, I wouldn't bother struggling with it too much. It might be nice if PW had it's own consistent alert (like the pw-modal that we have for modals), but I don't think you should put too much effort into overriding the browser in this case.

New Rows: Maybe there's two ways around this. In an earlier post I was wondering whether we need to use pages for Row and Column headers/labels (e.g. the Nitrogen, 1987 in your screenshot). In this option, we would let the first column and first row be the row and column headers respectively. That would mean, instead of using those columns (in the db) to store references to page IDs, we would use them to store Row and Column Labels. Alternatively, we could let the user choose whether they want labels to be existing pages or if they want to import custom strings as Row/Column headers.  That would make for easier appending new rows since it wouldn't need the existence of a page. The second option here is to automatically create new row and column pages on import by reading the row/label titles (or checking if that page exists and add it to the matrix if it does). The problem here is if auto-creating new pages, what templates will they use and what page(s) will be their parents.

For my purposes, I don't think I would want what you are suggesting because an incorrectly prepared CSV file could damage my site by adding additional years and indicators (nitrogen etc). The indicators are actual pages that have their own content, so I think it is important that site editors make a conscious decision first to add a new indicator which will then automatically appear in the Matrix field. This is the reason I am using Matrix and not Table - the automatic population and new indicators and years.

Natural/Normal way of structuring CSV data: I think you misunderstood me/I wasn't clear. This is what I meant. Consider the following data, including the row and column headers as it would appear in Excel:

Yes, I didn't see your initial point - sorry, but I also think that trying to deal with that is getting too complicated :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was talking about appending new rows. In my current use case, each year there will be a new "year" row that will appear in the matrix. I would like users to potentially be able to import a CSV of the data for that row. Of course importing for one row may not be worth the effort, but in some cases I can have up to 20 columns, so it might just be worth it. In that case, I would want "import" to just append the new row to the blank year that is in the matrix table.

Reading this line again, if we are not CREATING new rows per se (i.e. not creating new row/column pages) but appending starting from the first AVAILABLE BLANK row, that is doable and is how I was thinking originally, before I managed to confuse myself trying to figure out what exactly you meant by append :-). In that case, the users will have to ensure that a blank row exists before attempting an 'append import'. If at least one blank row exists, that row will be populated and any other subsequent blank rows as well as long as there are still other rows of data in the imported CSV. As usual, any extraneous rows and columns will be discarded (nothing to import to). Hmm, need to see which is easier; using PHP to find the first blank row or using jQuery/JavaScript to read the matrix client-side and get the first blank row and send that with the submitted form :-). Happy days. As for your users creating new blank rows every year, am sure you can work that out :-).

Edited by kongondo
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah yes - perhaps I should have said: "populate blank rows" vs "overwrite all existing rows", instead of append/overwrite.

Sorry for all the confusion, but I think we are on the same wavelength now :)

Yes - creating a new blank row for each year is easy - I have a "Years" parent page and they simply create a new year under that as required - well actually it is done using Batch Child Editor and the child pages are hidden to avoid confusion.

Thanks again!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quick thought on the "Note: Empty values will be saved" message - I am not sure that this is helpful to site editors, and may even be confusing!

Maybe it is something that doesn't need to be displayed, or maybe just for superusers?

Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK..What about an overwrite versus append message?

I think it is important that the user knows what is about to happen regarding appending vs overwriting for sure. Are you going to make the behaviour configurable in the import section settings?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Append vs Overwrite is configurable at both field (we set a default import mode [superuser]) and page (import section settings [page editor]; here we override the default) level. If no default has been set by superuser, it defaults to append. In addition to the note above the matrix table, if in append mode, the last blank row is highlighted, just a little visual reminder about what's about to happen if they hit save. The append note also tells the user that if a last blank row happens to have other non-blank rows beneath it, the imported values will be saved starting from the last blank row and overwrite any rows below it. If they want to avoid this, users need to make sure that the last blank row is always the last matrix table row. Thought about a pop-up warning the user instead (that there are populated rows beneath the last blank row) but didn't pursue the idea, putting the onus on the editor instead. It would mean getting the pop-up if they hit save, even for other reasons (e.g saving other fields on the page). Alternatively, we could have a separate 'save matrix' button, but that is probably complicating things. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Append vs Overwrite is configurable at both field (we set a default import mode [superuser]) and page (import section settings [page editor]; here we override the default) level. If no default has been set by superuser, it defaults to append. In addition to the note above the matrix table, if in append mode, the last blank row is highlighted, just a little visual reminder about what's about to happen if they hit save. The append note also tells the user that if a last blank row happens to have other non-blank rows beneath it, the imported values will be saved starting from the last blank row and overwrite any rows below it. If they want to avoid this, users need to make sure that the last blank row is always the last matrix table row. Thought about a pop-up warning the user instead (that there are populated rows beneath the last blank row) but didn't pursue the idea, putting the onus on the editor instead. It would mean getting the pop-up if they hit save, even for other reasons (e.g saving other fields on the page). Alternatively, we could have a separate 'save matrix' button, but that is probably complicating things. 

Are these new settings? I am running the latest from the dev branch and don't see these settings - am I being dumb? It's been a long week!

post-985-0-86645100-1446630559_thumb.png

post-985-0-36726200-1446630626_thumb.png

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My bad..those are incoming settings. Just haven't pushed them to dev yet  :-)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, what about an API method to create data - it would be nice to make it easier to create an import routine from an existing database.

You mean something more elaborate than this (which has always been possible btw)?

$p = $pages->get(1091);
$p->of(false);
$matrix = new Matrix();
$matrix->row = 1060;
$matrix->column = 1073;
$matrix->value = "This is my value";
$p->results->add($matrix);
$p->save('results');
$p->of(true);

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, I was talking about the ability to import a CSV via the API - perhaps like I did with the TableCSVImportExport:

http://modules.processwire.com/modules/table-csv-import-export/

$modules->get('TableCsvImportExport'); // load module // data, delimiter, enclosure, convert decimals, ignore first row, multiple values separator, append or overwrite 
$page->fields->tablefield->importCsv($csvData, ',', '"', false, true, ',', 'append');

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Update version 1.0.4 (Dev only for now)
 
Note: Haven't had time to update README
 
Changes

  1. Import Mode for file/copy-pasted CSV: Two options, 'append' and 'overwrite'. Default setting set in Field's Details tab. The setting can be overridden at page-edit level. Default setting is append (sorry guys, you will have to inform your clients of the changes. The prospect of data loss inherent in the overwrite mode outweighed the inconvenience of re-teaching your clients about the new default append mode).
    1. Append: In this mode, the module will look for the last available empty/blank row in the matrix. If it finds one, imported rows will be inserted from that point forward. Any subsequent rows (i.e. rows beneath that 'last blank row') will be overwritten. Any rows above the 'last blank row' will have their values preserved (untouched). When in append mode, the 'last blank row' will always be highlighted. The modules (jQuery) monitors any live changes to the table rows (typing and clear data) and the highlight will shift accordingly if the 'last blank row' changes. If there is no 'last blank row' and you attempt to save in this mode, you will get an PW error message and your older values will be preserved in the matrix. Used wisely, append can actually mimic an insert. Btw, for an empty matrix, append doesn't make much sense since data will only be inserted in the very last row of the matrix :-).
    2. Overwrite: What was the default behaviour; incoming values overwrite existing values.
  2. Ignore first row and/or column: Default set independently at Field setting (i.e. can ignore one but not the other if you wish). Default is ignore both first row and column. Both settings can be independently by-passed at page-edit level. In real world examples, first rows usually store column headers/labels and first columns usually store row headers/labels.
  3. Export checked rows: You can now export only the rows you want by checking them. If nothing is checked and you attempt to export you will get a JS error alert. The 'set range to export' setting became redundant and I removed it.
  4. Shift + Click enables the selection of a range of rows. The checkbox for toggling select all still works.
  5. Lots of code re-factoring

Thanks to @adrian for suggesting all of the above features ^-^.

Please test and let me know.

I think I have given this module enough love for now. MenuBuilder has refused to talk to me until the situation improves. So, for now, there's a feature freeze on this one and let's see if I can get MenuBuilder to smile again  :lol:  :P .

post-894-0-72496200-1446755440_thumb.png

Edited by kongondo
Added screenshot
  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Beautiful work!

I think I might have said this just recently to some of your other new features, but it is true - this has become one of my favourite field types. 

Now go spend some time on some of those commercial modules you have cooking :)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been hooked on it! And I've learnt some fun jQuery stuff along the way. Btw, didn't have time to test with non-superuser account + thoroughly check if 'append' caused any performance issues..Seemed there was a slight (milliseconds) delay when I added the feature. Maybe I just need some sleep  :P .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey kongondo - small bug for you. When editing a page in a modal window - eg through Lister, the Export Data button is ending up at the bottom of the modal.

post-985-0-50390800-1446848568_thumb.png

The PW modal code grabs some buttons and forces them to be in the footer, but I am not sure why "export data" is ending up there, but "clear data" isn't - likely a class that has been applied to the export button - but I haven't investigated.

Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey kongondo,

I have noticed an issue when using unpublished or hidden pages.

Here is my scenario. I am using this custom php code as the row selector:

return $pages->find("parent=/report-cards/{$page->parent->parent->name}/years/, sort=sort, include=all");

The "include=all" ensures that even though the latest year is unpublished (we are currently adding data and it's not ready to be live yet), we still see that year as a row in the matrix table. 

The problem is this line: https://github.com/kongondo/FieldtypeMatrix/blob/master/InputfieldMatrix.module#L439

//remove matrix-rows that are no longer needed i.e. 'unpublished', 'hidden', 'deleted' or 'trashed'
if(!$rp || $rp->is(Page::statusUnpublished) || $rp->isHidden() || $rp->isTrash()) continue;

Even though data is saved to the db, that line prevents it from being displayed in the matrix table - you enter and save, but it appears blank.

For my needs I have commented this line and it seems to be working fine. I am not sure of the best fix - perhaps this line is simply not necessary or maybe it needs to be an option?

The same issue occurs with columns as well.

Please let me know if I haven't explained properly or if you have any other questions.

Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi adrian,

I think the original idea was to avoid displaying and saving data that was 'no longer there/invalid', aka, that page is not reachable. But maybe I should have limited this to trashed pages only. I like your idea about making this configurable. Definitely I'll still exclude trashed pages but will make displaying of 'unpublished' and 'hidden' rows and columns configurable (not sure as one choice or two options [i.e. the page statuses as choices])  but separately for rows and columns .The default (for backward compatibility) will be to exclude such pages. Hope it makes sense (typing quickly...)...

Edited by kongondo
typos, etc
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just announcing that I've tested and can confirm that Matrix is compatible with ProcessWire 2.8.x and ProcessWire 3.x

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, kongondo said:

Just announcing that I've tested and can confirm that Matrix is compatible with ProcessWire 2.8.x and ProcessWire 3.x

Just to add to your testing, I can confirm that I have been using this awesome module with 3.x for probably 6 months now without any problems!

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey @kongondo - when adding via the API, eg:

$matrix = new Matrix();
$matrix->row = 1060;
$matrix->column = 1073;
$matrix->value = "This is my value";
$p->results->add($matrix);
$p->save('results');

is there a recommended way to overwrite existing rows? At the moment doing this when the cells are already populated results in duplicated entries in the "field_matrixfield" db table. Obviously only one set is shown when editing the field on a page in the backend, but I am worried about consistency of what will be returned (backend and frontend) and of course just wasted db space and data integrity. I am thinking that the easiest option might be to just remove the entries manually with a raw SQL statement before adding the matrix row.

Any thoughts?

Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi @adrian,

Good catch. Yes, raw SQL would be the way to go. I'm still mulling and testing most efficient way to go about this. 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey @kongondo - I just went to export for the first time and noticed that all I get is the first column entitled "Row Label". Is there something I am missing, or is this a bug?

I need this pretty urgently (actually immediately), so I am going to take a look and see what I can figure out, but in case you happy to be online and have an idea for a solution, or something I am missing, that would be great :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, I figured it out and have a quick fix in place. It was a multi-language issue.

This is my quick fix - to get the default row and column titles, rather than returning a title object.

			//prepare export values
			foreach($rows as $row) {
				$rowTitle = $row->title->getLanguageValue("default");
				//only export selected rows
				if(!in_array($row->id, $rowsChecked)) continue;

				foreach($columns as $column) {
					$columnTitle = $column->title->getLanguageValue("default");
					//get each matrix value at given coordinates (WireArray)
					$v = $values->get("rowLabel=$rowTitle, columnLabel=$columnTitle");
					$value = $v ? $v->value : '';//force blank values export
					$exportMatrix[$row->id][$this->_('Row Label')] = $rowTitle;
					$exportMatrix[$row->id][$columnTitle] = $value;
				}
			}

Not sure if you want to implement just like this, or whether you think it's worth adding a more complete ML solution.

PS - what about changing "Row Label" to the title of the parent page of the first column. In my case I have a page branch of Years to control this column. It would be much nicer if this read "Years" or "Year". Would that work, or are there more things to consider?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By David Karich
      ProcessWire InputfieldRepeaterMatrixDuplicate
      Thanks to the great ProModule "RepeaterMatrix" I have the possibility to create complex repeater items. With it I have created a quite powerful page builder. Many different content modules, with many more possible design options. The RepeaterMatrix module supports the cloning of items, but only within the same page. Now I often have the case that very design-intensive pages and items are created. If you want to use a content module on a different page (e.g. in the same design), you have to rebuild each item manually every time.
      This module extends the commercial ProModule "RepeaterMatrix" by the function to duplicate repeater items from one page to another page. The condition is that the target field is the same matrix field from which the item is duplicated. This module is currently understood as proof of concept. There are a few limitations that need to be considered. The intention of the module is that this functionality is integrated into the core of RepeaterMatrix and does not require an extra module.
      Check out the screencast
      What the module can do
      Duplicate multible repeater items from one page to another No matter how complex the item is Full support for file and image fields Multilingual support Support of Min and Max settings Live synchronization of clipboard between multiple browser tabs. Copy an item and simply switch the browser tab to the target page and you will immediately see the past button Support of multiple RepeaterMatrix fields on one page Configurable which roles and fields are excluded Configurable dialogs for copy and paste Duplicated items are automatically pasted to the end of the target field and set to hidden status so that changes are not directly published Automatic clipboard update when other items are picked Automatically removes old clipboard data if it is not pasted within 6 hours Delete clipboard itself by clicking the selected item again Benefit: unbelievably fast workflow and content replication What the module can't do
      Before an item can be duplicated in its current version, the source page must be saved. This means that if you make changes to an item and copy this, the old saved state will be duplicated Dynamic loading is currently not possible. Means no AJAX. When pasting, the target page is saved completely No support for nested repeater items. Currently only first level items can be duplicated. Means a repeater field in a repeater field cannot be duplicated. Workaround: simply duplicate the parent item Dynamic reloading and adding of repeater items cannot be registered. Several interfaces and events from the core are missing. The initialization occurs only once after the page load event Changelog
      2.0.0
      Feature: Copy multiple items at once! The fundament for copying multiple items was created by @Autofahrn - THX! Feature: Optionally you can disable the copy and/or paste dialog Bug fix: A fix suggestion when additional and normal repeater fields are present was contributed by @joshua - THX! 1.0.4
      Bug fix: Various bug fixes and improvements in live synchronization Bug fix: Items are no longer inserted when the normal save button is clicked. Only when the past button is explicitly clicked Feature: Support of multiple repeater fields in one page Feature: Support of repeater Min/Max settings Feature: Configurable roles and fields Enhancement: Improved clipboard management Enhancement: Documentation improvement Enhancement: Corrected few typos #1 1.0.3
      Feature: Live synchronization Enhancement: Load the module only in the backend Enhancement: Documentation improvement 1.0.2
      Bug fix: Various bug fixes and improvements in JS functions Enhancement: Documentation improvement Enhancement: Corrected few typos 1.0.1
      Bug fix: Various bug fixes and improvements in the duplication process 1.0.0
      Initial release Support this module
      If this module is useful for you, I am very thankful for your small donation: Donate 5,- Euro (via PayPal – or an amount of your choice. Thank you!)
      Download this module (Version 2.0.0)
      > Github: https://github.com/FlipZoomMedia/InputfieldRepeaterMatrixDuplicate
      > PW module directory: https://modules.processwire.com/modules/inputfield-repeater-matrix-duplicate/
      > Old stable version (1.0.4): https://github.com/FlipZoomMedia/InputfieldRepeaterMatrixDuplicate/releases/tag/1.0.4
    • By Robin S
      A new module that hasn't had a lot of testing yet. Please do your own testing before deploying on any production website.
      Custom Paths
      Allows any page to have a custom path/URL.
      Note: Custom Paths is incompatible with the core LanguageSupportPageNames module. I have no experience working with LanguageSupportPageNames or multi-language sites in general so I'm not in a position to work out if a fix is possible. If anyone with multi-language experience can contribute a fix it would be much appreciated!
      Screenshot

      Usage
      The module creates a field named custom_path on install. Add the custom_path field to the template of any page you want to set a custom path for. Whatever path is entered into this field determines the path and URL of the page ($page->path and $page->url). Page numbers and URL segments are supported if these are enabled for the template, and previous custom paths are managed by PagePathHistory if that module is installed.
      The custom_path field appears on the Settings tab in Page Edit by default but there is an option in the module configuration to disable this if you want to position the field among the other template fields.
      If the custom_path field is populated for a page it should be a path that is relative to the site root and that starts with a forward slash. The module prevents the same custom path being set for more than one page.
      The custom_path value takes precedence over any ProcessWire path. You can even override the Home page by setting a custom path of "/" for a page.
      It is highly recommended to set access controls on the custom_path field so that only privileged roles can edit it: superuser-only is recommended.
      It is up to the user to set and maintain suitable custom paths for any pages where the module is in use. Make sure your custom paths are compatible with ProcessWire's $config and .htaccess settings, and if you are basing the custom path on the names of parent pages you will probably want to have a strategy for updating custom paths if parent pages are renamed or moved.
      Example hooks to Pages::saveReady
      You might want to use a Pages::saveReady hook to automatically set the custom path for some pages. Below are a couple of examples.
      1. In this example the start of the custom path is fixed but the end of the path will update dynamically according to the name of the page:
      $pages->addHookAfter('saveReady', function(HookEvent $event) { $page = $event->arguments(0); if($page->template == 'my_template') { $page->custom_path = "/some-custom/path-segments/$page->name/"; } }); 2. The Custom Paths module adds a new Page::realPath method/property that can be used to get the "real" ProcessWire path to a page that might have a custom path set. In this example the custom path for news items is derived from the real ProcessWire path but a parent named "news-items" is removed:
      $pages->addHookAfter('saveReady', function(HookEvent $event) { $page = $event->arguments(0); if($page->template == 'news_item') { $page->custom_path = str_replace('/news-items/', '/', $page->realPath); } }); Caveats
      The custom paths will be used automatically for links created in CKEditor fields, but if you have the "link abstraction" option enabled for CKEditor fields (Details > Markup/HTML (Content Type) > HTML Options) then you will see notices from MarkupQA warning you that it is unable to resolve the links.
      Installation
      Install the Custom Paths module.
      Uninstallation
      The custom_path field is not automatically deleted when the module is uninstalled. You can delete it manually if the field is no longer needed.
       
      https://github.com/Toutouwai/CustomPaths
      https://modules.processwire.com/modules/custom-paths/
    • By teppo
      Hey folks!
      I'm happy to finally introduce a project I've been working on for quite a while now: it's called Wireframe, and it is an output framework for ProcessWire.
      Note that I'm posting this in the module development area, maily because this project is still in rather early stage. I've built a couple of sites with it myself, and parts of the codebase have been powering some pretty big and complex sites for many years now, but this should still be considered a soft launch 🙂
      --
      Long story short, Wireframe is a module that provides the "backbone" for building sites (and apps) with ProcessWire using an MVC (or perhaps MVVM... one of those three or four letter acronyms anyway) inspired methodology. You could say that it's an output strategy, but I prefer the term "output framework", since in my mind the word "strategy" means something less tangible. A way of doing things, rather than a tool that actually does things.
      Wireframe (the module) provides a basic implementation for some familiar MVC concepts, such as Controllers and a View layer – the latter of which consists of layouts, partials, and template-specific views. There's no "model" layer, since in this context ProcessWire is the model. As a module Wireframe is actually quite simple – not even nearly the biggest one I've built – but there's still quite a bit of stuff to "get", so I've put together a demo & documentation site for it at https://wireframe-framework.com/.
      In addition to the core module, I'm also working on a couple of site profiles based on it. My current idea is actually to keep the module very light-weight, and implement most of the "opinionated" stuff in site profiles and/or companion modules. For an example MarkupMenu (which I released a while ago) was developed as one of those "companion modules" when I needed a menu module to use on the site profiles.
      Currently there are two public site profiles based on Wireframe:
      site-wireframe-docs is the demo&docs site mentioned above, just with placeholder content replaced with placeholder content. It's not a particularly complex site, but I believe it's still a pretty nice way to dig into the Wireframe module. site-wireframe-boilerplate is a boilerplate (or starter) site profile based on the docs site. This is still very much a work in progress, but essentially I'm trying to build a flexible yet full-featured starter profile you can just grab and start building upon. There will be a proper build process for resources, it will include most of the basic features one tends to need from site to site, etc. --
      Requirements and getting started:
      Wireframe can be installed just like any ProcessWire module. Just clone or download it to your site/modules/ directory and install. It doesn't, though, do a whole lot of stuff on itself – please check out the documentation site for a step-by-step guide on setting up the directory structure, adding the "bootstrap file", etc. You may find it easier to install one of the site profiles mentioned above, but note that this process involves the use of Composer. In the case of the site profiles you can install ProcessWire as usual and download or clone the site profile directory into your setup, but after that you should run "composer install" to get all the dependencies – including the Wireframe module – in place. Hard requirements for Wireframe are ProcessWire 3.0.112 and PHP 7.1+. The codebase is authored with current PHP versions in mind, and while running it on 7.0 may be possible, anything below that definitely won't work. A feature I added just today to the Wireframe module is that in case ProcessWire has write access to your site/templates/ directory, you can use the module settings screen to create the expected directories automatically. Currently that's all, and the module won't – for an example – create Controllers or layouts for you, so you should check out the site profiles for examples on these. (I'm probably going to include some additional helper features in the near future.)
      --
      This project is loosely based on an earlier project called pw-mvc, i.e. the main concepts (such as Controllers and the View layer) are very similar. That being said, Wireframe is a major upgrade in terms of both functionality and architecture: namespaces and autoloader support are now baked in, the codebase requires PHP 7, Controllers are classes extending \Wireframe\Controller (instead of regular "flat" PHP files), implementation based on a module instead of a collection of drop-in files, etc.
      While Wireframe is indeed still in a relatively early stage (0.3.0 was launched today, in case version numbers matter) for the most part I'm happy with the way it works, and likely won't change it too drastically anytime soon – so feel free to give it a try, and if you do, please let me know how it went. I will continue building upon this project, and I am also constantly working on various side projects, such as the site profiles and a few unannounced helper modules.
      I should probably add that while Wireframe is not hard to use, it is more geared towards those interested in "software development" type methodology. With future updates to the module, the site profiles, and the docs I hope to lower the learning curve, but certain level of "developer focus" will remain. Although of course the optimal outcome would be if I could use this project to lure more folks towards that end of the spectrum... 🙂
      --
      Please let me know what you think – and thanks in advance!
    • By tcnet
      PageViewStatistic for ProcessWire is a module to log page visits of the CMS. The records including some basic information like IP-address, browser, operating system, requested page and originate page. Please note that this module doesn't claim to be the best or most accurate.
      Advantages
      One of the biggest advantage is that this module doesn't require any external service like Google Analytics or similar. You don't have to modify your templates either. There is also no JavaScript or image required.
      Disadvantages
      There is only one disadvantage. This module doesn't record visits if the browser loads the page from its browser cache. To prevent the browser from loading the page from its cache, add the following meta tags to the header of your page:
      <meta http-equiv="Cache-Control" content="no-cache, no-store, must-revalidate" /> <meta http-equiv="Pragma" content="no-cache" /> <meta http-equiv="Expires" content="0" /> How to use
      The records can be accessed via the Setup-menu of the CMS backend. The first dropdown control changes the view mode. There are 4 different view modes.
      View mode "Day" shows all visits of the selected day individually with IP-address, browser, operating system, requested page and originate page. Click the update button to see new added records. View mode "Month" shows the total of all visitors per day from the first to the last day of the selected month. View mode "Year" shows the total of all visitors per month from the first to the last month of the selected year. View mode "Total" shows the total of all visitors per year for all recorded years. Please note that multiple visits from the same IP address within the selected period are counted as a single visitor.
      Settings
      You can access the module settings by clicking the Configuration button at the bottom of the records page. The settings page is also available in the menu: Modules->Configure->ProcessPageViewStat.
      IP2Location
      This module uses the IP2Location database from: http://www.ip2location.com. This database is required to obtain the country from the IP address. IP2Location updates this database at the begin of every month. The settings of ProcessPageViewStat offers the ability to automatically download the database monthly. Please note, that automatically download will not work if your webspace doesn't allow allow_url_fopen.
      Dragscroll
      This module uses DragScroll. A JavaScript available from: http://github.com/asvd/dragscroll. Dragscroll adds the ability in view mode "Day" to drag the records horizontally with the mouse pointer.
      parseUserAgentStringClass
      This module uses the PHP class parseUserAgentStringClass available from: http://www.toms-world.org/blog/parseuseragentstring/. This class is required to filter out the browser type and operating system from the server request.
      Special Feature
      PageViewStatistic for ProcessWire can record the time a visitor viewed the page. This feature is deactivated by default. To activate open the module configuration page and activate "Record view time". If activated you will find a new column "S." in the records which means the time of view in seconds. With every page request, a Javascript code is inserted directly after the <body> tag. Every time the visitor switches to another tab or closes the tab, this script reports the number of seconds the tab was visible. The initial page request is recorded only as a hyphen (-).
       
    • By MoritzLost
      This module allows you to integrate hCaptcha bot / spam protection into ProcessWire forms. hCaptcha is a great alternative to Google ReCaptcha, especially if you are in the EU and need to comply with privacy regulations.

      The development of this module is sponsored by schwarzdesign.
      The module is built as an Inputfield, allowing you to integrate it into any ProcessWire form you want. It's primarily intended for frontend forms and can be added to Form Builder forms for automatic spam protection. There's a step-by-step guide for adding the hCaptcha widget to Form Builder forms in the README, as well as instructions for API usage.
      Features
      Inputfield that displays an hCaptcha widget in ProcessWire forms. The inputfield verifies the hCaptcha response upon submission, and adds a field error if it is invalid. All hCaptcha configuration options for the widget (theme, display size etc) can be changed through the inputfield configuration, as well as programmatically. hCaptcha script options can be changed through a hook. Error messages can be translated through ProcessWire's site translations. hCaptcha secret keys and site-keys can be set for each individual inputfield or globally in your config.php. Error codes and failures are logged to help you find configuration errors. Please check the README for setup instructions.
      Links
      Github Repository and documentation InputfieldHCaptcha in the module directory Screenshots (configuration)

      Screenshots (hCaptcha widget)

       
       

       
×
×
  • Create New...