totoff

the post about caching was the piece of information i was looking for. thanks teppo!

i am very much impressed. great work!

hi manfred62, many thanks, very cool feature. updated github.

hm, i'm not an expert myself and not a native englisch speaker but from my understanding this sounds like a category system as already often discussed here. as i understand it, i wouldn't wrap my page fields in a repeater, as repeaters are mainly used to give a "set" of fields, that you may repeat over and over again on your page. a repeater would make sense if, for example, you would need the category "which parts to use" twice on the page "pine tree". if i don't understand you completely wrong, i would attach several page fields to my templates each of one serving for one category (e.g. one page field for "parts to use", one for "type" etc.). than i would access each field with an foreach loop as described above. let me know if this works for you. EDIT: the blog profile works this way. look how tags and categories are implemented there http://modules.processwire.com/modules/blog-profile/

sorry for post #2 - i wasn't looking and thinking carefully enough. repeaters return an array and therefore you need to loop over it in order to have access to it's values. http://processwire.com/api/fieldtypes/repeaters/

i'm not quite sure if i understand right where you are heading for. however, if you have selected "checkboxes" under "input field type" for a page field, than the field returns an array. you'll need to foreach loop it in order to get the value of each title: <?php foreach($page->myRepeater as $repeaterItem): ?> <h1><?php echo "{$repeaterItem->title}"; ?></h1> <?php endforeach; ?> but why do you have grouped several page fields in a repeater?

EDIT: wrong. don't follow. as an example: <?php echo "{$page->myRepeater->myField}"; ?> as you have a checkbox, you will want to evaluate if your checkbox is checked or not. example: <?php if($page->myRepeater->myCheckbox): ?> // do something <?php else: ?> // do something different <?php endif; ?>

hi allesio, mi piace - very nice site! would you like to tell us a bit more about the technical details? something special why you have chosen pw for this platform? would love to hear how your decision making process was and why you opted for pw.

hi creative3minds, the account type is dl500 which my client booked some years ago and we did not make any special settings, only upgraded to php 5.3. all files in /site including /site/assets are owned by the main ftp user and belong to its group. we are on 2.2.9 though. don't know if 2.3 requires different server settings. sorry, i'm afraid i cant help very much.

hi ottogal, many thanks for your feedback. this isn't pretty, i agree. but the keyword sort order in the title tag is crucial for seo. so we decided to put the most important keywords first.

there are only two reasons i can think off for this imho: these people don't need what you have to offer. they find it nice-to-have but not necessary. focus on clients who have a benefit for their business from your work and make clear what this benefit is. don't try to sell refrigerators at the north pole. even millionaires don't pay for something they don't benefit from. they have somebody who delivers the same quality for a cheaper rate. make clear what sets you apart or get better in what you do - that's hard but i'm afraid that's the way it is.

can't you offer to work from spain over the internet and keep your day time job at the car rent? at least for a testing period.

i don't know very much about india (you are based there, right?) and the market there. but what i see from your portfolio website you are a professional. so my advise would be to take at a minimum the average rate that good professionals get in india and to stand it if clients refuse to pay this rate. of course, this requires a second income as long as your client base isn't strong enough. if you have no other choice than accept lower rates for low-level jobs but never advertise that you've worked on this projects and never tell everybody. they simply doesn't exist. if everything you do in public is focused on professional rates you WILL get better clients.

one important key to professionalism is to take professional rates. 15/20 euros is not enough to make a living from. this is, why you attract clients who doesn't take you for serious. they simply doesn't consider you as an professional. however, if you feel you are not market ready do a regular job and in you off-time work on a really good project you love to work on. do this for a person/client you like and who doesn't set you under pressure. use it for learning and improvement. once ready, you have something to showcase. than go to the market and tell prospects: this is what i can and i'll do it for you for a professional rate.

i would die and get nothing done without my awesome timetracking software mite by berlin based company yolk: http://mite.yo.lk/en/ i can't recommend enough these guys who made one of the best tools on the internet and are extremely responsive to their users. mite is worth every penny you spend on it. if it comes to getting-things-done tools i'm finally back to outlook after producteev, wunderlist and remember the milk which all didn't fill the bill for me. outlook does it neither but at the end it integrates best with email. last but not least i use for billing and accounting monkey office which is very specific to germany and austria unfortunately. i'm afraid it won't help you in the uk or us or india. but for germany/austria it's very good. that's pretty much my setup. the key to it all is to-do-lists and mite.

http://processwire.com/talk/topic/2435-tutorial-howto-create-a-simple-eventcalendar/ http://processwire.com/talk/topic/624-table-based-calendar-integration/

sweet! unfortunately they perform when people of my age are in bed sleeping ... did you also create the logo? some remarks anyway: the sentence on the front page isn't complete: "Balkantronika ist Balkan-Elektro-Produzenten und DJ-Team aus Berlin." - "ein" is missing and a hyphen after Produzenten- the music stops and has to be restarted from the beginning when you change to another page. i find source sans pro a bit to "brav" for the site - and the cool guys best, christoph

i'm not excited. what others say about the colors stands. but mainly i don't like the concept: the background has something of "digital age back in the 80ties" while the typography is more "gardening in the 90ties". that doesn't fit well together. apologize, but you were asking for honesty.

ok. thanks. i'll speak to the isp for apache log.

thanks kongondo, but not it the core? i would need data from the past for a site that's already online - without plugin :-(

hi forum, does pw has some kind of login tracking in the core? that is, can i somehow track who has logged in last and what was changed? i know site/assets/logs - but it only contains errors. thanks!

Well yes, I never thought this could happen. But than, one day...

Let's face it, the more you know about driving the faster you can drive your Porsche. If you are not skilled enough, you might get your car to 120 mpH, and that's your limit. Whatever product you build, you always have to compromise between accessibility (may be used by everyone) and scaleability (not for everyone, but the sky is the limit). PW has opted for the second route and that's a wise decision imho - though it clearly limits accessibility/popularity. There are enough CMS out there with which the less experienced can click together a website. A good example is Contao (though it is a good system with a strong foundation). Need a quick mockup, site structure, easy to use and maintain? Done in a second with Contao. Need a headline in two colors and therefore a nested span? And the whole thing must be maintainable by the client? Uh, think twice and check you budget again. No, from my point of view, the market gap is there for a system like PW, not for another click-ready-solution. I'm not a coder at all, my PHP skills are on a very basic level. But I feel as if I always get the support I need though it remains true that everybody has to climb his learning curve by himself. That's the price you have to pay for an open system. Just my two cents.

public_html --- cgi-bin --- webapp (this one is subdomain) ------ .htaccess (updated by pw during installation) ------ index.php (created/updated by pw during installation) --- site --- wire --- .htaccess (updated by pw during installation) --- index.php (created/updated by pw during installation) @fmgujju great to hear you got it working, but your configuration seems wrong to me. i understood you want to run a separate php application under /webapp, that is not a pw install. in this case your /webapp/index.php and /wepapp/.htaccess files shouldn't belong to pw but should be replaced by dedicated files of the application. @teppo your are definitely right, but unfortunately some isp doesn't allow for such a folder structure. this weekend i had to deal with a client's account at isp hetzner and they demand for precisely the same structure fmgujju has: primary domain point to /public_html and all subdomains point to dedicated directories within /public_html. don't know why they demand for this, but you don't have a choice.

hi horst, thanks for your feedback. very sharp eye - didn't see the misspelling ... guess this is one of the advantages the "rechtschreibreform" has brought to us