dotnetic

I think a button to prefix the topic's title with either [open], [solved], [closed], etc... would be a good idea and helps this forum becoming much more cleaner/organized. Right now I am writing in many posts which seem to be solved, that the OP should add a [solved] tag to his post, so it is easier for other users to see if they can find a solution there or if an answer is still needed. The voting feature should just show the number of upvotes and indicate what answers most users think are useful. It is not neccessary to highlight these upvoted answers and it would cause visual distraction when reading through the comments/answers. The flow and sorting of the conversation should not be changed. The OP should have a button to mark an answer as his "accepted answer" or "best answer". This answer should be highlighted or there should be a link directly beneath the initial question to this answer.

@Pete I created an online test version of the actual forum, and the user can choose if he wants to sort by date or by votes. So the upvoted answer is not pulled out of context. I did not try to mark one answer as correct yet, will do later. If you want, I can give you the admin account and URL so you can test for yourself. There is an option in the admin to set the default sort order, but as I logged in as a normal user, it seemed to not respect this order and I had to choose "Sort by date" by myself. Maybe I did something wrong. Have to take a look at it.

I know that there is not only ONE answer to a question. Maybe we have to not see this feature as a "This is the answer" but instead as an "This is an useful answer". StackOverflow was my reference also, because you can upvote multiple answers. Users would know that upvoted answers would/could work. I don't know much about the setup of the forum software, if you can enable the voting function for specific threads or not. Even if not, I do not see why support threads for example should not have an upvote option for useful answers, because of what I mentioned before. I really think, that upvoting answers would help everybody, because most times you (me) are searching for a solution in the forum/thread for hours and find many different solutions, try them out after once, and maybe one solution works. But you have to scan through the whole thread to get the correct one. There also is much bulk/clutter between the question and the answer, which may be a little bit off-topic, asks new questions or something else. I think everybody of us, had this problem more than once, right?

@kongondo What where the problems? Why didn't it work? @horst is right, that it would not make sense for support threads. But many threads here are questions, which have an answer or more answers. For these threads, this feature would be useful. Maybe the type of the subforum can be defined, if it is a forum with voting option, or not, but I don't know.

@Pete I saw on the Invision Community features page, that this forum should have support for questions & answers. Quote: Question & Answer forums enable users to upvote the best questions and highlight the best reply to give better visibility. There are so many post with solutions and also dead posts; marking answers as best or solved would help us all to find working solutions quickly. It also would help to keep the forum clean. Can the PW forums be upgraded or switched to this type of forum?

Yes I also have this problem. Windows 10 latest Chrome (70) and versions before that.

Did you find a solution by yourself? If not take a look at If this resolves your question, then I would like to request adding a [SOLVED] to the title of this thread. This helps others who are looking for working solutions and if an answer is still needed or not. Thank you ?

@mntob I would like to request adding a [SOLVED] to the title of this thread. This helps others who are looking for working solutions and if an answer is still needed or not. Thank you ?

@apeisa @ryan As soon as I installed IftRunner (such a great module), in my ListerPro actions tab a new option "when should the actions run" appeared. When are the actions executed if I choose "later"? Could not find any information about this. Thank you in advance for your answer.

@pwired EU GDPR only does apply if you process personal data of EU citizens. As long as the statistics are anonymous, the GDPR is not in effect.

@szabesz I understand your point, but think we don't have to worry about this. Because CKE4 Bug fixes and browser support - provided until January 2020. Security bug fixes and an extended SLA support - provided until January 2023. See https://support.ckeditor.com/hc/en-us/articles/115005281629-How-long-will-CKEditor-4-be-supported-

@szabesz I don't see any advantages of using or integrating Jodit. If you take it as an alternative you have to develop some plugins for images and links first, as they have to be modified to work together with ProcessWire (think links to existing pages in PW) or inserting images from an image field. It is also possible with CKE4 to insert HTML snippets/templates.

I would LOVE to see something like Gutenberg inside of PW. I think I remember there was a post about integrating it somewhere here in the forums. A drag 'n drop "Page Builder" or "Content Builder" was often requested here and most solutions that excist at the moment (including Repeater Matrix), are suboptimal in my eyes, but they get the job done, which is fine. I also love the editor from Dropbox Paper. A solution like this could be a huge step forward for ProcessWire. I think the approach of building Content/Structure instead of HTML (like CKEditor 5 does) is a good one, and it would eliminate many errors that are being made by users that have too much options in content editor fields (CKEditor, TinyMCE). But now CKE5 it is too restrictive, because many options mentioned before are missing. If we are using a content builder and the content would be stored not as HTML but in a structured array like bard does it, we would have a convenient way to edit and add content and still can control how the content is displayed on the frontend.

Hey @LAPS from my experience I can say that you would better go with @bernhards RockPDF. WirePDF and the included mPDF are outdated and don't work with PHP >= 7. RockPDF uses the latest version of mPDF and also provides a debugging feature. However, I also updated mPDF in wirePDF and made the module itself compatible with the new settings but then switched to RockPDF. Eventually I will make a PR on the github repo.

// in your department.php template file foreach($page->child('name=meet')->children() as $person) { echo "<li><a href='$person->url'>$person->title</a></li>"; }

@OLSA Thanks for your insights. After reading many github comments and parts of the documentation and also trying out different things, I want to summarize some conclusions: CKEditor is not an HTML editor. It is a content editor and HTML is just one of the possible outputs. (From the lead developer) CKEditor 4 uses the DOM as a model. When loading data, the HTML is processed (read – filtered, normalized and escaped) but it ends up in the DOM anyway. CKEditor 5 has a custom data model. When you load HTML into the editor, it's parsed and then features (initialized previously in the editor) try to pick up from this HTML the pieces they understand. This is called "conversion". As a result of a conversion, the content is being loaded into the custom data structure. The reverse process is executed when content needs to be rendered back to the DOM (either for editing or for data retrieval). Read the complete comment here https://github.com/ckeditor/ckeditor5/issues/592#issuecomment-335108129 There is no no "View source" button to edit the HTML output directly, because you are not working with HTML, but a custom data model instead. There is no option to insert custom tags or javascripts in the content. Or we have to use placeholders and replace them. Or someone writes plugins for them. Custom attributes like data-something on elements are not implemented atm but you could write a plugin to extend this feature. CKEditor 5 is not meant as a replacement or upgrade of CKeditor 4. There may be content loss if you try to use existing content produced by CKE4 in CKE5. Read https://github.com/ckeditor/ckeditor5/issues/592#issuecomment-399361490 Table Plugin is very basic. No option to add a class to the table or specific rows/cells ? No target attribute on hyperlinks, like OLSA said. You can not add classes to elements like paragraphs, or words, etc. You could develop a plugin for this, but this has to be done for every element as far as I understood. My conclusion is, that CKeditor 5 may not be the best option for most of us. I will close the feature-request on github with a reference to this comment.

@Zeka I would like to request adding a [SOLVED] to the title of this thread. This helps others who are looking for working solutions.

@joer80 @marcura The problem with the missing images can be fixed if you use the path instead of the URL $page->getUnformatted($fieldName)->first()->filename This is also working when you use pageFileSecure setting in config.php for protected files. Sadly when using the path instead of the URL, the image can not be shown in the webbrowser, but is available in the PDF.

It seems that you have $config->pagefileSecure = true; $config->pagefileSecurePathPrefix = '-'; in your config, is that correct? I had the same and to fix it you have to use the disk-filepath instead of an URL because the URL is protected via .htaccess. So I used $page->getUnformatted($fieldName)->first()->filename instead. Sorry, I did not read your comment correctly. If you use images in a textarea I think you could replace the relative image url with a textformatter.

@adrian Yes, this module works flawless, and I had an error in my own hook, so there IS a way to hide the "page" navigation item already. Don't know, why it worked before, and now it did not. Also I don't know why I did not tried this module, because I was aware of it. However, I still think my pull-request is a valid option, for changing the navigation.

@adrian Thank you for the latest additions and your continous great work on this essential module. I can't wait for the API explorer panel. This is great and would save me a lot of time going to ProcessWires API reference page and look for what I am searching. One thing that would be extremely useful would be a find-as-you-type-filter, to find what you are looking for quickly, similar to AdminOnSteroids filter function for AdminDataTables or modules.

Please read my comment about a proposal change for what is rendered in the navigation

Please read my comment about a proposal change for what is rendered in the navigation

It seems all solutions, including my own one from here don't work with AdminThemeUikit. So I proposed a change to the getPrimaryNavArray function which you can read on github and enables us to hide the "pages" menu item from the top navigation. Vote for it, if you like. EDIT: Actually, there is a working module from @netcarver - http://modules.processwire.com/modules/admin-restrict-page-tree/ My own function had an error and now I replaced it with the mentioned module. @bernhard Maybe this interesting for you also?!

@ryan It is an idea to implement anonymous installation statistics into the core. A user can choose if he wants them activated or not (think data protection). With this approach there would be an overview of how many sites approx. use ProcessWire. But it's up to Ryan how important this feature would be.