Recently Updated Topics

var_dump($page->introimg_field) gives: object(ProcessWire\RepeaterPageArray)#258 (5) { ["field"]=> array(4) { ["id"]=> int(111) ["name"]=> string(14) "introimg_field" ["label"]=> string(13) "Landing image" ["type"]=> string(17) "FieldtypeRepeater" } ["forPage"]=> array(6) { ["id"]=> int(1027) ["name"]=> string(7) "landing" ["parent"]=> string(6) "/home/" ["template"]=> string(16) "module_introImgs" ["title"]=> string(7) "landing" ["text"]=> string(0) "" } ["count"]=> int(0) ["items"]=> array(0) {} ["selectors"]=> string(0) "" } (I've never used this function, so I'm not entirely sure how to interpret this. Maybe ["count"]=> int(0) ["items"]=> array(0)count"=> int(0) is a bad sign?) It seems no matter what I do, the foreach function isn't working—until for some reason the images load, apparently randomly, after which the function works after every reload, suggesting a cache issue, I'm guessing (this is also why I tried loading the images in the main CSS file). EDIT: I am loading children pages as modules into the main pages. Take the following structure, for example: HOME - text - images - marquee - text2 The subordinate pages are loaded into the Home page using echo wireRenderFile(). Could it simply be that I'm referencing $page (in foreach($page->introimg_field as $intro_image), so it is looking for my Repeater Fields in the Home page, while in actuality they are on a child page?

Hi all, sorry haven’t been around Processwire in a while as I’ve been doing games and AI ethics work mostly these days. If you want some more things to read and hear then check out my podcast on the subject or my article about the end of programming…. Yep 🫠 Machine ethics podcast Programming is dead, we’re all code engineers now

Update: Improved "Link Module" UX We had an internal discussion about the "Link Module" interface and optimized how the different states are handled: Match found – The repo is resolved and ready to link. The green link opens the repository on GitHub so you can verify it's the right one before linking. This appears instantly when the module declares its GitHub URL in getModuleInfo() or has been resolved before (cached), otherwise after a quick GitHub search. No repo found – ProModules like RepeaterMatrix have no public GitHub repo. GitSync shows a clear "No repositories found." instead of false matches. Multiple repos – When a module exists in several repos (forks, different maintainers), you get a list to pick from. Selected, with "change" – After picking one, a "change" link lets you switch. It only appears when there are actually alternatives. Other improvements: single results are now auto-selected (no unnecessary click), the GitHub search uses Code Search API for exact .module.php filename matching (works even when repo name ≠ class name), and results are cached client-side so re-selecting a module is instant. Cheers, Mike

@ukyo Thanks for your awesome work with those modules, really impressive what you are building, and it's a big help for improving the AI friendliness of ProcessWire. The AgentTools module readme is now linking to your boost project as well. Glad you like the API.md files. Admittedly it was not my idea, but I asked Claude what would be helpful and he said these API.md files, plus an abbreviated sitemap json file so that it can get a big picture overview of a PW installation at a glance. That sitemap feature was actually added to the AgentTools module today. Several API.md files have been added to the core today as well. For Fieldtypes that don't have their own directory, they are in a combined /wire/modules/Fieldtype/API.md file. We're also adding dedicated Field classes specific to each Fieldtype, which will improve field documentation but also allow for custom field API methods separate from the Fieldtype (where useful).

Fantastic, thank you so much ukyo!

I think there is only one thing missing: a screenshot 😉

Good morning @Stefanowitsch! Right now, this is possible for all images on a page using the page mode for prompts. I did a short screencast which shows what I mean. This way, you have to open each page, click 'Save + Alt-Text' (or whatever you want to call it), and move on to the next page. You could definitely create a script to process multiple pages at once, but this would require some refactoring of the module – I actually like this idea 😄 prompt-ai-pagemode.mp4

Yes, it's documented in the README under "Best Practices → Session Continuity" section! I've also just improved the AGENTS.md file to make it more prominent with a clear example prompt. The docs now show: At end of each coding session, use this prompt: Update prompts/project-summary.md with current project state. Follow the existing format in the file: - Be concise and factual - Use bullet points - Update in place (don't overwrite history) - Remove any duplication Save the file. The template file itself also has the rules embedded, so AI sees them every time it updates. This is in v1.3.0 which I'm releasing shortly with CLI support for AI agents.

I could swear that was playing at the gym today.

That would be really cool! On the other hand I had problems when using Plausible as data grew extremely large on a very small site over a very short period of time... So I'm not using it at the moment and went with the oldschool (and ugly) matomo... Your dashboard looks definitely a lot better, so I'm looking forward to seeing where you bring this 🙂

I have trouble following the instructions here. I have several virtual domains successfully installed on Apache Ubuntu, with index.php placeholder files. I want to install Processwire sites in each of them, each with their own config and database, and have all of them use the same /wire codebase in /domainone. /www/html/domainone/site (+ /wire) /www/html/domaintwo/site /www/html/domainthree/site etc. The 'how to install' instructions on the link talk about creating subdirectories off the web root, tmp directories, moving and renaming folders, having to come up with different names for the site folders, etc. It does not sound like what I am looking for. Is there a simpler way to get the structure described above? ChatGPT claimed I could just bootstrap the /wire folder into the other with one line and install normally, but that did not work of course.

AFAIK Incus is a community fork of LXD developed (partly) by same people. So not so new actually)

@gerritvanaaken @pideluxe Yes, it automatically takes over all mail sending. I've updated the module and added OAuth2 support, but I haven't tested Azure specifically. You can follow the instructions here: https://github.com/trk/WireMailPHPMailer#xoauth2-google-microsoft-yahoo-azure-support Please test it and let me know the results, or feel free to submit a PR if any fixes are needed!

Sorry about that @PWaddict - both versions should be fixed now.

Now when they're all pinged, we need to have something for them... Something to do or to write about... Maybe just say hello and share where they're at now...

Just created a new test project and added the module. One thing I noticed immediately was that in my DDEV environment I needed to prefix the commands in order to run them in the actual container. // non-DDEV environment php index.php --at-eval 'echo wire()->pages->count() . " pages\n";' // DDEV environment ddev exec php index.php --at-eval 'echo wire()->pages->count() . " pages\n";'

Thanks, great suggestions. Being still kind of new to this, I've found myself overwhelmed by all agents tools and options. So having Claude code as the base is what I feel helped me to finally get into this stuff. It's like my key into this world. And I think it's working so well right now that I'm not concerned about whether a file is named Claude or agents, but it's good to know about for sure. If we start adding this type of file to the core then no doubt we'd want it to be an agents file, so that a broader audience can benefit from it. At the moment I'm loving the commit messages, claude attributions and GitHub replies. Feels like I have a coworker working with me at my computer all day now, which is something I've never had. but if it gets to be too much it's definitely helpful to know that this stuff is configurable. New PW AI updates coming tomorrow too.

After taking a look at the code, I guess the best approach would be to go with a custom validation rule, because there is so much going on inside the isValid() function that must be checked in the setErrorMessageToField() method too. Can you explain which kind of validation you need in this case. Maybe I can help you to create the custom rule. You can also send me a PM with the code you have so far.