kongondo

@justb3a, RE comments, thanks for that. Silly mistake on my part. Now that I have gotten a little bit used to Magnific, I have been planning to replace use of Fancybox, even earlier than a 3.x release. Whichever way, it is going to happen, thanks.

ProDrafts pre-release had a 'sale' (discount coupon) that run for 5 days ...It's gone now...

? You mean Ryan's ones? If other, Padloper recently had a sale, IIRC... Moving this to pub, btw..

Module (version 002) now in modules' directory http://mods.pw/BN

Sure...

I think this is good idea. Personally I have a number of module ideas but have no firm idea what to prioritise. Something like this would be of benefit to me. As for a calendar module, I have been working on something for a while now. These are very old screenshots and will change. The module was based on dhtmlxScheduler but that will definitely change. Maybe I should release this module next

Here's an old thread and Ryan's response A quick note for newbies....be careful not to invite the whole family ($page->find()) if you don't have enough room (memory)...you might need to limit numbers

What? I get nothing for my troubles? ...Glad you got it sorted...

In a hurry, short answer: http://processwire.com/api/variables/fields/

Depending on your needs...http://kongondo.github.io/ProcessWireAPIGen/ E.g. method attr()

Here you go German buddies (only 720p though on Vimeo)..

Happy to announce that Media Manager (Beta 001) is ready for release! I had to change the view/edit modes to streamline these into one unified interface. I think it works better as can be seen in the video below (or if can't access YT, see this instead). I am working on the documentation this week and 'preparing shelves at the shop' with an aim to officially release the module next week or early the week after at the latest. If you can't wait that long and would like to get your hands on a copy soonest, please send me a PM. I am also finalising a pricing model. Initially, support will be via email. Thanks for your patience

@jasonS, This is currently not supported but I can add it. If you could please file a request here so that I don't forget, thanks.

How to use the API is right there in the first post in this thread

@Ovi_S, Could you please mark your other two threads solved, thanks. Maybe also decide which of your three forum handles you want to keep

Thanks @BitPoet. I read @Lenz post too quickly and assumed all the steps had been followed....

Hi Citech. Welcome to the forums and ProcessWire. What @adrian said. Here's more info and workarounds/options:

Hi Lenz, Welcome to ProcessWire and the forums I have not had a chance to test the module in ProcessWire 3.x (let alone install PW 3.x!!). For the time being, and this goes for all my modules, I have not had time to test (and hence will not be supporting) them in ProcessWire 3.x. I am just swamped with too much (other) work and might wait until PW 3 is official released to port over my modules. Not ideal for some, I know, but that's just my (current) reality

Just use FieldsetTabOpen and FieldsetClose as normal on the user template, sandwiching the fields you want on a separate tab in between these two. Get to the user template by filtering for 'show system templates'

All the other hosts! . Just kidding. I doubt this is a host issue but rather a server configuration one. processwire.com runs on the same host as yours - ServInt - without problems. If you want to try other hosts, there's several other threads in the forums with several recommendations. Please search..

My bad. Would you believe I totally missed that! The 'problem/challenge' with ASM select (to organise the other settings in the backend GUI) is you won't be able to add notes, instructions, etc next to each option (not without a hook), so I see your point @adrian about it not being a better option compared to checkboxes. I agree that this is an admin page so, @adrian, don't spend more time than you should on it . Having said that, a small confession (not a criticism in any way!!!), I get 'bothered' by grid/columns, that don't balance ...In a single table/grid, I like all 'rows' to have the same number of columns if possible. In this case, I would have used collapsible fieldsets, with similar features grouped together under one fieldset, each single featere in its own row. Don't mind me, it's just me being weird. . I spent too much time getting bothered by Menu Builder and Matrix settings not 'balancing'

Shouldn't this be the other way round?

Hey Adrian. This is looking more awesome by the day. I have to agree with the boys though...It can feel a little overwhelming viewing the configurations' GUI. I agree that something simpler would work better. I would go with ASM as well, or some collapsed fieldsets to hide stuff if possible. As for contemplating adding these two panels: Available upgrades: core and site modules Data from Google Analytics - like realtime visitors and other timely stuff ...IMHO, I think these two are overkill. One, they are a 'digression' from the 'debugger' ball park, which is the core aim of this module. Secondly, we already have other modules that take care of those needs....to some extent. My suggestion is to only stick to tools/features that aid in debugging. Thanks!

Maybe this by @adrian? Admin Restrict Branch Edit:

Confirmed... Seems getenv('USERNAME') could be an alternative to posix_getpwuid() but haven't found an alternative for posix_getgrgid if function_exists('posix_getpwuid')......blah blah else $owner = getenv(fileowner($templateFilePath));