All Activity

The module is installed and running. Will report back on statistical findings after letting it run for about a week. The upgrade folder replacement went fine and did take up the settings from the database, so I didn't have to merge anything. The version info from the prior version is still reporting as the most up-to-date in ProcessWire Upgrade though (so searching for new versions won't show this version as available). Since I didn't get the column header in the cropped photo below, the 0.0.4 is currently installed, 0.0.2 is latest version (as reported).

This week we've got several updates to the core on the dev branch. It's primarily focused on small issue fixes and optimizations. Though there's enough since 3.0.251 that I'm bumping the dev branch version to 3.0.252. Next week there won't be any new updates this time next week because I'll be traveling, but will be back right working on the core right after that. Thanks for reading and have a great weekend!

No, neither nor. It only happens when I use them inside a combo and only when with TinyMCE.

Hi, I am working for a small-to-medium business and we have hundreds of websites out there and with a considerable percentage of those, we have a service contract set up. We're coming from WordPress and we did the switch to PW in 2021. So, still today, the majority of our long-running service contracts are about WordPress sites, trending down fast though. We're offering our clients a few things in our service contracts: Basic guarantee that their website will run and continue to run in an ever-changing environment of servers and technologies. A predefined amount of free hours to work on the website, which even includes minor design changes, adjustments and even small new features. Bigger undertakings require a new project contract though. Reduced hourly rates for work on the website if the hours go over the amount predefined in 2, using the same conditions as in 2. I have to say though that we have a LOT of clients who simply DO NOT WANT to edit their own site but have us do it for them. That's why for them, especially the second and third point above is a big plus and is also the main reason we're designing our service contracts like this. For WordPress sites, point 1 consists of updates, backups and health checks which we do in regular intervals spread out across the whole year. For ProcessWire, it's just backups and health checks and thus on average lower predefined hours in 2.

@Robin S I didn't intend for it to require PHP 8. I mistakenly was thinking str_contains and str_starts_with came in PHP 7.x. I've updated the download so that it replaces those function usages with strpos().

Worth a read! "The lesson here is to never mix manually constructed SQL fragments and bindings when using PDO emulation. You are opening yourself up to a huge risk by doing so as a single misparse results in SQL injection. If you are a developer: Disable PDO::ATTR_EMULATE_PREPARES if possible; If not, ensure you are on the latest version (PHP 8.4) and you do not allow null bytes in your queries." https://slcyber.io/assetnote-security-research-center/a-novel-technique-for-sql-injection-in-pdos-prepared-statements/

Hi, I've noticed that the base url in the OpenApi document is wrong with this configuration, e.g. "<domain>/testeapi/testeapi/api" instead of "<domain>/testeapi/api"

Dev directory issues are still on me sorry - I'll point it to a different page for now but I do still plan to get it rebuilt (as I have done for years - again my bad). It keeps falling foul of the classic "too much to do" but will get a temp page on the PW site signposting folks elsewhere for now I think.

I would not say a "rollback" is desirable, it is just that the new theme needs some more work because it is rough around the edges. Eg. when selecting pages in a Lister, the "label" showing the number of selections makes the list jump, which is bad UX but can be fixed with a display:"inline-block". Also, used to be shaded inputfield groups can have their background color back, etc... So while I agree that it is sort of half-baked, it can surely be made better.

Good day @ryan! After the launch of the redesigned admin theme and site I had private conversations with some community members about it. And I have to say that they were pretty harsh about it. Some of us are choosing words here in the forums keeping hard thoughts to ourselves. Was it the right move? Was it made with enough consideration? Didn't it cost too much breaking things that worked? Is it possible to rollback somehow? This is what at least some of us here are silently thinking. Ryan, a lot of us here like myself have always relied on your vision and gut. You have managed to deliver exactly what was needed so many times. We want to believe the redesign is the right move too and we are just are too accustomed to the familiar and struggling to change opinions... So let me ask this. You see the google analytics metrics, downloads and stuff. Maybe you can measure something else like forums activity rate. How did it change with the redesign? Did you get what you expected?

Just a quick note that most of Ryan's pro modules don't appear under paid either.

@bernhard Here's a function that solves the original problem of how to MOVE (not copy!) repeater items from one page to another, which preserves IDs. I tested it and I believe I accounted for everything, but I recommend testing it more before using it in production. // move the repeater items from fromPage to toPage // the same repeater field must be assigned to both pages // note: fromPage and toPage can be repeater page items as well since they are technically pages function moveRepeaterItems(string $fieldName, Page|RepeaterPage $fromPage, Page|RepeaterPage $toPage): void { // checks if(!wire('fields')->get($fieldName)) { throw new WireException("Field '$fieldName' does not exist."); } if(!$fromPage->id) { throw new WireException("From page does not exist."); } if(!$toPage->id) { throw new WireException("To page does not exist."); } if(!$fromPage->hasField($fieldName)) { throw new WireException("From page does not have field '$fieldName'."); } if(!$toPage->hasField($fieldName)) { throw new WireException("To page does not have field '$fieldName'."); } if($toPage->get($fieldName)->count('include=all,check_access=0')) { throw new WireException("To page already has items in field '$fieldName'."); } // store the parent_id $parent_id = wire('database')->query("SELECT parent_id FROM field_{$fieldName} WHERE pages_id = '{$fromPage->id}'")->fetchColumn(); // delete potential (and likely) existing toPage data placeholder // prevents this error: Integrity constraint violation: 1062 Duplicate entry '1491109' for key 'PRIMARY' in /wire/core/WireDatabasePDO.php:783 // remember, this will be empty since we checked above that there are no items in the toPage field wire('database')->query("DELETE FROM `field_{$fieldName}` WHERE `pages_id` = '{$toPage->id}'"); // update the record in table 'field_$field' where pages_id=$fromPage->id and change the pages_id to $toPage->id wire('database')->query("UPDATE `field_{$fieldName}` SET `pages_id` = '{$toPage->id}' WHERE `pages_id` = '{$fromPage->id}'"); // update the record in table 'pages' where id=$parent_id: change name from 'for-page-{$fromPage->id}' to 'for-page-{$toPage->id}' wire('database')->query("UPDATE `pages` SET `name` = 'for-page-{$toPage->id}' WHERE `id` = '{$parent_id}'"); } // example moveRepeaterItems( fieldName: 'order_line_items', fromPage: $pages->get("/orders/foo/"), toPage: $pages->get("/orders/bar/") );

I find this is a really good addition, thank you for including it in your module!

@BrendonKoz it should just be a matter of replacing the module files with the new ones. Then do a modules refresh. Then go to the module config page to setup throttling features. It should install the new ProcessRequestBlocker module automatically, which will appear on the Setup top nav menu.

As the module name has changed, is there any recommended way to upgrade from the prior module? The ProcessWireUpgrade module doesn't seem to notice there's an update to the WireRequestBlocker, but I'm thinking they'd share the same folder name on the physical server, but if they have a different database record, any custom settings may not transfer?

A quick note: Keep in mind that the clone will not occur (ProcessPageEdit::processSubmitAction is never executed) if there's a required field on the page being cloned that has not been populated and/or the page is statusFlagged.

Awesome! Just what I will need in the near future. Thanks @Mikel for sharing!

Version 2.2.44 includes a new feature besides some bug fixes (Thanks to @Stefanowitsch for reporting, testing and providing some fixes for the issues). New feature: File list below a file upload field Previous versions of FrontendForms have the "clear the file upload field" feature, which was a link below the input field to remove all files for upload from this file upload field. This was a nice feature to remove files from the file upload field, but @Stefanowitsch requested a better feature to remove not all, but only specific files from the field. The new feature is not just a link. Instead it provides a complete list of all added files below the file upload field and by clicking on the "X" you can remove a specific file from the field. The second advantage is that you can see all files that have been added to this field. Demo: demo-filelist.MP4 As always, please report any issues you discover here in the forum or on GitHub.

Hello @Stefanowitsch Thanks for reporting these issues. I have fixed them (point 1 and 2). Instead of adding the class "uk-form-label" I have added the class "uk-margin-small-right" to the label tag because I find it looks like better. I have updated the version of FrontendForms, so please update and test it. I hope it works fine, because it is very late here in Austria, but on my local installation everything looks good. I find your idea of showing the files for the upload very good, so I guess I will try to find a nice JavaScript solution to realize this. The best option would be that I will find a ready-to-use JavaScript which offers this feature, so I can include it in the next update. Thanks for giving FrontendForms a try and to make it better by reporting issues and sharing ideas to improve it with us. Best regards Jürgen

@BrendonKoz I've got all those buts in our list as well, except for Bingbot. As far as I can tell, Bingbot follows the crawl delay, so is one of the good ones.

I hope to give it a try tomorrow, but if I can't get to it, the first chance I'll have is next week. That said, I will definitely let you know! From a cursory search with recent logs, the following bots were problematic: Bingbot (Microsoft, USA) Bytespyder (ByteDance, so TikTok, China) MJ12bot (Majestic, SEO Tool, UK) AhrefsBot (Ahrefs, SEO Tool, USA) PetalBot (Petal Search Engine; China) CensysInspect (Internet Vulnerability Scanner, USA -- I think this is being abused and used as an attempted attack vector on our site, but they say it abides by crawl delay) I honestly did not realize there was/is a crawl speed directive for robots.txt (that some bots follow). I would've implemented that a long time ago. I do intend to implement ProCache at some point as well but this will be a very nice intermediary.

@BrendonKoz Great! Please let me know how it works for you. Any sense of which bots are causing the most trouble? The next thing I plan to build for WireRequestBlocker is a user agent counter/profiler, so that it's easier to identify problematic bots. That way you can throttle them specifically rather than throttling as general traffic.

This is awesome timing. Our hosting service only allots a set number of processes per customer, and due to bots we have been getting throttled and web requests were being delayed or outright refused due to too many requests being handled. Our overall traffic is, as reported by our host, about 55% bot requests!

Hi @Juergen! I tested your module, you did a great job and I found two small details that I would like to point out: 1. "for" attribute missing on labels (when using InputCheckboxMultiple and InputRadioMultiple) 2. <label> elements (when using InputCheckboxMultiple and InputRadioMultiple) need "uk-form-label" classes to apply margins (of course only when UI Kit styling is selected in the module settings) By default the <label> surrounds the input so that the "for" attribute is not needed. But if you use this option: $form->appendLabelOnCheckboxes(true); ...then clicking on the label does not activate the checkbox/radiobutton next to it (because of the missing for-attribute). Another thing that would be really convenient: Is it possible to allow multiple file uploads via the InputFile class and to show each file that is chosen for upload under the field (before submitting). Something like this: The idea is to get an overview over the files that should be submitted and also give the user the option to remove specific files.

Because this question came up: No, the user does not have to enter any data before checkout. All user data is pulled via Stripes PHP SDK (included with the module). Therefore the only thing needed for the module to work is that the redirect link configured in Stripe contains the session_id param. You configure this directly in the Stripe backend by simply adding ?session_id={CHECKOUT_SESSION_ID} to your desired redirect-URL: Thats all. With this session id the module has access to all data of this specific purchase. Cheers, Mike