monollonom

Here’s the update @MarkE, let me know if it’s all good (looks fine on my side) and I’ll push the update on github/modules directory TagsToFolders.module.php

Ah, good point. I’d say it actually makes sense to show tagged system fields in their respective “folders” (looking back I might have picked the wrong name...) as well since it’s something you’re willingly doing, right? I’m going to add this and the option mentioned before, post the update here first so you can have a look and if it’s good this way then I’ll push the update.

@MarkE there’s this module I made some time ago https://processwire.com/modules/tags-to-folders/ with one of the latest updates being having the system fields/templates in their own submenu. I could add an option to hide them so I’m taking your question as a feature request ?

When moving out / back in the files did you make sure you moved the .htaccess (the one in the PW’s root directory) file as well? You can easily forget about it as it can be hidden by default.

It seems you tried to upload the zip file of the github repository instead of the one within it with the translations (one can see this because of the repository’s README.md file in the error). First unzip “pw-30229-lang-fr-main.zip” and then upload ”pw_3.0.229_fr.zip” in ProcessWire.

If you click on the return value "PagesNames" you can get there. As to where / how I encountered it, it was from the "Name format for children" option in the ProcessTemplate edit page:

Is it possible you have this in mind? https://processwire.com/api/ref/pages-names/page-name-from-format/

Many thanks @ryan for all your hard work and happy holidays and new year everyone!

The parent class but actually I’m seeing in ryan’s comment that it’s only necessary for “Process” modules, my bad

Last shot: could it be because you don’t call the parent’s uninstall function? See ProcessHello’s exemple https://github.com/ryancramerdesign/ProcessHello/blob/189029f494870760107d8a621dfb5a59db53959c/ProcessHello.module.php#L227C69-L227C69

Or maybe it does? "get" does install and initialize the module, if available https://processwire.com/api/ref/modules/get/ Is it possible a visit occured right after you tried to uninstall?

I just came accross this feature request on Kirby: https://kirby.nolt.io/20. No real observation / comment but it’s just funny to see how PW and Kirby are opposite in approaches but still look to reach each other’s end

Also, have you tried using https://processwire.com/modules/tags-to-folders/ ?

It’s actually on the current master version (3.0.229) though the fix for svg files mentionned in the issue as well is only on the dev one

@Robin S brought up this issue not so long ago and it’s been fixed since. So yes it does pull from the database directly, see https://github.com/processwire/processwire-issues/issues/1812

Personally I don’t really see how setting something like this would entice the community to contribute more than making a pull request to a module’s repository to share your translation in your language (https://processwire.com/blog/posts/pw-3.0.181-hello/). I’m mostly working on english websites (or for people who are ok with an english admin) but if one day I’m required to use french and I need to translate some modules then I’d happily share my work this way. And if you need a shortcut, you can always give a shot at @FireWire ’s excellent Fluency translation module ?

I’ve never worked with panels (just yet) but from what I’m seeing if you have a view ready in your Process module, say “__executeSomething()”, isn’t it just a matter of having a link pointing to that view? <a href="/something/" class="pw-panel">Open in panel</a>

Hi all, Here is one of the latest website we created for a french company renting construction machines and trucks with specialized drivers, based in Le Mans. It’s a rather simple showcase/informational website, but we aimed at making clear (and visually attractive) what is available, what is the skillset and various ways to quickly get in touch. We produced everything, from the design, pictures, illustrations down to the development (ofc). There wasn’t any website before except for social media presence and this task was a follow-up to the update of the visual identity we did. Behind the scene, on the front-end, everything is custom made: we don’t use any frameworks. On the back-end we used the usual suspects and some: TracyDebugger ❤️ FormBuilder ProCache ProFields (RepeaterMatrix, Table) Dynamic options / Select images Our own flavor of “components” Thanks for having a look!

Shouldn’t you write <pw-region id="mainhead" instead of <div id="mainhead" in your code?

Hey! PageMjmlToHtml author here ? @BitPoet wouldn't it be best if instead of having to opt-out templates the js script was only added when the multiplier fields are added? Not tested but maybe you could put the Page::render hook inside of addMultipliedFieldsToProcessor?

The latest: ProFields Table 0.2.5 on PW master 3.0.229 I did a minimal setup to try it out with one template containing: - a Table field (1) - a FieldsetPage field with Table (2) - a Repeater field with Table (3) On first try there is a js error when clicking on "Add new" but this can be fixed by editing the InputfieldTable.js file on line 193: if(href && href.indexOf('#') === 0) { // check if href exists (pinging @ryan so he can see this) When adding a new row on (1) and (2), the Fluency button is there but is not responding to click. When creating a repeater item (3) and then adding a row there is no Fluency button. Save the page and Fluency will now work on (1) and (2) on the saved row (still not on new ones) and (3) is not working at all. Hope this helps!

I’m not sure I see the option for the button styles but I’m on version 0.9.1 so maybe that’s why? Should I try the dev version?

Hi @FireWire, I need to test it further but I’m posting here first just in case. Is the module supposed to work for any multi-lang text inputs? I seem to have an issue with the Profield Table, but I don’t know if you’re using it or not...? Here are three issues I noticed: - it makes InputfieldTable’s js crash at some point because of a missing href. I added a quick fix in the module’s js but then... - the "Translate" button doesn’t do anything - and it seems to not detect / initiate the InputfieldTable when inside a Repeater. Let me know if you need more infos

Okay I have to try it out but this is absolutely fantastic and something I wanted to tackle myself for a while now, working on websites with a lot of images. Thanks for sharing this!

@BrendonKoz here is a screenshot and screencast showing what gorny’s setup is (at least how I understood it): And here is what I’m suggesting / what I’m doing in such situation: Here the sum of the fields’ width is 100%