Jump to content

kongondo

PW-Moderators
  • Posts

    7,479
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    146

Everything posted by kongondo

  1. Mine are all empty, except for the 90% JPEG quality (which on its own will not do anything). So, yeah, strange. In my case though, these are new installs; I didn't upgrade.
  2. Like I said, available since 3.0.63 . That's 'later' (newer) than 3.0.41 .
  3. Not an answer, but just a clarification. Client-side image resize has been around since 3.0.63 Maybe the associated blog post answers your queries?
  4. Welcome to the forums @Orodreth. Blog does not support grandchild tags, hence the error. I have no current plans to change this behaviour, unfortunately.
  5. https://github.com/kongondo/MenuBuilder#api render() This method renders a menu/navigation list of a specified menu. The method accepts two arguments/parameters: render($menu, $options); The first argument is not optional and can be a Page object, a title, name or id of a menu or an array of menu items returned from a menu's menu_items field. Note that for multilingual environments, you cannot pass the method a title or a name; only the other three choices will work. The second argument is an optional array and will fall back to defaults if no user configurations are passed to the method. @thmsnhl That should resolve your issue .
  6. Hi all. I am intending to ONLY support ProcessWire 3.x starting from the next version of this module. Please have a read here and let me know what you think. Thanks.
  7. Hi all. I am intending to ONLY support ProcessWire 3.x starting from the next version of this module. Please have a read here and let me know what you think. Thanks.
  8. Hi all. I am intending to ONLY support ProcessWire 3.x starting from the next version of this module. Please have a read here and let me know what you think. Thanks.
  9. Hi all. I am intending to ONLY support ProcessWire 3.x starting from the next version of this module. Please have a read here and let me know what you think. Thanks.
  10. Hi all. I am intending to ONLY support ProcessWire 3.x starting from the next version of this module. Please have a read here and let me know what you think. Thanks.
  11. Hi all. I am intending to ONLY support ProcessWire 3.x starting from the next version of this module. Please have a read here and let me know what you think. Thanks.
  12. Hi all. I am intending to ONLY support ProcessWire 3.x starting from the next version of this module. Please have a read here and let me know what you think. Thanks.
  13. Hi all. I am intending to ONLY support ProcessWire 3.x starting from the next version of this module. Please have a read here and let me know what you think. Thanks.
  14. Hi all. I am intending to ONLY support ProcessWire 3.x starting from the next version of this module. Please have a read here and let me know what you think. Thanks.
  15. Quick update. I have made very good progress. Hi all. I am intending to ONLY support ProcessWire 3.x starting from the next version of this module. Please have a read here and let me know what you think. Thanks.
  16. @Roych What sort of output are you getting with your MarkupSimpleNavigation code? We can't tell what is not working if we can't see the output .
  17. Yeah, this approach is better. @ziu There's various examples in the forum regarding Robin's suggested approach. Just can't find them now.
  18. You will need to use a hook, maybe in ready.php. Here's some code to get u started (unstested and written in a hurry). // I can't remember if 'child' will get unpublished and/or hidden pages // you might need to perform other checks (user logged in? => $user->isLoggedin()) $usersChildPage = $parentPage->child("created_users_id={$user->id}"); if($usersChildPage && $usersChildPage->id) { // this user already has a child page; do something else }
  19. I missed that, sorry. Thanks for the correction.
  20. The brief is to have something that is viewable offline. Jasonette needs to call home every time you access it. https://docs.jasonette.com/ Edit: Above not true; see correction below
  21. Moderator Note @ziu, Please do not start several topics about the same issue. I have deleted your other thread.
  22. My bad, sorry. Understood it the other way round.
  23. Shouldn't this not be negated?
×
×
  • Create New...