dotnetic

@Macrura I tried to make a folder structure, but it does not work. First I created the page "Dokumentation" which has the process "ProcessList" assigned, as you wrote. And it has two children with the template "documentation". The menu item "Dokumentation" appears (I am using AdminThemeUikit), but when I click on it, I am redirected to a page that says: "The process returned no content." So what did I do wrong? Maybe you can describe the exact steps to be taken, to get a folder structure documentation. Another question: Is it possible to render the page in a panel instead of redirecting?

After watching for a couple of minutes, return to this page and watch how it moves ?

Upgrade then ?

@franciccio-ITALIANO Yes, VEX can be used on the frontend. Please read section "Including in your project" at https://github.hubspot.com/vex/ Integrate the code into your frontend template/s where you need it.

Should be added to the modules directory

Thats the same what I said in multiple posts here. You don't have to see the words "best answer" anywhere. Some other Q&A style forums use the words "Accepted answer". I would not like a list of "solutions" under the first post, because there could be many (think Support forums), and the "solutions" could be evolved through further discussion, that might be different to the initial question. A button/link "Most useful or upvoted replies" would be difficult to implement, because it makes no sense in support forums, and even for Q&A style forums, the list could be long, and what would be displayed? The last x replies with the most votes? Please note that I use the word reply instead of answer now. Because not all replies are answers. I think that changing the wording and thinking of replies instead of answer/s helps a lot in this discussion. Yeah, thats why the poster can decide which is his preferred "accepted or most useful reply". We have to disctint between two types of forums: Q&A and support forums. In the support forums the OP would not mark a reply as "accepted reply" because it was no question he had asked. I hope that makes sense because you have to think a little different to how the forum software works right now. One problem is, that if you change all forums to Q&A style the flow of the conversation is ruined as @Pete stated. Maybe there could be a plugin for keeping the sort order chronologically, without pulling the most upvoted or accepted reply out of the flow? The other problem is that in normal forums we can not up- or downvote replies.

Adminer in Tracy. Wonderful. Thank you very much @adrian

Expose the actual user and his role/s through the ProcessWire.config object so we can use them in JavaScript to trigger actions just for specific users or roles in the admin (frontend would be nice too). Right now the actual user and roles are assigned as a classname to the body element (user-username) Why would the enhancement be useful to users? I think this could be useful for many use cases like my request #236 or for AdminOnSteroids, because we can select which scripts are executed for which role or user. @tpr You can vote here for my request https://github.com/processwire/processwire-requests/issues/241

Yes, that would be a good idea.

I think a button to prefix the topic's title with either [open], [solved], [closed], etc... would be a good idea and helps this forum becoming much more cleaner/organized. Right now I am writing in many posts which seem to be solved, that the OP should add a [solved] tag to his post, so it is easier for other users to see if they can find a solution there or if an answer is still needed. The voting feature should just show the number of upvotes and indicate what answers most users think are useful. It is not neccessary to highlight these upvoted answers and it would cause visual distraction when reading through the comments/answers. The flow and sorting of the conversation should not be changed. The OP should have a button to mark an answer as his "accepted answer" or "best answer". This answer should be highlighted or there should be a link directly beneath the initial question to this answer.

@Pete I created an online test version of the actual forum, and the user can choose if he wants to sort by date or by votes. So the upvoted answer is not pulled out of context. I did not try to mark one answer as correct yet, will do later. If you want, I can give you the admin account and URL so you can test for yourself. There is an option in the admin to set the default sort order, but as I logged in as a normal user, it seemed to not respect this order and I had to choose "Sort by date" by myself. Maybe I did something wrong. Have to take a look at it.

I know that there is not only ONE answer to a question. Maybe we have to not see this feature as a "This is the answer" but instead as an "This is an useful answer". StackOverflow was my reference also, because you can upvote multiple answers. Users would know that upvoted answers would/could work. I don't know much about the setup of the forum software, if you can enable the voting function for specific threads or not. Even if not, I do not see why support threads for example should not have an upvote option for useful answers, because of what I mentioned before. I really think, that upvoting answers would help everybody, because most times you (me) are searching for a solution in the forum/thread for hours and find many different solutions, try them out after once, and maybe one solution works. But you have to scan through the whole thread to get the correct one. There also is much bulk/clutter between the question and the answer, which may be a little bit off-topic, asks new questions or something else. I think everybody of us, had this problem more than once, right?

@kongondo What where the problems? Why didn't it work? @horst is right, that it would not make sense for support threads. But many threads here are questions, which have an answer or more answers. For these threads, this feature would be useful. Maybe the type of the subforum can be defined, if it is a forum with voting option, or not, but I don't know.

@Pete I saw on the Invision Community features page, that this forum should have support for questions & answers. Quote: Question & Answer forums enable users to upvote the best questions and highlight the best reply to give better visibility. There are so many post with solutions and also dead posts; marking answers as best or solved would help us all to find working solutions quickly. It also would help to keep the forum clean. Can the PW forums be upgraded or switched to this type of forum?

Yes I also have this problem. Windows 10 latest Chrome (70) and versions before that.

Did you find a solution by yourself? If not take a look at If this resolves your question, then I would like to request adding a [SOLVED] to the title of this thread. This helps others who are looking for working solutions and if an answer is still needed or not. Thank you ?

@mntob I would like to request adding a [SOLVED] to the title of this thread. This helps others who are looking for working solutions and if an answer is still needed or not. Thank you ?

@apeisa @ryan As soon as I installed IftRunner (such a great module), in my ListerPro actions tab a new option "when should the actions run" appeared. When are the actions executed if I choose "later"? Could not find any information about this. Thank you in advance for your answer.

@pwired EU GDPR only does apply if you process personal data of EU citizens. As long as the statistics are anonymous, the GDPR is not in effect.

@szabesz I understand your point, but think we don't have to worry about this. Because CKE4 Bug fixes and browser support - provided until January 2020. Security bug fixes and an extended SLA support - provided until January 2023. See https://support.ckeditor.com/hc/en-us/articles/115005281629-How-long-will-CKEditor-4-be-supported-

@szabesz I don't see any advantages of using or integrating Jodit. If you take it as an alternative you have to develop some plugins for images and links first, as they have to be modified to work together with ProcessWire (think links to existing pages in PW) or inserting images from an image field. It is also possible with CKE4 to insert HTML snippets/templates.

I would LOVE to see something like Gutenberg inside of PW. I think I remember there was a post about integrating it somewhere here in the forums. A drag 'n drop "Page Builder" or "Content Builder" was often requested here and most solutions that excist at the moment (including Repeater Matrix), are suboptimal in my eyes, but they get the job done, which is fine. I also love the editor from Dropbox Paper. A solution like this could be a huge step forward for ProcessWire. I think the approach of building Content/Structure instead of HTML (like CKEditor 5 does) is a good one, and it would eliminate many errors that are being made by users that have too much options in content editor fields (CKEditor, TinyMCE). But now CKE5 it is too restrictive, because many options mentioned before are missing. If we are using a content builder and the content would be stored not as HTML but in a structured array like bard does it, we would have a convenient way to edit and add content and still can control how the content is displayed on the frontend.

Hey @LAPS from my experience I can say that you would better go with @bernhards RockPDF. WirePDF and the included mPDF are outdated and don't work with PHP >= 7. RockPDF uses the latest version of mPDF and also provides a debugging feature. However, I also updated mPDF in wirePDF and made the module itself compatible with the new settings but then switched to RockPDF. Eventually I will make a PR on the github repo.

// in your department.php template file foreach($page->child('name=meet')->children() as $person) { echo "<li><a href='$person->url'>$person->title</a></li>"; }

@OLSA Thanks for your insights. After reading many github comments and parts of the documentation and also trying out different things, I want to summarize some conclusions: CKEditor is not an HTML editor. It is a content editor and HTML is just one of the possible outputs. (From the lead developer) CKEditor 4 uses the DOM as a model. When loading data, the HTML is processed (read – filtered, normalized and escaped) but it ends up in the DOM anyway. CKEditor 5 has a custom data model. When you load HTML into the editor, it's parsed and then features (initialized previously in the editor) try to pick up from this HTML the pieces they understand. This is called "conversion". As a result of a conversion, the content is being loaded into the custom data structure. The reverse process is executed when content needs to be rendered back to the DOM (either for editing or for data retrieval). Read the complete comment here https://github.com/ckeditor/ckeditor5/issues/592#issuecomment-335108129 There is no no "View source" button to edit the HTML output directly, because you are not working with HTML, but a custom data model instead. There is no option to insert custom tags or javascripts in the content. Or we have to use placeholders and replace them. Or someone writes plugins for them. Custom attributes like data-something on elements are not implemented atm but you could write a plugin to extend this feature. CKEditor 5 is not meant as a replacement or upgrade of CKeditor 4. There may be content loss if you try to use existing content produced by CKE4 in CKE5. Read https://github.com/ckeditor/ckeditor5/issues/592#issuecomment-399361490 Table Plugin is very basic. No option to add a class to the table or specific rows/cells ? No target attribute on hyperlinks, like OLSA said. You can not add classes to elements like paragraphs, or words, etc. You could develop a plugin for this, but this has to be done for every element as far as I understood. My conclusion is, that CKeditor 5 may not be the best option for most of us. I will close the feature-request on github with a reference to this comment.