Leaderboard

ProcessPromptManager is a ProcessWire admin module for generating site-aware prompt exports for external AI agents. It allows an administrator to select a template, define which fields an agent should populate, add instructions, and export a zip containing a markdown prompt and JSON field definitions. The module does not handle authentication or integration. It provides a controlled starting point for accepting structured input from external agents. Never include credentials or sensitive data in prompts. Module info: https://github.com/clipmagic/ProcessPromptManager/

Shocking stuff. Perhaps a good title would be Another great reason not to use WordPress. 🙂 In PW world, how many of us run Module updates through any audit before installing?

Enables AI coding agents to access ProcessWire’s API. Also provides a content migration system. This module provides a way for Claude Code (or other AI helpers) to have full access to the ProcessWire API via a command-line interface (CLI). Once connected to your site, you can ask Claude to create and modify pages, templates and fields, or do anything that can be done with the ProcessWire API. It's even possible for an entire site to be managed by Claude without the need for ProcessWire's admin control panel, though we're not suggesting that just yet. While working with Claude Code, I asked what would be helpful for them in working with ProcessWire, and this module is the result. Claude needed a way to quickly access the ProcessWire API from the command line, and this module provides 3 distinct ways for Claude to do so. Claude collaborated with me on the development of the AgentTools module, and the accompanying ProcessAgentTools module was developed entirely by Claude Code. Admittedly, a big part of the purpose of this module is also to help me learn AI-assisted development, as I'm still quite new to it, but learning quickly. This module aims to add several agent tools over time, but this first version is also somewhat of a proof of concept. Its first feature is basic migrations system, described further in this document. Please note that this module should be considered very much in 'beta test' at this stage. If you do use it in production (such as the migrations feature) always test locally and have backups of everything that can be restored easily. While I've not run into any cases where I had to restore anything, just the nature of the module means that you should use extra caution. Continue reading in the GitHub README Agent Tools in the modules directory

Export your ProcessWire site structure as comprehensive, AI-optimized documentation for ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot, and other AI coding assistants. What It Does Context automatically generates complete documentation of your ProcessWire site in formats specifically optimized for working with AI: 📊 Site Structure Complete page hierarchy exported as JSON, TOON, and ASCII tree Shows all relationships, templates, URLs, and metadata Smart collapsing for large page lists 📋 Templates & Fields All template definitions with complete field configurations Field types, options, requirements, default values Special handling for Repeater, Matrix, Table fields 📦 Content Samples Real page examples exported for each template Shows actual data formats and field usage Helps AI understand your content patterns 💾 Code Snippets Customized selector patterns for your site type Helper functions and utility code API implementation examples 🤖 AI Prompts Ready-to-use project context file Template creation prompts Debugging assistance prompts Session continuity templates 🖥️ CLI Commands Export from command line for AI agents Query templates, fields, and pages directly Perfect for Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf integration Dual Format Export (The Game Changer!) Context exports in two formats simultaneously: JSON Format Standard format for development tools, APIs, and compatibility TOON Format (AI-Optimized) ✨ Token-Oriented Object Notation designed specifically for AI prompts: 30-60% fewer tokens than JSON Significantly reduces API costs Same data, more compact representation No external dependencies - pure PHP Real Savings Example For a typical ProcessWire site with 50 templates: structure.json (15,000 tokens) → structure.toon (8,500 tokens) = 43% savings templates.json (8,000 tokens) → templates.toon (4,000 tokens) = 50% savings samples/*.json (12,000 tokens) → samples/*.toon (6,500 tokens) = 46% savings Cost Impact (Claude Sonnet pricing): JSON export: $0.105 per AI interaction TOON export: $0.057 per AI interaction Save ~$5/month if you use AI assistants 100 times/month Installation cd /site/modules/ git clone https://github.com/mxmsmnv/Context.git Then in admin: Modules → Refresh → Install Or download from ProcessWire Modules Directory Quick Start Web Interface Setup → Modules → Context → Configure Choose your site type (Blog, E-commerce, Business, Catalog, Generic) ✅ Enable "Export TOON Format" (recommended for AI work!) Enable optional features: ✅ Export Content Samples ✅ Create Code Snippets ✅ Create AI Prompts ✅ Generate SKILL.md for AI Agents Click "Export Context for AI" Files appear in /site/assets/cache/context/ CLI Interface # Full export php index.php --context-export # Export TOON format only (fastest, smallest) php index.php --context-export --toon-only # Query specific data php index.php --context-query templates php index.php --context-query fields php index.php --context-query pages "template=product, limit=10" # Quick stats php index.php --context-stats # Help php index.php --context-help Perfect for AI coding agents like Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf! Generated Files /site/assets/cache/context/ ├── README.md # Complete documentation ├── SKILL.md # AI agent skill definition ├── structure.json / .toon # Page hierarchy ├── structure.txt # ASCII tree ├── templates.json / .toon # All templates & fields ├── templates.csv # Templates in CSV ├── tree.json / .toon # Combined structure ├── config.json / .toon # Site configuration ├── modules.json / .toon # Installed modules ├── classes.json / .toon # Custom Page classes │ ├── samples/ # Real content examples │ ├── product-samples.json │ └── product-samples.toon # 46% smaller! │ ├── snippets/ # Code patterns │ ├── selectors.php # Customized for your site type │ ├── helpers.php # Utility functions │ └── api-examples.php # REST API examples │ └── prompts/ # AI instructions ├── project-context.md # Complete project overview ├── create-template.md # Template creation guide ├── create-api.md # API creation guide ├── debug-issue.md # Debugging helper └── project-summary.md # Session continuity template Using with AI Assistants Web Interface Upload Upload TOON files to save tokens and costs: 📎 structure.toon 📎 templates.toon 📎 prompts/project-context.md Then ask your AI assistant: "Help me create a blog post template with title, body, author, categories, and featured image. Follow the existing patterns from templates.toon" AI Coding Agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf) 1. Tell your agent to read the docs: Read /site/modules/Context/AGENTS.md 2. Agent can now export context: php index.php --context-export --toon-only 3. Agent queries specific data: php index.php --context-query templates 4. Agent reads exported files: Read SKILL.md, then structure.toon and templates.toon The AI has complete context of your site and can generate code that follows your exact patterns! Site Type Customization Code snippets automatically adapt to your site type: Blog / News / Magazine Post listings, author archives, category filtering Recent posts, popular content, related articles E-commerce / Online Store Product listings, cart logic, order processing Inventory management, payment integration Business / Portfolio / Agency Service pages, team members, case studies Testimonials, project galleries Catalog / Directory / Listings Brand hierarchies, category filters Advanced search, sorting, pagination Generic / Mixed Content General purpose patterns for any site type Features Overview Always Exported (Core) ✅ Complete page tree structure ✅ All templates with field definitions ✅ Site configuration and settings ✅ Installed modules list ✅ Custom Page classes ✅ README with complete documentation ✅ SKILL.md for AI agents Optional (Configurable) ⚙️ Content samples (1-10 per template) ⚙️ API JSON schemas ⚙️ URL routing structure ⚙️ Performance metrics ⚙️ Code snippets library ⚙️ AI prompt templates ⚙️ Field definitions metadata Advanced Settings Auto-update on template/field changes Custom export path (supports absolute paths) Maximum tree depth (3-20 levels) JSON children limit (prevent huge files) Compact mode for large lists Custom AI instructions CSS framework detection (or manual override) Why TOON Format? TOON is specifically designed for AI prompts. Here's the difference: JSON (verbose): { "products": [ {"id": 1, "title": "Dark Chocolate", "price": 12.99}, {"id": 2, "title": "Milk Chocolate", "price": 9.99} ] } TOON (compact): products[2]{id,title,price}: 1,Dark Chocolate,12.99 2,Milk Chocolate,9.99 Same data, 50% fewer tokens! Use Cases 🤖 AI-Assisted Development Upload your site context to Claude/ChatGPT and get code that follows your exact patterns 🤖 AI Coding Agents Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf can export and query your site via CLI 📚 Developer Onboarding New team members get complete site documentation instantly 🔄 Site Migration Export complete site structure for documentation or migration planning 📖 Code Standards Maintain consistency across your team with AI that knows your patterns 💰 Cost Optimization Reduce AI API costs by 30-60% with TOON format 🔁 Session Continuity Maintain context between AI coding sessions with project-summary.md API Variable In your ProcessWire code: // Get Context module instance $context = wire('context'); // Programmatic export $context->executeExport(); // Get export path $path = $context->getContextPath(); Links GitHub: https://github.com/mxmsmnv/Context TOON Format Spec: https://toonformat.dev Screenshots Example Workflow Export your site Click one button or run php index.php --context-export Upload to AI Upload .toon files to Claude/ChatGPT for maximum efficiency Build features faster AI knows your exact site structure, templates, and patterns Save money Use 30-60% fewer tokens on every AI interaction Perfect for ProcessWire developers who use AI coding assistants! The TOON format support makes it significantly more cost-effective to work with Claude, ChatGPT, and similar tools. Now with CLI support for seamless AI agent integration! Questions? Suggestions? Let me know! 🚀

https://github.com/clipmagic/ProcessPromptManager @psy Thanx for sharing!

https://anchor.host/someone-bought-30-wordpress-plugins-and-planted-a-backdoor-in-all-of-them/ Without any ill intent, this comes across to me as sounding like promotion for ProcessWire.

@Soma Welcome back!

I was just thinking this when @Soma reappeared. I've been using MSN too on every project I've ever created and never had an issue with it.

@Soma So happy to see you back in the PW forums 🙂 Have been using your MarkupSimpleNavigation module for years without a problem, until well on current project. Timely! Problem was that current pages were not always being recognised as such. Fix was in function _renderTree line 211 - change: //$is_current = $child === $page; $is_current = ((int) $child->id === (int) $page->id); Credit to you that MuSNav has been solid for so long. Cheers psy

💯! I couidn't have said it any better - and said similar things in the past. At least 95% of my clients don't care about what is used to achieve their goals. They need tools that work, are easy to use, have a low barrier to onboard new editors to maintain content or data. Quite a lot of times, yes. I migrated a bunch of Wordpress, Typo3, Joomla projects over to ProcessWire and everyone was happy with the result. The moment you have to deal with lots or tons of data ProcessWire beats everything. This already starts with simple things like events (parties, concerts, those kind of events) and you take care of archiving old events. 🤯 Try this with WordPress. Try to automate things. It's super easy in ProcessWire. Remove daily maintenance tasks from your clients schedule - use this as a selling point - and they will understand. Depending on how big the project/budget was I either [a] showed them the most critical details about ProcessWire, like Security, API, Backend, Templates, Multilanguage, Access Rights/Roles. Everything is in the core, no additional modules/plugins needed. [b] built a MVP of the project, showcased automation, user management, access rights/roles, and let them (or those that would have to do so in the future) add/edit/delete content and data. BUT... When my only part in a project is implementing the design, build out templates, components, blocks - everything frontend - I don't care what they use later on as CMS. [Side note] Don't get me wrong about the overall topic. I think the new design/website could profit from some tweaks and iterations. I'd love to see more content and examples towards developers. Not only the basic API things, but how easy it is to work with it. Even when you are totally new to it.

I don't want to be too blunt and I can't speak for anyone else, but I've never referred a client to a software or service website as part of the education process. It doesn't do anything for them. You are the expert. The person making the pitch should be able to fully explain the technology stack to the extent that the conversation requires it in language they can understand because we are the interpreters. Clients trust me because I am the expert and the top 3 things they care about are these, in this order: How much is this going to cost me? Why don't we use xxx? (or, our current site is xxx I'm not sure we want to switch) When is it going to be done? Sending a client to any site for tools or software is like saying "here, do your own research". The ProcessWire site, like any other development tools/software sites, isn't there to woo clients. Most clients don't care enough to take time and truly understand it because that's not their job. If a curious client is in a position to go to websites like ProcessWire, several steps have been skipped in the client discovery/planning process IMHO. I'd even go so far as to say that if a site has "Docs" or "Documentation" in the primary nav, it's not for clients and they shouldn't be there. I hope this isn't a too hot a take... I would say that improvements could be made iteratively with more use of color for contrast, emphasis, and indicating priority. I think it's a flexible design that can evolve in whatever capacity that may be needed. This has the ability to highlight some impressive facts and figures. No notes on the content, some elements could be integrated into the current design. Even then, facts and figures are for devs. I used the word "scalability" with a manager once and they stopped the conversation to ask "wait, what does that mean?" and still didn't care when I explained. A a CMS or framework site is never going to lead to clients translating what's on the page to time or money. In all likelihood, the conversation you are having with a client at 10:00 just followed a call with their product distributor at 8:00am, their accountant at 9:00, and at 11:00 they're meeting with other members in management. Personally, I would no sooner send someone to processwire.com than I would laravel.com. You are the time and money. I agree with this. I will go out on a limb and say the number of end customers who went to the Drupal site and left thinking they need a Drupal site isn't zero, but it's probably close. If someone is hiring a Drupal developer then they're in a role where it's part of their job to understand the tech stack even if they aren't a dev. Visiting wordpress.com, it doesn't target the end user but name recognition still draws business which overcomes the website entirely. This is fair. It doesn't take a monitor that computer professionals use to get this experience. All you need is a consumer iMac. I think iteration can address concerns. I don't want to belabor the point, but to be fair, did you ever send a client to the QuarkXpress website... Just a little joke ☺️ Cheers from a fellow old school developer who built their first website in 1997 and tinkered with QuarkXpress 🍻

I don't disagree with that. Design is very subjective. While I don't understand why the headline is so massive (on a 4K screen), why texts are not aligned (see screenshot), and I don't like the boxes with the shadows and the box that has the "ProcessWire weekly" signup, I still understand that it's professionally made. The main point is that the content is IMO written more towards developers and less towards companies that have to choose a CMS for their next project. I made a quick AI mockup of how I think it could be improved, highlighting the value for the business and developers, that with PW everything takes less time. And time is money.

I burnt some credits on Seedream v4. (BTW, Our grandchildren will surely ask us: Grandma, Grandpa, is it true that your image generators were so stupid back in your day?)