kongondo

http://processwire.com/talk/topic/3426-search-not-returning-3-letter-words/ http://processwire.com/talk/topic/2342-selector-issue-and-differences/ http://processwire.com/api/selectors/

Yes it is...this is the latest campaign/discussion.....http://processwire.com/talk/topic/5299-vote-for-processwire-to-be-packaged-by-bitnami/

Admin -> Setup -> Fields..... Select "Input" Tab, scroll down to "Input Field Type".. Of course "Radios" are only compatible with "single page select"

but there's 15 days to go....

Hi Alec, Welcome to the forums. The simple answer is yes.... the realistic answer is: Such sites will most likely require significant amounts of custom code. As you rightly stated, PW is a framework It will give you the necessary tools to build the site but you will have to get your hands dirty...Having said that, there will be some things you will be able to get with PW right out of the box, e.g. pagination... Maybe you can expound on the specs of your travel site to get better answers... These sites built with PW may be of interest: http://www.villasofdistinction.com/ http://www.goaroundeurope.com/ http://processwire.com/skyscrapers/ More here: http://processwire.com/talk/forum/9-showcase/

...it will...+ its own VIP support forum and here's some details for you.. http://modules.processwire.com/modules/form-builder/

...no need to double post

Hi Mel, As a btw, don't know if you are aware PW has a blog profile (module). Archive example 1 and example 2

.....and then there was Soma....Better solution!

Not that I know of, but you can export your database tables (e.g. using phpMyAdmin) as CSV....Not sure if this will help you since I don't know your ultimate aim with the export Edited for clarity...

Correct me if I am wrong, but I feel you may be a bit out of your depth by starting with the Skyscraper profile. How comfortable are you with PHP? Secondly, it will be helpful if you show code examples of what you have done. It is a bit difficult to follow what you are saying (for me at least ; no offence meant). I don't get the question about the section...But, you just can't copy paste code without making changes and expect it to work...So, show us your code and clarify what you mean by section..

I'd go with pages here. That's no a lot of records (thinking of page tree). Someone in the forums has built a site with 100k pages!

Aah, I missed that bit....I thought this was about importing data once....

Sorry, TL;DR...Did you try to export as CSV?

Hi Wilsea, It really depends on how you want to use and present your data at the end of the day + how much data we are talking... A search of the forums will tell you that most people would choose pages over custom tables. Why? For one, you get access to the powerful PW API. Of course, behind the scenes, it is all db tables, but PW takes care of that. There is (almost) a selector for any query you would want to make....If this is not the case, you can also query PW tables using normal MySQL queries. If you want to present your data at unique URLs, then pages is the way to go.... How many tables are we talking? You have probably noticed that PW is insanely fast. Ryan has done a tremendous job in optimizing selectors. With power comes responsibility; so, limit=xx is a good friend when using "find".... Relational db/References...pages is the way to go...Page Reference Fields in PW make this very easy!! If you went the pages route, you can also harness the extended power of templates, e.g. using templates to control page access... For some people, having thousands of pages in the pages tree is not desirable. However, depending on how you structure your site, this may not be a problem. If it is a problem, then you might want to think of custom tables....although, there are ways around displaying your pages in a grid (as in a table) in the backend rather than the tree..Btw, I reckon you are talking about a local db table? (i.e. not external to your domain..). Easy-on-the-eyes...PW API is beautiful and easy to read....even though MySQL-like code is easy enough to read as well... Bottom line is this: If you really don't have to, do not reinvent the wheel. PW already gives you an easy, consistent and powerful way to query your data....using the API.. It is late and I am not thinking straight. I could have missed something. Others will chip in. Also use Google to search the forums (e.g. custom tables...). You might also find it useful to read the various threads detailing how some folks here imported data from other platforms/websites into PW....There are also bulk editing modules such as CSV Import module... Hope my comments give you a little idea how you might proceed... Edited: for clarity + additions...

See this post by Ryan - http://processwire.com/talk/topic/4650-new-processwire-admin-theme-on-dev-branch/?p=49703 with respect to future PW Admin Theme...

Glad you got it sorted. Yes, "site/profile" modules are different from your "normal" modules and need to be installed as a fresh site install...(hope this makes sense to others - Monday blues!)

Here you go http://modules.processwire.com/modules/skyscrapers-profile/ Welcome to ProcessWire stbazilio

Maybe this post should be in the wishlist forum?

Just remember to set debug back to "false" on a live site

...so maybe the name of the table has to be changed, hehe...Anyway, not to rehash the original [old] post...the idea was that posts count alone do not reflect "top" posts....In other words, it's a mechanism to "weight" posts... And yes, that's the (controversial/imperfect) formula...e.g. liking a post does not necessarily mean the post was helpful ....

@Pete...read the old post Horst linked to...it explains relation Sorting by member ID = Alphabetical sorting by member name actually

You sort of answered your question ... ...arrays...http://processwire.com/api/fieldtypes/images/ Hint..."foreach...." ;-) ...Edit...am too slow...Martijn beat me to it

Soma, is that a question? Happy new year Horst!....thanks for the "lies, damned lies and statistics!"...oops that should be "likes, damned likes, and statistics!" Seriously though, nice effort!